/irc-logs / w3c / #fx / 2014-11-10 / end

Options:

  1. # Session Start: Mon Nov 10 00:00:00 2014
  2. # Session Ident: #fx
  3. # [00:23] * Joins: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak)
  4. # [02:20] * heycam is now known as heycam|away
  5. # [04:14] * heycam|away is now known as heycam
  6. # [04:32] * Joins: nikos (~uid28403@public.cloak)
  7. # [05:25] <birtles> krit: thanks, I followed up in the etherpad
  8. # [05:26] <birtles> I'd prefer we talk about "discrete interpolation" rather than saying "no interpolation is possible"
  9. # [05:26] <birtles> I think we definitely want additive animation for filters
  10. # [05:27] <birtles> I think accumulative animation can be deferred but needs to be defined (otherwise it will default to additive which will be problematic)
  11. # [05:29] <birtles> by "needs to be defined" I mean, "needs to be defined as, e.g. simply returning the delta value"
  12. # [08:00] * heycam is now known as heycam|away
  13. # [08:03] * Quits: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  14. # [10:02] <krit> birtles: still here?
  15. # [10:02] <krit> birtles: IMO "discrete interpolation” is wrong
  16. # [10:03] <krit> birtles: either you can interpolate or you can't
  17. # [10:03] <krit> birtles: even WebAnimation is specific about interpolation
  18. # [10:03] <krit> birtles: “interpolation - given two target property values Vstart and Vend, produces an intermediate value Vres at a distance of p along the interval between Vstart and Vend such that p = 0 produces Vstart and p = 1 produces Vend."
  19. # [10:04] <krit> birtles: in the “Otherwise" case this is not possible
  20. # [10:05] <krit> birtles: ok SVG Animations talke about “discrete interpolation” again… IMO this is not correct
  21. # [10:06] <krit> birtles: anyway, we have the “no interpolation” case everywhere. we need to deal with it
  22. # [16:58] * Joins: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak)
  23. # [19:14] * Quits: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  24. # [19:17] <krit> birtles: I changed “no interpolation” to “Not animatable” and we can link to WebAnimations when it is in CR
  25. # [19:18] <krit> birtles: I also plan to use the subsections “Interpolation”, “Addition” and “Accumulation” to line up with the WebAnimations specification
  26. # [19:22] <krit> birtles: ok, things are a bit distributed in WebAnimations :P. I found this “Unless specifically defined not to be, all properties are considered animatable” now. I’ll change it again :/
  27. # [20:01] * Joins: dbaron (~dbaron@public.cloak)
  28. # [22:44] * Quits: logbot (~logbot@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  29. # [22:46] * Quits: heycam|away (~cam@public.cloak) (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
  30. # [22:48] * Joins: logbot (~logbot@public.cloak)
  31. # [22:57] * Joins: heycam|away (~cam@public.cloak)
  32. # [23:50] * heycam|away is now known as heycam
  33. # [23:53] <birtles> krit: "not animatable" is different, it means the attribute can't be changed by animation
  34. # [23:53] <birtles> krit: I argued to have "not interpolable" and "interpolable" but lost
  35. # [23:53] <birtles> krit: if you want to use "not interpolable" you'll have to take it up with Shane
  36. # Session Close: Tue Nov 11 00:00:00 2014

The end :)