Options:
- # Session Start: Sun Aug 05 00:00:00 2007
- # Session Ident: #html-wg
- # [00:23] * Quits: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123) (Quit: http://eric.daspet.name/ et l'édition 2007 de http://www.paris-web.fr/ )
- # [00:52] * Parts: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22)
- # [01:06] * Joins: mjs (mjs@17.255.105.80)
- # [01:35] * Quits: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [01:40] * Joins: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [02:03] * Joins: heycam (cam@203.214.100.97)
- # [02:21] * Quits: zcorpan (zcorpan@81.233.253.112) (Ping timeout)
- # [03:30] * Joins: kingryan (rking3@64.81.240.149)
- # [03:43] * Quits: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [03:48] * Joins: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [03:59] * Joins: Lachy (chatzilla@203.217.79.12)
- # [04:22] * Quits: Yudai (Yudai@210.174.55.3) (Ping timeout)
- # [04:23] <mjs> Hixie: are there any plans to drop <fieldset> and <legend>
- # [04:23] * Joins: Yudai (Yudai@210.174.55.3)
- # [04:35] <Lachy> mjs: I think Gregory just misunderstood the spec. I don't know where he got his information from about it being dropped
- # [04:36] <mjs> Lachy: that's what I figured, but maybe someone said something offline
- # [04:37] * Quits: Yudai (Yudai@210.174.55.3) (Ping timeout)
- # [04:37] <Lachy> yeah, either that, or he's read a comment about the limitations of styling legend elements and taken it out of context.
- # [04:38] <mjs> I dunno
- # [04:39] * Joins: Yudai (Yudai@210.174.55.3)
- # [04:43] <Hixie> mjs: no, why would there be?
- # [04:43] <Hixie> if anything we're extending <legend>
- # [04:43] <Hixie> (to work with <details> and <figure>)
- # [04:47] * Quits: tH (Rob@87.102.81.18) (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.78.1-rdmsoft [XULRunner 1.8.0.9/2006120508])
- # [04:48] <Lachy> I published my presentation slides from my presentation at Open Publish on Friday http://lachy.id.au/dev/presentation/developing-with-html5/
- # [04:49] <Lachy> I got quite a few questions afterwards. One person in particular was asking about why we're bothering with HTML, instead of just XHTML, which was fun
- # [04:53] <Hixie> "we're also doing XHTML"
- # [04:53] <Hixie> "any other questions?"
- # [04:54] <mjs> Hixie: I didn't think so, but there was a small chance Gregory might have known something I didn't
- # [04:54] <Lachy> yeah, there was a question about the security of server sent events, which I couldn't answer cause I'm not a security expert
- # [04:55] <mjs> I don't think they are problematic, security-wise
- # [04:56] <mjs> although using event-source with a URI that is not from the same origin could have all sorts of unexpected consequences
- # [04:57] <Lachy> yeah, I didn't think there was any
- # [04:57] <Lachy> hmm. possibly
- # [04:57] <mjs> and probably should be disallowed
- # [04:57] <mjs> well, it's no worse than including an off-site <script> I guess
- # [04:57] <Lachy> there was another question asking about the server-side implementation issues of server sent events, like how to maintain persistent connections
- # [04:57] <mjs> for either sender or receiver
- # [04:59] * Quits: beowulf (carisenda@91.84.50.132) (Ping timeout)
- # [04:59] <mjs> it's already possible to send an http response in multiple chunks, but it does create some server load to keep the socket open
- # [05:01] <Lachy> is it more efficient to keep connections open, than it is to have clients ping the server with new requests every 5 seconds?
- # [05:01] <mjs> depends on polling frequency and details of server configuration
- # [05:03] <mjs> I do not know enough about the details to say for sure
- # [05:07] * Joins: beowulf (carisenda@91.84.50.132)
- # [05:09] * Joins: foca (foca@190.64.38.171)
- # [05:24] * Parts: foca (foca@190.64.38.171)
- # [05:50] * Quits: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [05:55] * Joins: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [06:04] * Joins: Sander (svl@82.92.250.240)
- # [06:10] * Quits: Sander (svl@82.92.250.240) (Quit: And back he spurred like a madman, shrieking a curse to the sky.)
- # [06:18] * Quits: sbuluf (iqlc@200.49.140.187) (Client exited)
- # [06:20] * Joins: sbuluf (aks@200.49.140.187)
- # [06:51] * Parts: Lionheart (robin@66.57.69.65)
- # [07:17] * Quits: Lachy (chatzilla@203.217.79.12) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [07:38] * Joins: Lachy (chatzilla@203.217.79.12)
- # [07:48] <Lachy> I don't see what's so ambiguous about the term "content attribute". "HTML attribute" seems like it could be more ambiguous because HTML can refer to either the serialisation or DOM
- # [07:48] <mjs> I think "markup attribute" is more clear
- # [07:49] <mjs> but maybe that would make it sound like things set with setAttribute don't count
- # [07:57] * Quits: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [08:02] * Joins: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [08:27] <Hixie> it's not like i made up the term "content attribute"
- # [08:27] <Hixie> it's what they're called
- # [08:46] <mjs> the first few google hits I get are for attributes named 'content'
- # [08:57] * Quits: heycam (cam@203.214.100.97) (Ping timeout)
- # [08:59] * Joins: mjs_ (mjs@17.203.14.179)
- # [09:01] * Quits: mjs (mjs@17.255.105.80) (Ping timeout)
- # [09:04] * Quits: Lachy (chatzilla@203.217.79.12) (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.78.1 [Firefox 2.0.0.4/2007051502])
- # [09:14] * Joins: heycam (cam@203.214.100.97)
- # [09:29] * Joins: mjs (mjs@17.255.105.80)
- # [09:31] * Quits: mjs_ (mjs@17.203.14.179) (Ping timeout)
- # [09:48] * Joins: zcorpan (zcorpan@81.233.253.112)
- # [09:51] * Quits: schepers (schepers@128.30.52.30) (Client exited)
- # [09:51] * Joins: schepers (schepers@128.30.52.30)
- # [09:52] * Quits: kingryan (rking3@64.81.240.149) (Quit: kingryan)
- # [09:54] * Quits: Yudai (Yudai@210.174.55.3) (Ping timeout)
- # [09:54] * Joins: Yudai (Yudai@210.174.55.3)
- # [10:05] * Quits: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [10:10] * Joins: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [10:25] * Quits: Yudai (Yudai@210.174.55.3) (Ping timeout)
- # [10:30] * Joins: Yudai (Yudai@210.174.55.3)
- # [10:41] * Joins: ROBOd (robod@86.34.246.154)
- # [11:01] * Quits: mjs (mjs@17.255.105.80) (Quit: mjs)
- # [11:04] * Joins: Robbert (Robbert@85.144.207.28)
- # [11:14] * Joins: Lionheart (robin@66.57.69.65)
- # [11:17] * Joins: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123)
- # [11:17] * Joins: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22)
- # [11:29] * Joins: Lachy (chatzilla@203.217.79.12)
- # [11:43] * Quits: Lionheart (robin@66.57.69.65) (Ping timeout)
- # [11:45] * Joins: myakura (myakura@122.29.114.29)
- # [11:47] * Joins: Lionheart (robin@66.57.69.65)
- # [11:47] * Quits: schepers (schepers@128.30.52.30) (Ping timeout)
- # [11:51] * Joins: schepers (schepers@128.30.52.30)
- # [12:05] * Quits: Robbert (Robbert@85.144.207.28) (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
- # [12:15] * Joins: Robbert (Robbert@85.144.207.28)
- # [12:37] * Joins: mjs (mjs@64.81.48.145)
- # [12:44] * Quits: zcorpan (zcorpan@81.233.253.112) (Ping timeout)
- # [12:57] * Quits: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123) (Quit: http://eric.daspet.name/ et l'édition 2007 de http://www.paris-web.fr/ )
- # [13:18] * Joins: tH_ (Rob@87.102.81.18)
- # [13:18] * tH_ is now known as tH
- # [13:26] * Quits: Robbert (Robbert@85.144.207.28) (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
- # [13:42] <anne> cross-site event source is to be done using access-control on the remote server
- # [13:43] <anne> otherwise you could get information leakage from intranet pages for instance
- # [14:05] * Quits: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [14:10] * Joins: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [14:18] * Parts: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22)
- # [14:20] * Joins: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22)
- # [14:21] * Quits: Yudai (Yudai@210.174.55.3) (Ping timeout)
- # [14:21] * Joins: Yudai (Yudai@210.174.55.3)
- # [14:44] * Joins: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123)
- # [15:55] * Quits: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123) (Quit: http://eric.daspet.name/ et l'édition 2007 de http://www.paris-web.fr/ )
- # [16:12] * Quits: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [16:16] * Parts: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22)
- # [16:16] * Joins: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22)
- # [16:17] * Joins: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [17:58] * Quits: myakura (myakura@122.29.114.29) (Quit: Leaving...)
- # [18:19] * Quits: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [18:24] * Joins: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [18:26] * Joins: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123)
- # [19:35] * Joins: tH_ (Rob@87.102.91.209)
- # [19:35] * Quits: tH (Rob@87.102.81.18) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:35] * tH_ is now known as tH
- # [20:26] * Quits: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [20:31] * Joins: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [20:50] * Quits: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123) (Client exited)
- # [20:55] * Joins: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123)
- # [21:33] * Quits: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123) (Client exited)
- # [21:33] * Joins: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123)
- # [21:47] * Quits: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123) (Client exited)
- # [21:47] * Joins: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123)
- # [22:05] * Quits: hsivonen (hsivonen@130.233.41.50) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:06] * Joins: zcorpan (zcorpan@84.216.40.255)
- # [22:07] * Joins: hsivonen (hsivonen@130.233.41.50)
- # [22:14] * Joins: briansuda (briansuda@82.221.34.106)
- # [22:30] * Quits: zcorpan (zcorpan@84.216.40.255) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:32] * Joins: zcorpan (zcorpan@84.216.40.255)
- # [22:34] * Quits: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:39] * Joins: gavin (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [22:39] * Quits: tH (Rob@87.102.91.209) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:46] * Quits: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:50] * Joins: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123)
- # [22:51] * Quits: ROBOd (robod@86.34.246.154) (Quit: http://www.robodesign.ro )
- # [23:04] * Joins: tH (Rob@87.102.91.209)
- # [23:57] * Quits: zcorpan (zcorpan@84.216.40.255) (Connection reset by peer)
- # Session Close: Mon Aug 06 00:00:00 2007
The end :)