Options:
- # Session Start: Mon May 21 00:00:00 2007
- # Session Ident: #html-wg
- # [08:34] * Attempting to rejoin channel #html-wg
- # [08:34] * Rejoined channel #html-wg
- # [08:34] * Topic is 'HTML WG http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ logged: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/'
- # [08:34] * Set by Zeros on Mon Apr 30 23:38:28
- # [10:43] * Disconnected
- # [10:43] * Attempting to rejoin channel #html-wg
- # [10:43] * Rejoined channel #html-wg
- # [10:43] * Topic is 'HTML WG http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ logged: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/'
- # [10:43] * Set by Zeros on Mon Apr 30 23:38:28
- # [11:01] * Joins: tH_ (r@83.100.138.95)
- # [11:01] * tH_ is now known as tH
- # [11:04] * Quits: Shunsuke (kuruma@133.27.55.88) (Ping timeout)
- # [11:06] * Joins: glazou (daniel@80.118.184.70)
- # [11:06] <glazou> hello
- # [11:06] <glazou> anne: I just hit in my FullerScreen extension for firefox a case where I need html5 scoped stylesheets...
- # [11:08] <anne> implement it! :)
- # [11:08] <glazou> that's not difficult
- # [11:08] <glazou> BUT
- # [11:08] <glazou> the spec misses one important thing
- # [11:08] <glazou> what about the specificity of scoped rules ?
- # [11:09] <anne> I think that's not affected
- # [11:09] <glazou> IMHO, the spec of a scoped selector should be increased by an ID selector's specificity
- # [11:09] <glazou> otherwise scoped styles are not specific enough
- # [11:11] <glazou> anne: I also read the Wysiwyg Editing section
- # [11:11] <anne> if you have p { margin:10px } in your linked style sheet and p { margin:20px } in your scoped it will win
- # [11:12] <glazou> is :root matching the p in the scoped sheet ?
- # [11:12] <anne> no
- # [11:13] <anne> " If the attribute is present, then the user agent must only apply the specified style information to the style element's parent element (if any), and that element's child nodes. Otherwise, the specified styles must, if applied, be applied to the entire document."
- # [11:13] <anne> so :root would match the root element of the document and would therefore be "ignored" during scoping...
- # [11:14] <glazou> then it's not true scoping
- # [11:14] <glazou> in true scoping, nothing can apply outside of the subtree
- # [11:14] <glazou> the outside just does not exist
- # [11:14] <glazou> the subtree is the "local" tree for the scoped sheet
- # [11:14] <anne> it's not your definition of "true scoping" maybe
- # [11:15] <glazou> well, if you don't do that, then you need to know at least the element type of the subtree's root to style it !
- # [11:15] <glazou> BUT
- # [11:15] <anne> why?
- # [11:15] <glazou> if :root applies to it, then your scoped sheet can be generic
- # [11:16] <glazou> how do you style the root of the subtree and only that element without :root if you don't know its element type ?
- # [11:16] <anne> what's the use case for that?
- # [11:16] <glazou> web 2.0
- # [11:16] <anne> not a use case
- # [11:16] <glazou> creating stuff in a doc
- # [11:16] <glazou> fullerscreen extension
- # [11:16] <glazou> creating a slidemanager in the doc tree
- # [11:17] <anne> these are not specific enough...
- # [11:17] <anne> when wouldn't you know the "root" element type?
- # [11:17] <glazou> not necessarily if it is created by the user
- # [11:17] <glazou> in an editable doc
- # [11:18] * glazou needs to run, bbiab
- # [11:18] <anne> <section><style scoped> p { margin:2em } </style><p>2em margin</p></section>
- # [11:21] * Joins: mjs (mjs@64.81.48.145)
- # [11:22] * Quits: mjs (mjs@64.81.48.145) (Client exited)
- # [11:22] * Joins: mjs (mjs@64.81.48.145)
- # [11:25] <sbuluf> (what's scoped styles?)
- # [11:35] <Dashiva> They apply only to the subtree they appear in
- # [11:35] <anne> see my sample above
- # [11:36] <anne> <section><style scoped> p { margin:2em } </style><p>2em margin</p></section><p>default margin</p>
- # [11:36] <anne> would be a better example
- # [11:36] <sbuluf> styles that apply just to a part of a document? scoped, as in scope?
- # [11:37] <krijnh> Isn't p { margin: 1em; } section p { margin: 2em; } better separation?
- # [11:37] <anne> sbuluf, yes
- # [11:37] <sbuluf> (english is not my native tongue)
- # [11:37] <sbuluf> thanks, anne, dashiva
- # [11:38] <anne> krijnh, depends on what you want
- # [11:38] <krijnh> anne: Your example would be pretty much the same as inline styles?
- # [11:39] <anne> except that you can provide media specific style sheets and alternate style sheets with scoped style sheets
- # [11:39] <anne> which is why they are pretty useful
- # [11:39] <anne> (and also stuff like a:hover {} etc.)
- # [11:40] <krijnh> "a:hover is behavior and should be done with JS" ;p
- # [11:41] <anne> "<i> is presentation and is better done using <span class=italic>"
- # [11:41] <krijnh> :)
- # [11:41] <anne> fortunately it's not all black and white
- # [11:42] <krijnh> You can also @import stylesheets inside scoped blocks?
- # [11:43] <anne> yeah
- # [11:44] <krijnh> Cool
- # [11:46] * karl wonders if style elements found in the body is not put back in the head by browsers?
- # [11:47] <anne> only in Firefox
- # [11:47] <anne> iirc
- # [11:47] <karl> like meta name ?
- # [11:48] <anne> <meta>, <link>, etc. are put in <head> by more browsers (and also by HTML5)
- # [11:49] * Joins: hasather (hasather@81.235.209.174)
- # [11:49] <karl> hmm that would be good to have a test table for all head elements that are in the body and
- # [11:49] <karl> test which browsers does what.
- # [11:49] <karl> s/s//
- # [11:49] <anne> we have a spec now which is based on what browsers do
- # [11:50] <anne> you can use http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/ to get results for browsers pretty easily
- # [11:50] <karl> anne: I prefer to see what browsers do. :)
- # [11:50] <karl> ah cool
- # [11:50] <karl> that is helpful,
- # [11:51] <anne> it seems that IE7 and O9 don't move <link> and <meta>
- # [11:51] * Quits: ROBOd (robod@86.34.246.154) (Ping timeout)
- # [11:51] <anne> not sure why HTML5 does
- # [11:53] <karl> :) ah interesting
- # [11:53] <karl> it means that the meta of rdfa was a viable solution
- # [11:53] <anne> rdfa isn't though :)
- # [11:53] <karl> rdfa == microformats
- # [11:54] <anne> hah
- # [11:54] <karl> ;)
- # [11:54] <karl> style is put back in the head in Camino
- # [11:54] <anne> yeah, Firefox moves stuff around
- # [11:55] <karl> same for safari
- # [11:55] <anne> including <meta> and <link>
- # [11:55] <anne> wow, Safari too?
- # [11:55] <karl> <!DOCTYPE html>
- # [11:55] <karl> <html>
- # [11:55] <karl> <head><title></title></head>
- # [11:55] <karl> <body>
- # [11:55] <karl> <meta name="foo" content="bar"/>
- # [11:55] <karl> <style></style>
- # [11:55] <karl> </body>
- # [11:55] <karl> </html>
- # [11:55] <karl> I'm testing this
- # [11:55] <mjs> good evening gentlemen
- # [11:55] <karl> yes Safari too. It goes to head
- # [11:56] <karl> I can't test for IE and Opera
- # [11:56] <sbuluf> i might be missing something, but i don't even understand the whole concept of "browser moves element". the original doc in some server remains the same. what's the use of moving an element just locally?
- # [11:57] <anne> IE7 and O9 don't move things around
- # [11:57] <karl> sbuluf: in the dom
- # [11:57] <mjs> Opera doesn't tend to make an implicit head when called for
- # [11:57] <karl> you see anne that would be good to have a table
- # [11:57] <mjs> Safari moves style elements to head, but I am not sure that's right
- # [11:57] <mjs> we need to support style elements in the body anyway I think
- # [11:58] <anne> yeah
- # [11:58] <anne> IE7 doesn't move <style>, <meta> and <link>
- # [11:58] <karl> hehe
- # [11:58] <anne> karl, feel free to make a table
- # [11:58] * anne e-mails the WHATWG
- # [11:58] <karl> yep on my todo.
- # [12:01] <anne> I also think </head> should always be ignored
- # [12:01] <anne> makes cases like <head></head><link><body> easier to handle
- # [12:01] <anne> in fact, if you do that I wonder if you still have to move elements around...
- # [12:02] <anne> not moving stuff around would be nice :)
- # [12:02] <karl> I'm making test files
- # [12:05] <sbuluf> today i was wondering if there was overlap between canvas and forms
- # [12:06] <sbuluf> i don't know enough to comment even half-meaningfully, however. they simply both appear to have some "semi-acriptable gui" part to them
- # [12:07] <anne> all HTML elements have a scriptable interface...
- # [12:09] <karl> huh...
- # [12:09] <anne> e-mailed the suggestion about </head>
- # [12:09] <karl> <!ENTITY % head.misc "SCRIPT|STYLE|META|LINK|OBJECT" -- repeatable head elements -->
- # [12:09] <karl> Object in head?
- # [12:09] <anne> that's dropped
- # [12:10] <anne> i think it was for allowed for extensions or something
- # [12:10] <karl> I'm discovering
- # [12:10] <anne> maybe similar to <bgsound>
- # [12:10] <karl> I wonder what was the use case
- # [12:10] <karl> ah ok
- # [12:14] <anne> mjs, which elements would need to be moved?
- # [12:14] * anne replies on list too
- # [12:15] <anne> replied*...
- # [12:16] <mjs> anne: well, if you don't move head-specific elements in the body, then there's no need to move anything - I replied before reading your other message
- # [12:16] <mjs> anne: for conformance checking, it would presumably still be an error for any head-specific elements to be in the body, or for any elements to be between head and body if both are explicit
- # [12:24] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [12:26] * Joins: jdandrea (jdandrea@68.192.165.143)
- # [12:29] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [12:31] <anne> yeah, conformance checking might be harder if you want to ignore </head>
- # [12:32] <karl> very interesting results
- # [12:32] <karl> so far
- # [12:32] <karl> in the process of publishing
- # [12:32] <karl> my network sucks a bit right now. very slpw
- # [12:32] <karl> slow
- # [12:32] <anne> please include tests like </head><link><body>
- # [12:32] <anne> yeah, France...
- # [12:32] <karl> :) ah that would be another series
- # [12:33] <karl> anne: not France, but countryside
- # [12:38] <karl> http://www.w3.org/2007/05/dom-head-body.xhtml if someone can send me the results for Opera and IE with the exact version numbers.
- # [12:39] <karl> hmm I have forgotten meta
- # [12:41] <karl> fixing the test file
- # [12:41] <anne> update http://www.w3.org/2007/05/dom-head-body.xhtml,access please
- # [12:41] <karl> and then the results in the table
- # [12:41] <karl> good point ;)
- # [12:48] * Quits: sbuluf (rb@200.49.140.103) (Ping timeout)
- # [12:51] <karl> http://www.w3.org/2007/05/dom-html401.html - Test file
- # [12:51] <karl> http://www.w3.org/2007/05/dom-head-body.xhtml - Results
- # [12:51] <karl> writing an email to public-html
- # [12:53] <anne> Opera keeps everything in the DOM the way you wrote it
- # [12:54] <anne> <title> has display none
- # [12:54] <anne> IE7 does so too except that it drops <title> from the DOM
- # [12:54] <karl> interesting
- # [13:01] <karl> sent to the list.
- # [13:01] <karl> anne, please send your results replying to my message when it hits the list.
- # [13:01] <anne> I'm afraid I won't be the only one
- # [13:02] <anne> besides, I already told whatwg@whatwg.org what needs to be done...
- # [13:03] <karl> what needs to be done, is not the tests :) two different things
- # [13:17] <anne> What Opera does seems pretty straightforward here...
- # [13:19] <MikeSmith> Are there known issues when printing from IE of a page with images referenced through CSS?
- # [13:19] <MikeSmith> problem being the IE doesn't print them?
- # [13:20] <anne> You mean 'background'?
- # [13:20] <MikeSmith> anne - yeah; like this: "background: white url(W3C) no-repeat top left;"
- # [13:21] <MikeSmith> as used on http://www.w3.org/Mobile/
- # [13:21] <MikeSmith> IE fails to print the W3C and Mobile Web Initiative logos on that page
- # [13:22] <anne> Does any browser preserve it?
- # [13:22] <MikeSmith> opera does ...
- # [13:23] <anne> hmm ok
- # [13:23] <anne> I thought background was mostly ignored when printing
- # [13:23] <anne> because it might require lots of ink
- # [13:23] <MikeSmith> FF doesn't ...
- # [13:24] <anne> ah ok
- # [13:24] <anne> guess my recollection was from before my Opera days :)
- # [13:25] <MikeSmith> I'd try it in Safari, but my Webkit/Safari is refusing to connect to anything right now ...
- # [13:26] <MikeSmith> anyway, I guess the answer is that one can't rely on browsers printing CSS background
- # [13:27] <anne> imagine the background would be a simple pattern
- # [13:27] <anne> or black or something
- # [13:27] <anne> would you like to waste ink on that?
- # [13:28] * Joins: frippz (frippz@193.15.86.38)
- # [13:29] <MikeSmith> anne - yeah, I understand the rationale for that being the default. just that a browser should provide an option for overriding it
- # [13:29] <MikeSmith> which FF does
- # [13:30] <MikeSmith> Page Setup/Print Background
- # [13:31] <anne> right
- # [13:31] * Quits: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.139.123.225) (Quit: gsnedders)
- # [13:32] <tH> ie6 has it in options/advanced, don't know about 7
- # [13:36] <MikeSmith> tH - found in it IE 7 in Internet Options/Advanced/Printing
- # [13:36] <MikeSmith> not terrifically intuitive or at-point-of-use though
- # [13:40] * Joins: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.139.123.225)
- # [13:40] * Quits: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.139.123.225) (Quit: Don't touch /dev/null…)
- # [13:40] * Joins: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.139.123.225)
- # [14:20] <karl> http://www.w3.org/2007/05/dom-head-body.xhtml updated.
- # [14:20] <karl> thanks anne, dao
- # [14:30] <anne> what dao pointed out didn't seem like a fix just for <style> though
- # [14:34] * Joins: zcorpan_ (zcorpan@84.216.41.199)
- # [14:34] <karl> yep the bug report is not clear for the resolution
- # [14:34] <karl> they seem to say at a point that they want to stop to move the tags to the head
- # [14:34] <karl> but there's no clear resolution
- # [14:35] <anne> there's a patch though
- # [14:43] <karl> jdandrea: I have added your screenshots to the page. Thanks.
- # [14:43] <karl> See http://www.w3.org/2007/05/dom-head-body.xhtml
- # [14:45] <karl> I wonder what is happening with icab http://dev.joesapt.net/w3c/head-elements-wrong/iCab%203.0.3.png
- # [14:47] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [14:52] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [14:56] <jdandrea> karl: you're welcome! you might want to remove bizarre.png :)
- # [14:56] <jdandrea> (if not already)
- # [14:56] <jdandrea> ah, it's linked - I removed it.
- # [14:57] <zcorpan_> karl: you may want to test the same thing but in quirks mode
- # [14:58] <anne> i hope quirks mode parsing is the same...
- # [14:59] * jdandrea should have made a macos and win32 directory
- # [14:59] <jdandrea> karl: I wasn't sure about iCab either, but I blitzed through it. Let me check it more closely ...
- # [15:00] <zcorpan_> isn't testing one gecko 1.8 browser enough? :)
- # [15:00] <jdandrea> zcorpan_: I know, overkill. :)
- # [15:01] <karl> zcorpan_: yes I was thinking, that would be better to test engines more than browsers
- # [15:01] <karl> I wonder if there is a graph with browsers versions versus engines
- # [15:02] <karl> that would help to read results
- # [15:02] <jdandrea> This isn't a graph, but ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_web_browsers
- # [15:02] <zcorpan_> the first 3 are gecko 1.8
- # [15:03] <jdandrea> or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_layout_engines
- # [15:03] <jdandrea> I can adjust the descriptions.
- # [15:03] <zcorpan_> shiira is a newer webkit than safari 2
- # [15:03] <jdandrea> Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines
- # [15:05] <zcorpan_> or wait, i was thinking about swift
- # [15:05] <zcorpan_> dunno about shiira
- # [15:13] * Parts: zcorpan_ (zcorpan@84.216.41.199)
- # [15:13] * Joins: zcorpan_ (zcorpan@84.216.41.199)
- # [15:16] <jdandrea> karl: One more - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines_(HTML) (linked on my page)
- # [15:16] <Philip`> IE6 doesn't simply remove the second <title> - see e.g. http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/?%3C%21DOCTYPE%20HTML%3E%0D%0A%3Chtml%3E%0D%0A%3Chead%3E%0D%0A%3Ctitle%3EOne%3C/title%3E%0D%0A%3C/head%3E%0D%0A%3Cbody%3E%0D%0A%3Ctitle%20id%3Dt%3ETwo%3C/title%3E%0D%0A%3Cscript%3Ewindow.onload%20%3D%20function%20%28%29%20%7B%20alert%28document.getElementById%28%27t%27%29.innerHTML%29%20%7D%3C/script%3E
- # [15:17] <jdandrea> XSS Detected! :)
- # [15:17] <Philip`> where it assigns the second title's id to the first title's content
- # [15:17] <anne> Philip`, ah, it handles <title> like <html>
- # [15:17] <anne> (at a guess(
- # [15:18] <anne> although not entirely... :(
- # [15:19] <anne> it seems to only copy known attributes
- # [15:20] <Philip`> Does it copy any except for id?
- # [15:20] <anne> title=, class= but not x=
- # [15:21] <anne> no browser seems to copy that though
- # [15:21] <anne> and what I thought about <html> only works in Firefox
- # [15:22] <anne> and Opera
- # [15:23] <anne> browsers are insane
- # [15:23] <Philip`> Copies lang too
- # [15:24] <anne> yeah, known attributes
- # [15:24] <anne> "known"
- # [15:24] <karl> [15:27] <anne> browsers are insane
- # [15:24] <karl> hmmm yes, let's kill all browsers and use papernet.
- # [15:25] <anne> paper has other issues
- # [15:26] <Philip`> Paper can't express semantics
- # [15:32] * karl is trying to imagine the world we had before computers and is trying to guess what was not semantic
- # [15:32] <jdandrea> karl: iCab shows this under DOM view (note 'misparented'): <ul class="domTree"><LI CLASS="t1 misparented"><CODE>BODY</CODE></LI></ul>
- # [15:34] <jdandrea> karl: ... which is assigned if this test is false: (node.childNodes[i].parentNode == node)
- # [15:35] * jdandrea realizes that's taken out of context, but anyway ...
- # [15:35] <anne> oh, iCab has a graph as opposed to a tree?
- # [15:35] <anne> interesting
- # [15:38] <anne> Is it just me or do people not understand that scope= addresses similar use cases to headers=?
- # [15:39] <jdandrea> anne: ah, is that it? a directed graph then.
- # [15:39] <karl> anne: maybe it is just a *different* way of looking at same things, more than a wrong/right case.
- # [15:44] <Philip`> I wish the Live DOM Viewer worked in Netscape 2
- # [15:45] <anne> I wish Netscape 2 is obsolete
- # [15:45] <anne> oh wait, it is!
- # [15:46] <jdandrea> :)
- # [15:47] * jdandrea has to go - bbl (waves)
- # [15:47] * Quits: jdandrea (jdandrea@68.192.165.143) (Quit: ciao)
- # [15:56] * Quits: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org) (Quit: Get thee behind me, satan.)
- # [16:00] * Parts: asbjornu (asbjorn@84.48.116.134)
- # [16:12] * Joins: asbjornu (asbjorn@84.48.116.134)
- # [16:15] * Parts: hasather (hasather@81.235.209.174)
- # [16:30] * Joins: billmason (billmason@69.30.57.156)
- # [16:31] * Joins: hasather (hasather@81.235.209.174)
- # [16:41] * Joins: Zeros (Zeros-Elip@69.140.48.129)
- # [16:41] * Quits: Zeros (Zeros-Elip@69.140.48.129) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [16:50] <anne> cool, timbl reviewed access-control :)
- # [16:50] <anne> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-appformats/2007May/0060.html
- # [17:00] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [17:05] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [17:19] <karl> http://www.andybudd.com/archives/2007/05/xtech_2007/
- # [17:21] <anne> yeah, the session was kind of boring
- # [17:28] <karl> I didn't think it was boring. More that it was not long enough. Maybe the starting frame was not prepared enough.
- # [17:28] <karl> A panel is very difficult to achieve, because there are two things going on
- # [17:28] <karl> debate between the panelist
- # [17:29] <anne> the subject was to broad
- # [17:29] <karl> debate between the panelists and the public
- # [17:29] <karl> anne: yes I agree with the topic too broad
- # [17:29] <karl> it's why I said "starting frame"
- # [17:29] <anne> discussing HTML5, WF2, XHTML2 and XForms in 40 minutes is not doable
- # [17:29] <anne> I suppose I should've figured that out before I joined
- # [17:29] <karl> exactly
- # [17:30] <karl> and roles not well defined.
- # [17:30] <karl> This person will talk for html 5
- # [17:30] <karl> this one for this
- # [17:30] <karl> and so on.
- # [17:30] <karl> we learn from our mistakes
- # [17:32] <anne> I don't think many browser vendors would agree with his statements btw :)
- # [17:33] * Quits: frippz (frippz@193.15.86.38) (Quit: frippz)
- # [17:35] * Quits: glazou (daniel@80.118.184.70) (Quit: glazou)
- # [18:05] * Joins: frippz (fredrikfro@193.11.209.47)
- # [18:41] * Joins: Sander (svl@71.57.109.108)
- # [18:51] * Quits: wilhelm (wilhelm@129.241.93.37) (Ping timeout)
- # [18:52] * Quits: Hixie (ianh@129.241.93.37) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:08] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:09] * Joins: Zeros (Zeros-Elip@67.154.87.254)
- # [19:13] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [19:47] * Joins: da3d (opera@213.65.136.41)
- # [19:54] * Quits: mjs (mjs@64.81.48.145) (Quit: mjs)
- # [20:10] <zcorpan_> 444 group participants
- # [20:11] * zcorpan_ wonders if it will be 666 some day
- # [20:25] * Joins: kingryan (rking3@208.66.64.47)
- # [20:30] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@63.245.220.242)
- # [20:45] * Joins: jgraham (jgraham@85.210.7.238)
- # [20:49] * Joins: glazou (daniel@212.180.54.82)
- # [20:49] <glazou> karl:ping
- # [20:56] <gsnedders> zcorpan_: what do you think member #666 will be like?
- # [20:59] <zcorpan_> xhtml2 advocate?
- # [20:59] * zcorpan_ hides
- # [21:00] <glazou> ROFL
- # [21:00] * glazou laughs and laughs
- # [21:01] <anne> hehe
- # [21:01] <zcorpan_> :)
- # [21:04] <glazou> I must admit that reading that ten seconds after appearing into the channel is a lot of fun
- # [21:11] * Joins: jdandrea (jdandrea@24.228.42.231)
- # [21:12] * Parts: jdandrea (jdandrea@24.228.42.231)
- # [21:16] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [21:17] <glazou> BTW, HTML in email workshop : http://glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/index.php?2007/05/21/3578-html-in-email-w3c-workshop-24-jun-2007
- # [21:20] * Joins: mjs (mjs@17.255.96.131)
- # [21:21] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [21:25] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@63.245.220.242) (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
- # [21:33] * Quits: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.139.123.225) (Ping timeout)
- # [21:34] * Joins: inimino (inimino@75.71.88.233)
- # [21:34] * Joins: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.139.123.225)
- # [21:35] * Quits: glazou (daniel@212.180.54.82) (Quit: daddy duty)
- # [21:38] * Quits: inimino (inimino@75.71.88.233) (Client exited)
- # [21:40] * Quits: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.139.123.225) (Quit: Don't touch /dev/null…)
- # [21:40] * Joins: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.139.123.225)
- # [21:56] * Joins: DanC (connolly@128.30.52.30)
- # [21:57] <DanC> help? I'm outfitting a new machine... running debian, so far. fonts on some pages look crappy. e.g. http://www.advogato.org/trust-metric.html
- # [21:57] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@63.245.220.242)
- # [21:57] <DanC> http://homer.w3.org/~connolly/crummy-fonts2.png
- # [21:58] <hasather> DanC: gnome-font-properties maybe
- # [21:59] <DanC> no, I tried the antialising settings.
- # [21:59] <DanC> the advice I'm getting is to install msttcorefonts. sigh. I was hoping to stay away from non-free for a little while longer
- # [22:00] <hasather> oh, sorry, didn't notice it was only on some pages
- # [22:00] * Parts: asbjornu (asbjorn@84.48.116.134)
- # [22:00] <hasather> yea, I get poor looking fonts one in a while too
- # [22:01] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@63.245.220.242) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:03] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@63.245.220.242)
- # [22:10] * Parts: hasather (hasather@81.235.209.174)
- # [22:11] * Joins: hasather (hasather@81.235.209.174)
- # [22:11] * Parts: hasather (hasather@81.235.209.174)
- # [22:12] * Joins: hasather (hasather@81.235.209.174)
- # [22:44] * Quits: frippz (fredrikfro@193.11.209.47) (Quit: frippz)
- # [22:46] * Joins: frippz (fredrikfro@193.11.209.47)
- # [22:51] * Joins: asbjornu (asbjorn@84.48.116.134)
- # [22:53] * Quits: loic (loic@86.71.4.162) (Quit: hoopa rules)
- # [23:06] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@63.245.220.242) (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
- # [23:06] * Parts: hasather (hasather@81.235.209.174)
- # [23:06] * Joins: hasather (hasather@81.235.209.174)
- # [23:06] * Quits: frippz (fredrikfro@193.11.209.47) (Quit: frippz)
- # [23:07] * Joins: hyatt (hyatt@17.255.96.243)
- # [23:07] * Parts: hasather (hasather@81.235.209.174)
- # [23:07] * Joins: frippz (fredrikfro@193.11.209.47)
- # [23:07] * Joins: hasather (hasather@81.235.209.174)
- # [23:26] * Parts: hasather (hasather@81.235.209.174)
- # [23:26] * Joins: hasather (hasather@81.235.209.174)
- # [23:49] * Quits: karl (karlcow@128.30.52.30) (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
- # [23:54] * Quits: da3d (opera@213.65.136.41) (Quit: da3d)
- # Session Close: Tue May 22 00:00:00 2007
The end :)