Options:
- # Session Start: Tue Oct 29 00:00:00 2013
- # Session Ident: #css
- # [00:18] * heycam|away is now known as heycam
- # [00:26] * Quits: lmclister (~lmclister@public.cloak) ("")
- # [00:57] * Quits: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak) (jet)
- # [01:05] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
- # [01:05] * Quits: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [01:11] * Joins: plh (plehegar@public.cloak)
- # [01:12] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [01:14] * Joins: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak)
- # [01:55] * Joins: lmclister (~lmclister@public.cloak)
- # [02:00] * Joins: lmcliste_ (~lmclister@public.cloak)
- # [02:02] * Quits: lmclister (~lmclister@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [02:11] * Joins: lmclister (~lmclister@public.cloak)
- # [02:11] * Quits: lmcliste_ (~lmclister@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [02:18] * Quits: ed (~ed@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [02:28] * Quits: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [02:35] * Quits: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [02:40] * Quits: plh (plehegar@public.cloak) ("Leaving")
- # [02:40] * Joins: ed (~ed@public.cloak)
- # [02:44] * Quits: rhauck1 (~Adium@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [02:48] * Quits: sgalineau (~sgalineau@public.cloak) ("Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com")
- # [02:55] * Quits: lmclister (~lmclister@public.cloak) ("")
- # [03:30] * Joins: rhauck (~Adium@public.cloak)
- # [03:53] * Joins: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak)
- # [04:17] * Quits: logbot (~logbot@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [04:18] * heycam is now known as heycam|away
- # [04:21] * Quits: rhauck (~Adium@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [04:34] * Joins: logbot (~logbot@public.cloak)
- # [04:41] * Quits: logbot (~logbot@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [04:42] * Joins: logbot (~logbot@public.cloak)
- # [04:46] * Joins: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak)
- # [04:49] * Quits: logbot (~logbot@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [04:50] * Joins: logbot (~logbot@public.cloak)
- # [05:03] * heycam|away is now known as heycam
- # [05:53] * Joins: lmclister (~lmclister@public.cloak)
- # [05:59] * Joins: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak)
- # [06:24] * Joins: nvdbleek (~nvdbleek@public.cloak)
- # [06:25] * Quits: nvdbleek (~nvdbleek@public.cloak) (nvdbleek)
- # [07:06] * Quits: lmclister (~lmclister@public.cloak) ("")
- # [07:52] * Joins: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak)
- # [07:57] * Quits: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [08:13] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
- # [08:27] * Joins: Ms2ger (~Ms2ger@public.cloak)
- # [08:40] <krit> zcorpan_: ping
- # [08:40] <zcorpan> krit: pong
- # [08:44] <krit> zcorpan_: Leafing the message here. Did we resolve on DOM*ReadOnly APIs? Last time I checked, there were doubts about this.
- # [08:46] <zcorpan> i don't know if there was a resolution. there were some concerns with the current setup, but nothing better proposed i think
- # [08:49] <heycam> I thought it was DOMRectView
- # [08:50] * Quits: Ms2ger (~Ms2ger@public.cloak) ("bbl")
- # [08:55] * heycam is now known as heycam|away
- # [09:09] <zcorpan> the spec still has DOMRectReadOnly
- # [09:10] <zcorpan> but maybe DOMRectView was a better proposal
- # [09:15] <krit> zcorpan: I think the problem was more that DOMRect inherited from DOMRectReadOnly
- # [09:15] * Quits: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [09:16] <krit> zcorpan: so when you asked if DOMRect is of type DOMRectReadOnly, it returned true
- # [09:16] <zcorpan> right
- # [09:16] <krit> zcorpan: so it was less of a problem of the name
- # [09:16] <krit> zcorpan: or was DOMRectView the proposed solution?
- # [09:17] <krit> zcorpan: I assume I would be fine with that. If so, I would like to have a resolution ASAP
- # [09:17] <zcorpan> yeah, but i agree renaming doesn't remove the fundamental problem
- # [09:17] <krit> zcorpan: right
- # [09:17] <krit> zcorpan:
- # [09:18] <krit> zcorpan: at least View does not give you the impression that it must be read only
- # [09:18] * Quits: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak) (jet)
- # [09:19] <zcorpan> indeed. but given how people write code for the web, it's hard to reason about what will result in less bugs in practice
- # [09:19] <krit> zcorpan: I assume a NoInterface object that provides the data for the common types could be another solultion. But it would make it more complex and IMO isn’t prefered to having two totaly separate interfaces
- # [09:20] <krit> zcorpan: DOMRect could have a CTOR that takes DOMRectReadOnly and both would be separate interfaces
- # [09:21] <krit> (then ReadOnly would be right again IMO)
- # [09:21] <zcorpan> yeah the spec has already had separate interfaces (and a common NoInterfaceObject interface) :-)
- # [09:22] <zcorpan> a problem with separate interfaces is that you have to do two instanceof checks if you want to know it's a rect but don't care about the readonlyness
- # [09:27] <zcorpan> and this is basically where the discussion ended on the list, iirc
- # [09:28] <krit> zcorpan: right, but can an inherited object *remove* defined properties of the parent?
- # [09:28] <zcorpan> no
- # [09:29] <krit> zcorpan: if that is not possible (and I don’t know how it could be), then we just have the two choices: 1) go with separate interfaces 2) Go with DOM*View and the inheirtance IMO
- # [09:32] <krit> zcorpan: let me know what you would prefer and we can suggest it to the CSS WG
- # [09:33] <krit> zcorpan: need to leave ...
- # [09:50] <SimonSapin> oh noes
- # [09:50] <SimonSapin> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/ gives 500s when showing diffs
- # [10:29] * Joins: Ms2ger (~Ms2ger@public.cloak)
- # [10:33] * Joins: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak)
- # [11:15] * Quits: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [11:16] * Joins: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak)
- # [11:17] * Joins: teoli_ (~teoli@public.cloak)
- # [11:17] * Quits: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [11:38] * Joins: michou (~Adium@public.cloak)
- # [12:06] * Ms2ger is now known as MrT
- # [12:40] * Quits: MrT (~Ms2ger@public.cloak) ("lunch")
- # [12:58] * Joins: plh (plehegar@public.cloak)
- # [13:31] * Joins: glazou (~glazou@public.cloak)
- # [13:36] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [14:06] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
- # [14:11] * Joins: Ms2ger (~Ms2ger@public.cloak)
- # [14:12] * Joins: tobie (tobie@public.cloak)
- # [14:17] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [15:01] * Joins: dauwhe (~dauwhe@public.cloak)
- # [15:35] * Joins: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak)
- # [15:35] * Quits: teoli_ (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [15:44] * Joins: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak)
- # [16:05] * Quits: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak) (jet)
- # [16:23] * Joins: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak)
- # [16:47] * Joins: lmclister (~lmclister@public.cloak)
- # [16:55] * Quits: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [17:09] * Quits: glazou (~glazou@public.cloak) (glazou)
- # [17:14] * Joins: glazou (~glazou@public.cloak)
- # [17:22] <SimonSapin> TabAtkins: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-syntax/#issue-7c28d1bb is not actually an issue in Syntax, is it?
- # [17:22] <SimonSapin> possibly an issue on other specs
- # [17:22] <SimonSapin> or should Syntax have normative text that override other specs?
- # [17:23] * Quits: liam (liam@public.cloak) ("visa")
- # [17:24] <Ms2ger> SimonSapin, "should probably be translated into normative text in the relevant specs"
- # [17:24] <Ms2ger> Sounds like it's for other specs
- # [17:37] * Joins: cabanier (~cabanier@public.cloak)
- # [17:49] * Quits: glazou (~glazou@public.cloak) (glazou)
- # [17:58] * Quits: michou (~Adium@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [17:59] * Joins: rhauck (~Adium@public.cloak)
- # [18:00] * Joins: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak)
- # [18:03] * Joins: glazou (~glazou@public.cloak)
- # [18:03] * Quits: glazou (~glazou@public.cloak) (glazou)
- # [18:11] * Quits: tobie (tobie@public.cloak)
- # [18:19] * Joins: tobie (tobie@public.cloak)
- # [18:20] * Quits: tobie (tobie@public.cloak)
- # [18:29] * Quits: rhauck (~Adium@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
- # [18:32] <TabAtkins> SimonSapin: Yeah, it's not really a Syntax issue.
- # [18:32] * Joins: rhauck (~Adium@public.cloak)
- # [18:35] <SimonSapin> TabAtkins: I’m trying to resolve issues in order to ask for LC, what should we do with this one?
- # [18:36] <TabAtkins> Shift it to a Note.
- # [19:04] <SimonSapin> eh, I didn’t want to trigger a bikeshed on a feature we’re deferring
- # [19:04] <SimonSapin> not even a feature, syntax support for features we don’t have yet
- # [19:32] * Joins: glazou (~glazou@public.cloak)
- # [19:32] * Quits: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [19:34] * Joins: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak)
- # [19:36] * Joins: teoli_ (~teoli@public.cloak)
- # [19:36] * Quits: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [19:38] * Quits: glazou (~glazou@public.cloak) (glazou)
- # [19:39] <SimonSapin> TabAtkins: zero issues. Shall we ask for LC
- # [19:39] <SimonSapin> ?
- # [19:41] * Joins: liam (liam@public.cloak)
- # [19:43] <SimonSapin> the rsync script messed up and dev.w3.org does not have all the changes dvcs.w3.org has
- # [19:44] <Ms2ger> plinss, ^
- # [19:44] <SimonSapin> I suppose the next push will fix it
- # [20:05] * Joins: tobie (tobie@public.cloak)
- # [20:34] * Quits: tobie (tobie@public.cloak)
- # [20:34] * Quits: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak) (jet)
- # [20:36] * Quits: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [20:38] * Quits: liam (liam@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
- # [20:46] * Quits: teoli_ (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [20:59] * Joins: nvdbleek (~nvdbleek@public.cloak)
- # [21:02] * Joins: tobie (tobie@public.cloak)
- # [21:14] * Joins: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak)
- # [21:16] <TabAtkins> SimonSapin: Yeah, let's.
- # [21:19] <fantasai> SimonSapin: Publish WD this week, then ask for LC on the WD
- # [21:19] <fantasai> SimonSapin: People will want time to review. Best to have the WD up so you get aske even more people to review
- # [21:20] <fantasai> SimonSapin: You have a changes section up-to-date?
- # [21:34] * Joins: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak)
- # [21:34] * Quits: nvdbleek (~nvdbleek@public.cloak) (nvdbleek)
- # [21:36] * Quits: plh (plehegar@public.cloak) ("Leaving")
- # [21:41] * Joins: dauwhe_ (~dauwhe@public.cloak)
- # [21:41] * Quits: dauwhe_ (~dauwhe@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [21:41] * Quits: dauwhe (~dauwhe@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [21:41] * Joins: dauwhe (~dauwhe@public.cloak)
- # [21:42] * Quits: Ms2ger (~Ms2ger@public.cloak) ("nn")
- # [21:47] * Quits: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak) (jet)
- # [22:03] * Joins: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak)
- # [22:05] <SimonSapin> fantasai: I’ll add Changes since previous WD, but it’s only the Environment encoding stuff, which I would argue is only editorial
- # [22:05] <SimonSapin> should I keep around the existing Changes section?
- # [22:05] <SimonSapin> ie. changes since CSS 2.1
- # [22:05] * Joins: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak)
- # [22:05] <SimonSapin> fantasai: is it really useful to do another WD before LC?
- # [22:06] <SimonSapin> also, does "closing this issue without changes" needs a WG resolution?
- # [22:08] * Quits: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak) ("8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.")
- # [22:54] * Quits: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak) (jet)
- # [22:58] * Joins: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak)
- # [23:02] <SimonSapin> fantasai: what’s the point of another WD before LCWD?
- # [23:02] <SimonSapin> especially with so few changes since the previous WD
- # [23:03] <SimonSapin> this list is complete: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-syntax/#changes-WD-20130919
- # [23:15] * Quits: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
- # [23:19] * Joins: liam (liam@public.cloak)
- # [23:26] * Joins: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak)
- # [23:40] * liam is now known as LiamSLT
- # [23:50] <fantasai> SimonSapin: Getting a wider announcement for people to review and send comments while you ask the WG to review pre-LC :)
- # [23:51] <fantasai> SimonSapin: WG gets a heads-up, why not everyone else
- # [23:52] <SimonSapin> I write about pre-LC to www-style, going through the publication dance doesn’t seem worth it
- # [23:53] <fantasai> ok
- # [23:53] * fantasai would like to hold some W3C Staff member hostage until they fix the publication process, would that work?
- # [23:53] <SimonSapin> hehe
- # [23:54] <SimonSapin> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2013OctDec/0029.html looks good
- # [23:57] * Joins: antonp (~Thunderbird@public.cloak)
- # [23:58] <fantasai> SimonSapin: Sounds pretty close to what I had in mind
- # [23:58] <fantasai> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/spec-prod/2013JulSep/0003.html
- # [23:59] <SimonSapin> yes
- # [23:59] <fantasai> SimonSapin: Let's find the webmaster at TPAC and hold him hostage? :)
- # [23:59] <SimonSapin> I wonder what’s actionable to make this move forward
- # [23:59] * fantasai can bring rope
- # Session Close: Wed Oct 30 00:00:00 2013
The end :)