Options:
- # Session Start: Wed Jul 28 00:00:00 2010
- # Session Ident: #css
- # [00:23] * Quits: ChrisL (ChrisL@128.30.52.169) (Quit: Fire on main board error, client combusted)
- # [02:32] * Joins: Curt`` (DorkeyDear@76.241.81.242)
- # [02:32] * Quits: Curt` (DorkeyDear@76.241.81.242) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [02:39] * Joins: dydx (dydz@76.199.100.149)
- # [02:43] * Quits: dydx (dydz@76.199.100.149) (Quit: dydx)
- # [03:56] * Quits: nimbupani (nimbupani@24.22.131.46) (Quit: nimbupani)
- # [03:58] * Joins: nimbupani (nimbupani@24.22.131.46)
- # [04:59] * Joins: dydx (dydz@173.228.64.221)
- # [05:41] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@63.245.220.240) (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
- # [06:05] * Joins: jdaggett (jdaggett@202.221.217.73)
- # [06:20] * Joins: paul_irish (paul_irish@76.21.40.62)
- # [06:52] * Quits: dydx (dydz@173.228.64.221) (Quit: dydx)
- # [07:38] * Quits: nimbupani (nimbupani@24.22.131.46) (Quit: nimbupani)
- # [08:11] * Quits: Curt`` (DorkeyDear@76.241.81.242) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [08:16] * Quits: paul_irish (paul_irish@76.21.40.62) (Client exited)
- # [08:32] * Joins: dydx (dydz@76.199.100.149)
- # [09:35] * Quits: dydx (dydz@76.199.100.149) (Quit: dydx)
- # [13:38] * Joins: ASG (ASG@90.197.62.84)
- # [13:43] <ASG> does anyone know how to keep and extra wide data table constrained inside it's containing div?
- # [14:03] * Parts: ASG (ASG@90.197.62.84)
- # [15:04] * Joins: miketaylr (miketaylr@38.117.156.163)
- # [15:55] * Quits: miketaylr (miketaylr@38.117.156.163) (Client exited)
- # [16:00] * Joins: miketaylr (miketaylr@38.117.156.163)
- # [16:06] * Quits: jdaggett (jdaggett@202.221.217.73) (Quit: jdaggett)
- # [16:24] * Joins: paul_irish (paul_irish@76.21.40.62)
- # [16:53] * Joins: dydx (dydz@76.199.100.149)
- # [17:25] * Joins: nimbupani (nimbupani@24.22.131.46)
- # [17:42] * Joins: jdaggett (jdaggett@183.77.242.62)
- # [17:43] * Joins: glazou (glazou@82.247.96.19)
- # [17:43] * Joins: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.169)
- # [17:43] * Joins: RRSAgent (rrs-loggee@128.30.52.169)
- # [17:43] <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/07/28-CSS-irc
- # [17:43] <glazou> Zakim, this will be Style
- # [17:43] <Zakim> ok, glazou; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 19 minutes
- # [17:43] <glazou> RRSAgent, make logs public
- # [17:43] <RRSAgent> I have made the request, glazou
- # [17:48] * Quits: arronei (arronei@131.107.0.84) (Client exited)
- # [17:49] * Joins: arronei (arronei@131.107.0.76)
- # [17:52] * Quits: dydx (dydz@76.199.100.149) (Quit: dydx)
- # [17:57] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@98.234.51.190)
- # [17:58] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started
- # [17:58] <Zakim> +glazou
- # [17:59] <Zakim> + +1.650.214.aaaa
- # [18:00] * Joins: TabAtkin1_ (tabatkins@216.239.45.4)
- # [18:00] <glazou> Zakim, aaaa is TabAtkin1_
- # [18:00] <Zakim> +TabAtkin1_; got it
- # [18:00] <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
- # [18:00] <arronei> zakim, microsoft is me
- # [18:00] <Zakim> +arronei; got it
- # [18:01] <Zakim> +plinss_
- # [18:03] <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
- # [18:03] <Zakim> + +1.415.738.aabb
- # [18:04] <jdaggett> zakim: +1.415.738.aabb is jdaggett
- # [18:04] * Joins: ChrisL (ChrisL@128.30.52.169)
- # [18:04] <jdaggett> Zakim: aabb is jdaggett
- # [18:05] <jdaggett> Zakim: are you alive?
- # [18:05] * Joins: CesarAcebal (acebal@85.152.177.64)
- # [18:05] <Zakim> +??P29
- # [18:05] <TabAtkin1_> zakim, aabb is jdaggett
- # [18:05] <Zakim> +jdaggett; got it
- # [18:05] <Zakim> +??P27
- # [18:05] <ChrisL> zakim, ??P27 is me
- # [18:05] <Zakim> +ChrisL; got it
- # [18:06] <jdaggett> zakim, mute jdaggett
- # [18:06] <Zakim> jdaggett should now be muted
- # [18:07] <Zakim> +smfr
- # [18:07] * Joins: smfr (smfr@72.25.91.23)
- # [18:07] <Zakim> + +34.60.940.aacc
- # [18:08] <glazou> Zakim, aacc is CesarAcebal
- # [18:08] <Zakim> +CesarAcebal; got it
- # [18:08] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/planning/oslo-2010
- # [18:08] <fantasai> ScribeNick: fantasai
- # [18:08] <jdaggett> zakim, unmute me
- # [18:08] <Zakim> jdaggett should no longer be muted
- # [18:09] <Zakim> +David_Baron
- # [18:09] <fantasai> glazou: F2F coming up, only a few topics listed on agenda
- # [18:09] <ChrisL> http://www.w3.org/Style/Group/2010/Oslo.html
- # [18:09] <fantasai> glazou: Anyone have other topics?
- # [18:09] <Zakim> + +1.334.923.aadd
- # [18:09] <ChrisL> q+
- # [18:09] * Zakim sees ChrisL on the speaker queue
- # [18:09] <Zakim> -smfr
- # [18:10] * Joins: bradk (bradk@67.188.133.45)
- # [18:10] <smfr> oops
- # [18:10] * Bert sorry for the delay, trouble with zakim...
- # [18:10] <fantasai> ChrisL: We need to recharter, so we need to discuss what's going into the next charter period
- # [18:10] <ChrisL> ack ChrisL
- # [18:10] * Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
- # [18:10] <fantasai> jdaggett: I'd like to talk about CSS3 font feature support
- # [18:10] <Zakim> +smfr
- # [18:10] <fantasai> glazou: Please add to the wiki page the length of time you need for the discussion
- # [18:10] <fantasai> glazou: Anything else? Ok let's move back to CSS2.1 issues
- # [18:11] <fantasai> Topic: CSS2.1 Issues
- # [18:11] <jdaggett> zakim, mute me
- # [18:11] <Zakim> jdaggett should now be muted
- # [18:11] <fantasai> glazou: We have a few follow ups from previous weeks, and also a few issues from you
- # [18:11] * bradk is having computer problems. Can't launch anything since updating Safari, including Google voice. This message sent through my phone.
- # [18:12] <fantasai> bert: I posted a list of issues I edited
- # [18:12] <fantasai> bert: Issue 86 is a problem, just sent an email about that
- # [18:12] <Zakim> +SteveZ
- # [18:12] <fantasai> bert: My task for 86 was about the position of the list marker box, and my task was to tweak the text and make an edit, but after I tried and fantasai responded to that I wasn't sure what I was supposed to do there.
- # [18:13] * Joins: szilles (chatzilla@71.83.115.240)
- # [18:13] <fantasai> bert: Wanted to discuss how far exactly the marker should be undefined
- # [18:13] <fantasai> bert: the marker is supposed to be outside the box
- # [18:13] <fantasai> bert: we decided it doesn't scroll
- # [18:13] <fantasai> bert: we decided it's on the left for ltr and on the right for rtl
- # [18:13] <fantasai> bert: we decided the marker could create a first line if there wasn't one
- # [18:14] <fantasai> bert: For 86 we decided it would be undefined
- # [18:14] <fantasai> bert: the issue was for floats and centering
- # [18:14] <Zakim> -smfr
- # [18:14] <Zakim> +smfr
- # [18:15] <fantasai> fantasai: It should only be defined for cases where the start of the inline content is not at the start edge of the containing block
- # [18:15] <fantasai> fantasai: i.e. in the presence of floats
- # [18:15] <fantasai> fantasai: And when text-align: center or end (or equivalent)
- # [18:17] <fantasai> bert: We do have implementations that leave the bullet on the outside edge in the presence of text-align
- # [18:17] <Zakim> +bradk
- # [18:17] * TabAtkin1_ 's guests showed up sooner than expected - I'll have to leave.
- # [18:17] <glazou> np TabAtkin1_
- # [18:17] <Zakim> -TabAtkin1_
- # [18:18] * Joins: bradk_ (bradk@67.188.133.45)
- # [18:18] <fantasai> dbaron: I thought some people wanted the bullet to move with text-align
- # [18:18] <fantasai> bert: On the mailing list people said that should be handled by position: inside
- # [18:19] * dbaron thinks there's actually a good bit of interop in the floats case too
- # [18:20] * glazou thinks we should test interactive properties only with batch processors :-)
- # [18:21] <fantasai> fantasai: If we have implementations for the text-align case, then let's just undefine the case for floats
- # [18:23] <fantasai> fantasai: We do want to leave the marker alone in text-align for CSS3; the bidi group concluded that was desireable for certain cases
- # [18:24] <fantasai> RESOLVED: Leave text-align case defined, position of bullet in presence of floats undefined for issue 86
- # [18:24] <fantasai> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-110
- # [18:25] <fantasai> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jul/0404.html
- # [18:25] <fantasai> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jul/0372.html
- # [18:25] <TabAtkin1_> At this point I'm just going to go with what Elika suggested.
- # [18:26] <glazou> TabAtkin1_: go with your guests !
- # [18:26] <fantasai> fantasai: My action item is done, proposed text as bz wanted
- # [18:27] <fantasai> Bert: I don't like it, but I guess it's not that common
- # [18:28] <dbaron> I'm deferring to bz
- # [18:29] <fantasai> fantasai: my position is the same as Bert's. I don't like it, but if we have to do it, we have to do it
- # [18:29] <fantasai> SteveZ: Mine is the same
- # [18:29] <fantasai> RESOLVED: Accept bz's proposal
- # [18:29] * glazou needs water
- # [18:30] <glazou> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-118
- # [18:31] <jdaggett> zakim, unmute me
- # [18:31] <Zakim> jdaggett should no longer be muted
- # [18:31] <glazou> what was that noise??
- # [18:32] <jdaggett> zakim, mute me
- # [18:32] <Zakim> jdaggett should now be muted
- # [18:32] <fantasai> fantasai: I think the next text is fine. I agree with Anton that it's a little confusing about whether leading affects the content box area
- # [18:32] <dbaron> Is the term "em-box" defined? Should it be?
- # [18:33] <fantasai> Bert: That's explicitly undefined, so I tried to avoid talking about it
- # [18:33] * fantasai notes dbaron's comment comes after Bert's
- # [18:33] <fantasai> Bert: This is not the first time the em box appears in the text. I don't think we have a formal definition of it
- # [18:33] <ChrisL> if em box is used then it should be defined
- # [18:35] <Bert> (10.6.1. says the height of the content area is explicitly undefiend, that's why I didn't talk about content box in issue 118.)
- # [18:36] <fantasai> SteveZ: I don't think anyone's disagreeing with the text, but what the right way to say where the spacing goes
- # [18:36] <fantasai> SteveZ: The problem has to do with describing where the extra leading occurs
- # [18:37] <fantasai> Bert: We need some measure of what gets centered. It's not the ink of the glyph, because that maybe far outside the em box
- # [18:38] <ChrisL> http://www.d.umn.edu/~lcarlson/csswork/inline/embox.html
- # [18:38] <fantasai> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#font-size-props
- # [18:39] <bradk_> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=safari&rls=en&q=define%3A+em+box&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
- # [18:39] <ChrisL> The em-box is the theoretical box (or square) around a font character of a given 'size' as designed by the font designer. It is sometimes referred to as an em-square. It is the theoretical square that glyphs are designed upon. Its height is the intended distance between lines of type in the same type size. In other words its height is the distance between baselines when the font is set without any extra leading (line-height).
- # [18:40] <fantasai> SteveZ: I would prefer a definition from the font specs
- # [18:40] <ChrisL> http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/inline-format.html
- # [18:40] <fantasai> ChrisL: That's taken from a discussion of fonts in the context of CSS. Let me get another one.
- # [18:40] <fantasai> fantasai notes we'd have to get permission from the author
- # [18:41] <fantasai> dbaron: The other thing here is that you need something that both has a measurement, and one that provides a position with respect to the baseline
- # [18:41] <fantasai> SteveZ: That's why I want to go back and check with the font guys
- # [18:42] <fantasai> glazou: ok, deferred to next week
- # [18:43] <ChrisL> actually we don't need permission since that definition is drawn from CSS2
- # [18:43] <fantasai> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-120
- # [18:43] <ChrisL> Certain values, such as width metrics, are expressed in units that are relative to an abstract square whose height is the intended distance between lines of type in the same type size. This square is called the em square and it is the design grid on which the glyph outlines are defined.
- # [18:43] <ChrisL> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-CSS2-20080411/fonts.html#emsq
- # [18:43] <fantasai> heh, nice
- # [18:43] <szilles> dbaron: sometimes things are expressed in terms of "ascent" and "descent" which are positioned metrics
- # [18:44] <dbaron> szilles, yeah, that's how our code works :-)
- # [18:44] <fantasai> glazou: Has anyone reviewed this?
- # [18:44] <fantasai> No response
- # [18:45] <fantasai> glazou: I give one week to everyone to review this and if there's no response it's accepted
- # [18:45] <fantasai> ACTION: Everyone - one week to review proposal for 120
- # [18:45] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
- # [18:45] <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - Everyone
- # [18:45] * RRSAgent records action 1
- # [18:45] * Quits: TabAtkins_ (tabatkins@216.239.45.4) (Ping timeout)
- # [18:45] * Quits: TabAtkin1_ (tabatkins@216.239.45.4) (Ping timeout)
- # [18:45] <fantasai> glazou: issue 137
- # [18:45] <fantasai> fantasai: need to discuss with bzbarsky
- # [18:45] * Joins: TabAtkins_ (tabatkins@216.239.45.4)
- # [18:45] * Joins: TabAtkin1_ (tabatkins@216.239.45.4)
- # [18:46] <jdaggett> zakim, unmute me
- # [18:46] <Zakim> jdaggett should no longer be muted
- # [18:46] <fantasai> glazou: issue 154 open to jdaggett, arronei, and zwol (zack)
- # [18:46] <fantasai> jdaggett: Arron pinged me, but I don't know what we want to come up with
- # [18:46] <fantasai> arronei: I'll talk to you right after the meeting if you have time?
- # [18:46] <Zakim> -plinss_
- # [18:46] <fantasai> jdaggett: Maybe tomorrow morning / late afternoon your time?
- # [18:47] <fantasai> arronei: ping me when you're available tomorrow
- # [18:47] * dbaron thinks jdaggett means tomorrow for Japan and today for US :-)
- # [18:47] <Zakim> +plinss_
- # [18:47] * jdaggett it's 2am which means today is today everywhere!
- # [18:48] <fantasai> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-166
- # [18:48] * glazou thinks at 7pm I don't care about "today" but only about "dinner" and "off work" :)
- # [18:48] * glazou or at least my kids will remind me so
- # [18:49] <fantasai> Bert: The diff looks good, and is very easy to apply for me. :)
- # [18:49] <fantasai> Bert: I suggest we accept it
- # [18:49] <fantasai> glazou: Other thoughts?
- # [18:50] * glazou is lost in Bert's values and values :-)
- # [18:50] <smfr> -property does not accept percentages as values.
- # [18:50] <smfr> +property does not accept percentages in its values.
- # [18:50] <jdaggett> zakim, mute me
- # [18:50] <Zakim> jdaggett should now be muted
- # [18:51] <fantasai> glazou: No objection?
- # [18:51] <fantasai> RESOLVED: Proposal accepted for CSS2.1 Issue 166
- # [18:51] <fantasai> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-167
- # [18:52] * Quits: ChrisL (ChrisL@128.30.52.169) (Client exited)
- # [18:52] <fantasai> dbaron: Zack said he'd respond with another proposal. Maybe he did and we forgot to put it on the issues list?
- # [18:53] <fantasai> fantasai: Latest message from him on that is 15 July
- # [18:54] <fantasai> glazou: Ok, add to wiki and action everyone to review for next week
- # [18:54] <fantasai> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-170
- # [18:55] <fantasai> dbaron: There was some amount of agreement on leaving things undefined, question is what things exactly we want to leave undefined
- # [18:55] <fantasai> glazou: I remember that web designers expect these properties to apply to cells and rows
- # [18:56] <fantasai> glazou: If we disable them, we should explain it very carefully.
- # [18:56] <fantasai> glazou: Let's defer and wait for Tab
- # [18:57] <bradk_> Both Tab and I had posted to the list about the TD TR max-height min0height thing...
- # [18:59] <fantasai> RESOLVED: Add missing values from writing-mode in SVG to CSS
- # [19:00] <bradk_> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jul/0052.html
- # [19:00] <jdaggett> already added agenda items to the oslo f2f agenda page
- # [19:00] <fantasai> Meeting closed
- # [19:00] <Zakim> -[Microsoft]
- # [19:01] <Zakim> -jdaggett
- # [19:01] <Zakim> -smfr
- # [19:01] <Zakim> -ChrisL
- # [19:01] <Zakim> -David_Baron
- # [19:01] <Zakim> -arronei
- # [19:01] <Zakim> -glazou
- # [19:01] <Zakim> -CesarAcebal
- # [19:01] <Zakim> -plinss_
- # [19:01] * Quits: glazou (glazou@82.247.96.19) (Quit: glazou)
- # [19:01] <Zakim> -bradk
- # [19:01] <Zakim> -SteveZ
- # [19:01] <Zakim> - +1.334.923.aadd
- # [19:01] <Zakim> -??P29
- # [19:01] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended
- # [19:01] <Zakim> Attendees were glazou, +1.650.214.aaaa, TabAtkin1_, arronei, plinss_, [Microsoft], +1.415.738.aabb, jdaggett, ChrisL, smfr, +34.60.940.aacc, CesarAcebal, David_Baron,
- # [19:01] <Zakim> ... +1.334.923.aadd, SteveZ, bradk
- # [19:02] * Parts: smfr (smfr@72.25.91.23)
- # [19:02] <fantasai> who was +34, +1.650 and +1.334 ?
- # [19:02] * Quits: bradk_ (bradk@67.188.133.45) (Quit: Get MacIrssi - http://www.sysctl.co.uk/projects/macirssi/ )
- # [19:04] <Bert> Hmm, I was certainly there, but Zakim didn't recognize me?
- # [19:04] <fantasai> So +34 was probably you?
- # [19:04] <dbaron> maybe 334?
- # [19:04] <dbaron> +1.334. is southern Alabama
- # [19:04] <dbaron> but maybe it was really +33.4. ?
- # [19:05] <dbaron> +34 is Spain
- # [19:06] <Bert> I must have been the +1.334.923.aadd then.
- # [19:11] * Quits: bradk (bradk@67.188.133.45) (Client exited)
- # [19:13] <CesarAcebal> +34.60.940.aacc was me (calling from Skype but it's configured with my mobile phone number, and +34 is effectively Spain). I don't know why zakim has listed me twice (both by name and with my number).
- # [19:13] <Bert> I don't know about the +1, but my number starts with +334923... and that was the number that zakim reported just before my first message on IRC. (I was late, because Zakim gave me a busy tone at first.)
- # [19:14] <dbaron> The attendees list doesn't remove the original when you say "aacc is CesarAcebal"
- # [19:14] <dbaron> ...so you were listed twice.
- # [19:15] <Bert> Zakim has Cesar twice, because glazou told zakim that +34... was you, and zakim has the habit of only adding particiapnts to the list and never removing them.
- # [19:16] * Joins: Curt` (DorkeyDear@76.241.81.242)
- # [19:17] * Quits: jdaggett (jdaggett@183.77.242.62) (Quit: jdaggett)
- # [19:17] <Bert> Glazou also made 650=Tab, so Tab is there twice, too.
- # [19:18] <CesarAcebal> I see. I thought that in that case only the name and not the number appeared. Thanks!
- # [19:18] <Bert> Zakim normally remembers the assignment, so in theory, next time it should only list the name.
- # [19:19] <Bert> (But, in theory, it should also have known me...)
- # [19:19] <CesarAcebal> I know, but in my case not always work, and I suppose that it is because I don't always call with the same number.
- # [19:19] <CesarAcebal> :)
- # [19:31] * Quits: CesarAcebal (acebal@85.152.177.64) (Quit: CesarAcebal)
- # [19:52] * Quits: shepazu (schepers@128.30.52.169) (Quit: Core Breach)
- # [20:02] * Joins: shepazu (schepers@128.30.52.169)
- # [21:16] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@98.234.51.190) (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
- # [21:17] * Zakim excuses himself; his presence no longer seems to be needed
- # [21:17] * Parts: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.169)
- # [21:39] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@63.245.220.240)
- # [22:15] * Quits: TabAtkins_ (tabatkins@216.239.45.4) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:15] * Quits: TabAtkin1_ (tabatkins@216.239.45.4) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:18] * Joins: TabAtkins_ (tabatkins@216.239.45.4)
- # [23:03] * Quits: miketaylr (miketaylr@38.117.156.163) (Client exited)
- # [23:19] * Joins: jdaggett (jdaggett@183.77.242.62)
- # Session Close: Thu Jul 29 00:00:00 2010
The end :)