Options:
- # Session Start: Wed Mar 30 00:00:00 2011
- # Session Ident: #css
- # [00:11] * Quits: arno (arno@192.150.10.200) (Ping timeout)
- # [00:20] * Joins: arno (arno@192.150.10.200)
- # [00:35] * Quits: arno (arno@192.150.10.200) (Quit: Leaving.)
- # [01:19] * Joins: sylvaing (sylvaing@98.232.9.174)
- # [02:09] * Joins: szilles (chatzilla@192.150.10.200)
- # [02:17] * Joins: murakami (murakami@118.154.209.3)
- # [02:19] * Quits: kennyluck (kennyluck@128.30.52.169) (Quit: kennyluck)
- # [03:13] * Quits: szilles (chatzilla@192.150.10.200) (Ping timeout)
- # [03:17] * Joins: szilles (chatzilla@192.150.10.200)
- # [03:25] * Quits: szilles (chatzilla@192.150.10.200) (Ping timeout)
- # [03:27] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@63.245.220.240) (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
- # [03:56] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@173.228.28.143)
- # [04:22] * Joins: Arron (arronei@131.107.0.74)
- # [04:23] * Quits: arronei (arronei@131.107.0.85) (Ping timeout)
- # [04:26] * Joins: jdaggett (jdaggett@202.221.217.73)
- # [05:17] * Quits: sylvaing (sylvaing@98.232.9.174) (Ping timeout)
- # [05:37] <jdaggett> fantasai: ding-a-ling
- # [06:00] <fantasai> jdaggett: pong
- # [06:32] * Joins: mollydotcom (mollyh@68.225.52.230)
- # [06:37] * Quits: murakami (murakami@118.154.209.3) (Quit: Leaving...)
- # [07:03] * Quits: jdaggett (jdaggett@202.221.217.73) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [07:08] * Joins: jdaggett (jdaggett@202.221.217.73)
- # [07:56] * Joins: szilles (chatzilla@24.6.120.172)
- # [07:56] * Quits: szilles (chatzilla@24.6.120.172) (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.86.1 [Firefox 4.0/20110318052756])
- # [08:43] * Joins: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@91.181.134.12)
- # [08:52] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@173.228.28.143) (Ping timeout)
- # [09:30] <fantasai> Bert: I couldn't find the Changes for the {u}{r}{l} fix
- # [09:30] <fantasai> Bert: But there is a record of the original change from url()
- # [09:32] <fantasai> Bert: nm, I forgot to reload :)
- # [09:37] <fantasai> Bert: ok, edits checked
- # [09:41] <fantasai> meh, the DoC is out of date
- # [09:41] <fantasai> stay up and review or go to bed and do it tomorrow?
- # [09:41] * fantasai looks for a quarter
- # [09:42] <jdaggett> bed is always the best option
- # [09:42] <jdaggett> ;P
- # [09:42] <fantasai> but the eurocent says to stay up...
- # [09:43] <jdaggett> meh
- # [09:43] <fantasai> I'll go to bed.
- # [09:43] <fantasai> Not very awake
- # [09:43] <fantasai> want to curl up in the couch and naptime....
- # [10:08] * Quits: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@91.181.134.12) (Ping timeout)
- # [10:23] * Joins: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@91.181.196.94)
- # [10:31] * Joins: test (4de003c4@109.169.29.95)
- # [10:34] * Quits: test (4de003c4@109.169.29.95) (Quit: http://www.mibbit.com ajax IRC Client)
- # [10:39] * Quits: jdaggett (jdaggett@202.221.217.73) (Quit: jdaggett)
- # [11:16] * Quits: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@91.181.196.94) (Quit: bbl)
- # [13:34] * Joins: kennyluck (kennyluck@128.30.52.169)
- # [14:39] * Joins: jdaggett (jdaggett@118.243.227.145)
- # [15:31] * Quits: lhnz (lhnz@188.223.83.48) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [16:13] * Joins: lhnz (lhnz@188.223.83.48)
- # [17:05] * Quits: lhnz (lhnz@188.223.83.48) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [17:08] * Joins: lhnz (lhnz@188.223.83.48)
- # [17:08] * Joins: kojiishi (kojiishi@222.158.227.129)
- # [17:20] * Joins: glazou (glazou@82.247.96.19)
- # [17:20] * Joins: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.169)
- # [17:20] * Joins: RRSAgent (rrs-loggee@128.30.52.169)
- # [17:20] <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/03/30-css-irc
- # [17:20] <glazou> Zakim, this will be Style
- # [17:20] <Zakim> ok, glazou; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 43 minutes
- # [17:20] <glazou> RRSAgent, make logs public
- # [17:20] <RRSAgent> I have made the request, glazou
- # [17:22] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@173.228.28.143)
- # [17:33] * Joins: arno (arno@192.150.10.200)
- # [17:46] * Joins: antonp (4de003c4@109.169.29.95)
- # [17:47] * Parts: glazou (glazou@82.247.96.19)
- # [17:51] * Joins: glazou (glazou@82.247.96.19)
- # [17:51] * Joins: sylvaing (sylvaing@98.232.9.174)
- # [17:51] <glazou> salut sylvaing
- # [17:52] <sylvaing> hello!
- # [17:53] * Joins: alexmog (alexmog@131.107.0.102)
- # [17:54] <kennyluck> kojiishi, I was referring to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156881
- # [17:54] <kennyluck> especially https://bug156881.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=94217
- # [17:55] <kennyluck> Are you saying that Italian typography also has this?
- # [17:59] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started
- # [17:59] <Zakim> +plinss
- # [18:00] <Zakim> + +1.415.738.aaaa
- # [18:00] <Zakim> -plinss
- # [18:00] <Zakim> +plinss
- # [18:01] <Zakim> + +1.206.324.aabb
- # [18:01] * Joins: stearns (stearns@192.150.22.5)
- # [18:01] <plinss> zakim, aaaa is jdaggett
- # [18:01] <Zakim> +jdaggett; got it
- # [18:01] <Zakim> +hober
- # [18:01] <plinss> Zakim, aabb is sylvaing
- # [18:01] <Zakim> +sylvaing; got it
- # [18:01] * Joins: duga (duga@74.125.59.129)
- # [18:02] <Zakim> +stearns
- # [18:02] <Zakim> + +1.949.654.aacc
- # [18:03] <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
- # [18:03] * Joins: johnjan (qw3birc@128.30.52.28)
- # [18:03] <johnjan> zakim, microsoft has johnjan
- # [18:03] <Zakim> +johnjan; got it
- # [18:03] <Zakim> +[Microsoft.a]
- # [18:03] <duga> zakim, +1.949.654.aacc is duga
- # [18:03] <Zakim> +duga; got it
- # [18:03] <Arron> zakim, microsoft has me
- # [18:03] <Zakim> +Arron; got it
- # [18:03] <Zakim> +??P43
- # [18:04] <glazou> Zakim, ??PP43 is me
- # [18:04] <Zakim> sorry, glazou, I do not recognize a party named '??PP43'
- # [18:04] <Zakim> +arno
- # [18:04] * Joins: oyvind (oyvinds@213.236.208.22)
- # [18:04] * Joins: Cathy (qw3birc@128.30.52.28)
- # [18:04] <plinss> http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/info/name.php3
- # [18:04] <glazou> Zakim, ??P43 is me
- # [18:04] * Quits: Arron (arronei@131.107.0.74) (Quit: Arron)
- # [18:04] * Joins: arronei (arronei@131.107.0.74)
- # [18:04] <Zakim> +glazou; got it
- # [18:05] <Zakim> +David_Baron
- # [18:05] <Zakim> +??P50
- # [18:05] <kojiishi> zakim, ??P50 is me
- # [18:05] <Cathy> Present+ Cathy_Chan
- # [18:05] <Zakim> +kojiishi; got it
- # [18:07] <Zakim> +Bert
- # [18:07] <Zakim> + +1.415.920.aadd
- # [18:07] <Zakim> +Cathy
- # [18:07] * Joins: smfr (smfr@173.228.90.67)
- # [18:07] <plinss> zakim, aadd is fantasai
- # [18:07] <Zakim> +fantasai; got it
- # [18:08] <Zakim> + +1.408.636.aaee
- # [18:08] <smfr> Zakim, aaee is me
- # [18:08] <Zakim> +smfr; got it
- # [18:09] <fantasai> ScribeNick: fantasai
- # [18:09] <fantasai> plinss: Anything to add to agenda?
- # [18:09] * alexmog in arron's office
- # [18:09] <fantasai> glazou: We need to collect testimonials for CSS2.1
- # [18:10] <fantasai> glazou: Each member should ping their AC rep about that
- # [18:10] <fantasai> smfr: What's a testimonial?
- # [18:10] <fantasai> glazou: It's just one paragraph about how Apple is happy about the release of CSS2.1 and it's going to change the world and their strategy, etc.
- # [18:11] <fantasai> Topic: F2F meeting
- # [18:11] <fantasai> plinss: got an email from Koji this morning
- # [18:11] <glazou> kojiishi, your are VERY noisy
- # [18:11] <fantasai> koji: That's all the info I have.
- # [18:11] * Joins: bradk (bradk@99.7.175.117)
- # [18:12] * dbaron heard kojiishi just fine
- # [18:12] <fantasai> koji: If there are many concerns, we can look for locations in Osaka area which is safer
- # [18:12] <fantasai> plinss: Everyone read the email?
- # [18:12] <Zakim> +bradk
- # [18:12] <fantasai> glazou: Personally I prefer avoiding Japan at this time.
- # [18:12] <fantasai> jdaggett: Could you explain?
- # [18:13] <fantasai> glazou: First I have a veto from my family.
- # [18:13] <fantasai> glazou: Second, flights are chaotic at this time. E.g. Air France is diverting flights to Tokyo
- # [18:13] <fantasai> jdaggett: they're diverted to Osaka, though
- # [18:13] <fantasai> glazou: Lastly, we need to decide asap, otherwise my flight will be too expensive
- # [18:13] <fantasai> jdaggett: I have a feeling prices won't be going up
- # [18:14] <fantasai> glazou: I checked prices recently, and they're more expensive than they used to be
- # [18:14] <fantasai> glazou: at least from France
- # [18:14] <Zakim> +SteveZ
- # [18:14] <fantasai> sylvaing: There are a lot of people attending those meetings.
- # [18:14] <fantasai> sylvaing: I don't think it's fair to change the meeting because it will be more expensive for one person.
- # [18:14] <fantasai> sylvaing: We cannot predict airline prices, especially for Japan at this time.
- # [18:15] <fantasai> sylvaing: I don't understand why we need to make this decision today.
- # [18:15] <fantasai> jdaggett: I don't understand urgency. Sure better to decide quickly as possible, but not convinced it needs to be today.
- # [18:15] <fantasai> glazou: Because we're almost 60 days before the trip
- # [18:15] <fantasai> sylvaing: I always book my trips 30 days before
- # [18:15] <fantasai> glazou: You have a rich company behind you
- # [18:16] <fantasai> dbaron: Flight prices often go /down/ between 8wks and 4 wks. Not always.
- # [18:16] <Bert> (I'd be OK with Osaka or Kyoto. Offer of hosting at W3C/ERCIM in France also still stands. But please decide soon.)
- # [18:16] <fantasai> jdaggett: I would be interested in hearing from people who were originally coming to Japan and are now concerned.
- # [18:16] <fantasai> glazou: I am
- # [18:16] <fantasai> Bert: Me too. I'm concerned about Tokyo. Could go to Osaka or Kyoto.
- # [18:16] <fantasai> Steve: I'm concerned because I expected things to get better over this last week, and in fact they've gotten worse.
- # [18:17] <fantasai> Steve: So I haven't seen things getting better.
- # [18:17] <fantasai> sylvaing: Have you heard from the news, or from people actually there?
- # [18:17] <fantasai> sylvaing: I hear one thing from the news, but another from the people I know there.
- # [18:17] <fantasai> jdaggett: The actual radiation numbers are going down around the plant.
- # [18:18] <fantasai> jdaggett: No predictor of what could happen tomorrow, but there isn't actually a lot of stuff that's going right now that is an immediate concern for people living in Tokyo.
- # [18:18] <fantasai> jdaggett: I'd be concerned if I was living near the plant.
- # [18:18] <fantasai> jdaggett: But Tokyo is far enough away
- # [18:19] <fantasai> kojiishi: Not sure appropriate comparison, but Chernobyl escape zone was 100km, and Tokyo is more than 160km
- # [18:19] <Zakim> -glazou
- # [18:19] <fantasai> kojiishi: If you take Osaka, you have 500km more distance
- # [18:19] <fantasai> sylvaing: I'm fine with Tokyo, I'm fine with Osaka, I'm fine with Japan
- # [18:19] <Zakim> +??P1
- # [18:19] <kojiishi> s/160km/250km/
- # [18:19] <glazou> Zakim, ??P1 is me
- # [18:19] <Zakim> +glazou; got it
- # [18:19] <fantasai> sylvaing: I would like it if we could find a way to keep that workshop going for our Japanese friends to attend
- # [18:19] <fantasai> sylvaing: So if not in Japan, then somewhere nearby
- # [18:19] <fantasai> sylvaing: But I'm fine with Japan.
- # [18:20] <alexmog> vladivostok?
- # [18:20] <bradk> http://news.discovery.com/earth/japan-nuclear-reactors-worst-case-110329.html
- # [18:20] <fantasai> sylvaing: Wrt prices, I think the airfare might go up, but we're staying for awhile and hotel prices are likely to be very low.
- # [18:20] <fantasai> sylvaing cites case of his last trip
- # [18:21] <fantasai> jdaggett: But we need to outline a path to making a decision.
- # [18:21] <fantasai> jdaggett: i"m not comfortable with the idea of just deciding today
- # [18:21] <fantasai> jdaggett: But I think we need to set a scope for when the venue is defined
- # [18:21] <fantasai> jdaggett: Unfortunately Tab is not on call today
- # [18:21] <fantasai> jdaggett: And he was sponsor of venue
- # [18:21] <fantasai> jdaggett: Not sure from Koji's message that we have a solid meeting place there
- # [18:21] <fantasai> jdaggett: Google just has a small sales office in Osaka
- # [18:23] <fantasai> ...
- # [18:23] <fantasai> jdaggett: Tokyo would be a better place, there's much better accommodation etc.
- # [18:23] <kojiishi> http://www.consortium.or.jp/contents_detail.php?frmId=1608
- # [18:23] <fantasai> kojiishi: Current candidate is in Kyoto
- # [18:24] <fantasai> kojiishi: This is a candidate for the forum. Unfortunately the room is not available for June 4th, so we're looking for other places for the F2F
- # [18:24] <fantasai> kojiishi: Kyoto and Osaka are very close
- # [18:24] <fantasai> jdaggett: Japan has two electrical grids, and Osaka is in a different one from Tokyo
- # [18:24] <fantasai> jdaggett: The blackouts don't apply to Osaka
- # [18:25] * dbaron the 50Hz part of Japan and the 60Hz part of Japan?
- # [18:25] <fantasai> sylvaing: We should check with Tab about hosting situation
- # [18:27] * glazou trips to japan are still formally "not recommended" by US and France...
- # [18:27] <fantasai> fantasai: We could decide on Japan, and then figure out the venue later. Then people can book their flights now, and find their hotels later
- # [18:28] <fantasai> Steve: As long as someone is dedicated to sponsoring the venue, in case it costs something, then we're ok
- # [18:28] <plinss> zakim, who is noisy?
- # [18:28] <fantasai> kojiishi: Wrt rental offices, IC? group in Japan is willing to pay for that.
- # [18:28] <kojiishi> s/IC?/ICT/
- # [18:28] <Zakim> plinss, listening for 13 seconds I heard sound from the following: plinss (42%), fantasai (11%)
- # [18:28] <sylvaing> me glazou, US link ?
- # [18:28] <fantasai> Steve: Think we should spend 2 weeks to settle on the venue
- # [18:29] <fantasai> plinss: So, sounds like most people are ok with Osaka/Kyoto aside from glazou
- # [18:29] <glazou> sylvaing: state department
- # [18:29] <fantasai> plinss: I think 2 weeks is reasonable
- # [18:29] <fantasai> plinss: Meanwhile try to nail down a venue
- # [18:29] <fantasai> plinss: make a final call then
- # [18:29] <sylvaing> i'm there, i'm asking because i can't find what you're looking at
- # [18:29] <fantasai> Topic: CSS2.1
- # [18:29] <fantasai> plinss: Let's try to get this nailed down today.
- # [18:29] <plinss> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2011Mar/att-0238/last-call.htm
- # [18:30] * dbaron perhaps http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/tw/tw_5398.html ? (didn't read it yet)
- # [18:30] * Quits: glazou (glazou@82.247.96.19) (Client exited)
- # [18:30] <plinss> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-203
- # [18:30] * Joins: glazou (glazou@82.247.96.19)
- # [18:31] <fantasai> Bert: I agree with the proposal
- # [18:31] <Zakim> -jdaggett
- # [18:31] <plinss> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0567.html
- # [18:31] * sylvaing dbaron, reading it. not seeing anything about not traveling there yet
- # [18:31] <fantasai> Arron: fantasai and I spent a lot of time looking over with one of our developers here, and we all agree it's a viable solution here
- # [18:31] <fantasai> Arron: Text that was there previously seemed to be there for consistency with 8.3.1, and it just causes confusion in this section because it doesn't match exactly.
- # [18:32] * sylvaing "U.S. citizens should defer all travel to the evacuation zone around Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, areas affected by the earthquake and tsunami and tourism and non-essential travel to the rest of Japan at this time."
- # [18:32] <fantasai> Arron: So removing that line about bottom border doesn't create a problem, and make spec more consistent with implementations and with what we wwant in the end, really
- # [18:32] <fantasai> dbaron: That was to prevent margins below the bottom of the element from influencing the hypothetical position
- # [18:34] <fantasai> fantasai: The rules in 8.3.1 introduce the bottom border in some cases, such as the one you're concerned about. Just not in all, so saying that here is inconsistent with 8.3.1
- # [18:34] <fantasai> RESOLVED: proposal accepted
- # [18:34] <Zakim> -glazou
- # [18:34] <plinss> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-179
- # [18:35] <Zakim> +??P12
- # [18:35] <glazou> Zakim, ??P12 is me
- # [18:35] <Zakim> +glazou; got it
- # [18:35] <fantasai> johnjan: We were confused and just wanted to make sure it was in fact closed
- # [18:35] <jdaggett> just to clarify the F2F location suggestion, I suggested *Kyoto* as a place with better accomodations, not Tokyo
- # [18:35] <fantasai> plinss: We have an objection here
- # [18:35] <dbaron> the second objection URL there belongs on issue 192
- # [18:35] * dbaron Zakim, who is on the phone?
- # [18:35] * Zakim sees on the phone: plinss, sylvaing, hober, stearns, duga, [Microsoft], [Microsoft.a], arno, David_Baron, kojiishi, Bert, fantasai, Cathy, smfr, bradk, SteveZ, glazou
- # [18:35] * Zakim [Microsoft] has Arron
- # [18:36] <Zakim> -fantasai
- # [18:38] <Zakim> +fantasai
- # [18:38] <fantasai> ?: Bert responded after that message with further edits
- # [18:38] <fantasai> +Anton Prowse
- # [18:39] <fantasai> Anton: What came up on IRC, the first URL on objection is the latest that was on the mailing list about this
- # [18:39] <fantasai> Anton summarizes issue.
- # [18:40] <fantasai> fantasai: I think Bert just edited that.
- # [18:40] <dbaron> we're looking at http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/css2/visuren.html#anonymous-block-level ?
- # [18:40] <fantasai> Anton: In the copy I'm looking at it still says the same thing.
- # [18:40] <fantasai> Bert: I don't think you can see the actual editor's draft.
- # [18:41] <fantasai> "The P element contains a chunk (C1) of anonymous text followed by a block-level element followed by another chunk (C2) of anonymous text. The resulting boxes would be a block box representing the BODY, containing an anonymous block box around C1, the SPAN block box, and another anonymous block box around C2. "
- # [18:42] <fantasai> Anton: That looks right ot me
- # [18:42] <glazou> YAY :-)
- # [18:42] <glazou> GREEN
- # [18:42] <dbaron> yeah, http://www.w3.org/Style/Group/css2-src/visuren.html#anonymous-block-level and http://www.w3.org/Style/css2-updates/css2/visuren.html#anonymous-block-level differ on the "The resulting boxes"... sentence.
- # [18:42] <plinss> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-192
- # [18:42] <plinss> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0402.html
- # [18:43] <fantasai> dbaron: I sent a response email based on the WG discussion there, and no longer even agreed with that discussion while I was writing things up. And now I've forgotten it all anyway.
- # [18:43] * fantasai bert, did you uploade the updated draft yet?
- # [18:43] * Bert the public draft is now the same as the internal verison.
- # [18:43] * fantasai yay
- # [18:44] <fantasai> fantasai: Didn't Bert have some proposed changes for this?
- # [18:44] * dbaron wonders why these are on the internal mailing list
- # [18:45] <fantasai> Anton's suggestions in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0402.html are relative to text that already changed a bit. Relative to the current text, I think he means the following two changes in 9.5 (Floats). Replace
- # [18:45] <fantasai> > If a shortened line box is too small to contain any content > after the float, then that content is shifted downward until > either it fits or there are no more floats present. Any > content in the current line before a floated box is reflowed > in the first available line on the other side of the float.
- # [18:45] <fantasai> by:
- # [18:45] <fantasai> | If a shortened line box is too small to contain any content | after the float without overflowing its containing block, | then that content is shifted downward until | either it fits or there are no more floats present. Any | content in the current line before a floated box is reflowed | in the same line on the other side of the float.
- # [18:45] <fantasai> i.e., add "without overflowing its containing block" and replace "first available" by "same."
- # [18:46] <fantasai> dbaron: Doesn't this introduce an inconsistency between start and end floats
- # [18:46] <fantasai> fantasai: So we should say "line box" instead of "containing block"
- # [18:47] <fantasai> Anton describes an RTL case
- # [18:47] <fantasai> Anton: You can't have inline content overflowing the line box, it gets bigger
- # [18:47] <fantasai> dbaron: No, the line box edges are determined by the containing block / float intrusions.
- # [18:48] <fantasai> Anton: Ok, if that's true, then for sure we should talk about overflowing the line box htere.
- # [18:48] <fantasai> dbaron: I want to find the context here. All three times we've discussed this I've missed the context
- # [18:48] <fantasai> dbaron: What seciton is this in?
- # [18:48] * Joins: Evan_ (qw3birc@128.30.52.28)
- # [18:48] <glazou> s/seciton/section
- # [18:49] <fantasai> Anton: We want "if the content fits", not "it fits"...
- # [18:50] <fantasai> Anton: As far as I understand is, you have your stack of line boxes, you might have floats present.
- # [18:50] <fantasai> Anton: You're trying to flow the inline boxes into the line box
- # [18:50] <Zakim> -glazou
- # [18:50] <fantasai> Anton: You only shift things if you can't fit any piece of that content next to the float
- # [18:50] <Zakim> +??P12
- # [18:50] <glazou> Zakim, ??P12 is me
- # [18:50] <Zakim> +glazou; got it
- # [18:50] <fantasai> Anton: The one characteristic that's different btw normal line box and the shortened line box is that content can't overflow it
- # [18:51] <fantasai> Anton: If it would, it moves downward
- # [18:51] <fantasai> dbaron: I think your original proposal to delete "further" is correct -- it's about whether *any* content fits in the shortened line box.
- # [18:51] <fantasai> dbaron: If content before the float doesn't fit, then the float positioning rules kick in to move the float.
- # [18:51] <dbaron> If a shortened line box is too small to contain any content, then the line box is shifted downward until either some content fits or there are no more floats present.
- # [18:52] <fantasai> Anton: You used rules 6-8 to explain this, [...]
- # [18:52] <fantasai> Anton: You can never have a previous box that is below the top of the float
- # [18:52] <fantasai> Anton: Previous content absolutely has to stay in the same line box. It might get shifted to the other side of the float, but never moves down.
- # [18:52] <fantasai> dbaron points to his proposal in IRC
- # [18:53] <fantasai> Anton: That looks perfect.
- # [18:53] <fantasai> Bert: I don't see any difference between any of these variants
- # [18:53] <fantasai> dbaron: Difference with what I typed is it has fewere occurances of "it", some of those "it"s were unclear. So I expanded all of them.
- # [18:54] <fantasai> Anton: Other difference is the original text says "first available box"
- # [18:54] <fantasai> Anton: My impression was that Bert's original concept of line boxes was you had a line box grid, a stack of perfectly stacked line boxes inside the containing block.
- # [18:54] <fantasai> Anton: While that's a nice concept, it's not consistent with the rest of the spec, and certainly not with implementations
- # [18:55] <fantasai> Anton: It's not filling content into a lined notepad
- # [18:55] <fantasai> Anton: The line boxes can be shifted themselves
- # [18:55] <fantasai> Anton: leaving a gap
- # [18:55] <fantasai> Anton: So rather than a stack of empty line boxes, you have a gap
- # [18:55] <fantasai> Anton: "first available" made sense in the original vision, but not anymore.
- # [18:56] <fantasai> Anton: (Wasn't even correct in original case, because content before the float wouldn't get flowed into multiple line boxes anyway.)
- # [18:57] <fantasai> Bert: Sounds right. But we still have to decide which version of the text to adopt
- # [18:57] <fantasai> Anton: What dbaron proposed on IRC looks correct.
- # [18:58] <Bert> (The line box not just moves down, it also gets wider...)
- # [18:58] <dbaron> If a shortened line box is too small to contain any content, then the line box is shifted downward (and its width recomputed) until either some content fits or there are no more floats present.
- # [18:58] * Joins: fantasai_ (fantasai@76.14.69.234)
- # [18:59] <fantasai_> Steve: That implies the shortned lined box is moved down, but when it moves down it's no longer shortened necessarily
- # [18:59] * Quits: fantasai (fantasai@69.162.163.148) (Quit: Lost terminal)
- # [18:59] * Joins: fantasai (fantasai@69.162.163.148)
- # [18:59] <fantasai_> dbaron: I added another proposal in IRC.
- # [19:00] <fantasai_> Anton: works for me. felt it was implicit, but equally correct what dbaron wrote there
- # [19:00] <fantasai_> plinss: Any objections?
- # [19:00] <fantasai_> RESOLVED: dbaron's latest proposal accepted
- # [19:00] <Zakim> -arno
- # [19:00] <fantasai_> dbaron: Did we resolve all the bits of the issue email?
- # [19:00] <fantasai_> Anton: We've solved both parts in one sentence.
- # [19:01] <fantasai_> dbaron and Anton discuss "first available"
- # [19:01] <fantasai_> Bert: "first available" is in the next sentence
- # [19:02] <fantasai_> dbaron: So we've agreed to replace 2 sentences with 1?
- # [19:02] <fantasai_> Anton double-checks
- # [19:02] * glazou needs to run at the top of the hour
- # [19:02] <fantasai_> Anton: I think dbaron's proposal combines those two sentences.
- # [19:03] <fantasai_> Anton: What it misses is the part about content before the float moving to the other side of the float
- # [19:03] * Quits: arno (arno@192.150.10.200) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:03] <fantasai_> dbaron: well, i was only trying to replace the first, hadn't gotten to the second
- # [19:03] <fantasai_> Anton: If we were going to replace the second sentence...
- # [19:04] * smfr has to go
- # [19:04] <dbaron> Issue 2 is the first sentence and ISsue 3 is the second sentence
- # [19:04] * Quits: smfr (smfr@173.228.90.67) (Quit: smfr)
- # [19:04] <fantasai> RRSAgent: pointer
- # [19:04] <RRSAgent> See http://www.w3.org/2011/03/30-css-irc#T17-01-10
- # [19:04] <Zakim> -smfr
- # [19:04] * glazou need to go, bye people
- # [19:04] <Zakim> -glazou
- # [19:05] * Joins: arno (arno@192.150.10.200)
- # [19:05] <fantasai> dbaron: do you want to replace 'first available line' to 'same line'?
- # [19:05] * Quits: glazou (glazou@82.247.96.19) (Quit: glazou)
- # [19:05] <fantasai> Anton: Yes, that makes sense there.
- # [19:05] <fantasai> plinss: Other thoughts on that change?
- # [19:05] <fantasai> Bert: Fine with that too
- # [19:05] <fantasai> RESOLVED: Second proposal also accepted
- # [19:05] <fantasai> plinss: A couple more items left. If people can stay, would be nice to get publication out today
- # [19:06] <fantasai> sylvaing: I can stay. When do you need testimonials?
- # [19:06] <fantasai> Bert: If we are lucky, then first available date we can issue them is May 31st
- # [19:06] <fantasai> Bert: So before May 31st
- # [19:06] <fantasai> Bert: a few days before that
- # [19:07] <Bert> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0637.html
- # [19:07] <fantasai> Bert: I propose we don't change anything now.
- # [19:09] <oyvind> ("the other side" in the float issue still doesn't make sense...)
- # [19:09] <Zakim> -[Microsoft]
- # [19:09] <johnjan> i have to go to another meeting...sorry.
- # [19:09] <antonp> @oyvind: i agree for rtl, but that was rejected by the WG
- # [19:10] <antonp> sorry, i mean for right floats in ltr
- # [19:10] <fantasai> Bert summarizes the email
- # [19:10] <dbaron> oyvind, It really only makes sense for floats on the start-side, I think.
- # [19:10] <oyvind> right
- # [19:11] <fantasai> dbaron and Bert discuss something that they thought was defined but apparently isn't
- # [19:12] <fantasai> dbaron: ok, let's just leave it
- # [19:12] * bradk has to go. Bye.
- # [19:12] <fantasai> Bert: Description of line-height property ...
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -bradk
- # [19:12] <fantasai> dbaron: Used doesn't mean it changes the answer
- # [19:13] <dbaron> that definitely had a :-) at the end
- # [19:13] <fantasai> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0623.html
- # [19:13] * Quits: bradk (bradk@99.7.175.117) (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep)
- # [19:13] <fantasai> fantasai: Those edits seem correct to me
- # [19:13] <fantasai> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0277.html
- # [19:14] <fantasai> fantasai: Issue about why aren't we dropping :first-line and :first-letter
- # [19:15] <fantasai> fantasai: I think our answer is that it's in CSS1 and CSS3, so leaving it out of CSS2.1 doesn't make sense.
- # [19:15] <fantasai> dbaron: Although I wish we used text from an earlier draft of Selectors
- # [19:16] <fantasai> Arron: We have a good enough area of interop here, based on testcases.
- # [19:16] <fantasai> RESOLVED: Not dropping :first-line :first-letter from CSS2.1.
- # [19:16] <fantasai> dbaron would like to drop it, but not going there right now.
- # [19:17] <fantasai> Bert: we need an updated disposition of comments
- # [19:17] <fantasai> Arron: Already have it ready
- # [19:17] <fantasai> Bert: Implementation reports
- # [19:17] <fantasai> plinss: Have it, just need to write it up formally.
- # [19:17] <fantasai> Bert: Ok, then I have to update draft with what we decided today.
- # [19:17] <fantasai> plinss: I propose advancing 2.1 to PR
- # [19:17] <fantasai> plinss: Any objections?
- # [19:17] <fantasai> RESOLVED: Advance CSS2.1 to PR.
- # [19:18] * sylvaing oh man, no champagne in the house
- # [19:18] <fantasai> Anton: What's the plan for errata?
- # [19:18] <Zakim> -SteveZ
- # [19:18] <fantasai> Anton: Lots of issues that need errata'ing
- # [19:18] <fantasai> Anton: including contradictions in margin collapsing etc.
- # [19:18] <fantasai> plinss: Don't have a formal timeline
- # [19:18] <fantasai> yet
- # [19:18] <fantasai> plinss: There will always be issues, since it's such a long spec
- # [19:19] <fantasai> dbaron: Once we're at REC, it's easier to get to REC again. It combines LC and PR
- # [19:19] <fantasai> dbaron: and then we can publish an updated REC
- # [19:19] <dbaron> s/It combines/PER combines/
- # [19:19] <fantasai> Bert: Errata can be published any time. We can update the errata list anytime
- # [19:20] <Zakim> -David_Baron
- # [19:20] <Zakim> -hober
- # [19:20] <Zakim> -[Microsoft.a]
- # [19:20] <fantasai> Meeting closed.
- # [19:20] <Zakim> -duga
- # [19:20] <Zakim> -sylvaing
- # [19:20] <Zakim> -kojiishi
- # [19:20] <Zakim> -stearns
- # [19:20] <Zakim> -plinss
- # [19:20] * Parts: duga (duga@74.125.59.129)
- # [19:20] <Zakim> -fantasai
- # [19:20] <Zakim> -Bert
- # [19:20] <Zakim> -Cathy
- # [19:20] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended
- # [19:20] <Zakim> Attendees were plinss, +1.415.738.aaaa, +1.206.324.aabb, jdaggett, hober, sylvaing, stearns, johnjan, [Microsoft], duga, Arron, arno, glazou, David_Baron, kojiishi, Bert,
- # [19:20] <Zakim> ... +1.415.920.aadd, Cathy, fantasai, +1.408.636.aaee, smfr, bradk, SteveZ
- # [19:20] <fantasai> arronei: did you update the DoC with all the relevant Verified lines?
- # [19:21] <fantasai> dbaron: So what happened with the definitions of :first-line / :first-letter?
- # [19:21] * Quits: johnjan (qw3birc@128.30.52.28) (Quit: Page closed)
- # [19:21] <dbaron> fantasai, can we discuss that sometime after noon?
- # [19:21] <fantasai> dbaron: sure
- # [19:21] * Quits: alexmog (alexmog@131.107.0.102) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:23] * Joins: alexmog (alexmog@131.107.0.102)
- # [19:23] * Quits: oyvind (oyvinds@213.236.208.22) (Quit: oyvind)
- # [19:25] * Quits: Cathy (qw3birc@128.30.52.28) (Quit: Page closed)
- # [19:32] <arronei> fantasai: yes I added the verified lines in the document
- # [19:33] * Quits: kojiishi (kojiishi@222.158.227.129) (Quit: Leaving...)
- # [19:51] * Quits: sylvaing (sylvaing@98.232.9.174) (Quit: sylvaing)
- # [19:53] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@173.228.28.143) (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
- # [20:04] * Quits: Evan_ (qw3birc@128.30.52.28) (Quit: Page closed)
- # [20:04] * Quits: stearns (stearns@192.150.22.5) (Quit: stearns)
- # [20:14] * Quits: arno (arno@192.150.10.200) (Quit: Leaving.)
- # [20:15] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@63.245.220.240)
- # [20:20] * Joins: arno (arno@192.150.10.200)
- # [20:35] * Parts: antonp (4de003c4@109.169.29.95)
- # [20:35] * Quits: arno (arno@192.150.10.200) (Quit: Leaving.)
- # [20:36] * Joins: Martijnc (Martijnc@81.242.128.42)
- # [20:45] * Joins: arno (arno@192.150.10.200)
- # [21:01] * Parts: mollydotcom (mollyh@68.225.52.230)
- # [21:17] * Zakim excuses himself; his presence no longer seems to be needed
- # [21:18] * Parts: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.169)
- # [21:32] <fantasai> Minutes posted
- # [21:32] <fantasai> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Mar/0727.html
- # [21:41] <fantasai> Bert: edits checked for 192 and 203
- # [21:41] <fantasai> Bert: Is there a way to make the public editor's draft automatically sync to yours?
- # [21:42] <fantasai> Bert: we might want to do that so we don't have such out-of-sync problems in the future...
- # [21:42] <fantasai> it's kindof confusing to have two editor's drafts out-of-sync :)
- # [21:46] * Quits: Martijnc (Martijnc@81.242.128.42) (Quit: Martijnc)
- # [21:46] <Bert> Already sync'ed.
- # [21:48] * Quits: fantasai_ (fantasai@76.14.69.234) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:22] * Quits: arno (arno@192.150.10.200) (Ping timeout)
- # [23:12] * Joins: arno (arno@192.150.10.200)
- # [23:13] * Quits: arno (arno@192.150.10.200) (Quit: Leaving.)
- # [23:54] * Quits: jdaggett (jdaggett@118.243.227.145) (Quit: jdaggett)
- # [23:55] * Joins: arno (arno@192.150.10.200)
- # Session Close: Thu Mar 31 00:00:00 2011
The end :)