/irc-logs / w3c / #webapps / 2009-04-06 / end
Options:
- # Session Start: Mon Apr 06 00:00:00 2009
- # Session Ident: #webapps
- # [00:05] * Quits: heycam (cam@210.84.43.129) (Quit: bye)
- # [00:21] * Quits: Marcos (Marcos@84.215.160.79) (Quit: Marcos)
- # [01:25] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@85.196.122.246)
- # [01:44] * Joins: heycam (cam@130.194.221.53)
- # [02:07] * Joins: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org)
- # [03:26] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@85.196.122.246) (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
- # [04:56] * Quits: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org) (Quit: Tomorrow to fresh woods, and pastures new.)
- # [05:03] * Joins: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org)
- # [05:07] * Quits: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org) (Client exited)
- # [05:07] * Joins: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org)
- # [08:09] * Quits: heycam (cam@130.194.221.53) (Quit: bye)
- # [08:21] * Joins: heycam (cam@130.194.73.110)
- # [08:23] * Joins: phenny (phenny@80.68.92.65)
- # [08:45] * Joins: arve (arve@213.236.208.22)
- # [09:03] * Joins: Marcos (Marcos@84.215.160.79)
- # [09:04] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@85.196.122.246)
- # [09:09] * Quits: Marcos (Marcos@84.215.160.79) (Quit: Marcos)
- # [09:27] * Joins: Marcos (Marcos@213.236.208.22)
- # [10:18] * Quits: heycam (cam@130.194.73.110) (Quit: bye)
- # [10:26] * Joins: tlr (tlr@128.30.52.30)
- # [11:03] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@85.196.122.246) (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
- # [11:14] * Joins: anne (annevk@83.86.138.148)
- # [11:27] * Joins: heycam (cam@210.84.43.129)
- # [11:42] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22)
- # [11:48] * Quits: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org) (Quit: Tomorrow to fresh woods, and pastures new.)
- # [12:24] * Quits: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.136.52.180) (Quit: gsnedders)
- # [12:46] * Joins: ArtB (d0309a43@128.30.52.43)
- # [12:50] <Marcos> Anne, see webapps email. Hopefully I captured your proposal correctly.,
- # [12:51] <Marcos> Anne, thanks again for bringing a fresh perspective to this. V helpful.
- # [12:51] <anne> ta, seems ok, and np
- # [12:59] * Quits: arve (arve@213.236.208.22) (Quit: Ex-Chat)
- # [13:28] * Joins: arve (arve@213.236.208.22)
- # [13:41] * Quits: Hixie (ianh@129.241.93.37) (Ping timeout)
- # [14:12] <krijnh> ArtB: no problem! :)
- # [14:29] * Quits: anne (annevk@83.86.138.148) (Ping timeout)
- # [14:37] * Joins: anne (annevk@83.86.138.148)
- # [14:39] * Joins: chaals (chaals@89.130.83.193)
- # [15:08] * Joins: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.136.52.180)
- # [15:12] * Quits: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.136.52.180) (Quit: gsnedders)
- # [15:20] * Joins: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.136.52.180)
- # [15:23] * Quits: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.136.52.180) (Quit: gsnedders)
- # [15:23] * Joins: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.136.52.180)
- # [15:23] * Quits: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.136.52.180) (Client exited)
- # [15:23] * Joins: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.136.52.180)
- # [15:54] * Quits: arve (arve@213.236.208.22) (Quit: Ex-Chat)
- # [16:04] * Joins: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org)
- # [16:04] * Joins: billyjackass (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org)
- # [16:08] * Quits: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org) (Quit: Tomorrow to fresh woods, and pastures new.)
- # [16:09] <ArtB> marcos, got a sec for http://www.w3.org/mid/49D9DDA1.6070905@opera.com ?
- # [16:09] <Marcos> artb, yeah, we are talking about it in #wam
- # [16:10] <ArtB> for now, I just want to talk about the XHR req and its use in A+E
- # [16:11] <Marcos> k
- # [16:11] <ArtB> When I read the req, I think it's OK.
- # [16:11] <ArtB> It doesn't say which spec will satisfy it
- # [16:11] <ArtB> in fact, WebApps may never write a spec that says it will be satisified
- # [16:11] <ArtB> right?
- # [16:12] <ArtB> but some other SDO e.g. OMTP could make a spec
- # [16:13] <ArtB> Regarding this req and section 3.1 of the A+E spec and XHR depdendency, if it said MUST I'd be concerned
- # [16:13] <ArtB> but with the SHOULD, it's not clear there is a problem here
- # [16:13] <ArtB> i.e. why change what is in the spec?
- # [16:14] <Marcos> because it puts an API dependency that is not required and that we are not going to fulfill
- # [16:14] <Marcos> We should take it out
- # [16:15] <Marcos> we have two extremes on the table: 1. include all APIs and Specs and 2. abstract everything (current approach)
- # [16:16] <ArtB> so let me ask this question -> does any part of the A+E spec, as defined in the latest ED (March 26) Require XHR?
- # [16:18] <Marcos> Artb, yes, I think it says "a UA must implement XHR"
- # [16:18] <Marcos> "In addition to this specification, a user agent SHOULD support the following specifications:
- # [16:18] <Marcos> * [XMLHttpRequest]"
- # [16:18] <Marcos> well, it was a "should" not a must
- # [16:19] <ArtB> Yes, I see that but I'm asking if for example any of the methods or attributes require XHR
- # [16:19] <ArtB> If the answer is NO then I agree text you quote above should be deleted
- # [16:19] <ArtB> But deleting the related requirement is a separate issue
- # [16:20] <ArtB> And you wan to delete " * [Widgets-Updates]" too, right?
- # [16:21] <Marcos> You are correct, no method in the A&E depends on it. There are methods that depend on [Widget-updates]
- # [16:21] <ArtB> [[
- # [16:21] <ArtB> OK - I think we are on the same page here i.e. we both want to delete from the A+E spec the following:
- # [16:21] <ArtB> In addition to this specification, a user agent SHOULD support the following specifications: * [XMLHttpRequest] * [Widgets-update]
- # [16:21] <ArtB> ]]
- # [16:21] <Marcos> attribute Function onbeforeupdate;
- # [16:21] <Marcos> attribute Function onafterupdate;
- # [16:22] <Marcos> Seems Arve deleted update();
- # [16:23] <ArtB> I thought we had a discussion about "Which specs depend on Updates?" and the answer was "just P+C".
- # [16:23] <Marcos> I think we should trash those two methods
- # [16:23] <Marcos> they don't make sense anyway
- # [16:23] <Marcos> You can update a widget while its not running
- # [16:24] <Marcos> so those methods are unreliable
- # [16:26] <ArtB> If those two methods are deleted then then the [Widgets-Updates] ref can be deleted too?
- # [16:26] <Marcos> right
- # [16:26] <Marcos> I'll propose it
- # [16:26] <ArtB> Why remove the related requirement?
- # [16:27] <ArtB> for XHR that is?
- # [16:27] <ArtB> in the abstract e.g. for defining a useful "Widget UA", it is a reasonable requirement
- # [16:28] <ArtB> It just doesn't appear to be a requirement that is satisfied by A+E spec
- # [16:28] <Marcos> where would that requirement be addressed?
- # [16:29] <ArtB> In a "Widget User Agent" spec, I presume
- # [16:29] <Marcos> Seems that you get XHR for free if you implement HTML5. But if you use flash, you can use XML Sockets or whatever
- # [16:29] <ArtB> Did you say OMTP is defining such a spec?
- # [16:30] <Marcos> I can't comment on that right now.
- # [16:30] <ArtB> :)
- # [16:31] * ArtB is now known as _ArtB
- # [16:33] <Marcos> they may or may not do that. I'm not sure.
- # [16:48] * Quits: anne (annevk@83.86.138.148) (Ping timeout)
- # [16:56] * Joins: anne (annevk@83.86.138.148)
- # [17:04] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22) (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
- # [17:17] * Joins: Marcos_ (Marcos@213.236.208.247)
- # [17:17] * Quits: Marcos_ (Marcos@213.236.208.247) (Quit: Marcos_)
- # [17:19] * Quits: Marcos (Marcos@213.236.208.22) (Ping timeout)
- # [17:23] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@85.196.122.246)
- # [18:47] * Joins: Marcos (Marcos@84.215.160.79)
- # [18:52] * _ArtB is now known as ArtB
- # [19:08] * Quits: tlr (tlr@128.30.52.30) (Quit: tlr)
- # [20:06] * Joins: Hixie (ianh@129.241.93.37)
- # [20:24] * Joins: tlr (tlr@128.30.52.30)
- # [20:32] * Quits: tlr (tlr@128.30.52.30) (Ping timeout)
- # [20:49] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@85.196.122.246) (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
- # [21:37] <ArtB> Marcos, do you have a newer version of http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/waf/widgets/i18n.html than 3 April?
- # [21:58] <Marcos> ArtB: uploading up
- # [22:05] * Joins: aroben (aroben@17.246.16.247)
- # [22:06] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@85.196.122.246)
- # [22:08] * Quits: billyjackass (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:08] <ArtB> Marcos, thanks! If I have any comments I will send them by the EoD (left coast US time zone) on April 7
- # [22:08] <Marcos> ok, thanks!...
- # [22:09] <Marcos> If you get a chance, check later tonight for another update
- # [22:09] <Marcos> Artb: I'll keep working on this throughout this week
- # [22:21] * Quits: ArtB (d0309a43@128.30.52.43) (Quit: CGI:IRC)
- # [22:47] * Quits: Marcos (Marcos@84.215.160.79) (Quit: Marcos)
- # [22:49] * Quits: aroben (aroben@17.246.16.247) (Quit: aroben)
- # [22:57] * Joins: aroben (aroben@17.203.12.32)
- # [23:03] * Joins: Marcos (Marcos@84.215.160.79)
- # [23:04] * Quits: Marcos (Marcos@84.215.160.79) (Quit: Marcos)
- # [23:04] * Quits: aroben (aroben@17.203.12.32) (Ping timeout)
- # [23:05] * Joins: aroben (aroben@17.246.16.247)
- # [23:06] * Joins: aroben_ (aroben@17.203.12.32)
- # [23:08] * Quits: aroben (aroben@17.246.16.247) (Ping timeout)
- # [23:24] * Joins: Marcos (Marcos@84.215.160.79)
- # [23:26] * Joins: aroben (aroben@17.246.16.247)
- # [23:27] * Quits: aroben_ (aroben@17.203.12.32) (Ping timeout)
- # [23:27] * Joins: aroben_ (aroben@17.203.12.32)
- # [23:29] * Quits: aroben (aroben@17.246.16.247) (Ping timeout)
- # [23:49] * Quits: phenny (phenny@80.68.92.65) (Ping timeout)
- # Session Close: Tue Apr 07 00:00:00 2009
The end :)