Options:
- # Session Start: Wed Jun 19 00:00:00 2013
- # Session Ident: #css
- # [00:00] * Quits: plh (plehegar@public.cloak) ("Leaving")
- # [00:07] * Quits: tobie (tobie@public.cloak)
- # [00:43] * Quits: ed (~ed@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [00:45] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [00:51] * Joins: ed (~ed@public.cloak)
- # [00:53] * Joins: arronei_ (~arronei@public.cloak)
- # [00:57] * Quits: arronei (~arronei@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [01:45] * Quits: lmclister (~lmclister@public.cloak) (lmclister)
- # [01:56] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
- # [02:03] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [03:31] * Quits: dbaron_ (~dbaron@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [05:12] * Joins: dbaron_ (~dbaron@public.cloak)
- # [05:55] * Joins: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak)
- # [05:56] * Quits: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [05:56] * Joins: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak)
- # [07:49] * Joins: tobie (tobie@public.cloak)
- # [07:50] * Quits: dbaron_ (~dbaron@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [08:02] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
- # [08:33] * Quits: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [08:36] * Joins: SimonSapin (~simon@public.cloak)
- # [08:36] * Joins: Ms2ger (~Ms2ger@public.cloak)
- # [08:45] * Joins: nvdbleek (~nvdbleek@public.cloak)
- # [08:56] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [09:01] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
- # [09:14] * Quits: SimonSapin (~simon@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [09:34] * Joins: kensaku (~kensaku@public.cloak)
- # [09:35] * Joins: koji (~koji@public.cloak)
- # [09:36] * Quits: kensaku (~kensaku@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [09:36] * Quits: koji (~koji@public.cloak) ("Leaving...")
- # [09:36] * Joins: kensaku (~kensaku@public.cloak)
- # [09:54] * Joins: SimonSapin (~simon@public.cloak)
- # [09:56] <SimonSapin> fantasai: Can I copy your w3c-css-wg comments to www-style?
- # [09:56] <SimonSapin> To respond to the painting area stuff
- # [10:53] * Quits: kensaku (~kensaku@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [12:19] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [12:20] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
- # [13:27] * Joins: {Darktears} (~darktears@public.cloak)
- # [13:27] * Quits: darktears (~darktears@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [14:01] * Joins: plh (plehegar@public.cloak)
- # [14:27] * leaverou_away is now known as leaverou
- # [14:30] * leaverou is now known as leaverou_away
- # [14:53] * Joins: darktears (~darktears@public.cloak)
- # [14:53] * Quits: {Darktears} (~darktears@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [14:56] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [14:57] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
- # [15:04] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [15:27] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
- # [17:01] * Joins: lmclister (~lmclister@public.cloak)
- # [17:01] * Quits: lmclister (~lmclister@public.cloak) (lmclister)
- # [17:05] * Quits: nvdbleek (~nvdbleek@public.cloak) (nvdbleek)
- # [17:05] * Joins: nvdbleek (~nvdbleek@public.cloak)
- # [17:05] <nvdbleek> zakim, code?
- # [17:06] * Parts: tlr (roessler@public.cloak) (tlr)
- # [17:06] <SimonSapin> nvdbleek, starting in one hour
- # [17:15] * Joins: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak)
- # [17:22] * Joins: glazou (~glazou@public.cloak)
- # [17:23] * glazou changes topic to 'http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jun/0357.html'
- # [17:23] * Joins: Zakim (zakim@public.cloak)
- # [17:23] * Joins: RRSAgent (rrsagent@public.cloak)
- # [17:23] <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/06/19-css-irc
- # [17:23] <glazou> Zakim, this will be Style
- # [17:23] <Zakim> ok, glazou; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 37 minutes
- # [17:23] <glazou> RRSAgent, make logs public
- # [17:23] <RRSAgent> I have made the request, glazou
- # [17:26] * Joins: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak)
- # [17:35] * leaverou_away is now known as leaverou
- # [17:43] * Joins: antonp (~Thunderbird@public.cloak)
- # [17:49] * Joins: shezbaig_wk (~kvirc@public.cloak)
- # [17:49] * glazou waits for the power outage that will come with the massive thunderstorm we have right now in Paris...
- # [17:49] <glazou> honestly, the worst in ten years
- # [17:54] * Joins: sgalineau (~sgalineau@public.cloak)
- # [17:54] * Joins: florian (~florian@public.cloak)
- # [17:54] * Quits: sgalineau (~sgalineau@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [17:54] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started
- # [17:55] <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
- # [17:55] * Joins: sgalineau (~sgalineau@public.cloak)
- # [17:55] <florian> Zakim, [IPcaller] has me
- # [17:55] <Zakim> +florian; got it
- # [17:55] <Zakim> +plinss
- # [17:56] <Zakim> + +1.206.675.aaaa
- # [17:56] * plh zakim, call plh-mobile
- # [17:56] * Zakim ok, plh; the call is being made
- # [17:56] <Zakim> +Plh
- # [17:56] <sgalineau> Zakim aaaa is me
- # [17:56] <sgalineau> Zakim, aaaa is me
- # [17:56] <Zakim> +sgalineau; got it
- # [17:56] <Zakim> +??P11
- # [17:56] <glazou> Zakim, ??P11 is me
- # [17:56] <Zakim> +glazou; got it
- # [17:57] * Joins: jerenkrantz_ (~jerenkrantz@public.cloak)
- # [17:57] * Joins: BradK (~bradk@public.cloak)
- # [17:58] * Quits: SimonSapin (~simon@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [17:58] <glazou> wow, lights going down, almost power outage
- # [17:58] <glazou> if you see me leave the channel, you'll know why
- # [17:58] <Zakim> +Stearns
- # [17:59] <Zakim> +BradK
- # [17:59] <BradK> Driving in about a minute. Won't look at screen.
- # [17:59] <Zakim> + +93192aabb
- # [17:59] <antonp> Zakim, aabb is me
- # [17:59] <Zakim> +antonp; got it
- # [17:59] * sgalineau glazou starts another blue griffon compile. st germain is in the dark.
- # [17:59] <BradK> Muted too, but listening.
- # [17:59] * Joins: molly (~mholzsch@public.cloak)
- # [18:00] * glazou sgalineau yep, my array of supercomputers sucks all power in the paris area
- # [18:00] * Joins: dael (~dael@public.cloak)
- # [18:00] * Joins: SimonSapin (~simon@public.cloak)
- # [18:00] <Zakim> + +1.212.318.aacc
- # [18:00] <jerenkrantz_> Zakim: aacc is me
- # [18:00] <BradK> I don't see my 650 number
- # [18:00] <Zakim> +??P61
- # [18:00] * florian glazou: your array of supercomputers is causing a lightning storm in Fontainebleau. Pretty impressive
- # [18:00] <antonp> Zakim, aaccis jerenkrantz_
- # [18:00] <Zakim> I don't understand 'aaccis jerenkrantz_', antonp
- # [18:01] <BradK> Zakim, who is here?
- # [18:01] <Zakim> On the phone I see [IPcaller], plinss, sgalineau, Plh, glazou, Stearns, BradK, antonp, +1.212.318.aacc, ??P61
- # [18:01] <Zakim> [IPcaller] has florian
- # [18:01] <Zakim> On IRC I see SimonSapin, dael, molly, BradK, jerenkrantz_, sgalineau, florian, shezbaig_wk, antonp, dbaron, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou, cabanier, nvdbleek, zcorpan, darktears, plh,
- # [18:01] <Zakim> ... Ms2ger, tobie, arronei_, ed, arno, abucur, cbiesinger, logbot, Liam
- # [18:01] <Zakim> + +1.610.324.aadd
- # [18:01] <Zakim> +Lea
- # [18:01] * Joins: leif (~lastorset@public.cloak)
- # [18:01] <antonp> Zakim, aacc is jerenkrantz_
- # [18:01] <Zakim> +jerenkrantz_; got it
- # [18:01] <glazou> florian, same here, you can probably hear the thunder in background from my microphone
- # [18:01] <Zakim> +??P69
- # [18:01] <dael> zakim: aadd is me
- # [18:01] <glazou> Zakim, who is noisy?
- # [18:01] <antonp> Zakim, aadd is dael
- # [18:01] <Zakim> +dael; got it
- # [18:01] <Zakim> glazou, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: [IPcaller] (53%), plinss (9%)
- # [18:01] <glazou> Zakim, mute [IPcaller]
- # [18:01] <Zakim> [IPcaller] should now be muted
- # [18:01] * BradK starting to drive now, won't see irc.
- # [18:01] <SimonSapin> Zakim: ??P69 is probably me
- # [18:01] <SimonSapin> Zakim, ??P69 is me
- # [18:01] <Zakim> +SimonSapin; got it
- # [18:02] <glazou> Zakim, unmute [IPcaller]
- # [18:02] <Zakim> [IPcaller] should no longer be muted
- # [18:02] <Zakim> + +47.23.69.aaee
- # [18:02] <florian> [IPcaller] is several people, including me, but I was muted on my side
- # [18:02] <leif> Zakim, aaee is me
- # [18:02] <Zakim> +leif; got it
- # [18:02] <leif> done :)
- # [18:02] <Zakim> +Molly_Holzschlag
- # [18:02] <Zakim> +jerenkrantz_.a
- # [18:03] <shezbaig_wk> zakim, +jerenkrantz_.a is me
- # [18:03] <Zakim> +dbaron
- # [18:03] <Zakim> sorry, shezbaig_wk, I do not recognize a party named '+jerenkrantz_.a'
- # [18:03] <Zakim> +Krit
- # [18:03] <shezbaig_wk> zakim, jerenkrantz_.a is me
- # [18:03] <Zakim> +shezbaig_wk; got it
- # [18:03] * Joins: krit (~krit@public.cloak)
- # [18:03] <Zakim> +shezbaig_wk.a
- # [18:03] * Joins: oyvind (~oyvinds@public.cloak)
- # [18:03] <Zakim> +[Apple]
- # [18:03] <hober> Zakim, Apple is me
- # [18:03] <Zakim> +hober; got it
- # [18:04] * glazou feels there's a alien from the Alien movie on the call
- # [18:04] <glazou> Zakim, who is noisy?
- # [18:04] * molly sez oy with the noise!
- # [18:04] * Joins: Rossen (~Rossen@public.cloak)
- # [18:04] * sgalineau glazou, it's probably the NSA
- # [18:04] <Zakim> glazou, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: [IPcaller] (5%), plinss (5%)
- # [18:04] * Joins: c_palmer (~c_palmer@public.cloak)
- # [18:04] * plh glazou, it's behind you
- # [18:04] <molly> hahaha
- # [18:04] <Zakim> -shezbaig_wk.a
- # [18:04] <Zakim> +SteveZ
- # [18:04] <glazou> plh, well I don't ARRRRRRGLL
- # [18:05] <SimonSapin> what’s the status on background-position-x/y?
- # [18:05] * Joins: JohnJansen (~JohnJansen@public.cloak)
- # [18:05] <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
- # [18:05] <Rossen> zakim, microsoft is me
- # [18:05] <Zakim> +Rossen; got it
- # [18:05] <JohnJansen> Zakim, Micrsoft has JohnJansen
- # [18:05] <Zakim> sorry, JohnJansen, I do not recognize a party named 'Micrsoft'
- # [18:05] <JohnJansen> Zakim, Microsoft has JohnJansen
- # [18:05] <Zakim> sorry, JohnJansen, I do not recognize a party named 'Microsoft'
- # [18:05] <antonp> ScribeNick: antonp
- # [18:05] <Zakim> +shezbaig_wk.a
- # [18:05] * glazou yo molly !!!
- # [18:06] <sgalineau> Zakim [Microsoft] has JohnJansen
- # [18:06] <sgalineau> Zakim, [Microsoft] has JohnJansen
- # [18:06] <Zakim> sorry, sgalineau, I do not recognize a party named '[Microsoft]'
- # [18:06] <sgalineau> Zakim, you're drunk
- # [18:06] <Zakim> I don't understand 'you're drunk', sgalineau
- # [18:06] * Joins: SteveZ (~chatzilla@public.cloak)
- # [18:06] * glazou LOL @ archeology
- # [18:06] <Rossen> zakim, Rossen has JohnJansen
- # [18:06] <Zakim> +JohnJansen; got it
- # [18:07] * glazou plh if you find a dino, let the TTWF people know
- # [18:07] * Rossen lol
- # [18:07] <dbaron> is somebody scribing?
- # [18:07] <JohnJansen> I guess my phone is angry with Zakim.
- # [18:07] <antonp> plh: Chris is sick and Bert is on vacation. So I'm stepping in as publishing rep.
- # [18:07] * Joins: israelh (~israelh@public.cloak)
- # [18:07] <antonp> .. I hope tomorrow we will be up to date
- # [18:07] * sgalineau whoa Rossen has JohnJansen. Microsoft is turning weird
- # [18:07] * JohnJansen turning?
- # [18:07] <antonp> .. I don't look at the technical issues, just the administrative ones
- # [18:08] * sgalineau JohnJansen. Right. Never mind.
- # [18:08] * Joins: MaRakow (~MaRakow@public.cloak)
- # [18:08] <antonp> SimonSapin: shortnames - we discussed in Tokyo
- # [18:09] <antonp> plh: I think there is an issue in this group about shortnames
- # [18:09] <antonp> .. I found inconsistency
- # [18:09] <antonp> plinss: Issue about latest version links vs current version links?
- # [18:09] <antonp> plh: yes
- # [18:10] <krit> zakim, who is on the phone?
- # [18:10] <Zakim> On the phone I see [IPcaller], plinss, sgalineau, Plh, glazou, Stearns, BradK, antonp, jerenkrantz_, ??P61, dael, Lea, SimonSapin, leif, Molly_Holzschlag, shezbaig_wk, dbaron,
- # [18:10] <Zakim> ... Krit, hober, SteveZ, Rossen, shezbaig_wk.a
- # [18:10] <Zakim> [IPcaller] has florian
- # [18:10] <Zakim> Rossen has JohnJansen
- # [18:10] <antonp> plinss: Also we'll talk about the preprocessor
- # [18:10] <antonp> TOPIC: css-text-3 Issues
- # [18:10] <antonp> Elika sent regrets, and comments to the list
- # [18:10] <c_palmer> Zakim, ??P61 is me
- # [18:10] <Zakim> +c_palmer; got it
- # [18:10] * Joins: tantek (~tantek@public.cloak)
- # [18:10] <nvdbleek> zakim, code?
- # [18:10] <Zakim> the conference code is 78953 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), nvdbleek
- # [18:10] <antonp> dbaron: I'd rather wait for Elika I think
- # [18:10] <plinss> http://www.w3.org/mid/51C15ECC.2030309@inkedblade.net
- # [18:11] <antonp> plinss: OK
- # [18:11] <antonp> TOPIC: CSS Ruby Editors
- # [18:12] * Quits: tantek (~tantek@public.cloak) (tantek)
- # [18:12] <antonp> Elika and Koji would like to take over as editors.
- # [18:12] <antonp> glazou: fine
- # [18:12] <antonp> RESOLVED: Koji, Elika and Jim as editors
- # [18:12] * Joins: tantek (~tantek@public.cloak)
- # [18:12] <antonp> TOPIC: Revive direction focus nav properties
- # [18:12] <stearns> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jun/0332.html
- # [18:13] * tantek is unable to dial in. :(
- # [18:13] <antonp> leif: <summarizes issue>
- # [18:13] * plh tantek, what's your symptom?
- # [18:13] <JohnJansen> * JohnJansen is not able to dial in either.
- # [18:14] <MaRakow> Also can't dial in
- # [18:14] <tantek> plh, being told
- # [18:14] * TabAtkins Ugh, just woke up. Be in in a few. Feel free to postpone anything I need to be here for until I arrive.
- # [18:14] <tantek> The number or code you have dialed is incorrect. Please check the number or code and try again. Message 7. Switch 521.
- # [18:14] <tantek> have been trying for past 10 min
- # [18:15] * nvdbleek I can't dail in either
- # [18:15] * plh I wonder if our bridge is under over capacity
- # [18:15] <antonp> ..: tantek was concerned about whether the properties (?nav-up, nav-down, nav-right, and nav-left ?) were implementable/testable
- # [18:15] <antonp> ..: we have a test suite to demonstrate they "work"
- # [18:15] <antonp> ..: so, we conclude we only want to drop nav-index not those other four
- # [18:15] <antonp> ?: Are you ok with adding them to css4?
- # [18:15] * plh argh, the bridge is full
- # [18:16] * plh all 92 ports are in use
- # [18:16] <tantek> Am totally ok adding them to CSS4
- # [18:16] * hober antonp: that was me
- # [18:16] <antonp> leif: we think they're good to add to css3
- # [18:16] <tantek> hence I've put them on the wiki page for CSS4-UI
- # [18:16] <molly> I think they're fine wherever they go so long as they go somewhere #a11y
- # [18:16] <antonp> s/?:/hober/
- # [18:16] <antonp> hober: I'd rather not resolve without the editor on the call
- # [18:16] * dbaron can't understand the person talking now
- # [18:16] <tantek> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css4-ui
- # [18:16] * nvdbleek can't get in, giving up, talk to you next week
- # [18:16] * leif can't hear anything
- # [18:16] <dael> I'll drop the call if would help. I'm non-critial.
- # [18:16] <tantek> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css4-ui#nav-properties
- # [18:17] <SimonSapin> florian: (?) we can’t hear you
- # [18:17] * jerenkrantz_ whomever is speaking is garbled
- # [18:17] * hober has no idea what florian is saying
- # [18:17] * plh please try now
- # [18:17] <florian> I'll type it
- # [18:17] * antonp can't understand
- # [18:17] * plh several ports on zakim have been freed
- # [18:17] <Zakim> -dael
- # [18:17] <tantek> I'm opposed to putting them in CSS3-UI until there's more work done on the part of those that want them like submitting the test cases for directional nav-properties.
- # [18:17] <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
- # [18:18] <MaRakow> Zakim, [Microsoft] is me
- # [18:18] <Zakim> +MaRakow; got it
- # [18:18] <tantek> If that's done and the download simulator shows it clearly working, I'd strongly consider keeping directional nav-* properties in CSS3-UI but *at risk*.
- # [18:18] <antonp> leif: I'm ok with the idea that if we don't do the work then we don't include them in css3-ui
- # [18:18] <molly> Tantek: is your concern the type of implementations or lack of them?
- # [18:18] <antonp> ..: but I'd like not to make that decision now before we've tried
- # [18:19] <antonp> plinss: The props are there but at risk
- # [18:19] <tantek> That is, IF we have contributed test cases, AND *ONE* implementation that is easily downloadable/testable, THEN I think it is correct to include them in CSS3-UI but *AT RISK*
- # [18:19] <florian> It was argued that these are mainly used outside of the open web. But I don't think that's relevant. If it was in conflict with stuff on the open web, that would be a point, but there is not conflict I know of, and there is nothing in our charter that restricts CSS to open web only. Importantly, if walled garden people are increasingly adopting our technology stack, we try to accomodate them, to limit the risk of them forking into something incompatible
- # [18:19] <antonp> ..: so what specifically are you asking for?
- # [18:19] <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
- # [18:19] <antonp> leif: The edits haven't happened yet, but they were resolved dropped.
- # [18:19] <JohnJansen> Zakim, Microsoft has JohnJansen
- # [18:19] <Zakim> +JohnJansen; got it
- # [18:19] <antonp> plinss: ok
- # [18:20] <tantek> asking for: contribute the test cases per the existing process in CSSWG for contributing test cases
- # [18:20] <antonp> hober: regarding test cases, doesn't tantek's objection disappear if you can get simulator,implementation reports, tests our
- # [18:20] <antonp> leif: yes
- # [18:20] <florian> agree with Sylvain
- # [18:20] * hober antonp: that wasn't me
- # [18:20] <tantek> http://wiki.csswg.org/test#contributing
- # [18:20] <antonp> sylvain(?): I think your request to undo the previous resolution is reasonable; sounds like it was based on incorrect info
- # [18:21] <antonp> plinss: I agree
- # [18:21] <tantek> The reason I'm skeptical about this is that none of this has happened in the years that directional nav was previously in CR.
- # [18:21] <hober> s/hober/?/
- # [18:21] <antonp> s/hober/sylvain (earlier)#
- # [18:21] * plh tantek, you should be able to dial in now btw if you want
- # [18:21] <sgalineau> tantek, it has happened; we didn't know until now that it did
- # [18:21] <tantek> It wasn't based on incorrect info, it was based on the info at the time.
- # [18:21] <tantek> Now we have newer information
- # [18:21] <sgalineau> i didn't say incorrect, i said incomplete
- # [18:21] <tantek> We can re-assess once the test cases have been contributed.
- # [18:21] <antonp> leif: afaict there's limited functionality, not much "space" to test. Think it's interoperable
- # [18:21] <sgalineau> test cases are required to exit CR
- # [18:22] <florian> Level 3 at risk sounds good to me
- # [18:22] <antonp> plinss: any objections to leaving it as risk (instead of removing)?
- # [18:22] <tantek> currently they're slated for removal
- # [18:22] <antonp> molly: what does "at risk" actually mean?
- # [18:22] <tantek> I'll hold off on those edits if there's a commitment for contributing test cases within a reasonable time frame
- # [18:22] <antonp> plinss: We can drop them without regressing from CR to LC
- # [18:22] <sgalineau> tantek, yes the are. based on incomplete info.
- # [18:22] <florian> "at risk" means "at risk of being dropped or pushed back if there are no implementations"
- # [18:23] <tantek> so any such resolution should include a time commitment for contributing the tests
- # [18:23] <tantek> retrying zakim
- # [18:23] <Zakim> +Tantek
- # [18:23] <antonp> plinss: acknowledge tantek's request
- # [18:24] <florian> There are already 2 implementations, as Leif said: presto and webkit
- # [18:24] <antonp> tantek: If we're able to get even one implementation and see it working then that's good enough for leaving "at risk".
- # [18:24] * shezbaig_wk wonders how nav properites work in dynamic layouts like flexbox where things can move around?
- # [18:25] <antonp> plinss: was the webkit implementation done by opera as well
- # [18:25] <antonp> leif: probably not, but I'll get that confirms
- # [18:25] <antonp> s/confirms/confirmed/
- # [18:25] <antonp> plinss: I'm not hearing any objections to leaving them in "as risk"
- # [18:26] <antonp> tantek: I'd like a time commitment for submitting tests
- # [18:26] <antonp> plinss: well, that's the rec track right?
- # [18:26] <antonp> tantek: I'd like to pick a timeframe. I'm willing to be patient, but would like to hear a commitment
- # [18:26] <antonp> leif: I think we can do that within a month
- # [18:27] <antonp> tantek: OK let's wait a month. Then if no tests etc we'll drop them
- # [18:27] <antonp> RESOLUTION: leave these features at risk in level 3
- # [18:27] <antonp> ACTION leif to submit tests etc
- # [18:27] * trackbot is creating a new ACTION.
- # [18:27] <trackbot> Created ACTION-565 - Submit tests etc [on Leif Arne Storset - due 2013-06-26].
- # [18:28] <florian> My mike doesn't work, so I'll type it. We resolved to make "not", "or", "and", and "only" invalid (rather than unknown) media types. I made the change in MQ level 4 and posted a few tests: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jun/0270.html
- # [18:28] <florian> This looks like something that should cause an errata for MQ3, but I want the group's confirmation, and I don't know the process
- # [18:28] <SimonSapin> s/RESOLUTION: /RESOLVED: /
- # [18:28] <antonp> TOPIC: Errating MQ3
- # [18:28] <antonp> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jun/0270.html
- # [18:28] * molly leif - let me know if I can help with any tests, for the nav work
- # [18:28] <antonp> SimonSapin: Goes back to Tokyo discussion
- # [18:29] * glazou cannot hear florian at all
- # [18:29] * dbaron agrees with SimonSapin and can't hear Florian
- # [18:29] <tantek> zakim, who is making noise
- # [18:29] <Zakim> I don't understand 'who is making noise', tantek
- # [18:29] <tantek> zakim, mute tantek
- # [18:29] <Zakim> Tantek should now be muted
- # [18:29] * Quits: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [18:29] <SimonSapin> florian: we should errata level 3 if we agree on the changes
- # [18:29] <antonp> glazou: I think we should do the changes
- # [18:29] <florian> I'd like the group to tell me if the change I put in level 4 is fine, and if yes, someone explain the process
- # [18:30] <florian> that's the only errata
- # [18:30] * molly thinks that's the NSA bot zooming by
- # [18:30] * Joins: tantek_ (~tpod@public.cloak)
- # [18:30] <antonp> plinss: we probably don't have any errata yet for mq3?
- # [18:30] <florian> is there?
- # [18:30] <dbaron> http://www.w3.org/Style/2012/REC-mediaqueries-20120619-errata.html
- # [18:30] <antonp> dbaron: There's an erratum in the errata doc
- # [18:30] <florian> thanks for reminding me of the other errata
- # [18:31] <antonp> plh: Just tell me what I need to put there, and I'll put it
- # [18:31] <antonp> ..: the doc isn't normative until it's folded into a new edition
- # [18:31] <antonp> plinss: you mean an ED of the spec?
- # [18:31] <antonp> plh: correct
- # [18:31] <SimonSapin> the spec header says that errata are normative …
- # [18:31] <plh> s/ED/PER/
- # [18:31] <florian> I don't think there is a rush
- # [18:32] <florian> but I'd like implementers' opinion
- # [18:32] <antonp> plh: so do we fold into level 3? Or wait until level 4
- # [18:32] <plh> btw florian, your tests don't pass on IE10 either
- # [18:32] <florian> +1 to dbaron
- # [18:32] <florian> I'll try and remember
- # [18:32] <glazou> +1
- # [18:32] <antonp> dbaron: I'm inclined to say, stick it in the errata and wait to see if any other errata crop up in the next 6 months
- # [18:32] <dbaron> dbaron: And then hopefully we'll remember to come back in 6 months.
- # [18:33] <Zakim> -[Microsoft]
- # [18:33] <antonp> plinss: so we'll add it to the errata. Who will take that action?
- # [18:33] <florian> I've written if for level 4
- # [18:33] <florian> I think the same phrasing applies to level 3
- # [18:33] <florian> I'd like feedback
- # [18:33] <antonp> plh: I'm happy to add it - but someone needs to send the text
- # [18:33] <antonp> ACTION florian to send relevant prose to plh
- # [18:33] * trackbot is creating a new ACTION.
- # [18:33] <trackbot> Created ACTION-566 - Send relevant prose to plh [on Florian Rivoal - due 2013-06-26].
- # [18:33] <tantek> leif, florian, I couldn't find the URL to the Webkit-simulator with nav-* properties
- # [18:33] <tantek> could you provide URL to email or just the simulator directly?
- # [18:34] <antonp> SimonSapin: I'd like to go back to how we do changes
- # [18:34] * Quits: nvdbleek (~nvdbleek@public.cloak) (nvdbleek)
- # [18:34] * glazou plh we never deprecate anything, we have levels not versions ahem :-)
- # [18:34] <antonp> ..: Does a level 4 completely replace level 3? Or do we need to fix level 3?
- # [18:34] <Zakim> -BradK
- # [18:34] * Quits: tantek (~tantek@public.cloak) (tantek)
- # [18:34] * tantek_ is now known as tantek
- # [18:34] <antonp> ...: when level 4 becomes a REC
- # [18:34] <antonp> ?
- # [18:35] <antonp> plh: I don't remember what we do to the level 3 spec in that case. Add a note to readers?
- # [18:35] <florian> we don't have any level 4 rec yet, do we?
- # [18:35] <Zakim> +BradK
- # [18:35] <antonp> plinss: we don't have many level 4 yet
- # [18:35] <antonp> TOPIC: Extend !important to !<anything>*
- # [18:35] * molly says that just sounds so wrong
- # [18:35] <antonp> SimonSapin: <summarizes issue>
- # [18:35] <antonp> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jun/0268.html
- # [18:35] * leif tantek: It's http://www.smarttv-alliance.org/Markets/Developers.aspx
- # [18:36] * leif (warning: 1 GB download)
- # [18:36] * glazou is quietly waiting for the !not-important proposal :-D
- # [18:36] <antonp> hober (?): I don't think we should do this until we actually have a module which requires it
- # [18:37] * hober yup, that was me :)
- # [18:37] <florian> There were two parts proposed about it, one about forward compatibility, one about an actual used of the ! for new stuff. I am ok with the first stuff, I think the later is interesting but premature
- # [18:37] <antonp> molly: I'm really concerned about this. There's already misuse and understanding due to the existing syntax choice
- # [18:38] <dbaron> dbaron (after hober): I think we want to make the values of variables general now.
- # [18:38] <antonp> hober: until we have a concrete ident-after-! it would be premature to generalize the syntax
- # [18:39] <antonp> SimonSapin: but we need to think about compat
- # [18:39] <antonp> .. <explains>
- # [18:39] <antonp> plinss: Didn't we already resolve as invalid, variables with !important?
- # [18:40] <antonp> SimonSapin: <replies>
- # [18:40] <SimonSapin> SimonSapin: we want new stuff to be invalid in older UAs
- # [18:41] * dbaron is probably misunderstanding the proposal and not being useful
- # [18:41] <SteveZ> Doesn't this also simplify parsing of the variable value?
- # [18:41] <SimonSapin> dbaron: I want var-foo: red !type(color); to be invalid rather than have the value be "red !type(color)"
- # [18:42] <SimonSapin> s/dbaron:/dbaron,/
- # [18:42] <tantek> +1 to Molly's and Hober's objections/concerns.
- # [18:42] <antonp> hober: I don't see why we need to generalize this so early, but I'm not going to formally object or whatever
- # [18:43] <dbaron> hober: we can just disallow ! in variables other than !important so that we can extend it later, without extending it now
- # [18:43] <florian> I approve of the proposal
- # [18:43] <dbaron> SimonSapin: That's exactly my proposal.
- # [18:43] <antonp> glazou: looking at the example, I agree with the proposal
- # [18:43] <SteveZ> +1 for Simon's proposal
- # [18:44] <c_palmer> as long as !important is still valid for a variable, I'm for it
- # [18:44] * Joins: smfr (~smfr@public.cloak)
- # [18:44] <antonp> plinss: any objections to the proposal?
- # [18:44] <glazou> yay SimonSapin
- # [18:44] <antonp> RESOLVED: proposal accepted
- # [18:45] <SimonSapin> RESOLVED: top-level ! is invalid in Custom Properties
- # [18:45] <SimonSapin> … allowing for future extensions with similar syntax to !important
- # [18:46] <glazou> ScribeNick: molly
- # [18:46] <stearns> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jun/0245.html
- # [18:46] <Zakim> -antonp
- # [18:46] <molly> Topic: Paint order
- # [18:47] <molly> Alan: Describes issue
- # [18:47] <glazou> Zakim, mute me
- # [18:47] <Zakim> glazou should now be muted
- # [18:47] <SimonSapin> Topic: elementsFromPoint() and pointer-events:paint-order
- # [18:47] <molly> David: I think I'd have interest if it were clearly defined but I need to understand more
- # [18:47] <molly> Alan: I'll reply to thread with a more complete definition
- # [18:47] <Zakim> +antonp
- # [18:48] <molly> David: This is good for me, but in the spec would need to be more detailed
- # [18:48] <glazou> Zakim, unmute me
- # [18:48] <Zakim> glazou should no longer be muted
- # [18:48] <molly> David: I'm okay with it
- # [18:48] <molly> Peter: Thoughts/Objections?
- # [18:48] <dbaron> (we're discussing just elementsFromPoint() so far)
- # [18:49] <molly> Alan: Will add some text for more information, and wait until we have implementations of elementesFromPoint()
- # [18:49] <molly> Peter: Seems fair enough: opinions?
- # [18:49] <dbaron> Alan: For the second part (pointer-events: paint-order), I think it makes sense to wait until we have implementations of elementsFromPoint()
- # [18:49] <molly> Peter: Resolved
- # [18:50] <molly> no objection
- # [18:50] <plinss> RESOLVED: add elementsFromPoint() to cssom-view
- # [18:50] <plinss> ACTION: stearns to propose text for elementsFromPoint
- # [18:50] * trackbot is creating a new ACTION.
- # [18:50] * RRSAgent records action 1
- # [18:50] <trackbot> Created ACTION-567 - Propose text for elementsFromPoint [on Alan Stearns - due 2013-06-26].
- # [18:51] <glazou> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jun/0240.html
- # [18:51] <molly> Topic: Multiple Subject Indicators
- # [18:51] <molly> Glazou: Describing issue
- # [18:52] <molly> Glazou: Two possibilities - first if multiple, only last wins OR
- # [18:52] <molly> didn't catch that
- # [18:52] <SimonSapin> glazou: or all of them match
- # [18:52] <dbaron> I'd prefer either (a) or (c) in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jun/0240.html ; I don't like (b).
- # [18:52] <molly> Fantasai: I think it makes more sense if all of them match
- # [18:53] <molly> Glazou: it's an implementation change so I want to hear from implementors
- # [18:53] <molly> David: I might be missing something here
- # [18:53] <SimonSapin> s/Fantasai/leaverou/ ?
- # [18:53] <molly> Glazou and Dbaron - syntactic sugar discussion
- # [18:53] <glazou> s/Fantasai/leaverou
- # [18:53] * molly is that lea? Sorry! Hi Lea
- # [18:53] * leaverou molly: LOL, hi
- # [18:53] <molly> Peter: Is anyone implementing yet?
- # [18:54] * Joins: tantek_ (~tpod@public.cloak)
- # [18:54] <dbaron> Lea: It's just syntactic sugar.
- # [18:54] <molly> Glazou: put in selectors4
- # [18:54] <dbaron> dbaron: It might (depending on implementation) require implementations to remap the syntax, which is a bit of a pain, but hard to know.
- # [18:55] <molly> Peter: Resolved
- # [18:55] <plinss> RESOLVED: multiple subject selectors allowed and all match
- # [18:55] <molly> RESOLVED place Multiple Subject Indicator matching in Selectors Level 4
- # [18:56] <plinss> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jun/0097.html
- # [18:57] <molly> Discussing Cross-Origin Style Sheets
- # [18:57] <dbaron> dbaron: I think people who are interested should go review the change.
- # [18:57] <molly> Peter: Anyone else?
- # [18:58] * molly can't hear
- # [18:58] * dbaron couldn't hear what issue what Simon was talking about
- # [18:58] <dbaron> Simon: Please look at the issue in agenda item (A) on the mailing list.
- # [18:58] <SimonSapin> A. [css-backgrounds] Painting area and 'background-attachment: local'
- # [18:58] <SimonSapin> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jun/0276.html
- # [18:58] <Zakim> -dbaron
- # [18:58] <Zakim> -hober
- # [18:58] <antonp> Thanks for taking over the scribing, Molly! My line was terrible; couldn't hear half the group
- # [18:58] * Quits: tantek (~tpod@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [18:58] * tantek_ is now known as tantek
- # [18:58] <Zakim> -sgalineau
- # [18:58] <Zakim> -jerenkrantz_
- # [18:58] <Zakim> -glazou
- # [18:58] <Zakim> -Lea
- # [18:58] <Zakim> -Krit
- # [18:58] <Zakim> -shezbaig_wk
- # [18:58] <Zakim> -BradK
- # [18:58] <Zakim> -Molly_Holzschlag
- # [18:58] <Zakim> -Tantek
- # [18:59] <Zakim> -MaRakow
- # [18:59] <Zakim> -Stearns
- # [18:59] <Zakim> -antonp
- # [18:59] <Zakim> -leif
- # [18:59] * Quits: dael (~dael@public.cloak) (dael)
- # [18:59] <Zakim> -shezbaig_wk.a
- # [18:59] <Zakim> -Plh
- # [18:59] <Zakim> -plinss
- # [18:59] <Zakim> -SteveZ
- # [18:59] <Zakim> -SimonSapin
- # [18:59] <Zakim> -Rossen
- # [18:59] * Quits: MaRakow (~MaRakow@public.cloak) ("Page closed")
- # [18:59] * Parts: BradK (~bradk@public.cloak) (BradK)
- # [18:59] * Quits: antonp (~Thunderbird@public.cloak) (antonp)
- # [18:59] <SimonSapin> dbaron: looked at Syntax yet ? :)
- # [18:59] <Zakim> -c_palmer
- # [18:59] * Quits: molly (~mholzsch@public.cloak) ("computer says ow!")
- # [19:00] <leif> RRSAgent, please make minutes
- # [19:00] <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/06/19-css-minutes.html leif
- # [19:00] * Quits: jerenkrantz_ (~jerenkrantz@public.cloak) ("Page closed")
- # [19:02] * Quits: krit (~krit@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [19:03] * Quits: tantek (~tpod@public.cloak) ("Colloquy for iPod touch - http://colloquy.mobi")
- # [19:04] <glazou> FWIW, I now have UI for font-feature-settings in BlueGriffon
- # [19:04] <Zakim> disconnecting the lone participant, [IPcaller], in Style_CSS FP()12:00PM
- # [19:04] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended
- # [19:04] <Zakim> Attendees were florian, plinss, +1.206.675.aaaa, Plh, sgalineau, glazou, Stearns, BradK, +93192aabb, antonp, +1.212.318.aacc, +1.610.324.aadd, Lea, jerenkrantz_, dael, SimonSapin,
- # [19:04] <Zakim> ... +47.23.69.aaee, leif, Molly_Holzschlag, dbaron, Krit, shezbaig_wk, hober, SteveZ, JohnJansen, c_palmer, MaRakow, Tantek
- # [19:05] * Parts: leif (~lastorset@public.cloak) (leif)
- # [19:08] * Quits: glazou (~glazou@public.cloak) ("dinner time in europe")
- # [19:08] * Joins: leif (~lastorset@public.cloak)
- # [19:08] * Quits: florian (~florian@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [19:08] * Parts: leif (~lastorset@public.cloak) (leif)
- # [19:10] * Quits: oyvind (~oyvinds@public.cloak) (oyvind)
- # [19:16] <SimonSapin> TabAtkins: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/css/20130619#l-434
- # [19:17] <TabAtkins> Yup, saw that. I'll make the edit shortly.
- # [19:17] <SimonSapin> cool
- # [19:17] <TabAtkins> Except that !important is, of course, allowed.
- # [19:18] <TabAtkins> (And stripped out by the parser.)
- # [19:18] <SimonSapin> yeah, it’s removed and accounted for before we get to dealing with custom proporties
- # [19:28] <leaverou> TabAtkins: hi, are the minutes from the f2f published anywhere yet? Is there any draft I could look at?
- # [19:29] <TabAtkins> leaverou: I don't think so. You can check out the logs that krijn has, or the auto-generated minutes (but I forget how to access those).
- # [19:29] <leaverou> TabAtkins: thanks!
- # [19:30] <SimonSapin> for the generated stuff start with http://www.w3.org/2013/06/19-css-minutes.html and try changing the date
- # [19:31] <SimonSapin> The F2F was June 5-7
- # [19:31] <leaverou> thanks SimonSapin!
- # [19:32] <SimonSapin> leaverou: thoughts on background-attachment:local vs. background-clip? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jun/0276.html
- # [19:32] <leaverou> SimonSapin: lemme take a look
- # [19:33] <leaverou> SimonSapin: "Note: This means that 'background-clip: border-box' is indistinguishable from 'padding-box'." Why?
- # [19:34] <SimonSapin> if 'overflow: (not visible)' clips at padding box, like it does for content
- # [19:34] <leaverou> I can think of ways to paint it under the border too
- # [19:34] * Quits: israelh (~israelh@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [19:34] <leaverou> SimonSapin: is that how existing implementations behave?
- # [19:35] <SimonSapin> I’ll have to double-check, but I think there is no interop
- # [19:35] <SimonSapin> on eg. background-clip: content-box; background-attachment: local
- # [19:36] <SimonSapin> we *could* have 'overflow' clip backgrounds at the border-box instead, but the inconsistency with content such as text is weird
- # [19:38] <leaverou> SimonSapin: what inconsistency?
- # [19:39] * Quits: plh (plehegar@public.cloak) ("Leaving")
- # [19:39] <SimonSapin> scrolled text and scrolled background (with attachment: local) being clipped on different rectangels
- # [19:40] <SimonSapin> assuming overflow: scroll/auto/hidden
- # [19:40] <leaverou> SimonSapin: huh, so WebKit does what you're saying
- # [19:40] <leaverou> which is very weird, because it's different than both the other values
- # [19:40] <leaverou> http://dabblet.com/gist/5816242
- # [19:40] * Quits: arno (~arnog@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [19:41] * Joins: arno (~arnog@public.cloak)
- # [19:41] <SimonSapin> background-attachment: local basically moves the image inside the scrolling thing
- # [19:42] <SimonSapin> you don’t see scrolled text behind the border
- # [19:43] <SimonSapin> leaverou: see http://dabblet.com/gist/5816265 with 'background-clip: content-box' the content-box rectangle also scrolls with the content
- # [19:47] <leaverou> SimonSapin: it could still scroll, underneath the border
- # [19:47] <SimonSapin> it could
- # [19:47] <SimonSapin> but that would be inconsistent with how the text is clipped
- # [19:47] <leaverou> and you'd just see a part of it
- # [19:47] <leaverou> I could see cases where that "inconsistency" is intentional
- # [19:48] <SimonSapin> I could live with that either way
- # [19:48] * Joins: krit (~krit@public.cloak)
- # [19:48] <SimonSapin> I’m more interested in content-box scrolling with the content
- # [19:49] <SimonSapin> rather than doing this http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Jun/att-0076/painting-area-notref.html
- # [19:50] <SimonSapin> which is what Presto does
- # [19:52] <SimonSapin> … and IE too
- # [19:53] * Joins: tantek (~tpod@public.cloak)
- # [19:53] * Quits: tantek (~tpod@public.cloak) ("Colloquy for iPod touch - http://colloquy.mobi")
- # [19:56] * Parts: smfr (~smfr@public.cloak) (smfr)
- # [19:56] <leaverou> SimonSapin: huh, yeah, that's obvious
- # [19:57] <SimonSapin> leaverou: anyway, I would appreciate a comment one way or another on www-style, so far this thread is a bit of a monologue :)
- # [19:57] <leaverou> SimonSapin: ok, will do!
- # [19:57] <SimonSapin> thanks
- # [20:01] * Quits: arno (~arnog@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [20:01] * Joins: arno (~arnog@public.cloak)
- # [20:06] <leaverou> SimonSapin: btw, I couldn't find the minutes :(
- # [20:06] <leaverou> any URL I tried didn't work
- # [20:07] <Ms2ger> leaverou, http://www.w3.org/2013/06/19-css-minutes.html ?
- # [20:08] <leaverou> Ms2ger: that's for today
- # [20:08] <SimonSapin> leaverou: http://www.w3.org/2013/06/05-css-minutes.html
- # [20:08] <SimonSapin> then change 05 to 06 and 07
- # [20:08] <leaverou> SimonSapin: oooooh, it needed a leading zero
- # [20:08] <leaverou> that explains it
- # [20:08] <Ms2ger> Couldn't tell from what you were saying what you needed :)
- # [20:08] <SimonSapin> alternatively http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/css/20130605
- # [20:09] <leaverou> thanks Simon!
- # [20:09] <SimonSapin> the latter logs all the time, not just meetings
- # [20:17] * Quits: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [20:17] * Joins: SimonSapin1 (~simon@public.cloak)
- # [20:19] * Quits: krit (~krit@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [20:20] * Quits: SimonSapin (~simon@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [20:28] * Quits: JohnJansen (~JohnJansen@public.cloak) ("Page closed")
- # [20:34] * Quits: arno (~arnog@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [20:38] * Joins: arno (~arnog@public.cloak)
- # [20:44] * Joins: krit (~krit@public.cloak)
- # [20:46] * Joins: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak)
- # [20:51] * Joins: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak)
- # [20:52] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [20:52] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
- # [21:00] * Zakim excuses himself; his presence no longer seems to be needed
- # [21:00] * Parts: Zakim (zakim@public.cloak) (Zakim)
- # [21:06] * Quits: SimonSapin1 (~simon@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [21:27] * Joins: SimonSapin (~simon@public.cloak)
- # [21:39] * Quits: Ms2ger (~Ms2ger@public.cloak) ("nn")
- # [21:52] * Quits: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [22:01] * Quits: SimonSapin (~simon@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [22:01] * Joins: SimonSapin (~simon@public.cloak)
- # [22:04] * Quits: Rossen (~Rossen@public.cloak) ("Page closed")
- # [22:20] * Joins: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak)
- # [22:29] * Quits: SteveZ (~chatzilla@public.cloak) ("ChatZilla 0.9.90 [Firefox 21.0/20130511120803]")
- # [22:29] * Quits: tobie (tobie@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [22:31] * Joins: tobie (tobie@public.cloak)
- # [22:37] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [22:37] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
- # [22:39] * Joins: zcorpan_ (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
- # [22:39] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [22:48] * Quits: zcorpan_ (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [22:48] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
- # [22:55] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [22:56] * Quits: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [23:18] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
- # [23:43] * leaverou is now known as leaverou_away
- # [23:51] * Quits: SimonSapin (~simon@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # Session Close: Thu Jun 20 00:00:00 2013
The end :)