Options:
- # Session Start: Wed Mar 28 00:00:00 2012
- # Session Ident: #css
- # [00:01] * Joins: tpod (tpod@208.54.32.199)
- # [00:01] * fantasai just lists the background properties as applying to ::first-line for now, should be an issue about applying others
- # [00:08] * Joins: tpod_ (tpod@76.115.51.221)
- # [00:09] * Quits: tpod (tpod@208.54.32.199) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [00:09] * tpod_ is now known as tpod
- # [00:15] * Quits: arno (arno@192.150.10.201) (Quit: Leaving.)
- # [00:15] * Joins: arno (arno@192.150.10.201)
- # [00:18] * Quits: tpod (tpod@76.115.51.221) (Quit: Colloquy for iPod touch - http://colloquy.mobi)
- # [00:29] * miketaylr is now known as miketaylr|
- # [00:29] * miketaylr| is now known as miketaylr||
- # [00:29] * miketaylr|| is now known as miketaylr|||
- # [00:59] * sylvaing is now known as sylvaing_away
- # [01:09] * Quits: arno (arno@192.150.10.201) (Quit: Leaving.)
- # [01:12] * Joins: arno (arno@192.150.10.201)
- # [01:15] * Quits: arno (arno@192.150.10.201) (Quit: Leaving.)
- # [01:15] * Quits: jdaggett (jdaggett@12.197.88.252) (Quit: jdaggett)
- # [01:23] * Joins: jdaggett (jdaggett@12.197.88.10)
- # [01:30] * fantasai pokes TabAtkins
- # [01:32] <TabAtkins> Hm?
- # [01:32] <fantasai> you were going to copy some intrinsic dimensions text from 2.1
- # [01:32] <fantasai> TabAtkins: ^
- # [01:33] <TabAtkins> I did that, yes.
- # [01:34] * fantasai not seeing it
- # [01:37] <fantasai> TabAtkins: Also did you update the Changes section with the gradients stuff?
- # [01:38] <TabAtkins> After looking closely at the text, I decided that the current text was equal or better in nearly every aspect. I ended up copying over just a single sentence from it.
- # [01:38] <fantasai> kk
- # [01:38] <TabAtkins> I did not update the changes section yet.
- # [01:38] <fantasai> TabAtkins: we should probably add the security paragraph about intrinsic dimensions, though
- # [01:39] <TabAtkins> Okay.
- # [01:43] * miketaylr||| is now known as miketaylr||||
- # [01:43] * miketaylr|||| is now known as miketaylr|||||
- # [01:49] * Quits: jet (jet@12.197.88.252) (Quit: jet)
- # [02:00] * Joins: jet (jet@12.197.88.252)
- # [02:08] * Quits: jet (jet@12.197.88.252) (Quit: jet)
- # [02:10] * Quits: logbot (logbot@110.173.227.145) (Ping timeout)
- # [02:12] * Joins: logbot (logbot@110.173.227.145)
- # [02:31] * Quits: arronei (arronei@131.107.192.154) (Ping timeout)
- # [02:31] * Joins: arronei (arronei@131.107.192.154)
- # [02:31] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@12.197.88.252) (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
- # [02:35] * Joins: cyril (chatzilla@203.12.172.254)
- # [04:40] * Quits: cyril (chatzilla@203.12.172.254) (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.88.1 [Firefox 11.0/20120312181643])
- # [04:57] * Quits: miketaylr||||| (miketaylr@70.112.101.224) (Quit: Leaving...)
- # [05:21] * Joins: arno (arno@208.87.61.248)
- # [05:49] * Joins: myakura (myakura@110.233.178.43)
- # [06:02] * Quits: myakura (myakura@110.233.178.43) (Client exited)
- # [06:33] * Quits: arno (arno@208.87.61.248) (Quit: Leaving.)
- # Session Close: Wed Mar 28 06:40:36 2012
- #
- # Session Start: Wed Mar 28 06:40:36 2012
- # Session Ident: #css
- # [06:40] * Disconnected
- # [06:41] * Attempting to rejoin channel #css
- # [06:41] * Rejoined channel #css
- # [06:41] * Topic is 'CSS Working Group | logged at http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/'
- # [06:41] * Set by dbaron on Wed Oct 12 02:04:03
- # Session Close: Wed Mar 28 08:23:25 2012
- #
- # Session Start: Wed Mar 28 08:23:25 2012
- # Session Ident: #css
- # [08:23] * Disconnected
- # [08:25] * Attempting to rejoin channel #css
- # [08:25] * Rejoined channel #css
- # [08:25] * Topic is 'CSS Working Group | logged at http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/'
- # [08:25] * Set by dbaron on Wed Oct 12 02:04:03
- # [08:25] * Quits: gsnedders (gsnedders@204.232.194.186) (Ping timeout)
- # [08:25] * Quits: krijnh (krijnhoetm@145.53.238.157) (Ping timeout)
- # [08:26] * Joins: kojiishi (kojiishi@222.158.227.129)
- # [08:26] * Joins: sylvaing_away (sylvaing@173.230.149.95)
- # [08:26] * sylvaing_away is now known as sylvaing
- # [08:27] * Joins: shans_away (shans@173.230.149.95)
- # [08:27] * shans_away is now known as shans
- # [08:27] * Joins: vhardy_away (vhardy@173.230.149.95)
- # [08:27] * vhardy_away is now known as vhardy
- # [08:27] * Joins: gsnedders (gsnedders@204.232.194.186)
- # [08:28] * Joins: alexmog_away (alexmog@173.230.149.95)
- # [08:28] * Joins: logbot (logbot@110.173.227.145)
- # [08:28] * alexmog_away is now known as alexmog
- # [08:45] * Joins: myakura (myakura@110.233.178.43)
- # [10:29] * Joins: SimonSapin (simon@82.232.219.95)
- # [10:47] * Quits: jdaggett (jdaggett@12.197.88.10) (Quit: jdaggett)
- # [11:11] * Joins: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146)
- # [11:14] * Quits: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146) (Ping timeout)
- # [11:29] * Joins: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146)
- # [11:44] * Quits: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146) (Ping timeout)
- # [11:59] * Joins: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146)
- # [13:37] * Quits: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146) (Ping timeout)
- # [13:38] * Joins: mollydotcom (mollyh@68.231.163.89)
- # [14:27] * Joins: danielfilho_ (danielfilh@187.31.77.7)
- # [14:27] * Quits: danielfilho (danielfilh@187.31.77.7) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [14:27] * danielfilho_ is now known as danielfilho
- # [14:36] * Joins: danielfilho_ (danielfilh@187.31.77.7)
- # [14:36] * Quits: danielfilho (danielfilh@187.31.77.7) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [14:36] * danielfilho_ is now known as danielfilho
- # [14:53] * Joins: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146)
- # [15:57] * Joins: miketaylr (miketaylr@70.112.101.224)
- # [16:06] * Quits: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146) (Ping timeout)
- # [16:14] * Joins: ksweeney (ksweeney@63.119.10.10)
- # [16:18] * Joins: drublic (drublic@77.2.151.117)
- # [16:55] * Parts: ksweeney (ksweeney@63.119.10.10)
- # [17:11] * Joins: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146)
- # [17:21] * Joins: florian_ (florianr@61.115.188.242)
- # [17:31] * Joins: glazou (glazou@82.247.96.19)
- # [17:31] * Joins: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.169)
- # [17:32] <glazou> Zakim, this will be Style
- # [17:32] <Zakim> ok, glazou; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 36 minutes
- # [17:32] <glazou> RRSAgent, make logs public
- # [17:32] <RRSAgent> I have made the request, glazou
- # [17:37] * Joins: arno (arno@192.150.10.201)
- # [17:41] * Quits: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146) (Ping timeout)
- # [17:55] * Joins: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146)
- # [18:00] * Joins: glenn (gadams@174.29.126.113)
- # [18:03] * Joins: dstorey (Adium@67.180.84.179)
- # [18:03] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started
- # [18:03] <Zakim> +??P20
- # [18:03] <florian_> Zakim, I am ??P20
- # [18:03] <Zakim> +florian_; got it
- # [18:04] * Joins: oyvind (oyvinds@213.236.208.22)
- # [18:05] <Zakim> +??P30
- # [18:05] * Joins: smfr (smfr@173.228.90.231)
- # [18:05] <glazou> Zakim, ??P30 is me
- # [18:05] * Joins: antonp (50a94e63@64.62.228.82)
- # [18:06] <Zakim> +??P33
- # [18:06] <Zakim> +glazou; got it
- # [18:06] <Zakim> +Molly_Holzschlag
- # [18:06] <glazou> Zakim, ?P33 is dstorey
- # [18:06] <Zakim> sorry, glazou, I do not recognize a party named '?P33'
- # [18:06] <Zakim> +hober
- # [18:07] <dstorey> Zakim, ??P33 is me
- # [18:07] <Zakim> +dstorey; got it
- # [18:07] <Zakim> +antonp
- # [18:08] <Zakim> +stearns
- # [18:08] <Zakim> +smfr
- # [18:08] <Zakim> +??P52
- # [18:08] * Joins: JohnJansen (qw3birc@128.30.52.28)
- # [18:08] <glazou> Zakim, ??P52 is rossen
- # [18:09] <Zakim> +rossen; got it
- # [18:09] <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
- # [18:09] <Zakim> +SteveZ
- # [18:09] <Zakim> +fantasai
- # [18:09] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@173.228.85.36)
- # [18:09] * Joins: vhardy_ (qw3birc@128.30.52.28)
- # [18:10] <Zakim> + +1.206.427.aaaa
- # [18:10] <Zakim> +sylvaing
- # [18:10] <vhardy_> zakim, who is here?
- # [18:10] <Zakim> On the phone I see florian_, glazou, dstorey, Molly_Holzschlag, hober, antonp, stearns, smfr, rossen, [IPcaller], SteveZ, fantasai, +1.206.427.aaaa, sylvaing
- # [18:10] <Zakim> On IRC I see vhardy_, dbaron, JohnJansen, antonp, smfr, oyvind, dstorey, glenn, Ms2ger, arno, Zakim, glazou, florian_, drublic, miketaylr, danielfilho, mollydotcom, SimonSapin,
- # [18:10] <Zakim> ... myakura, logbot, alexmog, gsnedders, vhardy, shans, sylvaing, kojiishi, krijnhuman, hober, fantasai, arronei, Bert, Hixie, kennyluck, TabAtkins, Liam, shepazu, RRSAgent,
- # [18:10] <Zakim> ... macpherson, CSSWG_LogBot, ed, plinss, pjrm, stearns, trackbot, paul___irish, Echoes
- # [18:10] <vhardy_> zakim, [IPcaller] is me
- # [18:10] <Zakim> +vhardy_; got it
- # [18:10] <Zakim> -sylvaing
- # [18:10] * Joins: Katie (kellison@198.228.221.39)
- # [18:10] <glenn> zakim, what is code?
- # [18:10] * Joins: SteveZ (chatzilla@24.6.120.172)
- # [18:11] <Zakim> I don't understand your question, glenn.
- # [18:11] <glazou> Zakim, aaaa is Cathy
- # [18:11] <JohnJansen> Zakim, Microsoft has JohnJansen
- # [18:11] * Joins: tantek (tantek@76.115.51.221)
- # [18:11] <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
- # [18:11] <JohnJansen> Zakim, Microsoft has JohnJansen
- # [18:11] <Zakim> +Cathy; got it
- # [18:11] <Zakim> +JohnJansen; got it
- # [18:11] <glazou> Zakim, code?
- # [18:11] <Zakim> JohnJansen was already listed in [Microsoft], JohnJansen
- # [18:11] <Zakim> the conference code is 78953 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), glazou
- # [18:11] <Zakim> +dbaron
- # [18:11] <Zakim> +??P78
- # [18:12] <Zakim> +Bert
- # [18:12] <Zakim> +sylvaing
- # [18:12] <glenn> zakim, ??p78 is glenn
- # [18:12] <glenn> morning
- # [18:12] <Zakim> +glenn; got it
- # [18:12] <Zakim> +[Microsoft.a]
- # [18:12] <arronei> zakim, microsoft has me
- # [18:12] * dbaron Zakim, who is on the phone?
- # [18:12] <Zakim> +arronei; got it
- # [18:12] * Zakim sees on the phone: florian_, glazou, dstorey, Molly_Holzschlag, hober, antonp, stearns, smfr, rossen, vhardy_, SteveZ, fantasai, Cathy, [Microsoft], dbaron, glenn, Bert, sylvaing,
- # [18:12] * Zakim ... [Microsoft.a]
- # [18:12] * Zakim [Microsoft] has arronei
- # [18:12] <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
- # [18:13] <glazou> regrets: Brad, Tab, chrisL
- # [18:13] * Joins: howcome (howcome@213.236.208.22)
- # [18:13] <tantek> Zakim, IPCaller is me
- # [18:13] <Zakim> +tantek; got it
- # [18:13] <glazou> regrets: plinss
- # [18:13] <fantasai> ScribeNick: fantasai
- # [18:13] * Joins: jet (jet@166.250.32.73)
- # [18:13] * Joins: jdaggett (jdaggett@12.197.88.10)
- # [18:13] <fantasai> glazou: Tantek, noticed you sent an extra agenda item. Try to do that, but let's see if it fits.
- # [18:13] <fantasai> glazou: First thing on agenda is moving CSS3 Images to CR
- # [18:13] <Zakim> + +47.23.69.aabb
- # [18:14] <fantasai> glazou: Left 1 week to members to think about it and read the spec. What's the opinion?
- # [18:14] <fantasai> dbaron: I'm curious what conclusions fantasai and Tab came to
- # [18:14] <howcome> zakim, aabb is me
- # [18:14] <Zakim> +howcome; got it
- # [18:14] <Zakim> + +1.415.832.aacc
- # [18:14] <arno> Zakim, aacc is me
- # [18:14] <Zakim> +arno; got it
- # [18:15] <fantasai> fantasai: Only thing that changed since last week is the object sizing algorithm. I sent mail on those changes.
- # [18:15] <fantasai> dbaron: I didn't get a chance to look, but probably ok to move on
- # [18:15] <fantasai> florian: Opera is happy to publish
- # [18:15] <fantasai> glazou: me too
- # [18:15] <fantasai> Bert, sylvain: +1
- # [18:16] <fantasai> RESOLVED: CSS3 Images goes to CR
- # [18:17] <fantasai> Topic: Issues for CSS3 Transitions
- # [18:17] <Ms2ger> \o/
- # [18:17] <glazou> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/1083.html
- # [18:17] <kennyluck> \o/
- # [18:17] <fantasai> glazou: Anything else to review here?
- # [18:17] <glazou> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2012JanMar/0454.html
- # [18:17] <fantasai> dbaron: Nothing to discuss from 1st message -- need proposals
- # [18:17] <fantasai> dbaron: 2nd message, I made edits reflecting previous 2 discussions we had from 1st message.
- # [18:18] <fantasai> dbaron: 4 things want to follow up on
- # [18:18] <fantasai> dbaron: Straightforward, but wanted to run by ppl before we publish again
- # [18:18] <glazou> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0593.html
- # [18:18] <fantasai> dbaron: 1st, we agreed that when transition-? and transition-duration are 0, there is no transition
- # [18:18] <fantasai> dbaron: Didn't discuss what happens if transition-delay is negative
- # [18:18] <fantasai> dbaron: Wrote in spec that there's no transition if the end of the transition point is not in the future
- # [18:19] <fantasai> glazou, florian agree
- # [18:19] <fantasai> +simon
- # [18:19] * Zakim wonders where simon is
- # [18:19] * fantasai oops
- # [18:19] <smfr> Zakim, right here
- # [18:19] <Zakim> I don't understand 'right here', smfr
- # [18:19] <fantasai> RESOLVED: Accept proposal
- # [18:20] <fantasai> dbaron: Next one, we'd discussed rounding font-weight where we round to nearest 100
- # [18:20] <fantasai> dbaron: For integers we floor, though, instead of rounding to nearest
- # [18:20] <fantasai> dbaron: thought it would be best to be consistent, so made it floor. There is an open issue on rounding, but thought it best to make consistent
- # [18:20] * fantasai wonders whether -.0001 rounds to -1 or 0
- # [18:21] <fantasai> florian_: Not sure I like that. One thing I liked with the previous one was
- # [18:21] <glazou> we don't have negative font weights elika...
- # [18:21] <fantasai> florian_: If you're just in a loop, the time you spend on any of them would be same as others
- # [18:21] * fantasai but we have negative integers
- # [18:21] <fantasai> florian: This changes that
- # [18:21] * Joins: Cathy (qw3birc@128.30.52.28)
- # [18:21] <sylvaing> we don't but it's a valid point for integer interpolation based on real numbers
- # [18:21] <fantasai> glazou: Not sure I agree with that based on the proposal
- # [18:22] <fantasai> Bert: Don't you want the step function for that?
- # [18:22] <fantasai> florian_: If you're looping through font weights...
- # [18:22] <fantasai> fantasai: Why would you want to do that? It's not a smooth transition. You'll be jumping all around, pretty randomly too
- # [18:22] <fantasai> dbaron: I'm happy to change it back. Not what we implement, but I can switch it back to the other way.
- # [18:22] <fantasai> florian: I don't think it's critical, but prefer other behavior.
- # [18:23] <fantasai> smfr: We do have an issue filed that floor behavior is different from SMIL and SVG
- # [18:23] <fantasai> smfr: We picked floor so that you didn't jump near the beginning or right near the end.
- # [18:23] <fantasai> smfr: Wondering if we should resolve integer-rounding before font-weight
- # [18:24] <fantasai> fantasai: How about we make font-weight what we want, say there's an issue with making it consistent with integers but also there's an issue with how to round integers.
- # [18:24] * oyvind doesn't understand how floor doesn't jump at the end
- # [18:24] <fantasai> fantasai: Then we can publish this, and resolve the issue later
- # [18:24] <fantasai> szilles: Which way are you leaning, smfr?
- # [18:24] <fantasai> smfr: Have to go back and think about it. Think we wanted some sensible step behavior, but leads to issues like this one.
- # [18:24] <fantasai> glazou: Let's adopt fantasai's proposal
- # [18:25] <fantasai> RESOLVED: Make font-weight round to nearest, mark issues as above
- # [18:25] * Joins: Rossen (Rossen@131.107.0.84)
- # [18:25] <fantasai> dbaron: Said transitions btw visible and intermediate values map to visible
- # [18:25] <Zakim> +[Microsoft.aa]
- # [18:25] <Zakim> -rossen
- # [18:25] <fantasai> dbaron: Right now we have cubic bezier functions that output results that are not in the range 0-1
- # [18:25] <Rossen> Zakim, [Microsoft.aa] is me
- # [18:25] <Zakim> +Rossen; got it
- # [18:26] <fantasai> dbaron: I realized that, if you're 0 or 1 or anything outside that range, you pick the appropriate endpoint
- # [18:26] <fantasai> dbaron: And you do the visible thing between 0 and 1
- # [18:26] <Zakim> +??P5
- # [18:26] <fantasai> dbaron: if you transition from visible to hidden, then if you're 1 or greater you're hidden
- # [18:26] <fantasai> smfr: Think this issue crops up with other properties where you have to clamp
- # [18:26] <fantasai> dbaron: Noted in spec we need to address for some others
- # [18:26] <Zakim> + +1.415.832.aadd
- # [18:27] <fantasai> smfr: Say something about clamp to 0-1 range
- # [18:27] <fantasai> dbaron: effectively same thing
- # [18:27] <jdaggett> zakim, ??p5 is me
- # [18:27] <Zakim> +jdaggett; got it
- # [18:27] <fantasai> glazou: What about current implementations?
- # [18:27] <fantasai> dbaron: There are implementations, not sure what they do
- # [18:27] * Joins: krit (Adium@192.150.10.201)
- # [18:27] <fantasai> smfr: Webkit animates visibilities. Think we relaxed timing functions to go beyond 0/1, but not sure the details
- # [18:27] <fantasai> glazou: Would be good to know what current borwsers are doing.
- # [18:27] <krit> zakim, who's here
- # [18:27] <Zakim> krit, you need to end that query with '?'
- # [18:27] <krit> zakim, who's here?
- # [18:27] <Zakim> On the phone I see florian_, glazou, dstorey, Molly_Holzschlag, hober, antonp, stearns, smfr, vhardy_, SteveZ, fantasai, Cathy, [Microsoft], dbaron, glenn, Bert, sylvaing,
- # [18:27] <Zakim> ... [Microsoft.a], tantek, howcome, arno, Rossen, jdaggett, +1.415.832.aadd
- # [18:27] <Zakim> [Microsoft] has arronei
- # [18:27] <Zakim> On IRC I see krit, Rossen, Cathy, jdaggett, jet, howcome, tantek, SteveZ, Katie, vhardy_, dbaron, JohnJansen, antonp, smfr, oyvind, dstorey, glenn, Ms2ger, arno, Zakim, glazou,
- # [18:27] <fantasai> vhardy: ... not constrained with 0-1 range
- # [18:27] <Zakim> ... florian_, drublic, miketaylr, danielfilho, mollydotcom, SimonSapin, myakura, logbot, alexmog, gsnedders, vhardy, shans, sylvaing, kojiishi, krijnhuman, hober, fantasai,
- # [18:27] <glazou> s/borwsers/browsers
- # [18:28] <Zakim> ... arronei, Bert, Hixie, kennyluck, TabAtkins, Liam, shepazu, RRSAgent, macpherson, CSSWG_LogBot, ed, plinss, pjrm, stearns, trackbot, paul___irish, Echoes
- # [18:28] <fantasai> dbaron: We allow y values to be outside 0-1 range.
- # [18:28] <fantasai> dbaron: I just looked at Gecko, and it does match the proposal
- # [18:28] <fantasai> dbaron: Dunno if I thought about the issue when I wrote it
- # [18:28] <jet> Zakim: hello
- # [18:28] <fantasai> glazou: any objections against proposal?
- # [18:28] <fantasai> dbaron: Proposal is, rule that you're always visible applies only between 0-1, not at or beyond 0/1
- # [18:28] <fantasai> vhardy: is it clear what happens what happens if you go outside the 0-1 box for colors and things like this?
- # [18:29] <fantasai> dbaron: No, noted as issue in spec we need to fix
- # [18:29] <fantasai> florian: do we need to fix independently
- # [18:29] <fantasai> dbaron: different for different properties
- # [18:29] <fantasai> vhardy: Useful for transitions
- # [18:29] <fantasai> glazou: Want to know what it means for colors
- # [18:29] <vhardy_> s/transitions/translations
- # [18:29] <fantasai> dbaron: for Gecko, we clamp to 0-255
- # [18:29] <fantasai> Bert: It's not forbidden to have colors outside that range.
- # [18:29] <fantasai> dbaron: That's why it's not quite the right behavior
- # [18:30] <fantasai> glazou: Any objections to proposal?
- # [18:30] <fantasai> RESOLVED: Proposal accepted
- # [18:30] <fantasai> dbaron: Last thing, we agreed to add pseudo-attribute to Transition event. So I called it Pseudoelement
- # [18:30] <fantasai> dbaron: Wanted to check a) that ppl ok with that
- # [18:30] <smfr> event.pseudoElement i think dbaron said
- # [18:30] <dbaron> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0598.html
- # [18:31] <fantasai> dbaron: ... something about argument ...
- # [18:32] <fantasai> glazou: I think both make sense
- # [18:32] <fantasai> glazou: no objection?
- # [18:32] <fantasai> RESOLVED: proposal accepted
- # [18:32] <fantasai> dbaron: Other things ChrisL wanted to resolve for transitions
- # [18:32] <dbaron> and animations
- # [18:32] <glazou> http://www.w3.org/mid/1936834258.20120327170804@w3.org
- # [18:33] <smfr> looks good to me
- # [18:33] <fantasai> florian: Not sure what's in the drafts, but publishing is good
- # [18:34] <fantasai> RESOLVED: Publish Transitions and Animations as WD
- # [18:34] <glazou> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0234.html
- # [18:34] <fantasai> Topic: Animations
- # [18:34] * Quits: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146) (Ping timeout)
- # [18:35] <glazou> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14632
- # [18:35] <fantasai> sylvaing: First one is, we talked about defining an animationCancelled event
- # [18:35] <fantasai> sylvaing: For animations that don't run to completion
- # [18:35] <fantasai> sylvaing: I'm proposing we push that to L4
- # [18:35] <fantasai> sylvaing: Same for all features here -- propos to move ot next level
- # [18:35] <smfr> no objection
- # [18:35] <fantasai> florian: Have we done anything other than suggest it should exist? Is there any spec?
- # [18:35] <fantasai> sylvaing: No, just listed as a nice-to-have
- # [18:35] <fantasai> florian: ok
- # [18:36] <glazou> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14777
- # [18:36] <fantasai> sylvaing: Proposal to allow animations to happen along a path
- # [18:36] <fantasai> RESOLVED: defer
- # [18:36] <glazou> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14780
- # [18:37] <fantasai> RESOLVED: defer both thigns liste aboe
- # [18:37] <smfr> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Sep/0399.html
- # [18:37] <fantasai> s/liste aboe/listed above/
- # [18:38] <fantasai> sylvaing: When you create a keyframes rule, you divide 100% by number of keyframes ...
- # [18:38] <fantasai> sylvaing: Idea was let's get rid of percentages, and find syntactic way to use numbers, let browser add them up / divide evenly
- # [18:38] <fantasai> sylvaing: There's no spec, just nice to have
- # [18:38] <fantasai> glazou: It's a good idea, but we can defer that.
- # [18:38] <smfr> no objection
- # [18:39] <fantasai> sylvaing: Proposal for more complex animation scenarious
- # [18:39] <fantasai> s/us/s/
- # [18:39] <glazou> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14798
- # [18:39] <fantasai> sylvaing: Extending calc() function to use in animation functions like animation-delay
- # [18:39] <fantasai> sylvaing: Advanced scenarios, don't think we need for this level
- # [18:39] <fantasai> RESOLVED: defer (both)
- # [18:40] <fantasai> sylvaing: Last one, from Lea, about animation-direction
- # [18:40] <fantasai> sylvaing: Takes normal and alternate
- # [18:40] <fantasai> sylvaing: Asking whether to add a reverse value
- # [18:40] <fantasai> sylvaing: Essentially would be like alternate, except only one phase
- # [18:40] <fantasai> dbaron: I thought we resolved to add those at one point
- # [18:40] <fantasai> sylvaing: ok, I missed that
- # [18:40] <fantasai> sylvaing: did we resolve to add all three?
- # [18:41] <smfr> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011May/0676.html
- # [18:41] <fantasai> dbaron: Thought the proposal was to have 4 values
- # [18:41] * fantasai can't find the resolution
- # [18:42] <fantasai> fantasai: If it's very easy to add, let's add it
- # [18:42] <fantasai> florian: Significantly easier than everything else proposed so far
- # [18:42] <fantasai> dbaron: This is one of those things where implementing it is less work than unprefixing it
- # [18:42] <fantasai> glazou: Probably authors will use a lot
- # [18:42] <fantasai> smfr: WebKit has an implementation already
- # [18:42] <smfr> webkit implements this already
- # [18:43] <fantasai> RESOLVED: add animation-direction: normal | alternate | reverse | reverse-alternate
- # [18:43] <smfr> webkit has reverse | alternate-reverse
- # [18:43] * Quits: jet (jet@166.250.32.73) (Quit: jet)
- # [18:43] * Joins: jet (jet@166.250.32.73)
- # [18:44] <fantasai> Topic: Selectors for fragment identifiers
- # [18:44] <hober> would be nice to resolve on alternate-reverse, not reverse-alternate ^^
- # [18:44] <fantasai> glazou: There's a community group about that, started by ? and ?
- # [18:44] <glazou> http://simonstl.com/articles/cssFragID.html
- # [18:44] <glazou> s/?/Simon St.Laurent
- # [18:44] * Joins: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146)
- # [18:44] <fantasai> dbaron: Chris is most active member on their mailing list, and he's not here right now. Might be worth having him around for this discussion
- # [18:45] * Quits: jet (jet@166.250.32.73) (Quit: jet)
- # [18:45] * Joins: jet (jet@166.250.32.73)
- # [18:45] <dbaron> s/active member/active of WG members/
- # [18:45] <fantasai> Molly: Bears weight w/ other community groups starting up
- # [18:45] <fantasai> Molly: e.g. accessibility group for CSS
- # [18:45] <fantasai> Molly: ... for these community groups anyway
- # [18:46] <fantasai> Molly: liaison / relationship w/ groups that build things like CSS fragment identifiers, CSS a11y
- # [18:46] <Zakim> + +1.425.753.aaee
- # [18:46] <fantasai> Molly: There will be other groups that crop up, that we will need to have a relationship with
- # [18:46] <fantasai> glazou: Would you like to report to wg on a11y?
- # [18:46] <fantasai> ACTION: Molly something about a11y group
- # [18:46] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
- # [18:46] * RRSAgent records action 1
- # [18:46] <trackbot> Created ACTION-454 - Something about a11y group [on Molly Holzschlag - due 2012-04-04].
- # [18:47] <fantasai> glazou: This will drastically increase our liaison work
- # [18:47] <glazou> tantek: ping
- # [18:47] <glazou> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0057.html
- # [18:47] <fantasai> Topic: Margin collapsing
- # [18:48] * fantasai wonders what happend to item about CSS3 Backgrounds and Borders
- # [18:48] * Joins: Ms2ger` (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146)
- # [18:49] <fantasai> Topic: Backgrounds and Borders
- # [18:49] <glazou> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0602.html
- # [18:49] <fantasai> fantasai: 2 issues that are open
- # [18:49] <Bert> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Mar/0602.html
- # [18:49] <tantek> argh, not sure why my voice wasn't going through - I was able to hear everyone.
- # [18:49] <tantek> I'm on Skype.
- # [18:49] * Quits: jet (jet@166.250.32.73) (Ping timeout)
- # [18:49] * mollydotcom note that I will also talk with Eric and Simon re: css fragment identifiers
- # [18:50] * Quits: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146) (Ping timeout)
- # [18:50] <glazou> tantek, will do your extra item after this one if we can
- # [18:50] * glazou tantek: but we can't heard you
- # [18:50] <Bert> Fantasai: [explains the option at the bottom of that msg]
- # [18:50] <Bert> ... The difference is the effect of the width of the collapsed borders,
- # [18:50] <Bert> Dbaron: Why allow image borde ron collapsed table at all?
- # [18:51] <Bert> Fantasai: Why forbid it?
- # [18:51] <Bert> dbaron: it doesn't make much sense.
- # [18:51] * Quits: vhardy_ (qw3birc@128.30.52.28) (Quit: Page closed)
- # [18:51] <mollydotcom> Molly: Are there strong use cases?
- # [18:52] <Bert> fantasai: these options resolve the issues of corners and sides.
- # [18:52] <tantek> glazou ok I'll try again when you ask, otherwise I'm ok with group discussing my agenda item with me just listening.
- # [18:52] <Bert> Stevez: would be good to see this live.
- # [18:52] <tantek> text-size-adjust that is
- # [18:52] <Bert> SteveZ: what's implemented?
- # [18:52] <Bert> dbaron: What I proposed, i.e., no images borders
- # [18:53] <tantek> aside: here is the summary of the agenda item I sent in late:
- # [18:53] <Bert> ... I think that was what the commenter suggeted, too.
- # [18:53] <tantek> I'd like to spend a few minutes on text-size-adjust if that's ok.
- # [18:53] <tantek> Specifically, we don't currently have a spec, and I'd like to propose
- # [18:53] <tantek> a (very) rough draft based on notes/research of various
- # [18:53] <tantek> implementations[1] if there are no objections. Obviously I'll reformat
- # [18:53] <tantek> my notes into our spec template before checking in an editor's draft.
- # [18:53] <tantek> end aside
- # [18:53] <glazou> saw them
- # [18:53] <Bert> fantasai: : I think boh these options make it straughtforward to apply.,
- # [18:53] * Ms2ger` tantek, [1]: missing reference
- # [18:53] <tantek> [1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/CSS/text-size-adjust#property_definition
- # [18:54] <fantasai> Bert: I think it makes sense to have an image around the table even if the borders are collaspsed inside it.
- # [18:54] <fantasai> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-writing-modes/#logical-to-physical
- # [18:54] <fantasai> border-collapsed table there
- # [18:55] <Bert> Fantasai: Imagine this table with a paper background and a ragged paper edge around it.
- # [18:55] <Bert> ... I think that shoul dbe fine.
- # [18:55] <fantasai> glazou: yeah, why not
- # [18:55] <Bert> glazou: Yeah, why not...
- # [18:56] <fantasai> dbaron: Not happy with adding features
- # [18:56] <fantasai> fantasai: this isn't new
- # [18:56] <fantasai> dbaron: I think we implemented lots of features in this spec that nobody wants
- # [18:57] <tantek> can we action the proposer to post a use-case to the list? or defer to level 4?
- # [18:57] * Joins: jet (jet@166.250.34.216)
- # [18:57] <fantasai> glazou: Can we defer to L4?
- # [18:57] <fantasai> florian: Will there be a compatibility problem if we do it later?
- # [18:57] <Zakim> -jdaggett
- # [18:57] <mollydotcom> Molly: I'd like to see some visual or real-world use cases
- # [18:58] <mollydotcom> Molly: My concern is priority
- # [18:58] * glazou why is the word "collapsing" triggering headache here ? :-)
- # [18:58] <dbaron> s/implemented lots of/spent too much time implementing/
- # [18:58] <Zakim> -tantek
- # [18:59] <fantasai> florian: As general principle, don't want our specs to contradict future improvements. Otherwise I'm fine
- # [18:59] <Zakim> +??P5
- # [18:59] <fantasai> florian: Can we defer to L4 without contradicting ourselves later?
- # [18:59] <fantasai> fantasai: Yes, there's 3 ways I can do this
- # [18:59] * Joins: vhardy_ (qw3birc@128.30.52.28)
- # [18:59] <fantasai> 1. Say you MAY apply to border-collapsed tables, and if you do, this is how you do it
- # [19:00] <Bert> (Something like: "Border images apply to table elements, but the effect of the width of collapsed borders is not defined in level 3."?)
- # [19:00] <Zakim> -[Microsoft]
- # [19:00] <fantasai> 2. Say you MUSTn't do this
- # [19:00] <fantasai> 3. Say you it's undefined, we suggest you don't do anything for now, but we might define it later
- # [19:00] <fantasai> ?: Mark it at-risk
- # [19:01] <fantasai> Molly: [...]
- # [19:01] <fantasai> dbaron: When it's in the spec, we get pressure to implement it
- # [19:01] <glazou> Zakim, who is on the phone?
- # [19:01] <Zakim> On the phone I see florian_, glazou, dstorey, Molly_Holzschlag, hober, antonp, stearns, smfr, vhardy_, SteveZ, fantasai, Cathy, dbaron, glenn, Bert, sylvaing, [Microsoft.a],
- # [19:01] <Zakim> ... howcome, arno, Rossen, +1.415.832.aadd, +1.425.753.aaee, ??P5
- # [19:01] <fantasai> Straw poll
- # [19:01] <mollydotcom> Molly: Concern that priority gets passed to implementors
- # [19:01] <fantasai> florian: 3
- # [19:01] <fantasai> glazou: 3
- # [19:01] <fantasai> dstorey: 3
- # [19:01] <fantasai> molly: 3
- # [19:01] <hober> hober: abstain
- # [19:02] <fantasai> anton: 3
- # [19:02] <tantek> I'm ok with 3 or 1
- # [19:02] <fantasai> ?: 3
- # [19:02] <fantasai> smfr: 3
- # [19:02] <arronei> arronei: 3
- # [19:02] <fantasai> vhardy: 3
- # [19:02] <fantasai> steve: 3
- # [19:02] <fantasai> fantasai: 1, fine with 3
- # [19:02] <tantek> Zakim, ??P5 is me
- # [19:02] <Zakim> +tantek; got it
- # [19:02] <fantasai> dbaron: 1 or 2. or 3 I guess
- # [19:02] * Quits: jdaggett (jdaggett@12.197.88.10) (Quit: jdaggett)
- # [19:03] <fantasai> sylvaing: 3
- # [19:03] <glenn> glenn: 4 (at-risk)
- # [19:03] <fantasai> rossen: going to round up to 3
- # [19:03] * Joins: jet_ (jet@12.197.88.252)
- # [19:03] <howcome> howcome: 3
- # [19:04] <Bert> Bert: 1, second choice is 3
- # [19:04] <tantek> and me too :)
- # [19:04] <tantek> let's see if this works
- # [19:04] <tantek> Zakim, unmute me
- # [19:04] <Zakim> tantek was not muted, tantek
- # [19:04] <glazou> https://wiki.mozilla.org/CSS/text-size-adjust#property_definition
- # [19:04] <fantasai> RESOLVED: make interaction with collapsed tables undefined, suggest not implementing it in L3, expect it to be defined in L4
- # [19:05] * Quits: Ms2ger` (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:05] <fantasai> glazou: very rough draft of text-size-adjust
- # [19:05] <fantasai> glazou: He would like to have it in a WD if there's no objection
- # [19:05] <tantek> I can hear the telcon but apparently skype is not letting me talk
- # [19:05] <fantasai> glazou: Of course will reformat the notes into spec template
- # [19:05] * Quits: jet (jet@166.250.34.216) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:05] * jet_ is now known as jet
- # [19:05] <fantasai> florian: Opera doesn't implement that
- # [19:05] <tantek> oh odd, people are using -o-text-size-adjust
- # [19:06] <tantek> in pages today
- # [19:06] <tantek> oh boy
- # [19:06] <fantasai> glazou: They're putting the prefixes for all browsers
- # [19:06] <tantek> I always assume opera implements things :)
- # [19:06] <tantek> ok I'll update my notes
- # [19:06] <fantasai> florian: Thankful for ppl thinking of us, but we don't implement it.
- # [19:06] <fantasai> glazou: Afaict, Tantek's notes match the current implementations
- # [19:06] <fantasai> glazou: Any objection for turning that into an editor's draft
- # [19:06] <fantasai> Bert: Can someone explain what it does? "text inflation" doesn't mean anything to me
- # [19:07] <fantasai> dbaron: I can try to describe something
- # [19:07] <tantek> sorry still can't talk
- # [19:07] * Joins: Ms2ger` (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146)
- # [19:07] <fantasai> dbaron: But explanation is somewhat complicated
- # [19:07] <tantek> happy to include to text from dbaron
- # [19:07] <sylvaing> if Apple has IP, might there be an objection from them?
- # [19:07] <fantasai> florian: I have a guess at what it is, but not sure I'm right
- # [19:07] * glazou sylvaing has a good question
- # [19:07] <fantasai> florian: If you're a mobile browser with tap / zoom
- # [19:07] <tantek> this is just a question of may I start an editor's draft
- # [19:07] <tantek> I'm not saying I've resolved all issues
- # [19:07] <tantek> nor am I asking for a FPWD yet
- # [19:07] <fantasai> florian: You tap on something: could do 2 things, could zoom in at 100% size and if the lines are too long
- # [19:07] <glazou> tantek: sure
- # [19:07] <tantek> glazou - chair-request
- # [19:07] <fantasai> florian: they have to wrap
- # [19:07] <tantek> happy to collect issues
- # [19:08] <fantasai> florian: Alternatively you zoom in to make the lines fit
- # [19:08] <fantasai> florian: but then the font size might be too small
- # [19:08] <fantasai> florian: so you increase the font size
- # [19:08] * fantasai is confused
- # [19:08] <fantasai> ...
- # [19:08] <tantek> happy to record any disputes in the draft also
- # [19:09] <fantasai> szilles: Agree with Bert's comment that it needs more text before it goes in. not clear what it does
- # [19:09] <Zakim> -arno
- # [19:09] * Quits: SimonSapin (simon@82.232.219.95) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:09] <fantasai> glazou: Can you be more precise about concept of inflation before we decide?
- # [19:09] <tantek> yes
- # [19:09] <tantek> please action me
- # [19:09] <fantasai> ACTION Tantek make text-size-adjust more accurate definition of font inflation
- # [19:09] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
- # [19:09] <trackbot> Created ACTION-455 - Make text-size-adjust more accurate definition of font inflation [on Tantek Çelik - due 2012-04-04].
- # [19:09] <tantek> hober, any objection to an editor's draft?
- # [19:09] <fantasai> glazou: ?
- # [19:10] <fantasai> smfr: Ongoing discussions within Apple
- # [19:10] <hober> s/smfr/hober/
- # [19:10] <fantasai> vhardy: Wouldn't the IPR issue get resolved when we do FPWD and the exclusion period kicks in?
- # [19:10] <fantasai> glazou: Yes, but if it's a problem then not worht doing
- # [19:10] <fantasai> glazou: Tantek, please update the draft and send us email
- # [19:11] <fantasai> glazou: Going to suggest keeping this on the member's list, since controversial.
- # [19:11] <fantasai> glazou: Tantek?
- # [19:11] <tantek> is ok with that, but not my preference
- # [19:11] <fantasai> glazou: If you move fast and refine your proposal, we can move fast and go public immediately
- # [19:11] <tantek> ok
- # [19:11] <fantasai> glazou: Let's be clear about what we publish to the general public
- # [19:11] <tantek> ok
- # [19:11] <tantek> thanks glazou
- # [19:12] <fantasai> glazou: Ok, and that's top of hour. Thanks everyone, talk to you next week.
- # [19:12] <Zakim> - +1.415.832.aadd
- # [19:12] * Quits: Katie (kellison@198.228.221.39) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -dbaron
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -vhardy_
- # [19:12] <Zakim> - +1.425.753.aaee
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -antonp
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -smfr
- # [19:12] * Parts: mollydotcom (mollyh@68.231.163.89)
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -stearns
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -[Microsoft.a]
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -hober
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -Rossen
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -SteveZ
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -Bert
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -dstorey
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -Cathy
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -glazou
- # [19:12] * Joins: jdaggett (jdaggett@12.197.88.252)
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -sylvaing
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -tantek
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -Molly_Holzschlag
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -howcome
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -florian_
- # [19:12] * Quits: Rossen (Rossen@131.107.0.84) (Quit: Rossen)
- # [19:12] <Zakim> -glenn
- # [19:13] <glazou> tantek: call that a compromise on a controversial topic and we can still move fast if you make "inflation" more precise
- # [19:13] * glazou has to run, bye
- # [19:13] * Quits: glazou (glazou@82.247.96.19) (Quit: glazou)
- # [19:14] <florian_> s/if the lines are too long/if the lines are too long you wrap them/
- # [19:14] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@173.228.85.36) (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
- # [19:17] * Parts: oyvind (oyvinds@213.236.208.22)
- # [19:17] <Zakim> disconnecting the lone participant, fantasai, in Style_CSS FP()12:00PM
- # [19:17] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended
- # [19:17] <Zakim> Attendees were florian_, glazou, Molly_Holzschlag, hober, dstorey, antonp, stearns, smfr, rossen, SteveZ, fantasai, +1.206.427.aaaa, sylvaing, vhardy_, Cathy, JohnJansen, dbaron,
- # [19:17] <Zakim> ... Bert, glenn, [Microsoft], arronei, tantek, +47.23.69.aabb, howcome, +1.415.832.aacc, arno, +1.415.832.aadd, jdaggett, +1.425.753.aaee
- # [19:18] * Quits: vhardy_ (qw3birc@128.30.52.28) (Quit: Page closed)
- # [19:20] * Quits: Ms2ger` (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:22] * Quits: drublic (drublic@77.2.151.117) (Client exited)
- # [19:26] * Parts: antonp (50a94e63@64.62.228.82)
- # [19:29] * Parts: smfr (smfr@173.228.90.231)
- # [19:32] * Joins: Ms2ger` (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146)
- # [19:33] * Quits: florian_ (florianr@61.115.188.242) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:36] * Quits: arno (arno@192.150.10.201) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:37] * Joins: arno (arno@192.150.10.200)
- # [19:38] * Joins: drublic (drublic@95.115.16.191)
- # [19:39] * Quits: kojiishi (kojiishi@222.158.227.129) (Quit: Leaving...)
- # [19:46] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@166.250.32.73)
- # [19:49] * Joins: dbaron_ (dbaron@12.197.88.252)
- # [19:50] * Quits: Ms2ger` (Ms2ger@193.190.253.146) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:50] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@166.250.32.73) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:51] * Quits: dstorey (Adium@67.180.84.179) (Quit: Leaving.)
- # [20:12] * Joins: dstorey (Adium@144.189.101.1)
- # [20:20] * Quits: tantek (tantek@76.115.51.221) (Quit: tantek)
- # [20:25] * Quits: SteveZ (chatzilla@24.6.120.172) (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.88.1 [Firefox 11.0/20120312181643])
- # [20:28] <fantasai> Thinking about this more, I am not really happy about making something 100% undefined when we could have made it 100% defined and just made it optional+at-risk
- # [20:35] <glenn> that's why i voted 4 (at-risk)
- # [20:36] <glenn> if someone is willing to do the work (or already has been done), i view it as better to put it out there and let it get cut down than put nothing out
- # [20:40] * Joins: raiden (Raiden@87.239.29.55)
- # [20:49] * Joins: tantek (tantek@208.54.5.196)
- # [20:50] * Joins: tantek_ (tantek@76.105.181.98)
- # [20:52] * Quits: tantek (tantek@208.54.5.196) (Ping timeout)
- # [20:52] * tantek_ is now known as tantek
- # [20:54] * Quits: Cathy (qw3birc@128.30.52.28) (Ping timeout)
- # [21:14] * Quits: JohnJansen (qw3birc@128.30.52.28) (Ping timeout)
- # [21:18] * Quits: arno (arno@192.150.10.200) (Quit: Leaving.)
- # [21:24] * sylvaing is now known as sylvaing_away
- # [21:29] <kennyluck> fantasai, I think it's reasonable to defer this to CSS4 where we might be able to define the behavior for 'table' elements and border-collapsed internal table elements all together.
- # [21:31] * Quits: myakura (myakura@110.233.178.43) (Client exited)
- # [21:32] <fantasai> kennyluck: internal table elements are excluded from border-image for good reason
- # [21:32] <fantasai> kennyluck: There's no sensible way to handle corner joins, afaict
- # [21:32] <fantasai> kennyluck: also if you're collapsing borders, there's not much of a use case for having images on them
- # [21:33] <fantasai> kennyluck: you'd get more straightforward behavior by using separated borders with zero border-spacing
- # [21:33] <kennyluck> That's true indeed.
- # [21:34] <fantasai> glenn: The work's been done, there's 2 options for how to do it, but with either one of those sentences it's 100% defined how it behaves.
- # [21:34] * Zakim excuses himself; his presence no longer seems to be needed
- # [21:34] * Parts: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.169)
- # [21:34] <fantasai> glenn: It's actually going to be *harder* for me to come up with the appropriate undefinedness spec than to define it!
- # [21:35] <glenn> then reopen the straw poll based on new information
- # [21:38] <fantasai> what new information?
- # [21:38] <fantasai> that I, the editor, find it more difficult to spec option 3 than option 1? I don't think anyone will care...
- # [21:41] <fantasai> I guess the main new information to me is that I'm rather more convinced that #1 was the right option :)
- # [21:41] <fantasai> but again, doubt anybody would care
- # [21:41] <fantasai> almost everyone picked 3
- # [21:41] * fantasai doesn't really understand why
- # [21:44] <fantasai> well, ok, probably it's because I didn't explain things very well
- # [21:47] <kennyluck> I don't care that much. I guess my preference would be 2 > 1 > 3.
- # [21:47] <kennyluck> 2, but say a future specification might override this...
- # [21:47] <fantasai> that was the point of 3
- # [21:48] <fantasai> To explicitly allow a future spec to override
- # [21:48] <stearns> are there implementations that use either 1 or 2?
- # [21:48] <fantasai> definitely implementations for 2
- # [21:49] <kennyluck> Well, they just don't apply, so 2 maybe.
- # [21:49] <fantasai> 1 is a MAY clause, so also implementations for 3
- # [21:49] <fantasai> er
- # [21:49] <fantasai> 1
- # [21:49] <fantasai> :)
- # [21:49] <fantasai> we have implementations in all cases, really
- # [21:49] <fantasai> since none of the proposals require a UA to do anything with border-image on a table
- # [21:49] <fantasai> it's just do we allow them to, and if so, do we define how
- # [21:49] <kennyluck> Yeah indeed, so this is really just spec philosophy problem, but I just don't get the MAY/SHOULD/MUST logic yet...
- # [21:50] <fantasai> we resolved to allow it but discourage it and define how later
- # [21:51] <stearns> I voted for 3 because I'd rather progress on what we already agree on, and this didn't seem crucial to define right now
- # [21:52] * Parts: howcome (howcome@213.236.208.22)
- # [21:54] <kennyluck> I like 2. better because it allows you to write more tests, even though some of the tests might be testing some of the potential extension points and become invalid one we have a future specification.
- # [21:54] <kennyluck> I'll note that the CSS3 Color's test suite has a bunch of tests like that: potential syntax extension that's invalid in that level.
- # [21:55] * Joins: howcome (howcome@213.236.208.22)
- # [21:55] * Parts: howcome (howcome@213.236.208.22)
- # [21:59] <fantasai> TabAtkins: Did you update the Changes list for Images yet?
- # [22:10] * Joins: arno (arno@192.150.10.200)
- # [22:11] * Quits: arno (arno@192.150.10.200) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [22:11] * Joins: arno (arno@192.150.10.200)
- # [22:18] <glenn> ok
- # [22:18] * Quits: logbot (logbot@110.173.227.145) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:37] * sylvaing_away is now known as sylvaing
- # [22:37] * Joins: logbot (logbot@110.173.227.145)
- # [22:37] * Joins: tantek_ (tantek@76.105.181.98)
- # [22:38] * Quits: raiden (Raiden@87.239.29.55) (No route to host)
- # [22:51] * Quits: tantek_ (tantek@76.105.181.98) (Quit: tantek_)
- # [22:51] * Quits: tantek (tantek@76.105.181.98) (Quit: tantek)
- # [23:02] * miketaylr is now known as miketaylr|
- # [23:02] * miketaylr| is now known as miketaylr||
- # [23:17] * Quits: gsnedders (gsnedders@204.232.194.186) (Ping timeout)
- # [23:17] * Joins: gsnedders (gsnedders@204.232.194.186)
- # [23:28] * Joins: tantek (tantek@208.54.5.145)
- # [23:30] * Joins: tantek_ (tantek@76.115.51.221)
- # [23:30] * Quits: tantek (tantek@208.54.5.145) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [23:30] * tantek_ is now known as tantek
- # Session Close: Thu Mar 29 00:00:00 2012
The end :)