Options:
- # Session Start: Tue Nov 04 00:00:00 2008
- # Session Ident: #whatwg
- # [00:00] * Joins: KevinMarks (n=KevinMar@72.164.186.80)
- # [00:02] <sicking> Hixie, aboodman: ping
- # [00:02] <Hixie> hey
- # [00:02] <sicking> Hixie, so we realized that there is no spec in webworkers for figuring out what useragent is running
- # [00:03] <sicking> Hixie, i.e. something like navigator.userAgent
- # [00:03] <Hixie> yeah
- # [00:03] <sicking> Hixie, it's trivial to implement, and seems like it might help future compat a lot
- # [00:03] <sicking> Hixie, so i think we'll want to try to get it in for this release
- # [00:03] <Hixie> we should just expose the relevant parts of navigator
- # [00:03] <sicking> Hixie, should we simply expose a .navigator object which has the properties that are defined in html5?
- # [00:03] <Hixie> which is defined now in html5
- # [00:03] <Hixie> yeah
- # [00:03] <Hixie> what you said
- # [00:04] <sicking> readonly attribute DOMString appName;
- # [00:04] <sicking> readonly attribute DOMString appVersion;
- # [00:04] <sicking> readonly attribute DOMString platform;
- # [00:04] <sicking> readonly attribute DOMString userAgent;
- # [00:04] <Hixie> right
- # [00:04] <Hixie> i'm on vacation right now, will be back 11/11, but please do send feedback so i can add it when i get back
- # [00:04] <sicking> ok, we'll probably implement before then
- # [00:04] <sicking> but i'll send to list
- # [00:05] <othermaciej> sicking: send to the list, I'll ask Alexey to add it to ours too
- # [00:06] * Quits: csarven (n=csarven@modemcable106.33-81-70.mc.videotron.ca) (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out))
- # [00:07] * Quits: billmason (n=billmaso@ip41.unival.com) (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
- # [00:07] * Joins: tantek (n=tantek@c-67-161-5-143.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [00:07] <sicking> othermaciej, cool
- # [00:10] * Joins: olliej (n=oliver@nat/apple/x-495840f1572e025e)
- # [00:11] * Quits: KevinMarks (n=KevinMar@72.164.186.80) ("The computer fell asleep")
- # [00:11] * renke2 is now known as renke
- # [00:19] * Quits: aroben (n=aroben@unaffiliated/aroben) (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
- # [00:34] * Joins: tantek_ (n=tantek@c-67-161-5-143.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [00:34] * Quits: tndH (n=Rob@james-baillie-pc083-058.student-halls.leeds.ac.uk) ("ChatZilla 0.9.83-rdmsoft [XULRunner 1.9.0.1/2008072406]")
- # [00:35] <aboodman> hixie, sicking ... catching up
- # [00:36] <aboodman> sicking: what hixie said
- # [00:36] <sicking> cool
- # [00:36] <aboodman> sicking: i would like to come to agreement wrt dual interfaces for workers.
- # [00:36] <aboodman> i am still uncomfortable with it the way that it is.
- # [00:37] <aboodman> and i know you guys are getting ready to ship, so i think it's important to get consensus.
- # [00:37] <sicking> aboodman, i don't feel strongly either way. I'm happy with the way it is but don't really mind your changes.
- # [00:37] <aboodman> oh, cool.
- # [00:37] <sicking> aboodman, we don't implement shared workers for now at all, so as far as that goes i think it doesn't matter much
- # [00:37] <sicking> and we don't implement MessagePorts
- # [00:38] <aboodman> well, it makes a difference only in that the dedicated worker interfaces don't exist in my proposal.
- # [00:38] <aboodman> so you'd have to do some subset of the sharedworker interface.
- # [00:39] <sicking> we don't implement the dedicated interfaces separately anyway, i don't think that's detectable from the worker
- # [00:39] <sicking> we simply have a nsIDOMWorker interface
- # [00:39] <aboodman> right, but it has nsIDOMWorker::sendMessage(), I assume.
- # [00:39] <sicking> right, but that was the case in your proposal still right?
- # [00:40] <aboodman> no.
- # [00:40] <olliej> aboodman: you should talk to ap and weinig
- # [00:40] <aboodman> gar s/sendMessage/postMessage/g :)
- # [00:40] <sicking> i though it was in the "compromise"
- # [00:40] <sicking> heh
- # [00:40] * Joins: hasather (n=hasather@90-231-107-133-no62.tbcn.telia.com)
- # [00:40] <olliej> aboodman: i believe ap is getting all the worker apis implemented in webkit atm
- # [00:42] <aboodman> I can start a new thread with the full set of changes I suggest. Will mozilla and webkit review it?
- # [00:42] * Quits: tantek (n=tantek@c-67-161-5-143.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [00:42] <aboodman> or would something else be easier?
- # [00:42] <sicking> aboodman, you got a link to the old thread? or remember the subject?
- # [00:43] <aboodman> sicking: looking
- # [00:44] <sicking> aboodman, found it
- # [00:44] <aboodman> ko.
- # [00:44] <sicking> aboodman, in the message you sent 9/24 11:38 it looks like postmessage is still there
- # [00:44] <sicking> aboodman, though not sure if that changes later in the thread
- # [00:45] <sicking> oh
- # [00:45] <sicking> no
- # [00:45] <sicking> it's not
- # [00:45] <aboodman> sicking: that is me summarizing our conversation I believe.
- # [00:45] <aboodman> that is what we compromised to.
- # [00:45] <aboodman> I wanted to keep the whatwg list up to date on the changes.
- # [00:46] <sicking> right, what's in the message is what i remember we compromised on, and still has postMessage/onmessage directly on the worker context
- # [00:47] <sicking> aboodman, basically it adds 'connect' to dedicated workers
- # [00:47] <aboodman> sicking: yes, we are on the same page. however, i did not view discussion on worker.postMessage() as closed.
- # [00:48] <aboodman> i was just basically checkpointing what we had agreed to up at that point.
- # [00:48] <sicking> aboodman, ok
- # [00:48] <aboodman> i would still like to resolve the remaining disagreements.
- # [00:48] <sicking> aboodman, sorry, didn't realize that was the case. It's getting really close to shipping here
- # [00:49] <sicking> aboodman, which isn't neccesarily a problem unless we decide to remove postMessage directly on the worker
- # [00:49] * Joins: tantek (n=tantek@c-67-161-5-143.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [00:49] <aboodman> sicking: I definitely feel that it would be better to not have that interface, and to only use connect().
- # [00:50] <aboodman> It seems to me that the majority case is using connect() anyway.
- # [00:50] <sicking> aboodman, i know we disagree on that :)
- # [00:50] <aboodman> heh.
- # [00:50] <aboodman> usually it falls to hixie to resolve disagreements on merit, but he is away, and i just don't want this to fall off the radar and then get implemented.
- # [00:51] <sicking> i think the problem here is figuring out which use case is the common one
- # [00:53] <aboodman> well, do you agree that connect() is a superset?
- # [00:53] * Joins: ojan (n=ojan@nat/google/x-090e18dee39b34f4)
- # [00:53] <sicking> yeah
- # [00:54] <sicking> well
- # [00:54] <sicking> it's a different syntax
- # [00:54] * Joins: andybons_ (n=andybons@72.14.228.89)
- # [00:54] <aboodman> i mean a superset of capabilities
- # [00:54] * Parts: andybons_ (n=andybons@72.14.228.89)
- # [00:54] <aboodman> agree that it isn't a compatible superset, hence my concern.
- # [00:54] * Joins: andybons (n=andybons@72.14.228.89)
- # [00:54] <sicking> seems capabailties are the same in both syntaxes, can't think of anything you can do in one but not the other
- # [00:54] <aboodman> technically, we are allowed to change the whatwg proposals after vendors implement them.
- # [00:54] <aboodman> in reality, it becomes harder after vendors implement them.
- # [00:55] <sicking> absolutely
- # [00:56] <aboodman> how about this: I will start a new thread attempting to summarize my concerns as succinctly as possible. I'll also pester the relevant apple people to chime in.
- # [00:56] <sicking> aboodman, sounds good, and hixie if possible
- # [01:01] * Joins: csarven (n=csarven@modemcable150.182-202-24.mc.videotron.ca)
- # [01:06] * Quits: tantek_ (n=tantek@c-67-161-5-143.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [01:15] * Joins: tantek_ (n=tantek@c-67-161-5-143.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [01:18] * Joins: KevinMarks (n=KevinMar@72.164.186.80)
- # [01:19] * Parts: andybons (n=andybons@72.14.228.89)
- # [01:22] * Quits: dglazkov (n=dglazkov@nat/google/x-7293dc63d4192b77)
- # [01:22] * Quits: tantek (n=tantek@c-67-161-5-143.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [01:25] * Quits: webben (n=webben@nat/yahoo/x-0b6279efac8ddbc5) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [01:28] * Quits: hasather (n=hasather@90-231-107-133-no62.tbcn.telia.com) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [01:39] * Joins: kingryan (n=ryan@c-24-5-77-167.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [01:45] * Quits: KevinMarks (n=KevinMar@72.164.186.80) ("The computer fell asleep")
- # [01:58] * Quits: weinig (n=weinig@nat/apple/x-ab3b35c3d687c4fb)
- # [02:01] * Quits: svl (n=me@ip565744a7.direct-adsl.nl) (Nick collision from services.)
- # [02:01] * Joins: svl_ (n=me@ip565744a7.direct-adsl.nl)
- # [02:02] * svl_ is now known as svl
- # [02:10] * Joins: erlehmann (n=nils@dslb-088-074-205-243.pools.arcor-ip.net)
- # [02:25] * Quits: svl (n=me@ip565744a7.direct-adsl.nl) ("And back he spurred like a madman, shrieking a curse to the sky.")
- # [02:30] * Quits: csarven (n=csarven@modemcable150.182-202-24.mc.videotron.ca) ("http://www.csarven.ca")
- # [02:39] * Joins: mpt (n=mpt@canonical/launchpad/mpt)
- # [02:41] * Joins: hdh (n=hdh@118.71.124.204)
- # [02:54] * Joins: csarven (n=csarven@modemcable150.182-202-24.mc.videotron.ca)
- # [03:00] * Quits: famicom (i=famicom@5ED2FF2D.cable.ziggo.nl) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [03:02] * Joins: webben (n=webben@91.85.155.65)
- # [03:04] * Joins: weinig (n=weinig@nat/apple/x-30c5f69f6249f207)
- # [03:05] <Hixie> aboodman, sicking: personally i think of the proposals i've seen i like what's in the spec best, but i'll spec whatever you end up agreeing on if you do come to an agreeemnt that's good
- # [03:06] <Hixie> aboodman, sicking: however i'd recommend against compromising on things just to get agreement, you should definitely think that whatever you agree with is the best if you agree to it, not just agree for the sake of getting progress
- # [03:06] <Hixie> that way lies compromise-driven madness
- # [03:08] <sicking> yay madness!
- # [03:15] <othermaciej> Hixie: are you willing to compromise on your stance against compromise-driven madness?
- # [03:15] <Hixie> no :-)
- # [03:15] <Hixie> though i'll spec whatever gets implemented, so there are ways to override me :-)
- # [03:15] * Quits: weinig (n=weinig@nat/apple/x-30c5f69f6249f207)
- # [03:16] * Joins: dglazkov (n=dglazkov@c-24-130-144-56.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [03:17] <Dashiva> othermaciej: He'll have to wait for the committee to finish evaluating
- # [03:17] * Quits: olliej (n=oliver@nat/apple/x-495840f1572e025e) (lindbohm.freenode.net irc.freenode.net)
- # [03:17] * Quits: dbaron (n=dbaron@corp-241.mountainview.mozilla.com) (lindbohm.freenode.net irc.freenode.net)
- # [03:17] * Quits: jwalden (n=waldo@guest-225.mountainview.mozilla.com) (lindbohm.freenode.net irc.freenode.net)
- # [03:17] * Quits: john_fallows (n=j_r_fall@adsl-76-231-45-30.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net) (lindbohm.freenode.net irc.freenode.net)
- # [03:17] * Quits: nym (n=nym@216.218.203.211) (lindbohm.freenode.net irc.freenode.net)
- # [03:17] * Quits: jmb (n=jmb@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk) (lindbohm.freenode.net irc.freenode.net)
- # [03:17] * Quits: Amorphous (i=jan@unaffiliated/amorphous) (lindbohm.freenode.net irc.freenode.net)
- # [03:17] * Joins: dglazkov_ (n=dglazkov@72.14.224.1)
- # [03:17] * Joins: olliej (n=oliver@nat/apple/x-495840f1572e025e)
- # [03:17] * Joins: dbaron (n=dbaron@corp-241.mountainview.mozilla.com)
- # [03:17] * Joins: jwalden (n=waldo@guest-225.mountainview.mozilla.com)
- # [03:17] * Joins: john_fallows (n=j_r_fall@adsl-76-231-45-30.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net)
- # [03:17] * Joins: Amorphous (i=jan@unaffiliated/amorphous)
- # [03:17] * Joins: nym (n=nym@216.218.203.211)
- # [03:17] * Joins: jmb (n=jmb@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk)
- # [03:37] * Quits: dglazkov (n=dglazkov@c-24-130-144-56.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) (Connection timed out)
- # [03:37] * Joins: xcombelle_ (n=chatzill@AToulouse-158-1-33-126.w90-50.abo.wanadoo.fr)
- # [03:39] * Quits: xcombelle_ (n=chatzill@AToulouse-158-1-33-126.w90-50.abo.wanadoo.fr) (Client Quit)
- # [03:39] * Joins: xcombelle_ (n=chatzill@AToulouse-158-1-33-126.w90-50.abo.wanadoo.fr)
- # [03:45] * Quits: aboodman (n=aboodman@nat/google/x-ad9b27b3f6bef3e7)
- # [03:52] * Quits: ojan (n=ojan@nat/google/x-090e18dee39b34f4) ("Leaving")
- # [03:57] * Quits: xcombelle_ (n=chatzill@AToulouse-158-1-33-126.w90-50.abo.wanadoo.fr) (Remote closed the connection)
- # [04:00] * Joins: xcombelle_ (n=chatzill@AToulouse-158-1-33-126.w90-50.abo.wanadoo.fr)
- # [04:06] * Joins: weinig (n=weinig@c-71-198-176-23.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [04:22] * Joins: erlehmann_ (n=nils@dslb-092-078-104-081.pools.arcor-ip.net)
- # [04:23] * Quits: tantek_ (n=tantek@c-67-161-5-143.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [04:23] * Quits: erlehmann (n=nils@dslb-088-074-205-243.pools.arcor-ip.net) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [04:30] * Joins: MikeSmith (n=MikeSmit@58.157.21.205)
- # [04:30] * dglazkov_ is now known as dglazkov
- # [04:31] * Joins: weinig_ (n=weinig@c-71-198-176-23.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [04:34] * Joins: jruderman_ (n=jruderma@corp-241.mountainview.mozilla.com)
- # [04:34] * Quits: jruderman (n=jruderma@corp-241.mountainview.mozilla.com) (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
- # [04:36] * Joins: jruderman (n=jruderma@corp-241.mountainview.mozilla.com)
- # [04:36] * Quits: jruderman_ (n=jruderma@corp-241.mountainview.mozilla.com) (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
- # [04:46] * Quits: weinig (n=weinig@c-71-198-176-23.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) (Read error: 113 (No route to host))
- # [04:46] * weinig_ is now known as weinig
- # [04:53] * Joins: hdh0 (n=hdh@118.71.124.204)
- # [04:54] * Quits: john_fallows (n=j_r_fall@adsl-76-231-45-30.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net) (Remote closed the connection)
- # [04:56] * Joins: renke3 (n=user@Lc9e1.l.pppool.de)
- # [05:05] * weinig is now known as weinig|away
- # [05:05] * weinig|away is now known as weinig
- # [05:08] * Quits: hdh (n=hdh@118.71.124.204) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [05:09] * Joins: tantek (n=tantek@c-98-210-159-19.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [05:10] * weinig is now known as weinig|away
- # [05:11] * Quits: mpt (n=mpt@canonical/launchpad/mpt) (Remote closed the connection)
- # [05:13] * Quits: renke (n=user@Lcc01.l.pppool.de) (Connection timed out)
- # [05:23] * Quits: erlehmann_ (n=nils@dslb-092-078-104-081.pools.arcor-ip.net) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [05:37] * Quits: Lachy (n=Lachlan@85.196.122.246) ("Leaving")
- # [05:44] * Quits: dbaron (n=dbaron@corp-241.mountainview.mozilla.com) ("8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.")
- # [05:45] * Quits: kingryan (n=ryan@c-24-5-77-167.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [05:47] * Joins: Dashimon (i=Dashiva@wikia/Dashiva)
- # [05:48] * Quits: Dashiva (i=Dashiva@wikia/Dashiva) (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out))
- # [05:48] * Dashimon is now known as Dashiva
- # [05:50] * Quits: othermaciej (n=mjs@nat/apple/x-a05af5f0cf1efbc6)
- # [06:07] * Quits: roc (n=roc@202.0.36.64)
- # [06:11] * Quits: dglazkov (n=dglazkov@72.14.224.1)
- # [06:20] * Joins: dbaron (n=dbaron@c-71-204-144-136.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [06:20] * Quits: jwalden (n=waldo@guest-225.mountainview.mozilla.com) ("ChatZilla 0.9.82.1-rdmsoft [XULRunner 1.8.0.9/2006120508]")
- # [06:54] * Joins: othermaciej (n=mjs@c-69-181-43-20.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [07:11] * Joins: zcorpan (n=zcorpan@pat.se.opera.com)
- # [07:12] * Quits: csarven (n=csarven@modemcable150.182-202-24.mc.videotron.ca) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [07:14] * Joins: harig (n=harig_in@122.160.12.230)
- # [07:16] * Parts: harig (n=harig_in@122.160.12.230)
- # [07:23] * Joins: eric_carlson_ (n=ericc@adsl-67-112-12-110.dsl.anhm01.pacbell.net)
- # [07:24] * Quits: heycam (n=cam@clm-laptop.infotech.monash.edu.au) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [07:27] * Quits: eric_carlson_ (n=ericc@adsl-67-112-12-110.dsl.anhm01.pacbell.net) (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out))
- # [07:28] * Joins: heycam (n=cam@124-168-34-173.dyn.iinet.net.au)
- # [07:30] * Quits: eric_carlson (n=ericc@adsl-67-112-12-110.dsl.anhm01.pacbell.net) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [07:32] * Quits: dbaron (n=dbaron@c-71-204-144-136.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) ("8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.")
- # [07:34] * Joins: eric_carlson (n=ericc@adsl-67-112-12-110.dsl.anhm01.pacbell.net)
- # [07:35] * Quits: jruderman (n=jruderma@corp-241.mountainview.mozilla.com)
- # [07:37] * Quits: zcorpan (n=zcorpan@pat.se.opera.com) (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
- # [07:38] * Joins: zcorpan (n=zcorpan@pat.se.opera.com)
- # [07:59] * Joins: jruderman (n=jruderma@c-67-180-39-55.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [08:01] * Joins: jwalden (n=waldo@c-67-180-39-55.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [08:05] * Joins: aboodman4 (n=aboodman@dsl081-073-212.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net)
- # [08:05] * aboodman4 is now known as aboodman
- # [08:06] * Joins: maikmerten (n=merten@ls5laptop14.cs.uni-dortmund.de)
- # [08:10] * weinig|away is now known as weinig
- # [08:10] * Quits: eric_carlson (n=ericc@adsl-67-112-12-110.dsl.anhm01.pacbell.net) (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out))
- # [08:15] * Joins: eric_carlson (n=ericc@adsl-67-112-12-110.dsl.anhm01.pacbell.net)
- # [08:15] <aboodman> hi weinig, just posted that mail i promised
- # [08:15] <weinig> aboodman: sweet!
- # [08:18] <aboodman> argh, please replace all occurences of 'sendMessage()' with 'postMessage()'. I keep mixing up the gears and html5 names.
- # [08:30] * Joins: leptir (i=leptir@klinika.kb-merkur.hr)
- # [08:31] * Joins: roc (n=roc@121-72-190-118.dsl.telstraclear.net)
- # [08:32] * Parts: leptir (i=leptir@klinika.kb-merkur.hr)
- # [08:38] * Quits: olliej (n=oliver@nat/apple/x-495840f1572e025e)
- # [08:43] * Joins: aaronlev_ (n=chatzill@22.227.97-84.rev.gaoland.net)
- # [08:43] * aaronlev_ is now known as aaronlev
- # [08:49] * Joins: Mau`werk (n=ano@a80-100-71-209.adsl.xs4all.nl)
- # [08:51] * Joins: olliej (n=oliver@nat/apple/x-98962f548f60c869)
- # [08:58] * Joins: nessy (n=nessy@124-168-174-92.dyn.iinet.net.au)
- # [09:08] * Quits: eric_carlson (n=ericc@adsl-67-112-12-110.dsl.anhm01.pacbell.net) (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out))
- # [09:10] * Joins: eric_carlson (n=ericc@adsl-67-112-12-110.dsl.anhm01.pacbell.net)
- # [09:16] * Quits: tantek (n=tantek@c-98-210-159-19.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [09:27] * Joins: eric_carlson_ (n=ericc@adsl-67-112-12-110.dsl.anhm01.pacbell.net)
- # [09:30] * Quits: aaronlev (n=chatzill@22.227.97-84.rev.gaoland.net) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [09:34] * Quits: eric_carlson (n=ericc@adsl-67-112-12-110.dsl.anhm01.pacbell.net) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [09:49] * Quits: deltab (n=deltab@82-36-30-34.cable.ubr02.smal.blueyonder.co.uk) (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
- # [09:49] * Joins: deltab_ (n=deltab@82-36-30-34.cable.ubr02.smal.blueyonder.co.uk)
- # [09:50] * Joins: tantek (n=tantek@adsl-63-195-114-133.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
- # [09:58] * Joins: hdh (n=hdh@118.71.125.23)
- # [10:01] * Quits: hdh0 (n=hdh@118.71.124.204) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [10:04] * Joins: virtuelv (n=virtuelv@pat-tdc.opera.com)
- # [10:10] <zcorpan> hmm both safari and firefox seem crash prone if you throw 10 video elements at them in the same page
- # [10:16] <olliej> zcorpan: could you file a bug at bugs.webkit.org? :D
- # [10:16] * Quits: aboodman (n=aboodman@dsl081-073-212.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [10:20] * Joins: hdh0 (n=hdh@118.71.125.23)
- # [10:28] <hsivonen> zcorpan: would be good to have your test case on b.m.o, too :-)
- # [10:31] * Quits: webben (n=webben@91.85.155.65) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [10:34] <doublec> zcorpan, what version of firefox?
- # [10:37] * Joins: ROBOd (n=robod@89.122.216.38)
- # [10:39] <zcorpan> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1b2pre) Gecko/20081031 Minefield/3.1b2pre
- # [10:39] * Quits: hdh (n=hdh@118.71.125.23) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [10:44] <zcorpan> olliej, hsivonen: see http://simon.html5.org/test/html/semantics/video/loading-demos/
- # [10:44] <olliej> zcorpan: is it first click safe?
- # [10:45] <zcorpan> yes it's a dir page
- # [10:45] <zcorpan> don't have time right now to file bugs though sorry
- # [10:50] * Quits: deltab_ (n=deltab@82-36-30-34.cable.ubr02.smal.blueyonder.co.uk) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [10:53] <roc> it's not crashing for me, although it isn't really working either
- # [10:54] <roc> oh, I think I hit the HTTP connection limit or someting
- # [10:54] <roc> now they're all playing
- # [10:54] <roc> poorly
- # [10:54] <doublec> yes I see the same
- # [10:56] * Joins: webben (n=webben@nat/yahoo/x-7bd1c909f444b327)
- # [11:05] <zcorpan> roc: it doesn't crash for m,e every time
- # [11:07] <zcorpan> firefox actually first showed a gray area instead of the page when i tried to load 002.html, and then did the same for any other page, then when i tried to quit firefox it crashed. i pressed the restart firefox button and then it showed the uninstall minefield dialog (and restarted firefox)
- # [11:07] <zcorpan> very weird
- # [11:09] <roc> mmm
- # [11:10] * Quits: jwalden (n=waldo@c-67-180-39-55.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) ("ChatZilla 0.9.82.1-rdmsoft [XULRunner 1.8.0.9/2006120508]")
- # [11:20] * Joins: deltab (n=deltab@82-36-30-34.cable.ubr02.smal.blueyonder.co.uk)
- # [11:32] * Quits: olliej (n=oliver@nat/apple/x-98962f548f60c869) (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out))
- # [11:34] * Joins: olliej (n=oliver@nat/apple/x-36cbff9bbc5d13b5)
- # [11:43] * Quits: mcarter (n=mcarter@adsl-71-135-97-139.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net) ("Leaving")
- # [11:45] * olliej is now known as fakeolliej
- # [12:00] <Philip`> http://radar.barackobama.com/ - wow, it's a fancy animated map thing that isn't Flash - I think that's the first time I've ever seen one that isn't
- # [12:00] <Philip`> The layout's a bit broken in Opera, but it's the thought that counts
- # [12:01] * Philip` presumes it's using jQuery for animatedness
- # [12:12] * Quits: roc (n=roc@121-72-190-118.dsl.telstraclear.net)
- # [12:16] <zcorpan> i presume this is spam http://forums.whatwg.org/viewtopic.php?t=4025
- # [12:17] <zcorpan> same ip
- # [12:18] <hsivonen> are robocall in the U.S. legal for political advertising? I thought they were made illegal for telemarketing in general.
- # [12:18] <Philip`> http://www.google.com/search?q=%22I+need+to+ask+you+guyz+a+question%22
- # [12:23] <Philip`> hsivonen: I believe they are legal, purely on the basis that if they weren't then a lot of people would have complained very loudly about it, and I haven't heard anyone complaining that they're anything other than rude and irritating
- # [12:27] <Philip`> (Also, Wikipedia says lots of states have different rules for political organisations than commercial ones, for automated phone calls)
- # [12:28] <Philip`> (That combination of methods of proof-by-not-hearing-anyone-else-claim-it's-untrue and proof-by-Wikipedia is clearly infallible)
- # [12:30] * Joins: myakura (n=myakura@p4200-ipbf2306marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp)
- # [12:30] * Philip` discovers http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Proof as a useful repository of such proof methods
- # [12:55] * Joins: svl (n=me@ip565744a7.direct-adsl.nl)
- # [13:06] * Quits: nessy (n=nessy@124-168-174-92.dyn.iinet.net.au) ("This computer has gone to sleep")
- # [13:10] * Quits: webben (n=webben@nat/yahoo/x-7bd1c909f444b327) (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out))
- # [13:11] * Joins: webben (n=webben@nat/yahoo/x-dd28d764065bfb1e)
- # [13:11] * Parts: zcorpan (n=zcorpan@pat.se.opera.com)
- # [13:31] <jcranmer> Philip`: I love Proof-by-Wikipedia
- # [13:36] <jcranmer> I suppose that was a dumb idea
- # [13:37] <jcranmer> if I choose to reply to this email, I will probably embroil myself in a debate as to whether or not the HTML specification should be roughly as precise as a law
- # [13:38] * jcranmer chooses not to respond
- # [13:38] * hsivonen notes that law has very different precision in different countries
- # [13:39] <hsivonen> some countries assume you #include "commonsense.h"
- # [13:41] <jcranmer> jcranmer $ locate commonsense.h
- # [13:41] <jcranmer> /usr/include/bitbucket/commonsense.h
- # [13:41] <jcranmer> jcranmer $ ls -l /usr/include/bitbucket/commonsense.h
- # [13:43] <jcranmer> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 18 2008-01-01 00:00 /usr/include/bitbucket/commonsense.h -> /dev/null
- # [13:43] <jcranmer> :-(
- # [13:46] * Philip` wonders which email jcranmer is referring to
- # [13:48] <jcranmer> Philip`: off-list
- # [13:48] <Philip`> Ah
- # [13:50] * Joins: zcorpan (n=zcorpan@pat.se.opera.com)
- # [14:38] * Joins: smerp (n=smerp@66.192.95.199)
- # [14:58] * Quits: eric_carlson_ (n=ericc@adsl-67-112-12-110.dsl.anhm01.pacbell.net)
- # [14:59] * Joins: eric_carlson (n=ericc@adsl-67-112-12-110.dsl.anhm01.pacbell.net)
- # [15:06] * Quits: eric_carlson (n=ericc@adsl-67-112-12-110.dsl.anhm01.pacbell.net)
- # [15:06] * Joins: aroben (n=aroben@unaffiliated/aroben)
- # [15:12] * Quits: myakura (n=myakura@p4200-ipbf2306marunouchi.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp) ("Leaving...")
- # [15:13] * renke3 is now known as renke2
- # [15:14] * Joins: BenMillard (i=cerbera@cpc1-flee1-0-0-cust285.glfd.cable.ntl.com)
- # [15:19] * Quits: renke2 (n=user@Lc9e1.l.pppool.de) (Remote closed the connection)
- # [15:41] * Joins: mstange (n=markus@buntes215.wohnheim.uni-kl.de)
- # [15:51] * Quits: Amorphous (i=jan@unaffiliated/amorphous) (Success)
- # [15:55] * Joins: Amorphous (i=jan@unaffiliated/amorphous)
- # [15:56] * Joins: hdh00 (n=hdh@118.71.125.23)
- # [16:01] * Quits: virtuelv (n=virtuelv@pat-tdc.opera.com) ("Leaving")
- # [16:02] * Quits: hdh0 (n=hdh@118.71.125.23) (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out))
- # [16:03] <zcorpan> Hixie: you probably want to hide the "watch for updates" box for print media
- # [16:04] <Philip`> What if you print onto dynamic e-paper?
- # [16:07] <zcorpan> then it still overlaps the other text
- # [16:07] * Quits: broquaint (i=bab93a8c@spc1-brig11-0-0-cust544.asfd.broadband.ntl.com) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [16:08] * Parts: BenMillard (i=cerbera@cpc1-flee1-0-0-cust285.glfd.cable.ntl.com)
- # [16:08] <zcorpan> and dynamic e-paper might well use the screen media instead
- # [16:08] <zcorpan> s/and/or/
- # [16:08] * Joins: aroben_ (n=aroben@c-71-58-97-175.hsd1.pa.comcast.net)
- # [16:09] <zcorpan> i wonder why the status boxes aren't in the print version
- # [16:10] * Quits: aroben (n=aroben@unaffiliated/aroben) (Nick collision from services.)
- # [16:10] * aroben_ is now known as aroben
- # [16:15] * Joins: aroben_ (n=aroben@unaffiliated/aroben)
- # [16:15] <zcorpan> "???? (KUROSAWA Takeshi)" says the pdf
- # [16:22] * Joins: aroben__ (n=aroben@unaffiliated/aroben)
- # [16:23] * Quits: aroben (n=aroben@unaffiliated/aroben) (Nick collision from services.)
- # [16:23] * aroben__ is now known as aroben
- # [16:23] * Quits: aroben_ (n=aroben@unaffiliated/aroben) (Nick collision from services.)
- # [16:24] * Quits: jruderman (n=jruderma@c-67-180-39-55.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [16:27] * Joins: dglazkov (n=dglazkov@c-24-130-144-56.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [16:32] * Joins: renke2 (n=user@Lc9e1.l.pppool.de)
- # [16:33] * Quits: dglazkov (n=dglazkov@c-24-130-144-56.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [16:35] <Philip`> The link underlining in http://yaml.org/spec/1.2/#Introduction looks disturbingly weird to me
- # [16:36] <Philip`> It looks like they intentionally made it look that way, but I can't imagine why
- # [16:45] * Joins: KevinMarks (n=KevinMar@72.164.187.58)
- # [16:47] * Joins: dglazkov (n=dglazkov@c-24-130-144-56.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [16:51] * Joins: dglazkov_ (n=dglazkov@72.14.224.1)
- # [16:56] * Quits: webben (n=webben@nat/yahoo/x-dd28d764065bfb1e) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [17:01] * Joins: aroben_ (n=aroben@unaffiliated/aroben)
- # [17:03] * Quits: dglazkov_ (n=dglazkov@72.14.224.1)
- # [17:04] * Quits: maikmerten (n=merten@ls5laptop14.cs.uni-dortmund.de) (Remote closed the connection)
- # [17:06] * Quits: Mau`werk (n=ano@a80-100-71-209.adsl.xs4all.nl) ("Disconnected...")
- # [17:09] * Joins: hasather (n=hasather@90-231-107-133-no62.tbcn.telia.com)
- # [17:10] * Quits: hasather (n=hasather@90-231-107-133-no62.tbcn.telia.com) (Client Quit)
- # [17:11] * Joins: erlehmann (n=nils@dslb-092-078-104-081.pools.arcor-ip.net)
- # [17:12] * Quits: dglazkov (n=dglazkov@c-24-130-144-56.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [17:14] <jcranmer> egads
- # [17:15] * Joins: eric_carlson (n=ericc@17.203.15.202)
- # [17:15] <jcranmer> anyone here remember Dmitry Turin, or did he only do stuff on the CSS lists?
- # [17:16] <jcranmer> (well, I'm sure that many core people here watch both lists anyways)
- # [17:16] <Philip`> He was on public-html too
- # [17:16] <jcranmer> ah
- # [17:16] <Philip`> Sadly he seems to have been absent lately
- # [17:16] <jcranmer> well, consider him back as of today
- # [17:17] <jcranmer> he just made some posts to the mozilla newsgroups of all places
- # [17:17] <Philip`> Excellent!
- # [17:17] <jcranmer> Subject: HTML6 budget
- # [17:17] * Joins: aroben__ (n=aroben@unaffiliated/aroben)
- # [17:17] <jcranmer> it goes downhill from there, IMO
- # [17:17] <Philip`> That's a very promising start
- # [17:17] * Quits: aroben (n=aroben@unaffiliated/aroben) (Nick collision from services.)
- # [17:18] <Philip`> I liked it when he gave a link to a 200-slide Powerpoint presentation
- # [17:18] * aroben__ is now known as aroben
- # [17:18] * Quits: aroben_ (n=aroben@unaffiliated/aroben) (Nick collision from services.)
- # [17:25] * Quits: weinig (n=weinig@c-71-198-176-23.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [17:34] <MikeSmith> Good to hear that Dmitry Turin is back
- # [17:34] <MikeSmith> I was worried that he might have given up on his dreams
- # [17:36] * Joins: jruderman (n=jruderma@corp-241.mountainview.mozilla.com)
- # [17:36] <jcranmer> I'm not in the mood to deal with him in this case
- # [17:37] <jcranmer> I'm already embroiled in three or four long threads
- # [17:39] <Philip`> As far as I can tell, nobody has extracted any value from discussions with him on public-html, so it seems safe to ignore him
- # [17:39] <jcranmer> I definitely will do that
- # [17:42] * aroben is now known as aroben|lunch
- # [17:42] <MikeSmith> I think in many cases Dmitry is not necessarily expecting a response anyway
- # [17:42] <Philip`> (People have suggested that he should try identifying problems and use cases rather than just presenting a complete solution without explaining why it's worthwhile, but I haven't seen him follow that advice yet)
- # [17:43] <jcranmer> I think he is
- # [17:43] <jcranmer> expecting
- # [17:43] <Dashiva> Philip`: He saves us all the work of going through those phases by giving us the complete solution
- # [17:44] <Philip`> (He does seem to have put a lot of effort into his work, so it'd be nice if he could redirect that effort towards something that would actually be practical)
- # [17:44] * Quits: othermaciej (n=mjs@c-69-181-43-20.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [17:44] <hsivonen> mozilla.dev.planning it seems
- # [17:44] <jcranmer> Philip`: "He needs concrete budget. So i'm asking you to estimate and say, how much will it cost."
- # [17:45] <jcranmer> he wants a response, it seems
- # [17:45] <MikeSmith> I don't think Dmitry's interested in mundane things like examining and documenting use cases or investigating whether there may be some spec or technology that already solves the problems he's created complete solutions for
- # [17:45] <jcranmer> MikeSmith: of course not
- # [17:46] <Philip`> jcranmer: Did you mean s/Philip`/MikeSmith/?
- # [17:46] <jcranmer> Philip`: oh, right
- # [17:46] <jcranmer> sorry
- # [17:46] <jcranmer> MikeSmith: it only works with his new solutions
- # [17:46] <Philip`> Apology accepted
- # [17:46] <Philip`> :-p
- # [17:46] <MikeSmith> jcranmer: right
- # [17:46] * Joins: virtuelv (n=virtuelv@pat-tdc.opera.com)
- # [17:47] <MikeSmith> He wants to build the whole complete rocket ship to the moon, from scratch
- # [17:47] <Philip`> MikeSmith: I think he is aware of existing technology - e.g. he looked at the existing XPath technology, and then changed the syntax a bit so that he liked it more
- # [17:47] * Quits: xcombelle_ (n=chatzill@AToulouse-158-1-33-126.w90-50.abo.wanadoo.fr) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [17:47] <MikeSmith> Philip`: OK
- # [17:48] <Philip`> or at least gave a few examples of what the syntax ought to look like
- # [17:48] <Philip`> which is totally enough to justify making a new XML path selector standard
- # [17:49] * Quits: tantek (n=tantek@adsl-63-195-114-133.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
- # [17:49] * Quits: svl (n=me@ip565744a7.direct-adsl.nl) ("And back he spurred like a madman, shrieking a curse to the sky.")
- # [17:51] <Philip`> MikeSmith: Hmm, how long ago did people realise that making a moon rocket would require a lot of work? I think it was some Jules Verne thing where one guy built one himself, whereas nowadays everyone realises you need giant corporations or government organisations to do it, but I have no idea when people switched from one view to the other...
- # [17:52] <MikeSmith> Philip`: me neither..
- # [17:52] <Philip`> MikeSmith: Alas :-(
- # [17:58] * Joins: dglazkov (n=dglazkov@nat/google/x-9c42075eb74149b0)
- # [18:00] * Joins: hasather (n=hasather@90-231-107-133-no62.tbcn.telia.com)
- # [18:02] * Joins: aroben_ (n=aroben@unaffiliated/aroben)
- # [18:03] <MikeSmith> related to that "how long ago.." question - http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2008-November/016985.html seems sort of relevant
- # [18:03] <MikeSmith> the part where Mike Schinkel writes, "The irony is that if TBL had gotten this kind of resistance"...
- # [18:07] * Joins: Maurice` (n=copyman@cc90688-a.emmen1.dr.home.nl)
- # [18:09] <MikeSmith> and Hixie points out that TimBL actually implemented what he spec'ed
- # [18:10] * Quits: dglazkov (n=dglazkov@nat/google/x-9c42075eb74149b0)
- # [18:13] <Dashiva> "This is very much a case of empowering serendipity" <- What?
- # [18:15] <MikeSmith> the thing with Dmitry Turin -- and I guess a good number of others as well -- is that they spin these grand plans without any intention of actually implementing them. The expect that somebody else will implement it for them.
- # [18:15] * Quits: KevinMarks (n=KevinMar@72.164.187.58) ("The computer fell asleep")
- # [18:15] <MikeSmith> the word empowering should be banned from all discussions. anybody who uses it should receive a thrubbing
- # [18:15] <Dashiva> And that everyone will use them once implemented.
- # [18:16] * Philip` made an entry for the ICFP contest where you had to write an AI bot that would navigate a map and find food and push competing robots out of the way, and called it Serendipity because that was the only way it would ever actually find any food
- # [18:16] <MikeSmith> heh
- # [18:17] <Dashiva> Oh, that quote. "what does your robot do, sam?" "it collects data about the surrounding environment, then discards it and drives into walls"
- # [18:17] * Joins: dglazkov (n=dglazkov@nat/google/x-784a8a5d6409131c)
- # [18:19] <Philip`> It would be funnier if it weren't so true
- # [18:20] * Philip` once made a robot which triggered its own reset switch every time it hit an obstacle
- # [18:21] <MikeSmith> robots shouldn't do practical stuff -- the should to crazy, unpredictable stuff, and make strange sounds
- # [18:22] <MikeSmith> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorkbot
- # [18:22] <Philip`> Also, it's unfortunate that the power of Lego motors is greater than the strength of the Lego chassis in which I usually put them
- # [18:22] <MikeSmith> "people doing strange things with electricity"
- # [18:23] <MikeSmith> Philip`: out-of-control torque is a great thing to watch
- # [18:23] <erlehmann> Philip`: pixxx!
- # [18:24] <Philip`> Attaching four Lego motors (powered from a 12V adapater) to a half-meter S shape made of Lego monorail track is great fun, particularly when mounted on top of a combat robot
- # [18:25] <Philip`> *adapter
- # [18:25] <Philip`> You can get quite a lot of kinetic energy out of them
- # [18:27] <erlehmann> wat
- # [18:28] <erlehmann> back to biz - are there any deprecated items in the HTML5 spec ?
- # [18:29] * Quits: aroben|lunch (n=aroben@unaffiliated/aroben) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [18:29] <Philip`> erlehmann: No - you're either allowed to write things, or not allowed to
- # [18:29] <erlehmann> also, i believe that section 4.8.2.1.3 should contain strong wording to use CSS
- # [18:29] <zcorpan> erlehmann: why?
- # [18:29] <Philip`> (though of course you can still write things that you're not allowed to, and they'll still work)
- # [18:30] <Philip`> (for some understanding of 'work')
- # [18:30] <erlehmann> CSS3 content replacement would probably make the section obsolete anyway
- # [18:31] <zcorpan> erlehmann: why would you use css for logos and icons?
- # [18:32] * Parts: hasather (n=hasather@90-231-107-133-no62.tbcn.telia.com)
- # [18:33] <erlehmann> zcorpan: i already do, if they conver no additional semantic info. for navlists as presented in the spec i just change the "list icon" (how is it called).
- # [18:33] <zcorpan> erlehmann: you didn't answer my question though :)
- # [18:33] <erlehmann> common icons usually are deco that can be replaced without changing semantics, therefore i use CSS.
- # [18:34] <zcorpan> ah
- # [18:34] <erlehmann> like doing a web site in tango style, then switching over to aqua look.
- # [18:34] <erlehmann> most icons have the same purposes as colors - merely being stylistic elements
- # [18:35] <zcorpan> i don't quite agree -- icons are closer to the content than the color scheme
- # [18:35] <zcorpan> pretty much like italics vs font face
- # [18:36] <erlehmann> well yes, but they usually convey semantics that are already there.
- # [18:37] <Philip`> The semantics usually aren't there unless you specifically add class names as hooks for the images
- # [18:37] <erlehmann> consider a change of a corporations' logo. on the corporation website, it is purely stylistic. on a web site discussing design and typography the logo is semantic content.
- # [18:38] <jcranmer> ... must ... resist ... troll ... posting
- # [18:38] <jcranmer> ...
- # [18:38] * Joins: tndH (n=Rob@james-baillie-pc083-058.student-halls.leeds.ac.uk)
- # [18:38] <zcorpan> it's not just stylistic -- it's important for users to recognize where they are
- # [18:39] <Philip`> If you're changing the logo, you'd just overwrite /images/logo.gif and it doesn't matter how you're referencing it in a page :-)
- # [18:39] <Philip`> Uh oh
- # [18:40] <Philip`> Dmitry came back to public-html
- # [18:46] * Joins: weinig (n=weinig@c-71-198-176-23.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [18:46] * Parts: zcorpan (n=zcorpan@pat.se.opera.com)
- # [18:48] * Joins: mabdul (n=mabdul@141.40.225.130)
- # [18:53] <jcranmer> oh, I just realized why I didn't see that post... I subscribe to all but public-html :-)
- # [19:04] * Joins: maikmerten (n=maikmert@La7f9.l.pppool.de)
- # [19:14] * Quits: weinig (n=weinig@c-71-198-176-23.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
- # [19:17] * Parts: mabdul (n=mabdul@141.40.225.130)
- # [19:17] * Joins: roc (n=roc@121-72-190-118.dsl.telstraclear.net)
- # [19:21] * Quits: virtuelv (n=virtuelv@pat-tdc.opera.com) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [19:21] * Joins: hasather (n=hasather@90-231-107-133-no62.tbcn.telia.com)
- # [19:23] * Joins: csarven (i=nevrasc@univcomm-allison-gm606-37.Concordia.CA)
- # [19:25] <erlehmann> Philip`: that proves that the image by itself has no semantic meaning, doesn't it ?
- # [19:25] <erlehmann> which was my point, btw
- # [19:25] * Joins: jwalden (n=waldo@guest-225.mountainview.mozilla.com)
- # [19:49] * Joins: aboodman (n=aboodman@72.14.229.81)
- # [19:52] * Joins: smedero (n=smedero@pia145-154.pioneernet.net)
- # [19:53] * Joins: othermaciej (n=mjs@nat/apple/x-3e6e5a50c9c5751f)
- # [19:58] * Joins: aroben (n=aroben@unaffiliated/aroben)
- # [20:01] * Joins: dbaron (n=dbaron@corp-241.mountainview.mozilla.com)
- # [20:04] * Quits: eric_carlson (n=ericc@17.203.15.202)
- # [20:08] * Quits: aroben_ (n=aroben@unaffiliated/aroben) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [20:16] * Joins: aboodman2 (n=aboodman@72.14.229.81)
- # [20:18] * Joins: eric_carlson (n=ericc@17.244.16.122)
- # [20:21] * Quits: aboodman (n=aboodman@72.14.229.81) (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out))
- # [20:23] * Philip` wonders why people are being so rude to Pentasis
- # [20:23] <jcranmer> Philip`: his assertion that specs shouldn't be written by/for browser vendors?
- # [20:27] <Philip`> jcranmer: That's a reason to strongly disagree, particularly when he's making those claims within the context of the WHATWG which is fundamentally designed in opposition to his claims
- # [20:27] <Philip`> but it doesn't seem like a reason to explicitly laugh at him or to say "Now GTFO my web"
- # [20:30] * Joins: aboodman (n=aboodman@72.14.229.81)
- # [20:30] <jcranmer> Philip`: I haven't seen any of the recent messages, so I can't riposte
- # [20:31] * Quits: aboodman2 (n=aboodman@72.14.229.81)
- # [20:37] <erlehmann> Philip`: the point is that his criticism is pointless. he claims that WHATWG has "not the right" to evolve HTML. fine, fine, go make another standard ! what pentasis does is akin to flaming on the KDE mailing list that they should use GTK.
- # [20:44] * Quits: dbaron (n=dbaron@corp-241.mountainview.mozilla.com) ("8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.")
- # [20:44] * Joins: dbaron (n=dbaron@corp-241.mountainview.mozilla.com)
- # [20:50] <jcranmer> I wonder what Hixie's position is
- # [21:02] * Joins: sbublava (n=stephan@77.119.88.197.wireless.dyn.drei.com)
- # [21:09] * Joins: virtuelv (n=virtuelv@163.80-202-65.nextgentel.com)
- # [21:14] * Joins: tantek (n=tantek@adsl-63-195-114-133.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
- # [21:23] * Parts: hasather (n=hasather@90-231-107-133-no62.tbcn.telia.com)
- # [21:23] * Joins: hasather (n=hasather@90-231-107-133-no62.tbcn.telia.com)
- # [21:24] <Hixie> my position on the guy who said "GTFO my web" is that i told him that was unacceptable; if he does it again he'll get banned for a week
- # [21:28] <erlehmann> Hixie: oh, that would be me.
- # [21:28] <erlehmann> i'll watch my output, then.
- # [21:31] * Quits: roc (n=roc@121-72-190-118.dsl.telstraclear.net)
- # [21:33] * Quits: hasather (n=hasather@90-231-107-133-no62.tbcn.telia.com) (Remote closed the connection)
- # [21:34] * Joins: hasather (n=hasather@90-231-107-133-no62.tbcn.telia.com)
- # [21:37] * Quits: eric_carlson (n=ericc@17.244.16.122)
- # [21:39] * Joins: eric_carlson (n=ericc@17.203.15.202)
- # [21:42] * Joins: Lachy (n=Lachlan@scandic749.host.songnetworks.se)
- # [21:44] * Quits: Amorphous (i=jan@unaffiliated/amorphous) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [21:47] * Joins: webben (n=webben@nat/yahoo/x-814338dc86545a2f)
- # [21:47] * Joins: mpt (n=mpt@canonical/launchpad/mpt)
- # [21:52] * Joins: Amorphous (i=jan@unaffiliated/amorphous)
- # [21:53] <gsnedders> oh hell
- # [21:54] <gsnedders> /. commenhs are now worse than digg at tines
- # [21:54] <jcranmer> weren't they always?
- # [21:54] <doublec> this the theora thread?
- # [21:56] <gsnedders> doublec: yep. totally not reading what I'm saying
- # [21:56] <gsnedders> jcranmer: Rarely.
- # [21:58] <gsnedders> Apparently I'm suggesting Ogg has patent problems. I'm not. I'm saying Theora's patent status beyond On2's patents is unknown.
- # [21:58] * Quits: ROBOd (n=robod@89.122.216.38) ("http://www.robodesign.ro")
- # [21:58] * Quits: tantek (n=tantek@adsl-63-195-114-133.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
- # [21:58] <Philip`> But when talking about patents, being unknown is a problem
- # [21:59] <gsnedders> But Ogg != Theora.
- # [22:01] <Philip`> Ah
- # [22:01] <Philip`> But they're close enough :-p
- # [22:03] <gsnedders> The guy who is arguing with me knows the difference, but thinks I am saying Ogg has problems and can't believe he's arguing with someone who thinks that.
- # [22:03] * Joins: ojan (n=ojan@nat/google/x-52987594d3723466)
- # [22:03] <Dashiva> Why don't we just encode the video as sound
- # [22:03] <Dashiva> That way we're safe!
- # [22:04] <Philip`> Dashiva: That won't work - it wouldn't be accessible to deaf people
- # [22:04] <gsnedders> :D
- # [22:05] <Dashiva> They could convert back to video. It's all just waves anyway
- # [22:05] <Philip`> Ah, cunning
- # [22:06] <jcranmer> gsnedders: I see what you mean
- # [22:06] <Philip`> Of course, somebody will have patented the audio/video conversion algorithm
- # [22:06] * Joins: mabdul (n=mabdul@host150.natpool.mwn.de)
- # [22:07] <gsnedders> jcranmer: /. comments in general or the thread specifically?
- # [22:08] * Quits: maikmerten (n=maikmert@La7f9.l.pppool.de) (Remote closed the connection)
- # [22:08] * Joins: othermaciej_ (n=mjs@17.244.18.25)
- # [22:08] * Joins: nessy (n=nessy@124-168-174-92.dyn.iinet.net.au)
- # [22:09] * Quits: othermaciej (n=mjs@nat/apple/x-3e6e5a50c9c5751f) (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out))
- # [22:09] * Quits: Lachy (n=Lachlan@scandic749.host.songnetworks.se) ("Leaving")
- # [22:10] <jcranmer> gsnedders: specific thread
- # [22:10] * Joins: weinig (n=weinig@17.203.15.152)
- # [22:10] <gsnedders> Can I be bothered to write a long comment?
- # [22:11] <gsnedders> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?threshold=-1&commentsort=0&mode=nested&cid=25625761
- # [22:11] <gsnedders> hmm
- # [22:11] * jcranmer attempts to gauge how much will make it through
- # [22:12] <gsnedders> that URI doesn't work
- # [22:13] <jcranmer> Hixie: good thing I did some discussion off-list, then :-)
- # [22:13] * Parts: mabdul (n=mabdul@host150.natpool.mwn.de)
- # [22:16] <gsnedders> I had a discussion like it at TPAC. Some people were taking it up with timbl, who grabbed me (or rather called me, first by another name beginning with g, then correctly) as a passing HTML WG member.
- # [22:17] <gsnedders> Got some history about HTML's relation to SGML
- # [22:18] <Dashiva> "You look like a suitable decoy"
- # [22:18] <gsnedders> :D
- # [22:18] * Quits: mpt (n=mpt@canonical/launchpad/mpt) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [22:18] * Joins: eric_carlson_ (n=ericc@17.244.16.122)
- # [22:19] * Quits: mstange (n=markus@buntes215.wohnheim.uni-kl.de) ("ChatZilla 0.9.83 [Firefox 3.1b2pre/20081102020254]")
- # [22:20] * Joins: roc (n=roc@202.0.36.64)
- # [22:26] * Joins: mpt (n=mpt@canonical/launchpad/mpt)
- # [22:26] * Joins: eric_carlson__ (n=ericc@17.203.15.202)
- # [22:28] * Quits: eric_carlson (n=ericc@17.203.15.202) (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
- # [22:36] <aboodman> sicking, othermaciej_: i wanted to make sure that you saw i resumed the thread about workers as promised.
- # [22:36] <othermaciej_> aboodman: I did
- # [22:36] <sicking> aboodman, yeah, will comment
- # [22:36] * othermaciej_ is now known as othermaciej
- # [22:37] <sicking> aboodman, it's a little fuzzy on what new API you are proposing though
- # [22:37] <sicking> aboodman, such as, is there an implicit call to 'connect' when a shared worker is created?
- # [22:37] <aboodman> sicking: yes. should i follow up with the IDL?
- # [22:38] <sicking> aboodman, i'll comment first
- # [22:39] <aboodman> sicking: i misread your question. there is no implicit connect() call. callers must always call connect() explicitly.
- # [22:39] <sicking> aboodman, ah, that's what i suspected, though you don't mention that change
- # [22:40] <aboodman> sicking: my apologies, i wasn't sure what would be the least lossy way to communicate my ideas.
- # [22:47] * Quits: eric_carlson_ (n=ericc@17.244.16.122) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [22:53] * Quits: heycam (n=cam@124-168-34-173.dyn.iinet.net.au) ("bye")
- # [22:54] * Joins: KevinMarks (n=KevinMar@72.164.187.224)
- # [22:56] * Joins: othermaciej_ (n=mjs@nat/apple/x-7c5d36737a4390e3)
- # [22:58] <sicking> othermaciej: I don't see your reply yet on the whatwg list btw
- # [23:01] <othermaciej_> I did not reply
- # [23:01] <othermaciej_> I did see the thread
- # [23:03] <othermaciej_> I agree with Alexey's reply
- # [23:03] <othermaciej_> and also the general sentiment that it would be good to reduce the number of interfaces to the messaging mechanism
- # [23:04] * Quits: othermaciej (n=mjs@17.244.18.25) (Read error: 145 (Connection timed out))
- # [23:11] * Quits: smerp (n=smerp@66.192.95.199) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [23:15] * Quits: csarven (i=nevrasc@univcomm-allison-gm606-37.Concordia.CA) (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out))
- # [23:19] * Joins: heycam (n=cam@clm-laptop.infotech.monash.edu.au)
- # [23:20] <sicking> othermaciej_, aboodman: my concern with forcing connect() to be called on a dedicated worker is that it makes the simple case so complicated for the user. I've detailed in a response
- # [23:21] <sicking> othermaciej_, aboodman: in any case this is something that we need to decide on very soon. We're freezing today, but i might be able to get changes done for a few more days
- # [23:24] * Quits: eric_carlson__ (n=ericc@17.203.15.202)
- # [23:27] * othermaciej_ is now known as othermaciej
- # [23:28] * Joins: hdh (n=hdh@118.71.125.23)
- # [23:28] <othermaciej> sicking: it doesn't seem that much more complicated to me, particularly considering that Workers are an advanced feature in the first place
- # [23:28] * Quits: nessy (n=nessy@124-168-174-92.dyn.iinet.net.au) (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
- # [23:28] * Joins: nessy (n=nessy@124-168-174-92.dyn.iinet.net.au)
- # [23:29] <othermaciej> sicking: I tend to think overall API simplicity is more important here than optimizing the simple case
- # [23:29] <sicking> othermaciej, even with the nested event handlers?
- # [23:30] <sicking> othermaciej, I do think there is value in making the simple case simpler, if it's the common use case
- # [23:31] * Quits: nessy (n=nessy@124-168-174-92.dyn.iinet.net.au) (Client Quit)
- # [23:31] * Hixie thought what we had today was pretty simple as it was
- # [23:31] <sicking> othermaciej, creating a single API that fits all use cases doesn't always yield the simplest API for any of them
- # [23:31] <othermaciej> sicking: so you are really concerned about one extra line of code in 4-5 line code sequences?
- # [23:31] * sicking agrees with Hixie
- # [23:31] <othermaciej> I have to admit I don't care much about this either way, other than wanting a resolution
- # [23:32] <othermaciej> but I agree with aboodman that having three different ways to do worker-related messaging overall seems like a mess
- # [23:32] <sicking> othermaciej, mostly the nested functions, with two different events in scope are complicated
- # [23:32] <Hixie> i don't really see that we have three ways
- # [23:32] <Hixie> they're all the same way
- # [23:32] <sicking> well, startConversaion is just a convinence method, not really a new mechanism. I'm fine with dropping that
- # [23:33] <Hixie> and startConversation was only added in response to aaron's request :-)
- # [23:33] <sicking> ultimately there is only one communication mechanism: postMessage
- # [23:34] <othermaciej> I have a hard time getting worked up about it either way
- # [23:34] <othermaciej> like I said
- # [23:34] <sicking> with aarons proposal you'll actually always have to use two mechanisms, connect() and postMessage()
- # [23:34] <othermaciej> I think this is an advanced feature in any case
- # [23:34] <sicking> i mostly agree, i'm ok with either, though it might be hard to get postMessage dropped from FF3.1 at this point
- # [23:34] * Quits: Maurice` (n=copyman@cc90688-a.emmen1.dr.home.nl) ("Disconnected...")
- # [23:35] <othermaciej> I'd be more concerned about the complexity of determining worker lifetime if anything
- # [23:35] <othermaciej> although that's more a concern for implementations than an API issue
- # [23:36] <Hixie> i'm ok with whatever API people want, but in the face of apathy i'm strongly in favour of the status quo
- # [23:36] <Hixie> (if the arguments aren't convincing, as, imho, in this case)
- # [23:39] * Quits: KevinMarks (n=KevinMar@72.164.187.224) ("The computer fell asleep")
- # [23:43] * Quits: hdh00 (n=hdh@118.71.125.23) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [23:51] * Joins: csarven (n=csarven@modemcable150.182-202-24.mc.videotron.ca)
- # [23:57] * Joins: svl (n=me@ip565744a7.direct-adsl.nl)
- # [23:58] <aboodman> Jonas, hixie, I don't see how you think there is only one mechanism.
- # [23:59] <aboodman> Maybe we are having a terminology problem.
- # [23:59] <sicking> aboodman, the only way you can send data is through 'postMessage'
- # [23:59] <aboodman> yes, but the method is located on different objects.
- # [23:59] <aboodman> and must be initialized differently.
- # [23:59] <Hixie> the only mechanism is the message channel mechanism
- # [23:59] <Hixie> and it's initialised automatically whenever possible
- # Session Close: Wed Nov 05 00:00:00 2008
The end :)