Options:
- # Session Start: Wed Feb 25 00:00:00 2009
- # Session Ident: #css
- # [03:14] * Joins: anne (annevk@58.1.246.135)
- # [03:20] * Joins: dsinger (mobile@67.218.105.29)
- # [03:21] <dsinger> Testing please ignore
- # [03:22] * Parts: dsinger (mobile@67.218.105.29)
- # [03:45] <anne> for calc() we might also need to define that some properties start getting ignored at use time rather than parse time
- # [03:45] <anne> e.g. (1em-16px) can get negative if the user resizes things
- # [04:57] <fantasai> define "ignore"
- # [05:00] <fantasai> and send it to www-style, I don't think howcome tracks issues on #css :)
- # [05:03] <anne> x { width:-16px; width:16px } versus x { width:calc(1em-16px); width:16px }
- # [05:03] <anne> I don't really know what the exact issue is, just thaat ther be one :)
- # [05:10] <fantasai> you mean, in the opposite order
- # [05:10] <fantasai> in that particular case you'd just get width: 16px in both cases
- # [05:10] <fantasai> very simple
- # [05:11] <fantasai> but -16px gets thrown out at parse time
- # [05:11] <fantasai> whereas you can't do that with calc(1em-16px)
- # [05:11] <fantasai> since style resolution happens after parsing and cascading
- # [05:15] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@63.245.220.246) (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
- # [05:19] <anne> oh yeah, in opposite order
- # [05:19] * Quits: anne (annevk@58.1.246.135) (Client exited)
- # [05:19] * Joins: anne (annevk@58.1.246.135)
- # [06:10] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@98.234.51.190)
- # [07:20] * Quits: arronei (arronei@131.107.0.103) (Ping timeout)
- # [07:26] * Joins: arronei (arronei@131.107.0.85)
- # [08:26] <jdaggett> anne: ping
- # [08:31] <anne> hey
- # [08:31] <anne> any chance tomorrow would work for you?
- # [08:31] <jdaggett> sure!
- # [08:31] <jdaggett> lunch is ok? i have a class in the evening
- # [08:32] <anne> yeah and can I bring a friend (mike smith, w3c)?
- # [08:32] <jdaggett> sure, sounds good
- # [08:32] <jdaggett> anytime is fine
- # [08:32] <jdaggett> you know how to get here?
- # [08:32] <anne> mike does :)
- # [08:32] <jdaggett> ok, cool
- # [08:33] <anne> we'll be there between 12-2 then
- # [08:33] <jdaggett> great
- # [08:33] <jdaggett> call me if something comes up
- # [08:33] <anne> kk
- # [08:34] <jdaggett> by the way, how many folks from opera japan are coming next week?
- # [08:35] <jdaggett> you mentioned a couple folks were interested in vertical layout discussions
- # [08:35] <jdaggett> they're coming just wed aft (JLTF meeting)?
- # [08:37] <jdaggett> anne: ^
- # [08:38] <anne> so it seems like it might be one
- # [08:38] <anne> and he's not sure whether he can make it:/
- # [08:39] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@98.234.51.190) (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
- # [08:39] <jdaggett> ok
- # [08:40] <anne> and it would be just be for that wednesday afternoon, yeah
- # [08:40] <jdaggett> k
- # [11:23] * Parts: anne (annevk@58.1.246.135)
- # [11:26] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@85.196.122.246) (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
- # [11:47] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22)
- # [13:06] * Joins: myakura (myakura@221.191.119.20)
- # [14:09] * Quits: myakura (myakura@221.191.119.20) (Quit: Leaving...)
- # [14:16] * Joins: myakura (myakura@221.191.119.20)
- # [14:24] * Quits: myakura (myakura@221.191.119.20) (Quit: Leaving...)
- # [14:39] * Joins: myakura (myakura@221.191.119.20)
- # [16:24] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [16:24] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.247)
- # [16:47] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.247) (Ping timeout)
- # [16:48] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22)
- # [17:39] * Quits: myakura (myakura@221.191.119.20) (Quit: Leaving...)
- # [17:45] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [17:56] * Joins: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.30)
- # [17:56] * Joins: RRSAgent (rrs-loggee@128.30.52.30)
- # [17:56] <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-css-irc
- # [17:56] <plinss> zakim, this will be style
- # [17:56] <Zakim> ok, plinss; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 7 minutes
- # [17:58] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started
- # [17:58] <Zakim> + +1.253.307.aaaa
- # [17:59] <Zakim> - +1.253.307.aaaa
- # [17:59] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended
- # [17:59] <Zakim> Attendees were +1.253.307.aaaa
- # [18:00] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started
- # [18:00] <Zakim> + +1.858.354.aaaa
- # [18:00] <plinss> zakim, +1.858.354 is me
- # [18:00] <Zakim> +plinss; got it
- # [18:01] <Zakim> +dsinger
- # [18:01] <Zakim> -dsinger
- # [18:01] <Zakim> +dsinger
- # [18:01] <Zakim> + +1.253.307.aabb
- # [18:01] * Joins: dsinger (mobile@67.218.105.29)
- # [18:01] <plinss> zakim, +1.253.307 is arronei
- # [18:01] <Zakim> +arronei; got it
- # [18:01] <dsinger> Zakim, mute me
- # [18:01] <Zakim> dsinger should now be muted
- # [18:01] <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
- # [18:02] <dsinger> Good morning ... On bus as usual
- # [18:02] <plinss> morning David
- # [18:04] <plinss> zakim, [microsoft] has sylvaing
- # [18:04] <Zakim> +sylvaing; got it
- # [18:04] <dsinger> Zakim, who is here?
- # [18:04] <Zakim> On the phone I see plinss, dsinger (muted), arronei, [Microsoft]
- # [18:05] <Zakim> [Microsoft] has sylvaing
- # [18:05] <Zakim> On IRC I see dsinger, RRSAgent, Zakim, arronei, fantasai, plinss_, shepazu, jdaggett, plinss, Bert, krijnh, trackbot, Hixie
- # [18:05] <dsinger> Ah, do we have a chair?
- # [18:05] <plinss> yes
- # [18:06] <dsinger> Cool
- # [18:06] * Joins: ChrisL (ChrisL@128.30.52.30)
- # [18:06] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@98.234.51.190)
- # [18:07] <dsinger> I will have to stop at 9:55 btw
- # [18:07] <Zakim> +ChrisL
- # [18:07] * Joins: sylvaing (sylvaing@131.107.0.71)
- # [18:08] <Zakim> +Bert
- # [18:08] <Zakim> +David_Baron
- # [18:09] <Zakim> +??P10
- # [18:10] <dsinger> P10 must be fantasai?
- # [18:10] <ChrisL> zakim, ??p10 is probably fantasai
- # [18:10] <Zakim> +fantasai?; got it
- # [18:11] <ChrisL> scribe: chris
- # [18:11] <Zakim> +howcome
- # [18:11] <ChrisL> scribenick: chrisl
- # [18:12] <ChrisL> rrsagent, here
- # [18:12] <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-css-irc#T17-09-05
- # [18:12] <ChrisL> rrsagent, make logs public
- # [18:12] <RRSAgent> I have made the request, ChrisL
- # [18:12] <ChrisL> topic: @import
- # [18:12] <plinss> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Feb/0119.html
- # [18:13] <ChrisL> cl: sent some email about multiple @rules clamouring to be 'first'
- # [18:13] <ChrisL> zakim, who is speaking?
- # [18:13] <Zakim> ChrisL, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: [Microsoft] (64%), ChrisL (63%), Bert (4%), howcome (5%)
- # [18:14] <sylvaing> Zakim, [Microsoft] has sylvaing
- # [18:14] <Zakim> sylvaing was already listed in [Microsoft], sylvaing
- # [18:14] <ChrisL> sg: need to distinguish functionaly valid from syntactically valid
- # [18:15] <ChrisL> hl: we should use the canonoical CSS syntax
- # [18:15] <ChrisL> pl: agree with chris point but its not related to the current issue
- # [18:15] <ChrisL> ... so the current case seems like a problem
- # [18:15] <Zakim> +Melinda_Grant
- # [18:16] <ChrisL> hl; problematic, use the eternal syntax not the css 1, 2 or 3 syntax
- # [18:16] <ChrisL> db: so implementations that dont implement that currently will need to do so, to see if some junk fits the eternal synbtax
- # [18:16] * Joins: melinda (melinda.gr@67.47.246.6)
- # [18:17] <ChrisL> ee: we don't wat to cut off extensibility
- # [18:17] <ChrisL> sl: the specific test case in anne's emailis gramatically correct, but implementations differ
- # [18:18] <ChrisL> ae: in fact it is invalid due to leading numeric
- # [18:19] <ChrisL> pl: would not allow a valid rule, but would allow known or unknown @rules.
- # [18:19] <ChrisL> hl: yes
- # [18:19] <ChrisL> cl: i agree
- # [18:19] * Joins: alexmog (alexmog@131.107.0.113)
- # [18:19] <ChrisL> so in the anne test case, its not an @rule.
- # [18:20] <ChrisL> sl: spec talks about valid statements, not @rules specifically. but this is not a valid statement
- # [18:20] <ChrisL> hl: bert?
- # [18:20] <ChrisL> bb: don't want it to load, as the rule ight be valid in the future. need to stop it loading
- # [18:21] <ChrisL> sl: butbrowsers do load these currently
- # [18:21] <ChrisL> hl: they should not
- # [18:21] <ChrisL> bb: some day we may invent an @rule that has to come before an @import
- # [18:22] <ChrisL> cl: @charset isn't an @rule
- # [18:22] <ChrisL> bb: no, its special cased in the grammar
- # [18:22] <Zakim> -arronei
- # [18:22] <ChrisL> ae: yes but its reparsed as an @rule once the charset is detected
- # [18:22] <ChrisL> bb: no
- # [18:23] * Quits: dsinger (mobile@67.218.105.29) (Quit: Rooms • iPhone IRC Client • http://rooms.derflash.de)
- # [18:23] <ChrisL> sl: spec says @import cannot come after a valid statement. but this is not a valid sytatement.
- # [18:23] <ChrisL> bb: its correct
- # [18:23] <ChrisL> bb: its a normal token,
- # [18:24] <ChrisL> sl: which meaning of valid do we mean here. succesfully parsed, or known and can be applied?
- # [18:24] <ChrisL> pl: the former
- # [18:24] <ChrisL> hl: we cn say there should be nothing ahead of @import except @charset. removes need to discuss 'valid'
- # [18:25] <ChrisL> db: has anyone looked at whatwebkit does? do not want to get into non-interoperable behaviour
- # [18:25] <ChrisL> .. what exactly does webkit to to accept or reject this @rule?
- # [18:26] <ChrisL> hl: if we can agree on a simple workable solution we can test it against implementations
- # [18:26] <fantasai> db: The solution we use in Gecko is, if it parses into something that we know about, then we drop following @import rules
- # [18:26] <ChrisL> db: in gecko, if the rule is dropped then we continue to process the @rule
- # [18:26] <ChrisL> hl; easy to flag if something has been dropped
- # [18:27] <ChrisL> db: an extra semicolon at end of time - would that cause the @import to be dropped?
- # [18:27] <ChrisL> hl: no
- # [18:27] * Joins: dsinger (dsinger@17.202.35.52)
- # [18:27] <Zakim> +[Apple]
- # [18:27] <Zakim> -dsinger
- # [18:27] <dsinger> zakim, [apple] has dsinger
- # [18:27] <Zakim> +dsinger; got it
- # [18:27] <ChrisL> ee: do you drop @import after an invalid selector? eg two commas
- # [18:28] <fantasai> or an unknown pseudo
- # [18:28] <ChrisL> db: yes so following @import would be allowed
- # [18:28] <ChrisL> bb: suggest we allow empty stements, space, cdo cdc, nothing else
- # [18:28] <fantasai> s/allowed/loaded/
- # [18:28] <ChrisL> s/stements/statements/
- # [18:29] <ChrisL> plh: its reasonable but not forward compatible
- # [18:29] <ChrisL> db: properties not an issue as they are inside the rules, . error in selctor forces rule to be dropped
- # [18:29] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@85.196.122.246)
- # [18:30] <ChrisL> bb; concerned about things that could be valid in the future
- # [18:30] <ChrisL> db: spec id clear on rules being ignored. if spec must be ignored it can't trigger other things
- # [18:30] <ChrisL> cl: so ignored means treat as if it was never there
- # [18:31] <ChrisL> db: we have that issue witha lot of things. dont want future stylesheets to break completely
- # [18:31] <ChrisL> pl: issue is that if the rule becomes valid tomorrow, it stops the @import loading
- # [18:32] <ChrisL> sl: this can happen today, ie8 does not support :: for example so following import will load but later, or in other browsers, it will be skipped
- # [18:33] <ChrisL> cl: how much existing content would break if the spec said nothing before @import?
- # [18:33] <ChrisL> hl: little to none
- # [18:34] <ChrisL> pl: would require changes in implementations though
- # [18:34] <ChrisL> ee: any @rules that are dropped should be allowed before @import
- # [18:35] <ChrisL> db: media queries changed syntax f @import. its not valid css2. so does non-media-queries implementsation drop?
- # [18:35] * Joins: szilles (chatzilla@192.150.10.200)
- # [18:35] <dbaron> example was, given two rules: @import url(foo) (min-width:800px); @import url(bar);
- # [18:35] <ChrisL> pl: there are implementations that do not support media queries
- # [18:35] * ChrisL thanks
- # [18:35] <dbaron> implementations without media queries skip the first; with this change would we also require them to skip the second?
- # [18:36] <fantasai> I strongly believe that we should allow dropped @rules before @import
- # [18:36] <ChrisL> ee: we should allow any (currently invalid) @rule before @import
- # [18:36] <ChrisL> sl: invalid or unknown?
- # [18:36] <ChrisL> cl: unknown
- # [18:36] <ChrisL> hl: can live with
- # [18:37] <ChrisL> ee: and also as bert said, empty statements and cdo cdc
- # [18:38] <ChrisL> pl; odd that current @rules would block @import
- # [18:38] <ChrisL> db: thats ok and we want it for forward compat
- # [18:38] <ChrisL> ee: adding @rule before @import is pretty rare. less of an issue than withselectors
- # [18:39] <dbaron> so if you only allow unknown @-rules and don't allow anything that's not an @-rule, don't you end up distinguishing between:
- # [18:39] <dbaron> @new-rule {}
- # [18:39] <ChrisL> pl: issue is known @rules not supported by older browsers
- # [18:39] <dbaron> @new-rule {}; /* extra semicolon at end */
- # [18:39] <ChrisL> pl: covered by emptystatement rule
- # [18:40] <ChrisL> db; we have a concept of empty statement?
- # [18:40] <ChrisL> bb: would need to be defined in spec, but its clear
- # [18:40] <ChrisL> pl; i detect consensus
- # [18:42] <plinss> the current proposal is: disallow any statements before @import except: empty statements, comment tokens, and unknown, but wel-formed @rules
- # [18:42] <ChrisL> ee: unknown or invalid
- # [18:42] <fantasai> @foo;
- # [18:42] <ChrisL> sl: it says unknown but wel formed
- # [18:42] <fantasai> @import;
- # [18:43] <fantasai> @namespace *;
- # [18:43] <ChrisL> bb: grammar does not seem to allow empty statements
- # [18:43] <ChrisL> ee: anything that has been ignored
- # [18:43] <dbaron> yeah, maybe the extra-semicolon thing causes the next selector/rule to be ignored at present
- # [18:44] <fantasai> that starts with an @sign
- # [18:44] <ChrisL> s/anything/anything starting @/
- # [18:44] <fantasai> @1;
- # [18:44] <fantasai> @import "style.css";
- # [18:44] <ChrisL> ee: @1; does not parse as an at-rule
- # [18:44] <ChrisL> bb; neither a selector nor an @rule
- # [18:45] <ChrisL> sl; has to parse as an @rule first, then the rule is applied
- # [18:45] <ChrisL> pl: so @1; would block @import
- # [18:45] <ChrisL> cl: yes
- # [18:46] <ChrisL> (no objection heard)
- # [18:46] <dbaron> I think it would be good to see the proposal actually written up.
- # [18:46] <dbaron> This is rather hard to follow with lots of abstract statements.
- # [18:46] <fantasai> I agree
- # [18:47] <ChrisL> dbaron - yes, but if we resolve it then someone can get an action to write it up in detail
- # [18:47] <ChrisL> bb: (error recovery - scribe missed)
- # [18:47] <dbaron> I think we should action somebody to write it up without resolving.
- # [18:48] <ChrisL> trackbot, status
- # [18:48] * trackbot knows about the following 37 users: Alex, Chris, Timothy, Masayuki, Elika, Peter, Anne, Daniel, Yasuhiro, Steve, ming, Cesar, Doug, Shinyu, Svante, Saloni, Jeff, Tokushige, Dean, Robert, Arron, Giorgi, David, Ian, John, Bert, Sylvain, Melinda, Molly, Markus, Chris, David, Emily, Håkon Wium, Ben, David, Tona
- # [18:48] <ChrisL> action; sylvian to write up the proposal on @import and unknown well formed @rules
- # [18:48] <ChrisL> action: sylvian to write up the proposal on @import and unknown well formed @rules
- # [18:48] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
- # [18:48] <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - sylvian
- # [18:48] * RRSAgent records action 1
- # [18:48] <Bert> (Issue 24 is about recovering from invalid tokens when inside a selector. The ; in @1; is such an invalid token. What to do? Skip to the next {}?)
- # [18:48] <fantasai> Sylvain
- # [18:49] <ChrisL> action: sylvain to write up the proposal on @import and unknown well formed @rules
- # [18:49] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
- # [18:49] * RRSAgent records action 2
- # [18:49] <trackbot> Created ACTION-123 - Write up the proposal on @import and unknown well formed @rules [on Sylvain Galineau - due 2009-03-04].
- # [18:49] * ChrisL woohoo
- # [18:49] <fantasai> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-102
- # [18:49] <fantasai> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-106
- # [18:49] <ChrisL> topic: issue-24
- # [18:49] <plinss> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-24
- # [18:49] <ChrisL> issue-24?
- # [18:49] * trackbot getting information on ISSUE-24
- # [18:49] <trackbot> ISSUE-24 -- Does the 'background' shorthand needs both clip and origin? -- CLOSED
- # [18:49] <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/24
- # [18:50] <ChrisL> pl: not that one
- # [18:50] <ChrisL> oops,css2.1 issue not tracker issue. ifnore above
- # [18:50] <fantasai> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Nov/0509.html
- # [18:51] <ChrisL> ee: we wanted to requie matching brackets, the change we made to fix this solves selectors but adds a new problem for
- # [18:51] <ChrisL> ... declarations
- # [18:52] * Quits: alexmog (alexmog@131.107.0.113) (Ping timeout)
- # [18:52] <ChrisL> ... makes the trap point for an invalid declaration to be astatement not a declaration
- # [18:52] <ChrisL> ... so a rue with an invalid statement will be completely ignored instead of justthat statement
- # [18:52] <fantasai> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Dec/0091.html
- # [18:53] <ChrisL> ee: so we need to go back and replace with 'statement ordeclaration'. or duplicate the rule, one for malformed statement and one for malformed declarations
- # [18:54] <ChrisL> bb: statement or declaration is probably correct. problem is the section is called malformed declarations
- # [18:54] <ChrisL> ee: change all occurences
- # [18:54] <ChrisL> bb: would work
- # [18:55] <ChrisL> bb: so if you are in a declaration, skip to end of declaration
- # [18:55] <ChrisL> bb: yes, think its correct
- # [18:55] <ChrisL> cl: so there are two proposals
- # [18:56] <ChrisL> ee: scope of changes is only one paragraph
- # [18:57] <ChrisL> bb; edge case, when inside a selector, if the token in error is at or before the start of the selector. what are you 'in'
- # [18:57] <ChrisL> ee: a statement
- # [18:57] <ChrisL> bb: what kind?
- # [18:57] <ChrisL> ee: you don;t know at that point
- # [18:57] <ChrisL> bb: so ignore that singe token?
- # [18:57] <ChrisL> ee: treat it as a selector, dont ignore that token.
- # [18:58] <ChrisL> bb: talking of tokens thatare disallowed by the grammar
- # [18:58] <ChrisL> bb: colon is allowed, better example ....
- # [18:58] <ChrisL> ... closing brace for example
- # [18:58] <ChrisL> ee: if its not an @rule, treat as aselector
- # [18:59] <ChrisL> bb: fine with me. deals with future expansion
- # [18:59] <ChrisL> pl: other opinions?
- # [19:00] <ChrisL> bb: hard to follow without examples
- # [19:00] <Zakim> -[Apple]
- # [19:00] <dsinger> bye...another meeting, sorry
- # [19:00] <ChrisL> pl: can we resolve here or do we need more discussion?
- # [19:01] <dbaron> (Confusion about what we would be resolving on.)
- # [19:01] * dbaron Zakim, who is noisy?
- # [19:01] * Zakim dbaron, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: fantasai? (63%), ChrisL (50%), Bert (5%), howcome (8%)
- # [19:02] <ChrisL> action: bert to propose specific wording on complete text for what is inserted and deleted for bracket/quote parsing
- # [19:02] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
- # [19:02] * RRSAgent records action 3
- # [19:02] <trackbot> Created ACTION-124 - Propose specific wording on complete text for what is inserted and deleted for bracket/quote parsing [on Bert Bos - due 2009-03-04].
- # [19:02] <ChrisL> ee: is it solved with two separate rules?
- # [19:02] <ChrisL> bb: not sure
- # [19:03] <ChrisL> pl: why dont you two work together onthat action so it can be closed quickly
- # [19:03] <ChrisL> zakim, list attendees
- # [19:03] <Zakim> As of this point the attendees have been +1.858.354.aaaa, plinss, dsinger, +1.253.307.aabb, arronei, sylvaing, ChrisL, Bert, David_Baron, fantasai?, howcome, Melinda_Grant
- # [19:03] <ChrisL> chair: Peter
- # [19:03] <ChrisL> rrsagent, make minutes
- # [19:03] <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-css-minutes.html ChrisL
- # [19:05] <Zakim> -howcome
- # [19:05] <Zakim> -[Microsoft]
- # [19:05] <Zakim> -Melinda_Grant
- # [19:05] <Zakim> -ChrisL
- # [19:05] <Zakim> -plinss
- # [19:05] <Zakim> -David_Baron
- # [19:05] <Zakim> -Bert
- # [19:05] <Zakim> -fantasai?
- # [19:05] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended
- # [19:05] <Zakim> Attendees were +1.858.354.aaaa, plinss, dsinger, +1.253.307.aabb, arronei, sylvaing, ChrisL, Bert, David_Baron, fantasai?, howcome, Melinda_Grant
- # [19:05] <ChrisL> Meeting: CSS telcon
- # [19:05] <ChrisL> rrsagent, make minutes
- # [19:05] <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-css-minutes.html ChrisL
- # [19:05] <dbaron> I assume no telecon next week since it'll be 2-3am between the first and second day of the f2f meeting
- # [19:06] <ChrisL> zakim, where is 858?
- # [19:06] <Zakim> North American dialing code 1.858 is California
- # [19:06] <ChrisL> zakim, where is 253?
- # [19:06] <Zakim> North American dialing code 1.253 is Washington
- # [19:06] <arronei> 253 was arronei
- # [19:06] <dbaron> 858 is San Diego
- # [19:06] <ChrisL> dbaron, that seems a safe assumption
- # [19:06] <plinss> chris: 858 was me
- # [19:06] <dbaron> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area_code_858
- # [19:07] <ChrisL> ok, they are both listed explicitly in the attendance list already
- # [19:07] <ChrisL> Present: plinss, dsinger, arronei, sylvaing, ChrisL, Bert, David_Baron, fantasai, howcome, Melinda_Grant
- # [19:07] <ChrisL> rrsagent, make minutes
- # [19:07] <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-css-minutes.html ChrisL
- # [19:09] * Quits: sylvaing (sylvaing@131.107.0.71) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:18] <ChrisL> regrets: szilles, daniel, emily, molly, anne
- # [19:18] <ChrisL> rrsagent, make minutes
- # [19:18] <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-css-minutes.html ChrisL
- # [19:19] <ChrisL> s/ifnore/ignore/
- # [19:20] <ChrisL> s/bb;/bb:/g
- # [19:20] <ChrisL> s/sl;/sl:/g
- # [19:20] <ChrisL> s/pl;/pl:/g
- # [19:21] <ChrisL> s/db;/db:/g
- # [19:21] <ChrisL> s/hl;/hl:/g
- # [19:21] <ChrisL> rrsagent, make minutes
- # [19:21] <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-css-minutes.html ChrisL
- # [19:23] * Joins: sylvaing (sylvaing@131.107.0.102)
- # [19:35] * Quits: sylvaing (sylvaing@131.107.0.102) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:36] * Joins: sylvaing (sylvaing@131.107.0.102)
- # [19:47] * Quits: ChrisL (ChrisL@128.30.52.30) (Client exited)
- # [20:33] * Quits: dsinger (dsinger@17.202.35.52) (Quit: dsinger)
- # [20:44] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@98.234.51.190) (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
- # [20:57] * Quits: melinda (melinda.gr@67.47.246.6) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [21:03] * Joins: melinda (melinda.gr@67.47.246.6)
- # [21:05] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@63.245.220.246)
- # [21:07] * Quits: sylvaing (sylvaing@131.107.0.102) (Ping timeout)
- # [21:09] * Quits: melinda (melinda.gr@67.47.246.6) (Quit: melinda)
- # [21:31] * Zakim excuses himself; his presence no longer seems to be needed
- # [21:31] * Parts: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.30)
- # [21:40] * Joins: sylvaing (sylvaing@131.107.0.71)
- # Session Close: Thu Feb 26 00:00:00 2009
The end :)