Options:
- # Session Start: Wed May 26 00:00:00 2010
- # Session Ident: #css
- # [00:48] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.59.50)
- # [02:16] * jdaggett_afk is now known as jdaggett
- # [03:02] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@63.245.220.240) (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
- # [03:51] * Quits: Curt` (DorkeyDear@76.241.92.153) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [04:17] * Joins: Curt` (DorkeyDear@76.241.92.153)
- # [04:25] * Joins: miketaylr (miketaylr@24.42.95.234)
- # [04:56] * Quits: Curt` (DorkeyDear@76.241.92.153) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [04:56] * Joins: Curt`` (DorkeyDear@76.241.92.153)
- # [05:20] * Quits: miketaylr (miketaylr@24.42.95.234) (Client exited)
- # [05:29] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@98.234.51.190)
- # [07:35] * Quits: Curt`` (DorkeyDear@76.241.92.153) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [07:55] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@98.234.51.190) (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
- # [09:38] * Joins: shepazu (schepers@128.30.52.169)
- # [09:55] * Joins: plinss_ (plinss@68.107.121.183)
- # [11:07] * jdaggett is now known as jdaggett_afk
- # [11:07] * Quits: DanC (connolly@128.30.52.169) (Client exited)
- # [11:25] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.59.50) (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
- # [11:41] * Joins: CesarAcebal (acebal@193.51.208.72)
- # [11:49] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22)
- # [12:31] * Joins: myakura (myakura@220.104.128.62)
- # [15:34] * Joins: DanC (connolly@128.30.52.169)
- # [15:46] * Joins: jdaggett (jdaggett@118.243.224.63)
- # [15:47] * jdaggett is now known as jdaggett_home
- # [15:55] * Quits: jdaggett_home (jdaggett@118.243.224.63) (Quit: jdaggett_home)
- # [17:00] * Quits: myakura (myakura@220.104.128.62) (Quit: Leaving...)
- # [17:06] * Joins: Curt` (DorkeyDear@76.241.92.153)
- # [17:22] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22) (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
- # [17:38] * Joins: glazou (glazou@82.247.96.19)
- # [17:38] * Joins: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.169)
- # [17:38] * Joins: RRSAgent (rrs-loggee@128.30.52.169)
- # [17:38] <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/05/26-CSS-irc
- # [17:38] <glazou> Zakim, this will be Style
- # [17:38] <Zakim> ok, glazou; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 24 minutes
- # [17:38] <glazou> rrsagent, make logs public
- # [17:38] <RRSAgent> I have made the request, glazou
- # [17:38] * glazou is now known as glazou_brb
- # [17:48] * Joins: sylvaing (sylvaing@76.104.131.10)
- # [17:58] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started
- # [17:58] <Zakim> +plinss
- # [17:59] * glazou_brb is now known as glazou
- # [17:59] <Zakim> +glazou
- # [18:00] * Joins: oyvind (oyvinds@213.236.208.22)
- # [18:01] <Zakim> + +49.238.aaaa
- # [18:01] <glazou> Zakim, aaaa is CesarAcebal
- # [18:01] <Zakim> +CesarAcebal; got it
- # [18:01] <Zakim> +Bert
- # [18:02] <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
- # [18:02] <Zakim> +TabAtkins
- # [18:02] <arronei> zakim, microsoft is me
- # [18:02] <Zakim> +arronei; got it
- # [18:02] * Joins: murakami (murakami@118.154.209.3)
- # [18:02] * Joins: smfr (smfr@72.25.91.23)
- # [18:02] <Zakim> +sylvaing
- # [18:04] <Zakim> +smfr
- # [18:04] * Joins: bradk (bradk@67.188.133.45)
- # [18:05] <Zakim> +??P21
- # [18:06] <fantasai> Zakim, ? is me
- # [18:06] <Zakim> +fantasai; got it
- # [18:06] <bradk> why does my phone have to be difficult?
- # [18:07] <glazou> Zakim, who is noisy?
- # [18:07] <Zakim> +bradk
- # [18:07] <Zakim> glazou, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: CesarAcebal (24%), TabAtkins (14%), bradk (4%)
- # [18:07] <TabAtkins> ScribeNick: TabAtkins
- # [18:07] * Joins: alexmog (alexmog@131.107.0.116)
- # [18:08] <TabAtkins> glazou: first item is about adding murakami-san as new editor for css3 lists.
- # [18:08] <fantasai> +!
- # [18:08] * Zakim wonders where ! is
- # [18:08] <TabAtkins> glazou: any objection?
- # [18:08] <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Murakami-san added as 3rd editor of css3 lists
- # [18:08] <murakami> thanks
- # [18:08] <TabAtkins> glazou: First lets review the issues for everyone.
- # [18:09] <TabAtkins> glazou: dbaron is not on the call yet.
- # [18:09] <TabAtkins> glazou: elika?
- # [18:09] <TabAtkins> fantasai: I haven't done any work on issues yet.
- # [18:09] <TabAtkins> glazou: When will you?
- # [18:09] <TabAtkins> fantasai: Early june, as I reported last week.
- # [18:09] <TabAtkins> glazou: Sylvain?
- # [18:10] <TabAtkins> sylvaing: Anton got back to me; we're basically done, but he's asking me to reconsider something. I need to read through the whole thread which is very time-consuming.
- # [18:10] <TabAtkins> glazou: You're confident you can have a proposal for the issue by next week?
- # [18:10] <TabAtkins> sylvaing: Yes.
- # [18:10] <TabAtkins> glazou: Bert?
- # [18:10] <TabAtkins> Bert: I did 119 just now.
- # [18:10] <Zakim> + +47.23.69.aabb
- # [18:11] <TabAtkins> Bert: 120 and 122 are being added. I don't think they need further discussion, though.
- # [18:11] <glazou> Zakim, aabb is howcome
- # [18:11] <Zakim> +howcome; got it
- # [18:11] <TabAtkins> glazou: arron?
- # [18:11] <TabAtkins> arronei: Created test cases, but had some problems with uploading them last night; access was blocked for some reason.
- # [18:11] <Bert> s/they need/any of the others need/
- # [18:12] <Bert> s/122/121/
- # [18:12] * alexmog is on the phone with Arron. hi everyone
- # [18:12] <TabAtkins> glazou: tab?
- # [18:13] <bradk> that typing is really loud. Not that I'm complaining about a person other than me scribing.
- # [18:13] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-138
- # [18:13] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: I'm still discussing issue 161 with boris, but I think I'm finally to a point where he's happy with the wording (even if not with the proposal itself). I should have it wrapped up this week.
- # [18:15] <TabAtkins> glazou: issue 138
- # [18:16] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: I think that what fantasai explained as what it's "trying to say" is correct, but as boris says, we need to clarify it.
- # [18:16] <TabAtkins> fantasai: What about abspos?
- # [18:17] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: Abspos elements act like blocks anyway, so that case should be less ambiguous.
- # [18:17] <fantasai> So we want something like appending "If any floats are contained by the anonymous box, then those floats are shifted, too."
- # [18:17] <fantasai> ?
- # [18:17] <TabAtkins> glazou: Who volunteers to write a proposal?
- # [18:17] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: I'll try it out.
- # [18:17] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-139
- # [18:17] <TabAtkins> ACTION Tab: Write proposal for issue 138
- # [18:17] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
- # [18:17] * RRSAgent records action 1
- # [18:17] <trackbot> Created ACTION-232 - Write proposal for issue 138 [on Tab Atkins Jr. - due 2010-06-02].
- # [18:17] <TabAtkins> glazou: Next, issue 139, a grammar issue.
- # [18:18] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: Did we agree that that's a valid report? If so, then it's clearly an error - the escape character should never appear unescaped.
- # [18:18] <TabAtkins> glazou: Any objections?
- # [18:19] <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Accept Yves's proposal for issue 139.
- # [18:19] <TabAtkins> Bert: I'll make the edit.
- # [18:19] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-146
- # [18:19] <TabAtkins> glazou: Issue 146.
- # [18:20] <TabAtkins> glazou: Seems pretty simple. The marker box shouldn't be optional.
- # [18:20] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: Are we going to accept elika's wording?
- # [18:21] * Quits: shepazu (schepers@128.30.52.169) (Quit: shepazu)
- # [18:21] <TabAtkins> fantasai: What do you mean?
- # [18:21] <TabAtkins> glazou: It can be more explicit. It should say "no marker when list-style-type:none", etc.
- # [18:21] <TabAtkins> fantasai: That's specified in the list section; this is the box generation section.
- # [18:22] <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Accept fantasai's proposal for issue 146.
- # [18:22] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-118
- # [18:22] <TabAtkins> glazou: Now to the issues with no owner at all. First is 118.
- # [18:24] * fantasai wishes dbaron was here
- # [18:24] <TabAtkins> Bert: It's imprecise. The glyphs aren't centered, the "em box" is.
- # [18:25] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: Yeah, not sure if we want to use the *term* "em box", but that's definitely the idea we're shooting for.
- # [18:26] <TabAtkins> fantasai: What other term would we use?
- # [18:27] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: What about inline-blocks?
- # [18:27] * Joins: howcome (howcome@77.16.255.168)
- # [18:27] <glazou> Zakim, who is on the phone?
- # [18:27] <Zakim> On the phone I see plinss, glazou, CesarAcebal, Bert, arronei, TabAtkins, sylvaing, smfr, fantasai, bradk, howcome
- # [18:27] <TabAtkins> fantasai: This section is about text; you need the assumption of a font for this to make sense.
- # [18:27] <TabAtkins> bradk: Some glyphs are taller than others.
- # [18:27] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: Yeah, but their em boxes are the same if their font-size is.
- # [18:27] <TabAtkins> bradk: Do we define "em box" anywhere?
- # [18:28] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: No. It's a standard definition in fonts, but we should probably add a token definition of it.
- # [18:28] <TabAtkins> glazou: So we more or less agree; who's going to write the proposal?
- # [18:28] <sylvaing> thought the leading was line-height-font-size and went on top/bottom of the content area where the glyphs go
- # [18:29] <TabAtkins> Bert: I guess we need some text that says we assume each glyph is defined relative to an "em box".
- # [18:29] <TabAtkins> fantasai: And we assume that the font-size is mapped to the em box.
- # [18:29] <fantasai> or rather, the em box is mapped to the font size
- # [18:29] <TabAtkins> ACTION Bert: Write proposal for issue 118.
- # [18:29] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
- # [18:29] * RRSAgent records action 2
- # [18:29] <trackbot> Created ACTION-233 - Write proposal for issue 118. [on Bert Bos - due 2010-06-02].
- # [18:30] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-122
- # [18:30] <TabAtkins> glazou: Next is issue 122, related to fonts.
- # [18:30] <TabAtkins> glazou: Reporter complains that the spec is redefining what "serif" and "sans serif" means.
- # [18:30] <TabAtkins> glazou: And we have a proposal from dbaron to solve that.
- # [18:31] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: Agreed with dbaron's proposal - fonts already know if they're serif or whatever, and we can just have a weak description of what the terms mean.
- # [18:31] <howcome> http://somuchpun.com/?s=serif
- # [18:31] <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Accept dbaron's proposal to resolve issue 122.
- # [18:32] <TabAtkins> ACTION Tab: Propose text for resolving issue 122.
- # [18:32] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
- # [18:32] * RRSAgent records action 3
- # [18:32] <trackbot> Created ACTION-234 - Propose text for resolving issue 122. [on Tab Atkins Jr. - due 2010-06-02].
- # [18:32] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-140
- # [18:34] <TabAtkins> glazou: I think david's proposal makes sense - it's probably the only way to solve this problem.
- # [18:35] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: I don't have a deep enough understanding of the core grammar to know how good of a solution dbaron's proposal is, or what a better one is.
- # [18:35] <TabAtkins> Bert: Another option, certainly, is to change the example that spawned the issue, and remove the braces from between the parens?
- # [18:36] <TabAtkins> glazou: People could still write that sort of thing, correct?
- # [18:36] <TabAtkins> Bert: Right, people can write things that can't be tokenized, and we just don't know what to do with them.
- # [18:37] <TabAtkins> glazou: I don't think that's a good enough solution.
- # [18:37] <TabAtkins> Bert: Do we want to define the meaning of every possible bytestream? I don't think that's needed.
- # [18:37] <TabAtkins> glazou: I think it would be useful. ^_^
- # [18:37] <TabAtkins> glazou: I recommend waiting for dbaron to attend a call and get his input.
- # [18:38] <TabAtkins> Bert: It's probably okay to allow braces inside parens, but I'm still a little bit afraid.
- # [18:38] <TabAtkins> glazou: We'll revisit next week, and move on for now.
- # [18:38] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-142
- # [18:39] * sylvaing the Boris/Tab thread is the bomb
- # [18:39] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: We do need a definition of what the "ancestor box" is, because Boris and I disagreed on that while discussing my abspos-in-tables issue.
- # [18:39] <TabAtkins> glazou: So what's suggested to rewrite?
- # [18:40] <TabAtkins> Bert: Make it clear what the ancestor box is in all contexts.
- # [18:40] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: Boris says 3 instances, and I'd *like* to depend on the definition of "ancestor box" in my table issue too.
- # [18:41] * sylvaing does, in his weaker moments, hope CSS gives box generation the HTML5 parsing algorithm treatment.
- # [18:41] <TabAtkins> Bert: If it's only in chapter 10, i can do it.
- # [18:41] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-144
- # [18:41] * TabAtkins wants to do that too.
- # [18:42] <smfr> yep
- # [18:42] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: I don't think we need to worry about 144 - it's pointed out that the reporter's results were from looking at it in quirks mode; the spec defines it precisely and all browsers agree in standards mode.
- # [18:42] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-145
- # [18:42] <TabAtkins> glazou: So no action on this. Any objections?
- # [18:42] <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: No action on 144 - not a problem.
- # [18:43] <TabAtkins> fantasai: The i18nWG has been going back and forth on issue 145 for a while.
- # [18:44] <TabAtkins> fantasai: We probably need to defer this for them.
- # [18:44] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-147
- # [18:44] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: i18n is having a meeting for bidi in html second week of june that elika and i are attending. We can make sure it's discussed then.
- # [18:45] <TabAtkins> fantasai: It makes sense to recommend scaling for images, but not necessarily for java applets, etc.
- # [18:45] <TabAtkins> fantasai: Sometimes you just want to rescale the box and just tell the replaced element to redraw itself in the new space.
- # [18:46] <TabAtkins> fantasai: Frex, java applet or iframe.
- # [18:46] <TabAtkins> fantasai: So I don't think it makes sense to specify how a replaced element draws in normative terms here.
- # [18:46] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: Agreed.
- # [18:47] <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: No change for issue 147
- # [18:47] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-153
- # [18:48] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: I think the test case just needs to be updated, no spec change, right?
- # [18:48] <TabAtkins> glazou: elika says the spec is vague.
- # [18:49] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: Ah, yes, I see that now.
- # [18:50] <TabAtkins> glazou: Any objections to elika's proposal?
- # [18:50] <TabAtkins> arronei: That means the test case needs to be updated too.
- # [18:50] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: Elika already provided an updated test case.
- # [18:50] <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Accept Elika's proposal to resolve issue 153.
- # [18:50] <TabAtkins> Action Elika: Write text for 153.
- # [18:50] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
- # [18:50] * RRSAgent records action 4
- # [18:50] <trackbot> Created ACTION-235 - Write text for 153. [on Elika Etemad - due 2010-06-02].
- # [18:51] <fantasai> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Dec/0322.html
- # [18:51] <TabAtkins> fantasai: Wrt the previous issue, 147, there's an email not tracked in the issue list pointing out a sentence that doesn't make any sense at all.
- # [18:52] * sylvaing YES! I could never understand this.
- # [18:52] <fantasai> fantasai: I think it should be removed, and Tantek agrees.
- # [18:52] <TabAtkins> Bert: I don't see what's wrong with it.
- # [18:52] * sylvaing ...now imagine documenting to the EU whether/how you comply with this one
- # [18:52] <TabAtkins> fantasai: If you specify a height, the width of the replaced element's box may not be intrinsic.
- # [18:52] <TabAtkins> Bert: Oh, in that sense.
- # [18:53] <TabAtkins> fantasai: It's weird, and it doesn't add anything since everything is otherwise specified. So I think we should just remove it.
- # [18:53] <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Remove the offending sentence in visudet.
- # [18:54] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-157
- # [18:55] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: I don't think it's circular. I think it can look like it to a surface reading, but it's just a statement of constraints.
- # [18:55] <TabAtkins> glazou: dbaron and bert have long messages explaining why it's not circular.
- # [18:55] <TabAtkins> fantasai: Bert has a nice examle that I think would clarify things.
- # [18:55] <TabAtkins> glazou: Can you add the example to the spec?
- # [18:56] <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Add Bert's example about clearance, otherwise no change for issue 157.
- # [18:56] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-158
- # [18:56] <TabAtkins> ACTION Bert: Add example about clearance for issue 157.
- # [18:56] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
- # [18:56] * RRSAgent records action 5
- # [18:56] <trackbot> Created ACTION-236 - Add example about clearance for issue 157. [on Bert Bos - due 2010-06-02].
- # [18:59] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: This isn't even a change, just a clarification.
- # [18:59] <TabAtkins> ACTION Tab: Suggest text to resolve issue 158.
- # [18:59] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
- # [18:59] * RRSAgent records action 6
- # [18:59] <trackbot> Created ACTION-237 - Suggest text to resolve issue 158. [on Tab Atkins Jr. - due 2010-06-02].
- # [18:59] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-159
- # [19:00] <TabAtkins> TabAtkins: dbaron already has some rough text to resolve the issue.
- # [19:00] <TabAtkins> fantasai: I can take this; I'll probably be doing other margin-related things anyway.
- # [19:00] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-114
- # [19:00] <TabAtkins> ACTION Elika: Propose text to resolve 114.
- # [19:00] * RRSAgent records action 7
- # [19:00] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
- # [19:00] <trackbot> Created ACTION-238 - Propose text to resolve 114. [on Elika Etemad - due 2010-06-02].
- # [19:01] <TabAtkins> glazou: Anyone know what SVG is doing about 114?
- # [19:01] <TabAtkins> arronei: Chris sent me a message about it yesterday.
- # [19:01] <TabAtkins> glazou: So they're working on it, excellent.
- # [19:02] <Zakim> -arronei
- # [19:02] <Zakim> -smfr
- # [19:02] <Zakim> -fantasai
- # [19:02] * Parts: smfr (smfr@72.25.91.23)
- # [19:02] * fantasai will not be on the call next week
- # [19:02] <Zakim> -howcome
- # [19:02] * Quits: bradk (bradk@67.188.133.45) (Quit: Get MacIrssi - http://www.sysctl.co.uk/projects/macirssi/ )
- # [19:02] <Zakim> -CesarAcebal
- # [19:02] <Zakim> -bradk
- # [19:02] <Zakim> -Bert
- # [19:02] <glazou> Zakim, who is on the phone
- # [19:02] <Zakim> I don't understand 'who is on the phone', glazou
- # [19:03] <TabAtkins> Zakim, who's here?
- # [19:03] <Zakim> On the phone I see plinss, glazou, TabAtkins, sylvaing
- # [19:03] <Zakim> On IRC I see howcome, alexmog, murakami, oyvind, sylvaing, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou, Curt`, DanC, CesarAcebal, plinss_, arronei, anne, krijnh, Hixie, karl, lhnz, jdaggett_afk,
- # [19:03] <Zakim> ... lgombos, TabAtkins, jgraham, fantasai, plinss, Bert, trackbot
- # [19:03] <plinss_> zakim, drop sylvaing
- # [19:03] <Zakim> sylvaing is being disconnected
- # [19:03] <Zakim> -sylvaing
- # [19:07] <Zakim> -TabAtkins
- # [19:07] <Zakim> -glazou
- # [19:07] <Zakim> -plinss
- # [19:07] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended
- # [19:07] <Zakim> Attendees were plinss, glazou, +49.238.aaaa, CesarAcebal, Bert, TabAtkins, arronei, sylvaing, smfr, fantasai, bradk, +47.23.69.aabb, howcome
- # [19:07] * Quits: CesarAcebal (acebal@193.51.208.72) (Quit: CesarAcebal)
- # [19:07] * Quits: glazou (glazou@82.247.96.19) (Quit: glazou)
- # [19:09] * Parts: murakami (murakami@118.154.209.3) (Leaving...)
- # [19:11] * Quits: arronei (arronei@131.107.0.69) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:11] * Quits: howcome (howcome@77.16.255.168) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:16] * Joins: arronei (arronei@131.107.0.81)
- # [19:19] * Quits: sylvaing (sylvaing@76.104.131.10) (Quit: sylvaing)
- # [19:24] * Quits: oyvind (oyvinds@213.236.208.22) (Quit: oyvind)
- # [21:20] * Zakim excuses himself; his presence no longer seems to be needed
- # [21:20] * Parts: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.169)
- # [22:00] * Joins: jdaggett (jdaggett@118.243.224.63)
- # [23:05] * Quits: jdaggett (jdaggett@118.243.224.63) (Ping timeout)
- # [23:06] * Joins: jdaggett (jdaggett@118.243.224.63)
- # [23:19] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.59.50)
- # [23:20] * Joins: shepazu (schepers@128.30.52.169)
- # Session Close: Thu May 27 00:00:00 2010
The end :)