/irc-logs / w3c / #css / 2014-01-22 / end

Options:

  1. # Session Start: Wed Jan 22 00:00:00 2014
  2. # Session Ident: #css
  3. # [00:00] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
  4. # [00:03] * Joins: eliezerb (~Eliezer@public.cloak)
  5. # [00:08] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  6. # [00:36] * Quits: dwim (~dwim@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  7. # [00:36] * Joins: dwim (~dwim@public.cloak)
  8. # [00:45] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
  9. # [00:52] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  10. # [00:57] * Joins: rhauck1 (~Adium@public.cloak)
  11. # [01:02] * Quits: rhauck (~Adium@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  12. # [01:19] * Quits: lmcliste_ (~lmclister@public.cloak) ("")
  13. # [01:20] * Quits: rhauck1 (~Adium@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
  14. # [01:22] * Joins: rhauck (~Adium@public.cloak)
  15. # [01:31] * Joins: jdaggett (~jdaggett@public.cloak)
  16. # [01:33] * Joins: eliezerb_2nd (~Eliezer@public.cloak)
  17. # [01:34] * Quits: eliezerb (~Eliezer@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  18. # [01:36] * Quits: plh (plehegar@public.cloak) ("Leaving")
  19. # [01:42] * Joins: dauwhe_ (~dauwhe@public.cloak)
  20. # [01:43] * Joins: dauwhe__ (~dauwhe@public.cloak)
  21. # [01:46] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
  22. # [01:47] * Quits: dauwhe (~dauwhe@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  23. # [01:49] * Quits: dauwhe_ (~dauwhe@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  24. # [01:53] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  25. # [02:04] * Quits: rhauck (~Adium@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
  26. # [02:17] * Joins: lmcliste_ (~lmclister@public.cloak)
  27. # [02:25] * Quits: lmcliste_ (~lmclister@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  28. # [02:27] * Joins: lmcliste_ (~lmclister@public.cloak)
  29. # [02:34] * Quits: jdaggett (~jdaggett@public.cloak) (jdaggett)
  30. # [02:43] * Quits: lmcliste_ (~lmclister@public.cloak) ("")
  31. # [02:44] * Joins: jdaggett (~jdaggett@public.cloak)
  32. # [02:46] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
  33. # [02:51] * Quits: emalasky1 (~Adium@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
  34. # [02:51] * Joins: emalasky (~Adium@public.cloak)
  35. # [02:53] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  36. # [02:55] * Quits: eliezerb_2nd (~Eliezer@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  37. # [02:59] * Quits: emalasky (~Adium@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  38. # [03:02] * Joins: glenn (~gadams@public.cloak)
  39. # [03:19] * Quits: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  40. # [03:20] * Quits: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak) (jet)
  41. # [03:20] * Joins: plh (plehegar@public.cloak)
  42. # [03:47] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
  43. # [03:54] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  44. # [03:56] * Joins: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak)
  45. # [04:28] * Quits: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak) (jet)
  46. # [04:48] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
  47. # [04:55] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  48. # [05:35] * Joins: emalasky (~Adium@public.cloak)
  49. # [05:49] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
  50. # [05:52] * Joins: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak)
  51. # [05:56] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  52. # [06:13] * Joins: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak)
  53. # [06:36] * Quits: dwim (~dwim@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  54. # [06:36] * Joins: dwim (~dwim@public.cloak)
  55. # [06:44] * Quits: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  56. # [06:44] * Joins: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak)
  57. # [06:50] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
  58. # [06:57] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  59. # [07:01] * Quits: darktears (~darktears@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  60. # [07:01] * Joins: darktears (~darktears@public.cloak)
  61. # [07:09] * Quits: darktears (~darktears@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  62. # [07:10] * Quits: plh (plehegar@public.cloak) ("Leaving")
  63. # [07:12] * Quits: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  64. # [07:48] * Disconnected
  65. # [08:14] * Attempting to rejoin channel #css
  66. # [08:14] * Rejoined channel #css
  67. # [08:14] * Topic is '15-jan-2014 Telcon Canceled'
  68. # [08:14] * Set by plinss on Wed Jan 15 08:57:50
  69. # [08:17] * Disconnected
  70. # [09:13] * Attempting to rejoin channel #css
  71. # [09:13] * Rejoined channel #css
  72. # [09:13] * Topic is '15-jan-2014 Telcon Canceled'
  73. # [09:13] * Set by plinss on Wed Jan 15 08:57:50
  74. # [09:16] * Disconnected
  75. # [12:44] * Attempting to rejoin channel #css
  76. # [12:44] * Rejoined channel #css
  77. # [12:44] * Topic is '15-jan-2014 Telcon Canceled'
  78. # [12:44] * Set by plinss on Wed Jan 15 08:57:50
  79. # [12:47] * Disconnected
  80. # [13:13] * Attempting to rejoin channel #css
  81. # [13:13] * Rejoined channel #css
  82. # [13:13] * Topic is '15-jan-2014 Telcon Canceled'
  83. # [13:13] * Set by plinss on Wed Jan 15 08:57:50
  84. # [13:16] * Disconnected
  85. # [16:32] * Attempting to rejoin channel #css
  86. # [16:32] * Rejoined channel #css
  87. # [16:32] * Topic is '15-jan-2014 Telcon Canceled'
  88. # [16:32] * Set by plinss on Wed Jan 15 08:57:50
  89. # [16:39] * Joins: nvdbleek (~nvdbleek@public.cloak)
  90. # [16:41] * Quits: nvdbleek (~nvdbleek@public.cloak) (nvdbleek)
  91. # [16:41] * Quits: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak) (jet)
  92. # [16:45] * Joins: nvdbleek (~nvdbleek@public.cloak)
  93. # [16:48] * Quits: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  94. # [17:06] * Joins: lmcliste_ (~lmclister@public.cloak)
  95. # [17:07] * Quits: nvdbleek (~nvdbleek@public.cloak) (nvdbleek)
  96. # [17:09] <dauwhe__> The sun never sets on the CSSWG.
  97. # [17:09] <Ms2ger> On its vast empire of never-finished specs?
  98. # [17:11] <dauwhe__> :)
  99. # [17:19] * leaverou_away is now known as leaverou
  100. # [17:26] * dauwhe__ is now known as dauwhe
  101. # [17:26] * Joins: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak)
  102. # [17:33] * leaverou is now known as leaverou_away
  103. # [17:34] * leaverou_away is now known as leaverou
  104. # [17:35] * Joins: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak)
  105. # [17:37] * Joins: nvdbleek (~nvdbleek@public.cloak)
  106. # [17:38] * leaverou is now known as leaverou_away
  107. # [17:38] * Joins: rhauck (~rhauck@public.cloak)
  108. # [17:38] * Joins: rhauck_ (~rhauck@public.cloak)
  109. # [17:39] * Joins: glazou (~glazou@public.cloak)
  110. # [17:39] * glazou changes topic to 'http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Jan/0294.html'
  111. # [17:39] * Joins: Zakim (zakim@public.cloak)
  112. # [17:40] <glazou> Zakim, this will be Style
  113. # [17:40] <Zakim> ok, glazou; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 17 minutes
  114. # [17:40] <glazou> RRSAgent, make logs public
  115. # [17:40] <RRSAgent> I have made the request, glazou
  116. # [17:40] * Ms2ger waves at glazou
  117. # [17:41] <glazou> hi Ms2ger !
  118. # [17:41] <Ms2ger> Haven't had time for Servo yet? :)
  119. # [17:43] <glazou> too little :(
  120. # [17:43] <glazou> but that will change right after my trip to US
  121. # [17:44] <Ms2ger> Good to know :)
  122. # [17:44] <glazou> yeah
  123. # [17:44] <glazou> same feeling here
  124. # [17:44] <glazou> mastering powerpoint has never been one of my goals in life :-/
  125. # [17:45] <Ms2ger> Heh
  126. # [17:45] <Ms2ger> HTML slide decks?
  127. # [17:45] <krit> Didn't we say we don't have meeting around a F2F or was it just after a F2F?
  128. # [17:45] * Quits: rhauck (~rhauck@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  129. # [17:45] <glazou> after
  130. # [17:45] <glazou> the week after
  131. # [17:45] <krit> k
  132. # [17:46] * Ms2ger will not attend this f2f :)
  133. # [17:49] * Joins: antonp (~Thunderbird@public.cloak)
  134. # [17:49] * Joins: BradK (~bradk@public.cloak)
  135. # [17:51] * Joins: rhauck (~Adium@public.cloak)
  136. # [17:52] * Joins: dael (~dael@public.cloak)
  137. # [17:53] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started
  138. # [17:53] <Zakim> +glenn
  139. # [17:53] <Zakim> +dael
  140. # [17:53] * Quits: rhauck_ (~rhauck@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  141. # [17:54] <dael> ScribeNick: Dael
  142. # [17:54] <Zakim> + +1.917.207.aaaa
  143. # [17:55] <dauwhe> Zakim, aaaa is dauwhe
  144. # [17:55] <Zakim> +dauwhe; got it
  145. # [17:55] <Zakim> +??P24
  146. # [17:55] <Zakim> +??P26
  147. # [17:55] <glazou> Zakim, ??P26 is me
  148. # [17:55] <Zakim> +glazou; got it
  149. # [17:55] <abinader> Zakim, ??P24 is me
  150. # [17:55] <Zakim> +abinader; got it
  151. # [17:55] <Zakim> +plinss
  152. # [17:56] <Zakim> +SGalineau
  153. # [17:56] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  154. # [17:57] * Joins: rhauck_ (~rhauck@public.cloak)
  155. # [17:57] <Zakim> +krit
  156. # [17:57] <Zakim> +??P21
  157. # [17:57] <SimonSapin> Zakim, ??P21 is me
  158. # [17:57] <Zakim> +SimonSapin; got it
  159. # [17:57] <Zakim> +Stearns
  160. # [17:58] * Quits: nvdbleek (~nvdbleek@public.cloak) (nvdbleek)
  161. # [17:58] <Zakim> +rhauck
  162. # [17:58] <Zakim> +[Bloomberg]
  163. # [17:58] <Zakim> +??P37
  164. # [17:58] <Zakim> +antonp
  165. # [17:58] <Zakim> +Bert
  166. # [17:59] <Zakim> +smfr
  167. # [17:59] * Joins: SteveZ (~SteveZ@public.cloak)
  168. # [17:59] * Joins: arybka (~arybka@public.cloak)
  169. # [17:59] * Joins: leif (~lastorset@public.cloak)
  170. # [18:00] * plh zakim, call plh-mobile
  171. # [18:00] * Zakim ok, plh; the call is being made
  172. # [18:00] <Zakim> +Plh
  173. # [18:00] <Zakim> +SteveZ
  174. # [18:00] <Zakim> +??P52
  175. # [18:00] <Zakim> +BrianKardell
  176. # [18:00] * Zakim hears ??P37's hand up
  177. # [18:00] * Zakim sees ??P37 on the speaker queue
  178. # [18:00] * Joins: sgalineau (~sgalineau@public.cloak)
  179. # [18:00] <leif> Zakim, I am ??P37
  180. # [18:00] <Zakim> +leif; got it
  181. # [18:00] <leif> q-
  182. # [18:00] * Zakim sees ??P37 on the speaker queue
  183. # [18:01] <leif> hm
  184. # [18:01] <dael> plinss: Let's get started
  185. # [18:01] <dael> ...: Anything to add to the agenda?
  186. # [18:01] <leif> q- ??P37
  187. # [18:01] * Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
  188. # [18:01] * Joins: smfr (~smfr@public.cloak)
  189. # [18:02] <dael> plinss: F2F is coming quickly, please add topics to the wiki
  190. # [18:02] <dael> ...: I'd like to make progress on tranforms, transitions and animations
  191. # [18:02] <dael> Topic: May F2F
  192. # [18:02] <dael> glazou: As I said, I pinged Samsung in Korea
  193. # [18:02] <Zakim> +BradK
  194. # [18:02] <dael> ...: I have confirmation that we can host in Seoul with help of W3C office
  195. # [18:03] <dael> ...: I posted a doodle for dates to the private mailing list and not everyone has answered.
  196. # [18:03] <dael> ...: I'd like avail. from everyone so we can pick dates.
  197. # [18:03] <dael> ...: Right now 19-21 May is the most available
  198. # [18:03] <dael> ...: That's a Monday-Wedensday
  199. # [18:03] <dael> plinss: Do we want to give time for people to doodle, or should we do dates now?
  200. # [18:04] * Quits: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak) (jet)
  201. # [18:04] <dael> glazou: We can do more. Korean new year is soon, so it's not a problem if we give them a few days to decide.
  202. # [18:04] <dael> ...: If that's okay by everyone unless someone needs a choice now.
  203. # [18:04] * Joins: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak)
  204. # [18:04] * Quits: jet (~junglecode@public.cloak) (jet)
  205. # [18:04] <dael> SteveZ: I'd prefer we don't overlap, so a different week would be good
  206. # [18:04] <dael> plinss: Okay.
  207. # [18:04] <glazou> s/SteveZ/glenn
  208. # [18:04] <dael> Topic: Selectors 4 :has()
  209. # [18:05] <dael> glazou: I forgot to mention that immegration requires passports be valid for, I think, 6 months after.
  210. # [18:05] * sgalineau air traffic control is on the line, trying to land selectors
  211. # [18:05] <dael> ...: You'll want to check that soon.
  212. # [18:05] * Joins: Koji (~koji@public.cloak)
  213. # [18:05] * glazou will find the exact info about that
  214. # [18:06] <dael> SimonSapin: So explained on the ML I'd like to propose adding has() pseudoclass
  215. # [18:06] <dael> ...: I think there are equivalents where if you express with one you can use the other one
  216. # [18:06] <dael> ...: I think this is faster and is the same for ??? and this
  217. # [18:06] * Joins: smfr_ (~smfr@public.cloak)
  218. # [18:06] <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
  219. # [18:06] <dael> ...: The pseudoclass has utility where we can fix issues with indicators
  220. # [18:06] <Koji> zakim, [ipcaller] is me
  221. # [18:06] <Zakim> +Koji; got it
  222. # [18:06] <dael> ...: The ! has more issues then it has
  223. # [18:07] * glazou CONFIRMED : korean immigration requires passports to be valid 6 months after RETURN DATE
  224. # [18:07] <dael> ...: Any comments or options?
  225. # [18:07] <dael> briankardell: I believe it was originally has() and then morphed.
  226. # [18:07] <dael> ...: I htink that was lack of an ability to agree on a child for has()
  227. # [18:07] <astearns> +1 to :has over overloading !
  228. # [18:07] * Joins: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak)
  229. # [18:07] <Bert> q+ to say I don't particularly like the need for parentheses. And "!" is actually very good as an emphasis mark.
  230. # [18:07] * Zakim sees Bert on the speaker queue
  231. # [18:07] <Zakim> -??P52
  232. # [18:07] <Zakim> +dbaron
  233. # [18:08] <dael> bert: I don't think the () are good, you'd have nester [] in ()
  234. # [18:08] <dael> ...: It makes it unreadable.
  235. # [18:08] * glazou and Bert agree AT LAST :-)
  236. # [18:08] <dael> ...: I like the use of the single ! since it means emphasis.
  237. # [18:08] <dael> ...: I'd better like it if you could underline the subject selector
  238. # [18:08] * Quits: smfr (~smfr@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  239. # [18:08] * smfr_ is now known as smfr
  240. # [18:09] <dael> SimonSapin: I agree ! means emphasis, but in a boolan conxtex it doesn't work
  241. # [18:09] <dael> glazou: I don't think it's a problem.
  242. # [18:09] * BradK is not a big fan of the functional notation inside selectors
  243. # [18:09] <dael> ...: I disccused with web authors a while ago and they don't deal with boolean
  244. # [18:09] <dael> ...: They liked the ! as a selector.
  245. # [18:09] <sgalineau> I have the completely opposite experience
  246. # [18:09] <dael> BradK: I had the opposite experience. I don't know if there's a way to collect information, but I wish we could
  247. # [18:09] <sgalineau> +1 to BradK
  248. # [18:10] <dael> ...: I've run it past 50-75 people and they all think it means not
  249. # [18:10] <TabAtkins> Speaking from a lot of jQ experience, :has() is *very* easy to use and really easy to read.
  250. # [18:10] <dael> glazou: I agree with Bert's comment about ()
  251. # [18:10] <BradK> It wasn't me speaking
  252. # [18:10] <Zakim> -abinader
  253. # [18:10] <dael> glazou: It excludes the part, it is the subject at the end of the chain instead of the beginging
  254. # [18:10] <dael> SimonSapin: () is inside nesting, but we've had that.
  255. # [18:10] <dael> ...: about being at the end, it's what we've always had so far
  256. # [18:10] <Zakim> +??P12
  257. # [18:10] <dael> glazou: You ddin't understand.
  258. # [18:11] <abinader> Zakim, ??P12 is me
  259. # [18:11] <Zakim> +abinader; got it
  260. # [18:11] <dael> ...: If you had a chain of selectors inside a big selector, !<p>
  261. # [18:11] * Joins: MaRakow (~MaRakow@public.cloak)
  262. # [18:11] <bkardell> +TabAtkins comment re: it exists in the most popular library and is widely used for a long time now
  263. # [18:11] <glazou> !p.class:hover vs. p.class:hovr:has(..)
  264. # [18:11] <TabAtkins> ! also has some funky issues with regards to exactly what selector *arguments* it's allowed in.
  265. # [18:11] <dael> s/bradk/bkardell (i think
  266. # [18:11] <dael> glazou: I prefer the first one
  267. # [18:12] <dael> SimonSapin: I don't see a difference
  268. # [18:12] <TabAtkins> We need to allow it in :matches(), but shadow DOM's :host() selector doesn't make any sense.
  269. # [18:12] * sgalineau finds the latter easier to read
  270. # [18:12] <dael> glazou: When you read it it works.
  271. # [18:12] * sgalineau no controversy here
  272. # [18:12] <dael> glazou: I'm only giving my opinion here
  273. # [18:12] <smfr> ! looks like "not" to me
  274. # [18:12] <dael> bkardell: I see people find the latter on easier, that's the has() one, correct?
  275. # [18:13] * antonp reads ! as "not" too
  276. # [18:13] <bkardell> my question was which sgalineau was indicating
  277. # [18:13] <glazou> I think we already had that exact discussion about ! long ago and made a decision
  278. # [18:13] <dael> plinss: I'm hearing people on both sides, no clear concencious
  279. # [18:13] <sgalineau> bkardell, I prefer :has()
  280. # [18:13] <dael> ...: How do we move forward?
  281. # [18:13] <glazou> s/concencious/consensus
  282. # [18:13] <Zakim> +??P4
  283. # [18:13] * Bert has a hard time believing that a significant number of users of CSS associates ! with not. You must be a programmer to be able have that funny association.
  284. # [18:13] <dael> plinss: Drop poll, public poll?
  285. # [18:13] <glazou> Bert +1
  286. # [18:13] <sgalineau> the ! is too ambiguous for too many people
  287. # [18:13] <dael> bkardell: I think public is more useful
  288. # [18:14] <TabAtkins> Bert: A lot of CSS users are at least light programmers.
  289. # [18:14] <TabAtkins> But I can def set up a poll.
  290. # [18:14] <dael> ...: The consistuancy needs to know who says what
  291. # [18:14] <dael> glazou: Saying ! is a subject selector denotes a negation, we've never had the problem with !important
  292. # [18:14] <sgalineau> Bert, I don't know a single web professional who only writes CSS and does zero programming in some scripting language
  293. # [18:14] <BradK> s/drop/straw
  294. # [18:14] <dael> dbaron: We have that problem with !important all the time
  295. # [18:14] <dael> glazou: I've never heard that
  296. # [18:14] <dael> ???: It does happen allt he time
  297. # [18:15] <glazou> s/???+smfr
  298. # [18:15] <dael> bkardell: I've had that experience as well
  299. # [18:15] <astearns> s/everyone/the people I talk to/
  300. # [18:15] <glazou> s/???/smfr
  301. # [18:15] <dael> plinss: Looks liek Tab was offering to set up a poll.
  302. # [18:15] <smfr> wat
  303. # [18:15] * krit maybe use !!important then
  304. # [18:15] * Bert ???
  305. # [18:15] * dbaron Zakim, who is noisy?
  306. # [18:15] <sgalineau> lol
  307. # [18:15] * smfr settles back with popcorn
  308. # [18:15] * Zakim dbaron, listening for 12 seconds I heard sound from the following: BradK (7%), SimonSapin (15%), glazou (8%), Bert (7%)
  309. # [18:15] * plh spam on the css wg call :)
  310. # [18:15] * TabAtkins Zakim, those percentages don't add up to 100%.
  311. # [18:15] * Zakim I don't understand 'those percentages don't add up to 100%', TabAtkins
  312. # [18:15] <BradK> I didn't know we had commercials here
  313. # [18:15] <astearns> wow
  314. # [18:15] * sgalineau must be the ad inserts to pay for our minute taker
  315. # [18:15] * dbaron Zakim, mute BradK
  316. # [18:15] * Zakim BradK should now be muted
  317. # [18:15] * smfr CSS WG, now ad-sponsored
  318. # [18:15] <glenn> zakim, who is noisy?
  319. # [18:15] * dbaron Zakim, mute SimonSapin
  320. # [18:15] * Zakim SimonSapin should now be muted
  321. # [18:15] <Zakim> + +1.206.992.aabb
  322. # [18:16] * dbaron Zakim, unmute SimonSapin
  323. # [18:16] * Zakim SimonSapin should no longer be muted
  324. # [18:16] <glazou> Zakim, mute me
  325. # [18:16] <Zakim> glazou should now be muted
  326. # [18:16] * Bert wonders if somebody is using "free" phone service
  327. # [18:16] * TabAtkins Zakim, anything about statistics.
  328. # [18:16] * Zakim I don't understand 'anything about statistics', TabAtkins
  329. # [18:16] * dbaron Zakim, unmute BradK
  330. # [18:16] * Zakim BradK should no longer be muted
  331. # [18:16] <BradK> Not me, I'm muted
  332. # [18:16] <Zakim> glenn, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds
  333. # [18:16] * krit ok, W3C sponsered by ..
  334. # [18:16] * TabAtkins I know, Zakim. I know.
  335. # [18:16] * plh zakim, who is making noise?
  336. # [18:16] * Zakim plh, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: BradK (57%), SimonSapin (4%)
  337. # [18:16] * dbaron zakim, unmute glazou
  338. # [18:16] * Zakim glazou should no longer be muted
  339. # [18:16] <plh> zakim, mute bradK
  340. # [18:16] <Zakim> BradK should now be muted
  341. # [18:16] * dbaron Zakim, mute Bert
  342. # [18:16] * Zakim Bert should now be muted
  343. # [18:16] * plh arghh
  344. # [18:16] * sgalineau in fairness, 'talk to your doctor' is an appropriate message for CSS discussions
  345. # [18:16] * dbaron Zakim, unmute Bert
  346. # [18:16] * Zakim Bert should no longer be muted
  347. # [18:16] <astearns> talk to your doctor about your interpretation of !
  348. # [18:16] <Zakim> -??P4
  349. # [18:16] * dbaron Zakim, who is on the phone?
  350. # [18:16] * Zakim sees on the phone: glenn, dael, dauwhe, glazou, plinss, SGalineau, krit, SimonSapin, Stearns, rhauck, [Bloomberg], leif, antonp, Bert, smfr, Plh, SteveZ, BrianKardell, BradK
  351. # [18:16] <antonp> ! is bad for yoiur health
  352. # [18:16] * Zakim ... (muted), Koji, dbaron, abinader, +1.206.992.aabb
  353. # [18:17] <Zakim> -smfr
  354. # [18:17] * sgalineau SNORING STOPS HERE
  355. # [18:17] * TabAtkins "If your image continues floating for more than four hours..."
  356. # [18:17] <Zakim> -glazou
  357. # [18:17] <SteveZ> I am muted
  358. # [18:17] <Zakim> +??P19
  359. # [18:17] <Zakim> -glenn
  360. # [18:17] <Zakim> +??P4
  361. # [18:17] * Joins: israelh (~israelh@public.cloak)
  362. # [18:17] <Zakim> +smfr
  363. # [18:17] * krit was it baron making ad for banks?
  364. # [18:17] <bkardell> best.css.teleconf.ever. :)
  365. # [18:17] <Zakim> -dauwhe
  366. # [18:17] * dbaron Zakim, mute abinader
  367. # [18:17] * Joins: Rossen_ (~Rossen@public.cloak)
  368. # [18:17] * Zakim abinader should now be muted
  369. # [18:17] <glazou> I guess someone opened a web page in the bg with an ad
  370. # [18:17] <Zakim> -SteveZ
  371. # [18:17] * plh zakim, who is making noise?
  372. # [18:17] * dbaron Zakim, mute aabb
  373. # [18:17] * Zakim +1.206.992.aabb should now be muted
  374. # [18:17] * dbaron Zakim, unmute aabb
  375. # [18:17] * Zakim +1.206.992.aabb should no longer be muted
  376. # [18:17] <BradK> It's not me. If i am noisy it must be from static or something, since I am using my phone's mute already.
  377. # [18:17] * dbaron Zakim, unmute abinader
  378. # [18:17] * Zakim abinader should no longer be muted
  379. # [18:17] * Zakim plh, listening for 10 seconds I could not identify any sounds
  380. # [18:17] <Zakim> -krit
  381. # [18:17] <Zakim> +??P17
  382. # [18:18] <glazou> OMG
  383. # [18:18] <leif> I think the telconf software bugged out
  384. # [18:18] * plh a crossed line maybe?
  385. # [18:18] <dbaron> BradK, do you not hear a television?
  386. # [18:18] <Zakim> -??P19
  387. # [18:18] <Zakim> +dauwhe
  388. # [18:18] <BradK> Yes, I do
  389. # [18:18] * Bert redialing...
  390. # [18:18] * plh zakim, who is on the phone?
  391. # [18:18] * Zakim sees on the phone: dael, plinss, SGalineau, SimonSapin, Stearns, rhauck, [Bloomberg], leif, antonp, Bert, Plh, BrianKardell, BradK (muted), Koji, dbaron, abinader, +1.206.992.aabb,
  392. # [18:18] * Rossen_ is anyone scribing this?
  393. # [18:18] * Zakim ... ??P4, smfr, ??P17, dauwhe
  394. # [18:18] <Zakim> -Bert
  395. # [18:18] <antonp> lol
  396. # [18:18] <plh> zakim, mute dael
  397. # [18:18] <Zakim> dael should now be muted
  398. # [18:18] <glazou> Rossen_, LOL
  399. # [18:18] <Zakim> -dbaron
  400. # [18:18] <Zakim> +SteveZ
  401. # [18:18] <plh> zakim, mute plinss
  402. # [18:18] <Zakim> plinss should now be muted
  403. # [18:18] <smfr> whoo
  404. # [18:18] <Zakim> -[Bloomberg]
  405. # [18:18] <BradK> Don't know why I am being shown as noisy, I meant
  406. # [18:18] * plh zakim, who is on the phone?
  407. # [18:18] * Zakim sees on the phone: dael (muted), plinss (muted), SGalineau, SimonSapin, Stearns, rhauck, leif, antonp, Plh, BrianKardell, BradK (muted), Koji, abinader, +1.206.992.aabb, ??P4,
  408. # [18:18] * Zakim ... smfr, ??P17, dauwhe, SteveZ
  409. # [18:18] <Zakim> +krit
  410. # [18:18] <plh> zakim, unmute plinss
  411. # [18:18] <Zakim> plinss should no longer be muted
  412. # [18:18] <Zakim> +??P24
  413. # [18:18] <antonp> that was awesome
  414. # [18:18] <plh> zakim, unmute dael
  415. # [18:18] <Zakim> dael should no longer be muted
  416. # [18:18] <glazou> Zakim, ??P17 is me
  417. # [18:18] <Zakim> +glazou; got it
  418. # [18:18] <plh> zakim, unmute BradK
  419. # [18:18] <Zakim> BradK should no longer be muted
  420. # [18:18] <Zakim> +Bert
  421. # [18:19] <glenn> is it fixed yet?
  422. # [18:19] <glazou> yes
  423. # [18:19] <dael> yes, fixed now
  424. # [18:19] <smfr> was it -[Bloomberg] ?
  425. # [18:19] <plh> yep, it's fixed
  426. # [18:19] <plh> probably
  427. # [18:19] <sgalineau> far too many of these messages were relevant...
  428. # [18:19] <Zakim> +dbaron
  429. # [18:19] <Zakim> +glenn
  430. # [18:19] <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
  431. # [18:19] <sgalineau> 'talk to your doctor' is totally acceptable when we argue syntax
  432. # [18:19] * dauwhe the MPAA influence is starting sooner than I thought...
  433. # [18:20] * Quits: rhauck (~Adium@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  434. # [18:20] <MaRakow> Zakim, +1.206.992.aabb is me
  435. # [18:20] <Zakim> +MaRakow; got it
  436. # [18:20] <dael> plinss: Where were we?
  437. # [18:20] <dael> plinss: I think Tab was offering to set up a poll on the selector bit.
  438. # [18:20] <SteveZ> someone wanted to filabuster the "has()" discussion
  439. # [18:20] <dael> ...: Let's do that, get more data, and come back
  440. # [18:20] * plh guesses it's not the right time to bring up z-index values for marketing purposes
  441. # [18:20] <dael> Topic: Page Transitions
  442. # [18:20] <Zakim> -??P4
  443. # [18:20] <Zakim> +[Microsoft.a]
  444. # [18:20] <dauwhe> s/filabuster/filibuster/
  445. # [18:21] <dael> glazou: I posted a question on www-style and some of you have contibuted to that thread.
  446. # [18:21] <Rossen_> zakim, microsoft has me
  447. # [18:21] <Zakim> +Rossen_; got it
  448. # [18:21] <dael> ...: I think it's time to consider these transitions.
  449. # [18:21] <dael> ...: A few reasons this is need. Mostly because some industries want to move to web based apps and want to do somethings
  450. # [18:21] <dael> ...: One thing users require is nice transitions
  451. # [18:22] <dael> ...: industry said they can't move to web based apps without page transtions.
  452. # [18:22] <dael> ...: Users will react negatively without it
  453. # [18:22] <dael> ...: I'm not saying we have to do this now or that it's CSS, but the discussion should be in our next charter
  454. # [18:22] <dael> ...: I'd like the WG to agree on the fact that this conversation is in scope for next charter
  455. # [18:22] <dael> tantek: I agree this is in scope and I think I can dig up a 1999 proposal.
  456. # [18:22] * smfr notes http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms532847(v=vs.85).aspx#Interpage_Transition
  457. # [18:23] <dael> ...: I may be numbers based, but I'm happy to publish publically
  458. # [18:23] <dael> glazou: We have things from you, Miscrosoft, animations, SVG, photo effects...I'm sure we can aggrigate in a secure manner
  459. # [18:23] <dael> ...: I think now is the right time to discuss it
  460. # [18:23] * sgalineau wonders if there is anything that wasn't proposed in the 90s or done in DXImageTransform
  461. # [18:23] <dael> ...: WE have user requests, basically
  462. # [18:23] <dael> tantek: seconded
  463. # [18:23] <dael> glazou: Any other opinions?
  464. # [18:24] <dael> bert: Just a question, is thie related to Opera proposal of directional nav
  465. # [18:24] <dael> glazou: No. I suggested this independantly and don't know what you're talking about
  466. # [18:24] <dael> bert: It's a simple transation, next page can be left, right etc.
  467. # [18:24] <dael> glazou: It's not that. It's fading between source and desitional.
  468. # [18:24] <bkardell> seems logical that it be in the charter esp. if that doesn't commit that a CSS solution *must* come about
  469. # [18:24] <dael> ...: It's a visual fade from one page to the next.
  470. # [18:25] <dael> ...: How do you do it. I fyou buid a GPA app for auto, you want things to be really cool.
  471. # [18:25] <dael> ...: And the industry won't use web-based if they're not cool.
  472. # [18:25] <plinss> s/GPA/GPS/
  473. # [18:25] <dael> SimonSapin: That's interesting, but I'd liket os ee proposals on what a page is
  474. # [18:25] <dael> ...: Is it new URL, or after page break
  475. # [18:26] <dael> glazou: That's what we need to discuss, but we can't do that officially without charter
  476. # [18:26] * leif I'm not aware of any Opera proposal, and ftr directional navigation is about navigating within a page, not positioning pages visually in relation to eachother
  477. # [18:26] <SimonSapin> s/after page break/page generated by the page-break-after property/
  478. # [18:26] <Zakim> -abinader
  479. # [18:26] * sgalineau almost time for another commercial break
  480. # [18:26] <BradK> html:next { transition: flip-left; }
  481. # [18:26] <dael> ???: There's things we can reference like card, there's transitions between card like swipe left, right, etc.
  482. # [18:26] <dbaron> s/???/tantek/
  483. # [18:26] <dbaron> s/card/hypercard/
  484. # [18:26] <dael> tantek: This is more than 20 years olf
  485. # [18:26] <plinss> s/like card/like hypercard/
  486. # [18:26] <Zakim> +??P4
  487. # [18:26] * dauwhe ebook readers often use transition effects between "pages" (used in the "paginated" sense).
  488. # [18:26] <dael> glazou: Any objections, or can we add that to charter?
  489. # [18:26] <abinader> Zakim, ??P4 is me
  490. # [18:26] <Zakim> +abinader; got it
  491. # [18:26] <dael> glazou: I hear no obj.
  492. # [18:27] <BradK> +1 to page transitions
  493. # [18:27] <bkardell> +1
  494. # [18:27] <dael> ba\ert: I can see lots of problems, but not obj to talking
  495. # [18:27] <dael> glazou: I'd like to be able to just talk
  496. # [18:27] <dael> RESOLVED: Add page transitions to the charter
  497. # [18:27] <dael> plinss: Can we go another step, does anyone want to work on this
  498. # [18:27] <dael> glazou: I do
  499. # [18:28] <dael> tantek: I can at least dig up my old draft, I think it was in member space
  500. # [18:28] <dael> ...: But I can dig it up and I can just publish it to the public lists.
  501. # [18:28] <dael> ...: It's not going to be modern, but it will help with historical context
  502. # [18:28] <dael> plinss: I'm sure it'll be a useful reference
  503. # [18:28] <dael> ...: Whatever we do should tie into shader
  504. # [18:29] <dael> glazou: Since this is a charter edit, as soon as we start discussing it we should study the security aspects
  505. # [18:29] <dael> plinss: Security will be fun
  506. # [18:29] <dael> Topic: CSS 2.2
  507. # [18:29] <glazou> Security IG will help
  508. # [18:29] <dael> bert: Some time ago we discuss pub an update for CSS 2.2 and we discovered we need new tests due to erratta
  509. # [18:30] * Joins: tantek (~tantek@public.cloak)
  510. # [18:30] <dael> ...: People asked me to make a wiki and people signed up to make tests, but some of the errata don't have signups
  511. # [18:30] <plinss> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.2
  512. # [18:30] <dael> ...: This is a request for people to again look at the wiki page
  513. # [18:30] * Ms2ger would help out if tests were in web-platform-tests
  514. # [18:30] <dael> ...: If there's any topic you can write a test about, please do.
  515. # [18:30] <dael> ....: We wanted to pub an update months ago, but we're still waiting on tests.
  516. # [18:30] <dael> ...: I have some people signed up, arron, Chris, Simon.
  517. # [18:30] <tantek> zakim, who is on the phone?
  518. # [18:30] <Zakim> On the phone I see dael, plinss, SGalineau, SimonSapin, Stearns, rhauck, leif, antonp, Plh, BrianKardell, BradK, Koji, MaRakow, smfr, glazou, dauwhe, SteveZ, krit, ??P24, Bert,
  519. # [18:30] <dael> ...: If any of those people are here, do you have tests?
  520. # [18:30] <Zakim> ... dbaron, glenn, [Microsoft], [Microsoft.a], abinader
  521. # [18:30] <Zakim> [Microsoft] has Rossen_
  522. # [18:31] <tantek> Zakim, ??P24 is tantek
  523. # [18:31] <Zakim> +tantek; got it
  524. # [18:31] <dael> SimonSapin: I don't have tests yet, but I'm going to work on them
  525. # [18:31] <Zakim> -smfr
  526. # [18:31] <dael> bert: Another idea I had was some tests would be written at TTWF
  527. # [18:31] <dael> ...: If people going would keep that it mind, it's a good oppotunity to write the tests of CSS 2.2
  528. # [18:31] <dael> ...: Any ideas how to get more tests?
  529. # [18:31] * Ms2ger doubts anybody at testtwf has the expertise to write those tests
  530. # [18:32] <dael> plinss: Typically at TTWF there's an oppotunity for people to solicit tests
  531. # [18:32] <dael> ...: I won't be there, but will someone be there to make this pitch?
  532. # [18:32] <dael> ...: Anyone going to TTWF?
  533. # [18:32] <dael> bert: I'm going
  534. # [18:32] <dael> ???: I'm going to be there
  535. # [18:32] <dael> plinss: Can either of you help
  536. # [18:32] <dael> ???: I'm new and the plan was for GCPM tests, but I'll do what I can
  537. # [18:33] <dauwhe> s/???/dauwhe/
  538. # [18:33] <dael> plinss: My other q is there a list of tests that were invalidated?
  539. # [18:33] <dael> bert: not that I know of.
  540. # [18:33] <rhauck_> This will be the first one I'm missing, sorry :(
  541. # [18:33] <dael> ...: I don't think anyone has done that analysis
  542. # [18:33] <dael> ...: There was expectation that tests have changed, but no one found out which.
  543. # [18:33] <dael> plinss: Can someone do that analysis?
  544. # [18:34] <dael> plinss: Anyone?
  545. # [18:34] <dael> bert: Maybe those that said they'd write tests can looka t existing tests in same area?
  546. # [18:34] <dael> plinss: That's prop. resonable
  547. # [18:34] <dael> plinss: Anything else on CSS 2.2?
  548. # [18:34] <dael> bert: I don't think so, we need those tests and I think we're ready.
  549. # [18:35] <dael> plh: I think the errata for charter is incomlete, so I'll try and submit those tests
  550. # [18:35] <dael> plinss: OKay.
  551. # [18:35] <SimonSapin> s/plh/SimonSapin
  552. # [18:35] <SimonSapin> s/charter/character encodings/
  553. # [18:35] <dael> Topic: Filedset Rendering
  554. # [18:35] <dauwhe> s/Filedset/Fieldset/
  555. # [18:35] <dael> plinss: It looks like this is underspeced and there's lots of varrience between browsers.
  556. # [18:35] <glazou> s/Filedset/Fieldset
  557. # [18:35] <dael> ...: So we want to spec it, are we okay with it as is, if we do spec where would it go?
  558. # [18:36] <dael> dbaron: Seems like this is bigger than fieldsets, though it may m ake sense to start there.
  559. # [18:36] <dael> ...: We may be the right people to work on it, for all that it's between HTML and CSS. I don't know.
  560. # [18:36] <tantek> is this just for legacy? I mean, do any real world web pages actually depend on fieldset rendering?
  561. # [18:36] <dael> plinss: Anyone else?
  562. # [18:37] <dael> SimonSapin: I think part of the point as far as it comes to styling it goes it.
  563. # [18:37] <tantek> my understanding is that the rendering is unpredictable enough that any actually "designed" web page doesn't bother with fieldset rendering because it is so ugly/unstylable.
  564. # [18:37] <SimonSapin> s/SimonSapin/rossen/
  565. # [18:37] <dael> ...: Overflow, border styling should certainly come to us
  566. # [18:37] * Quits: rhauck_ (~rhauck@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  567. # [18:37] <dael> Rossen_: I'm not sure if the rest should be CSS or HTML
  568. # [18:37] <dael> plinss: I think there's overall coordination, but there are def. styling issues.
  569. # [18:38] <glazou> Zakim, mute me
  570. # [18:38] <Zakim> glazou should now be muted
  571. # [18:38] <dael> Rossen_: I was playing with different impl and I can see the frustration of some impl not honoring overflow: auto
  572. # [18:38] <dael> ...: How is the legend positioned, it is to box or to content.
  573. # [18:38] <dael> ...: All these style issues we can spec.
  574. # [18:39] * Quits: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  575. # [18:39] <glazou> Zakim, unmute me
  576. # [18:39] <Zakim> glazou should no longer be muted
  577. # [18:39] <dael> ...: I can see how we can do extensions to overflow, but my opinion is CSS should be like the rest and if it supports scrolling, it should always do it.
  578. # [18:39] <BradK> Is there a shadow DOM for fieldset and label?
  579. # [18:39] <dael> ...: But these are things we should discuss.
  580. # [18:39] <dael> Rossen_: Are we prep to discuss now, or does it need more ML time?
  581. # [18:39] <dael> tantek: Is this legacy, or is this actually used?
  582. # [18:39] <dael> Rossen_: My assuption is this is refering to ...you said legacy control?
  583. # [18:40] <dael> ...: The reference in the e-mail is to the siting for the WG, so I'm assuming this is current
  584. # [18:40] <bkardell> Seems like this could use more info/discussion on the list if folks are unclear about legacy/unused etc
  585. # [18:40] <dael> plinss: It's part of HTML5 so people are still using it
  586. # [18:40] <dael> tantek: What I'm asking about is fieldset rendering and my understanding is people turn of the rendering b/c it's ugly.
  587. # [18:40] <dael> ...: Is this to fix that or for an actual feature?
  588. # [18:41] <dael> Rossen_: My understanding is frustration over a lack of interop
  589. # [18:41] <dael> plinss: I'm not sure we can spec legacy and I'm not sure we need new features, but we need to spec how it behavies.
  590. # [18:41] <dael> plinss: Other q is who wants to work on it, where should it live?
  591. # [18:41] <dael> tantek: My q is what is "this"?
  592. # [18:41] <SimonSapin> s/tantek/Rossen_
  593. # [18:42] <dael> plinss: I guess there's 2 approaches. Look at all bit of fieldset and make sure they're addressed or start a new spec
  594. # [18:42] <Zakim> -abinader
  595. # [18:42] <dael> ...: I'm not sure, but there's def. an issue here.
  596. # [18:42] <dael> plinss: Thoughts?
  597. # [18:42] <dael> dbaron: I think there will need to be a new spec unless it all goes on HTML5
  598. # [18:42] * krit so much complexity in CSS :)
  599. # [18:42] <dael> ...: I don't know.
  600. # [18:42] * Joins: teoli_ (~teoli@public.cloak)
  601. # [18:43] <dael> Rossen_: This is why I was curious if it was planning or comonent since component shouldn't be us.
  602. # [18:43] <dael> ...: As far as style Rob was frustrated at i can see border having spec for fieldset handling and also handling for overflow
  603. # [18:43] * Joins: rhauck (~rhauck@public.cloak)
  604. # [18:43] <dael> ...: We can put that in CSS. The rest, I don't see how we can do it.
  605. # [18:44] <BradK> Define its structure internally as shadow DOM, then define a default style sheet for it once 'appearance' is turned off.
  606. # [18:44] <dael> ...: WHat is the component unless we go into what HTML is trying to do with position and size.
  607. # [18:44] <dael> ...: We'll either define comonent model or won't. If we're doing component model, let's do it more holestically then fieldset
  608. # [18:44] <dael> tantek: That would spec fieldset??
  609. # [18:44] <tantek> (that's not me talking)
  610. # [18:45] <dael> tantek: Part of the goal would be answering it more broadly? Fieldset would be one use case of the component?
  611. # [18:45] <tantek> s/tantek/???
  612. # [18:45] <dael> Rossen_: Right. If you go after the component and this would be a part of it, this would be easy. I'm not sure we're the rigth WG
  613. # [18:45] <bkardell> dael: that was me
  614. # [18:45] <dael> dbaron: I'm not sure this is component model stuff?
  615. # [18:45] <dael> Rossen_: What would it be?
  616. # [18:45] <dael> dbaron: Fieldset is a thing that exists and you spec what is there and how style effect it. If people want to impl as a component model that's fine
  617. # [18:46] <dael> ...: But they don't have to
  618. # [18:46] <dael> Rossen_: For one this the legend is always in a fieldset. That's already semi-componet.
  619. # [18:46] <dael> dbaron: You just said it in prose
  620. # [18:46] <dael> Rossen_: What do you mean?
  621. # [18:46] <dael> dbaron: What I'm talking about is spec like wha tyou jsut said.
  622. # [18:46] <tantek> aside: regarding page transitions, I think this is the prior art I was thinking of: https://www.w3.org/Style/Group/2003/progrend.html
  623. # [18:46] <dael> s/wha tyou/what you
  624. # [18:47] <dael> plinss: So dbaron made a proposal for a spec of form rendering. My concern is if we do piecemeal we'll still have interop issues.
  625. # [18:47] <dael> Rossen_: I'd be happy with that as a spec.
  626. # [18:47] <dael> plinss: Other opinions?
  627. # [18:47] <dael> Rossen_: Is this something you want to work on dbaron?
  628. # [18:47] <dael> dbaron: Not espeically
  629. # [18:48] <dael> plinss: If we're going to create a new spec, who will edit?
  630. # [18:48] <dael> Rossen_: I can volunteer to work on it
  631. # [18:48] <dael> plinss: Anyone else?
  632. # [18:48] <dael> plinss: Any objections to the new spec?
  633. # [18:48] <dael> RESOLVED: Create a new spec for form control rendering with Rossen_ with an editor
  634. # [18:48] <dael> plinss: I imaging Rossen_ wouldn't mind other people stepping up to help
  635. # [18:49] <dael> Topic: <ol reversed>
  636. # [18:49] <tantek> aside: regarding page transitions prior art in HyperCard, the "visual effect" command, documented with various options (e.g. dissolve, iris open, scroll left, wipe left, etc.) http://www.jaedworks.com/hypercard/HT-Masters/visual-effects.html
  637. # [18:49] <dael> plinss: Tab made some edits, but I was concerned this had behaviour that couldn't be addressed in counters or are people ok with that
  638. # [18:49] <tantek> aside: and that should complete my actions for page transitions from this telcon. :)
  639. # [18:49] <dael> SimonSapin: There's on part that can't be address, but I think it's okay because it's only a problem inside the UN Countries
  640. # [18:50] <dael> dbaron: I think we'll want lists to function within counters.
  641. # [18:50] <dael> SimonSapin: I think CSS defines that
  642. # [18:50] <dael> SimonSapin: That's why I wanted the edit.
  643. # [18:50] <dael> plinss: IF we can't do a revese list we're not complete. We need to expland the model to address that
  644. # [18:50] <dael> dbaron: Prob. WE should also consider being able to set a counter without creating a new scope.
  645. # [18:51] <dael> ...: I think we had an agreement about making some new additions a few years ago
  646. # [18:51] <dael> plinss: TabAtkins isn't here today
  647. # [18:51] <dael> ???: I think we have counter-sets
  648. # [18:51] <dbaron> s/???/SimonSapin/
  649. # [18:51] <dael> dbaron: We do have them? Okay.
  650. # [18:51] <dbaron> s/counter-sets/counter-set
  651. # [18:51] <dael> SimonSapin: Yes.
  652. # [18:51] <dael> plinss: I guess q is do we want to work on reverse-lists? Do we want to be able to do that?
  653. # [18:51] <dael> ...: Any obj?
  654. # [18:52] <dael> SimonSapin: I think what we have is fine unless we want to expose the selection behaviour without using HTML
  655. # [18:52] <dael> plinss: That's what I'm leaning toward. I'd like to be able to explain everything in the model we have.
  656. # [18:52] <glazou> not me
  657. # [18:52] <dael> plinss: We don't have the people we need on the call to move forward, but anyone obj. to that?
  658. # [18:53] <dael> plinss: I'll take that as no obj. Maybe we'll discuss at the F2F when people are together.
  659. # [18:53] <dael> ...: That's the end of the agenda and the top of the hour.
  660. # [18:53] <Zakim> -BrianKardell
  661. # [18:53] <Zakim> -glenn
  662. # [18:53] <Zakim> -SGalineau
  663. # [18:53] * SteveZ Bye
  664. # [18:53] <dael> ...: Thanks everyone and safe travels. We'll see you Monday 9am.
  665. # [18:53] <Zakim> -rhauck
  666. # [18:53] <Zakim> -[Microsoft]
  667. # [18:53] <Zakim> -antonp
  668. # [18:53] <Zakim> -dbaron
  669. # [18:53] <Zakim> -[Microsoft.a]
  670. # [18:53] <Zakim> -SimonSapin
  671. # [18:53] <dael> plinss: Bye.
  672. # [18:53] <Zakim> -krit
  673. # [18:53] <Zakim> -leif
  674. # [18:53] <Zakim> -MaRakow
  675. # [18:53] <Zakim> -glazou
  676. # [18:53] <Zakim> -dauwhe
  677. # [18:53] <Zakim> -SteveZ
  678. # [18:53] <sgalineau> actually, breakfast arrives at 8:30am
  679. # [18:53] <Zakim> -plinss
  680. # [18:53] <Zakim> -dael
  681. # [18:53] <Zakim> -Koji
  682. # [18:53] <Zakim> -Plh
  683. # [18:53] <Zakim> -tantek
  684. # [18:53] <Zakim> -Bert
  685. # [18:53] <sgalineau> delicious bagels, to be exact
  686. # [18:53] <Zakim> -BradK
  687. # [18:53] <SimonSapin> sgalineau, good to know :)
  688. # [18:54] * Quits: dael (~dael@public.cloak) ("")
  689. # [18:54] * sgalineau is game for eating 40 bagels with SimonSapin
  690. # [18:54] * Quits: Koji (~koji@public.cloak) ("Leaving...")
  691. # [18:54] <sgalineau> seriously: scheduled breakfast things everyday at 8:30. will email about that very important fact...
  692. # [18:55] <glazou> sgalineau, true yiddish bagels ?-)
  693. # [18:55] * Parts: smfr (~smfr@public.cloak) (smfr)
  694. # [18:56] <dauwhe> sgalineau: boiled in lye?
  695. # [18:56] * Joins: emalasky (~Adium@public.cloak)
  696. # [18:56] <glazou> :)
  697. # [18:57] * Quits: BradK (~bradk@public.cloak) ("Buh bye")
  698. # [18:57] * Quits: rhauck (~rhauck@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  699. # [18:57] <glazou> the best ones I had in my own life are in here in Paris and in NYC a block from BH Photo IIRC
  700. # [18:57] <TabAtkins> dbaron: Setting a counter without creating a new scope was defined a year ago, in Counter Styles, with the counter-set property.
  701. # [18:58] <dbaron> TabAtkins, ok, so we did add counter-set :-)
  702. # [18:58] <dbaron> TabAtkins, I didn't realize the counter styles draft had things other than counter styles in it
  703. # [18:58] <TabAtkins> It defines counters, in general.
  704. # [18:59] <TabAtkins> Which are separable from lists.
  705. # [18:59] <SimonSapin> TabAtkins: isn’t it in Lists rather than Counter Styles?
  706. # [18:59] <TabAtkins> Whoops, yes it is.
  707. # [18:59] <TabAtkins> Forget my justification from a second ago.
  708. # [18:59] <TabAtkins> The counter-manipualting properties are in Lists.
  709. # [18:59] * glazou needs to run; bye people
  710. # [19:01] <Zakim> disconnecting the lone participant, Stearns, in Style_CSS FP()12:00PM
  711. # [19:01] <Zakim> Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended
  712. # [19:01] <Zakim> Attendees were glenn, dael, +1.917.207.aaaa, dauwhe, glazou, abinader, plinss, SGalineau, krit, SimonSapin, Stearns, rhauck, [Bloomberg], antonp, Bert, smfr, Plh, SteveZ,
  713. # [19:01] <Zakim> ... BrianKardell, leif, BradK, Koji, dbaron, MaRakow, Rossen_, tantek
  714. # [19:01] * Quits: MaRakow (~MaRakow@public.cloak) ("Page closed")
  715. # [19:02] * Quits: teoli_ (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  716. # [19:03] * Joins: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak)
  717. # [19:05] * Joins: teoli_ (~teoli@public.cloak)
  718. # [19:05] * Quits: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  719. # [19:05] <sgalineau> glazou: actually, yes
  720. # [19:06] <sgalineau> or rather, very close to it
  721. # [19:06] <sgalineau> also, not the usually massive US bagels. those are the proper size afaik
  722. # [19:06] <sgalineau> http://eltana.com/menu/
  723. # [19:07] * Quits: glazou (~glazou@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  724. # [19:08] <tantek> rossen, are we running next week?
  725. # [19:09] <tantek> maybe Tue morning
  726. # [19:12] <plh> how long would the running be?
  727. # [19:14] * sgalineau loves running around lake union. less fond of doing it this time of year, however
  728. # [19:14] <Ms2ger> plh, for as long as tantek feels like chasing you :)
  729. # [19:15] <sgalineau> there is a visual
  730. # [19:15] * dauwhe anyone want to go ski mountaineering on Saturday?
  731. # [19:16] <plh> ms2ger, hum, there might not be an end to that. he might be too motivated :)
  732. # [19:16] <tantek> plh ~10k
  733. # [19:17] <dauwhe> tantek: how fast?
  734. # [19:17] <tantek> are you a runner Ms2ger?
  735. # [19:17] <Ms2ger> Only when I need to catch a train
  736. # [19:18] <tantek> dauwhe - somewhere in the 55min-1hr range. not very fast.
  737. # [19:19] <plh> I could probably do a not very fast 10k
  738. # [19:20] <leif> dauwhe: I'd go if I got in earlier that day!
  739. # [19:21] <dauwhe> leif: hoping to go to Muir Snowfields on Mt. Rainier, but logistics are not looking good.
  740. # [19:21] <tantek> basic idea: *before* breakfast at the hotel, maybe ~6:30-7:30.
  741. # [19:22] <plh> tantek, works for me
  742. # [19:28] * tantek will pack his running gear for Seattle then.
  743. # [19:29] * Joins: glenn_ (~gadams@public.cloak)
  744. # [19:30] * Quits: lmclister (~sid13822@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  745. # [19:30] * Joins: lmclister (~sid13822@public.cloak)
  746. # [19:33] * Quits: glenn (~gadams@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  747. # [19:39] <leif> dauwhe: unfortunately I'll arrive pretty late, but would be fun
  748. # [19:40] <leif> s/would be/would have been/
  749. # [19:44] <Rossen_> I'd love to go for a run (you pick the distance) but it'd be hard for me to make 6:30 in Seattle if I've no place to shower :)
  750. # [19:44] <Rossen_> If Adobe has showers in their building we can go for a pre-lunch run along the canal - it's pretty there
  751. # [19:45] <astearns> we do have showers, but not in the areas your badges will access. You'll need an Adobe person to let you in there (I'm planning on being in early most days)
  752. # [19:49] <Rossen_> awesome! So we can do lunch runs. Tantek?
  753. # [19:51] <tantek> Rosse, you're talking pre-lunch right? do you think we'll have sufficient time? like maybe 20-30min tops?
  754. # [19:52] <Rossen_> we'll make the time
  755. # [19:52] <Rossen_> otherwise we can do the am near Adobe and ask Alan to let us have shower
  756. # [19:53] <tantek> IIRC the breakfast from the hotel is pretty filling, so I'd be up for either pre-breakfast or pre-lunch
  757. # [19:54] <Rossen_> the pre-lunch will be better for me so let's shoot for that?
  758. # [19:56] * Quits: eliezerb_3nd (~Eliezer@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  759. # [19:56] <tantek> also likely to be sunnier/warmer so that's good. hoping the chairs give us 90+ min for lunch rather than 60 so we have time to run + rinse off.
  760. # [19:57] <Rossen_> it is usually 90 mins right? 12 - 1:30?
  761. # [19:58] <tantek> sgalineau, what have mid-day temperatures been like outside the Adobe offices?
  762. # [19:58] <sgalineau> varied between low-40s to low-50s
  763. # [19:58] <sgalineau> but the lake can be windy; and given enough wind and drizzle it can feel very cold
  764. # [19:59] <sgalineau> so far forecast is good, except for Tuesday
  765. # [20:00] <sgalineau> we use 90mn for lunch? really?
  766. # [20:00] <sgalineau> anyway. if you guys want to run mid-day i'm happy to give you access to the lockers/showers
  767. # [20:01] * Quits: israelh (~israelh@public.cloak) ("Page closed")
  768. # [20:06] <dauwhe> leif: Opera should host a CSSWG meeting in Norway during ski season :)
  769. # [20:08] * Quits: leif (~lastorset@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
  770. # [20:08] * Joins: leif (~lastorset@public.cloak)
  771. # [20:09] <sgalineau> I think you're saying Opera should hold a meeting between October and June?
  772. # [20:09] * leaverou_away is now known as leaverou
  773. # [20:10] <dauwhe> sgalineau: the specs would progress faster if the F2F lasted from October to June. But never in Shenzhen!
  774. # [20:12] <sgalineau> <shudder>Shenzhen</shudder>
  775. # [20:12] <plh> I'll pass on the mid-day run. I'm only a pre-breakfast type of runner
  776. # [20:12] <tantek> plh - we can go for a quick/short pre-breakfast run too if you'd like
  777. # [20:12] <tantek> I also prefer pre-breakfast running on a daily basis
  778. # [20:12] <plh> I like pre-breakfast, so let's do it
  779. # [20:13] <tantek> maybe 7-7:30 then
  780. # [20:14] <sgalineau> also, if anyone rows there is a rowing club right by the office.
  781. # [20:14] <plh> dauwhe, you don't phrase properly: the f2f will be in Shenzen and won't be adjourned until the specs are done :)
  782. # [20:14] <sgalineau> well, that is one way to empty the CSSWG
  783. # [20:14] <plh> as far as I remember, it's dangerous to go on a boat during a css f2f
  784. # [20:15] <sgalineau> plh, you would push yourself in the water?
  785. # [20:15] <sgalineau> taht's some serious commitment to tradition
  786. # [20:15] <plh> :)
  787. # [20:17] <sgalineau> officially, no one in the CSSWG falls in the water. We just have a policy of helping people upgrade their smartphones.
  788. # [20:17] <Ms2ger> Ha
  789. # [20:17] <Ms2ger> Is annevk invited?
  790. # [20:18] <sgalineau> if he were, would he come?
  791. # [20:19] <Ms2ger> If there's water nearby? Who knows...
  792. # [20:20] <sgalineau> you may have a point there. we'll have british people to say things like 'SHEDULE'. we lack someone who will say we suck every 15mn.
  793. # [20:22] <Ms2ger> Only every 15 minutes?
  794. # [20:26] <tantek> Ms2ger - it was a slow day
  795. # [20:27] * Quits: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak) ("8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.")
  796. # [20:40] * Zakim excuses himself; his presence no longer seems to be needed
  797. # [20:40] * Parts: Zakim (zakim@public.cloak) (Zakim)
  798. # [20:42] * Joins: adenilson (~anonymous@public.cloak)
  799. # [21:01] * Quits: teoli_ (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  800. # [21:01] * Joins: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak)
  801. # [21:03] * Joins: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak)
  802. # [21:08] * Quits: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  803. # [21:26] * leaverou is now known as leaverou_away
  804. # [21:48] * Quits: leif (~lastorset@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
  805. # [21:48] * Joins: leif (~lastorset@public.cloak)
  806. # [21:52] * Parts: leif (~lastorset@public.cloak) (leif)
  807. # [22:00] * Quits: emalasky (~Adium@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
  808. # [22:01] * Joins: emalasky (~Adium@public.cloak)
  809. # [22:02] * Quits: Ms2ger (~Ms2ger@public.cloak) ("nn")
  810. # [22:06] * Quits: lmcliste_ (~lmclister@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  811. # [22:14] * Joins: lmcliste_ (~lmclister@public.cloak)
  812. # [22:38] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
  813. # [22:39] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  814. # [22:52] * Quits: sgalineau (~sgalineau@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  815. # [22:54] * Joins: rhauck (~Adium@public.cloak)
  816. # [23:00] * Quits: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak) ("8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.")
  817. # [23:00] * Joins: rhauck1 (~Adium@public.cloak)
  818. # [23:01] * Joins: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak)
  819. # [23:03] * Joins: teoli_ (~teoli@public.cloak)
  820. # [23:03] * Quits: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak) (Client closed connection)
  821. # [23:03] * Quits: tantek (~tantek@public.cloak) (tantek)
  822. # [23:04] * Quits: rhauck (~Adium@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  823. # [23:10] * Quits: teoli_ (~teoli@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  824. # [23:13] * Quits: adenilson (~anonymous@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  825. # [23:14] * Joins: teoli (~teoli@public.cloak)
  826. # [23:20] * Quits: rhauck1 (~Adium@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
  827. # [23:22] * Joins: rhauck (~Adium@public.cloak)
  828. # [23:40] * Joins: adenilson (~anonymous@public.cloak)
  829. # [23:46] * Quits: emalasky (~Adium@public.cloak) ("Leaving.")
  830. # [23:49] * Joins: emalasky (~Adium@public.cloak)
  831. # [23:49] * Joins: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak)
  832. # [23:56] * Quits: zcorpan (~zcorpan@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  833. # Session Close: Thu Jan 23 00:00:00 2014

The end :)