Options:
- # Session Start: Thu Aug 16 00:00:00 2007
- # Session Ident: #html-wg
- # [00:10] * Joins: mjs (mjs@17.203.15.142)
- # [00:34] * Quits: mjs (mjs@17.203.15.142) (Quit: mjs)
- # [00:37] * Joins: mjs (mjs@17.255.108.127)
- # [00:46] * Quits: mjs (mjs@17.255.108.127) (Ping timeout)
- # [01:30] * Joins: sbuluf (nhkyfzx@200.49.140.182)
- # [01:45] * Joins: mjs (mjs@17.203.15.142)
- # [01:50] * Quits: mjs (mjs@17.203.15.142) (Quit: mjs)
- # [01:52] * Joins: mjs (mjs@17.203.15.142)
- # [02:00] * Joins: karl (karlcow@128.30.52.30)
- # [02:05] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [02:10] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [02:19] * Joins: mjs_ (mjs@17.255.108.127)
- # [02:21] * Quits: mjs (mjs@17.203.15.142) (Ping timeout)
- # [02:26] * Joins: mjs (mjs@17.203.15.142)
- # [02:28] * Quits: mjs_ (mjs@17.255.108.127) (Ping timeout)
- # [02:39] * Quits: tH (Rob@87.102.94.41) (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.78.1-rdmsoft [XULRunner 1.8.0.9/2006120508])
- # [03:18] * Quits: kingryan (rking3@208.66.64.47) (Ping timeout)
- # [03:41] * Joins: olivier (ot@128.30.52.30)
- # [04:05] * Joins: kingryan (rking3@64.81.240.149)
- # [04:13] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [04:18] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [04:48] * Quits: gavin (gavin@63.245.208.169) (Ping timeout)
- # [05:34] * Joins: gavin (gavin@63.245.208.169)
- # [06:03] * Joins: Lionhear1 (robin@66.57.69.65)
- # [06:03] * Quits: schepers (schepers@128.30.52.30) (Client exited)
- # [06:03] * Quits: Lionheart (robin@66.57.69.65) (Ping timeout)
- # [06:08] * Joins: schepers (schepers@128.30.52.30)
- # [06:20] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [06:25] * Quits: drry (drry@211.9.170.176) (Quit: drry)
- # [06:25] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [06:28] * Quits: mjs (mjs@17.203.15.142) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [06:28] * Joins: mjs (mjs@17.203.15.142)
- # [06:28] * Quits: mjs (mjs@17.203.15.142) (Quit: mjs)
- # [06:30] * Joins: drry (drry@211.9.170.176)
- # [06:43] * Quits: drry (drry@211.9.170.176) (Quit: drry)
- # [06:45] * Joins: drry (drry@211.9.170.176)
- # [06:49] * Quits: drry (drry@211.9.170.176) (Quit: drry)
- # [06:52] * Joins: drry (drry@211.9.170.176)
- # [06:53] * karl wonders if it would help if Hixie was sending a simple email to the mailing list each time he starts to edit a new item in the editor's draft.
- # [06:53] <karl> Even better having a list of the table of content
- # [06:54] <karl> and with last edited date beside each entry. and a not yet edited beside things to come.
- # [06:55] <karl> then people will /maybe/ be less afraid of things which seem to be dropped when they have not been edited yet.
- # [06:57] * Lachy wonders when people will realise that the approach of requiring consensus before editing anything is counterproductive
- # [06:58] * Quits: drry (drry@211.9.170.176) (Quit: drry)
- # [06:58] <Lachy> ... and when they will realise that so many issues have been thoroughly discussed in the whatwg prior to merging with the W3C
- # [07:00] * Joins: drry (drry@211.9.170.176)
- # [07:02] <karl> Lachy: it's why I suggest to give information to people beforehand. :)
- # [07:03] <karl> it will help people to understand.
- # [07:03] <Lachy> yeah, publishing some sort of schedule might be useful
- # [07:04] <Lachy> Hixie sometimes indicates which sections he'll be working on in the next few weeks in IRC. I think he mentioned he'll be starting on the headers and/or longdesc issues soon (can't remember which one)
- # [07:05] * Joins: Lionheart (robin@66.57.69.65)
- # [07:06] * Joins: schepers_ (schepers@128.30.52.30)
- # [07:06] * Quits: Lionhear1 (robin@66.57.69.65) (Ping timeout)
- # [07:10] * Quits: schepers (schepers@128.30.52.30) (Ping timeout)
- # [07:11] * Quits: schepers_ (schepers@128.30.52.30) (Quit: Trillian (http://www.ceruleanstudios.com)
- # [07:11] * Joins: schepers (schepers@128.30.52.30)
- # [07:35] <Lachy> hey, I just realised that this photo album of Gregory's is a good example of providing long descriptions without longdesc=""! http://my.opera.com/oedipus/albums/showpic.dml?album=212490&picture=3302055
- # [08:24] * Quits: karl (karlcow@128.30.52.30) (Quit: Where dwelt Ymir, or wherein did he find sustenance?)
- # [08:28] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [08:33] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [08:37] * Joins: karl (karlcow@128.30.52.30)
- # [09:16] * Quits: Lionheart (robin@66.57.69.65) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [09:28] * Quits: karl (karlcow@128.30.52.30) (Quit: Where dwelt Ymir, or wherein did he find sustenance?)
- # [09:33] * Quits: olivier (ot@128.30.52.30) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [09:37] * Joins: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123)
- # [09:39] * Joins: ROBOd (robod@86.34.246.154)
- # [09:42] * Joins: Lionheart (robin@66.57.69.65)
- # [10:15] <jgraham> Lachy: your reply on the "Baby steps or backward steps" neatly summarised everything I had put in a much less well written, unfinished, email. Thanks ;)
- # [10:15] * Quits: kingryan (rking3@64.81.240.149) (Quit: kingryan)
- # [10:35] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [10:40] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [10:43] * Joins: tH_ (Rob@87.102.94.41)
- # [10:43] * tH_ is now known as tH
- # [11:08] <gsnedders> time to do what I promised DanC I'd do last night
- # [11:10] <gsnedders> Lachy: he was going through dom-events last I knew
- # [11:10] <Lachy> gsnedders: who was?
- # [11:10] <gsnedders> Lachy: hixie
- # [11:10] <Lachy> ok
- # [11:11] <gsnedders> Lachy: he asked for a random number, and I gave the number (42) of the dom-events mailbox
- # [11:21] * Joins: zcorpan_ (zcorpan@84.216.41.251)
- # [11:45] <Lachy> aargh! Robert Burns is now shifting the burden of proof for the inclusion of a feature he wants included, onto me. That's absolutely absured
- # [11:48] <gsnedders> Lachy: while you're at it, can you go and find proof for inclusion of a colour picker? :P
- # [11:48] <Lachy> who wants that?
- # [11:48] <Lachy> you?
- # [11:48] <gsnedders> among others, yes
- # [11:49] <gsnedders> I've been meaning to go and get all the proof together when I have time
- # [11:49] <Lachy> ok, I'll figure out what the use case is for you to :-)
- # [11:49] <gsnedders> (I actually went back to something on my to-do list that's been there since Feb '06 yesterday)
- # [12:01] <Hixie> colour pickers would be nice
- # [12:02] <Hixie> but they're not making the cut for html5
- # [12:02] <Hixie> we're adding too much other new widgets
- # [12:02] <Hixie> too many, rather
- # [12:02] <gsnedders> Hixie: how much do you expect you'll change WF2, BTW?
- # [12:04] <Hixie> other than dropping the repetition section and rewriting all the text to be self-contained instead of a diff spec from DOM2 and HTML4, not much
- # [12:05] <hsivonen> speaking of WF2, if I got to nominate, I'd nominate Hixie, anne and mjs to the Forms TF
- # [12:05] <gsnedders> Hixie: I wonder how much the WG will want, though
- # [12:06] <Lachy> I'm sure there will be some people who object having 3 people involved with the WHATWG on the task force, though I agree that situation would be ideal
- # [12:07] <gsnedders> Lachy: how would it be ideal, though?
- # [12:08] <Lachy> because people on the WHATWG tend to be quite well informed about the current state of WF2
- # [12:08] <gsnedders> (I do agree with hsivonen's nominations, though)
- # [12:08] <Lachy> (and also because those 3 people generally share my POV in many issues)
- # [12:09] <zcorpan_> iirc, anne nominated Hixie, mjs and hsivonen
- # [12:09] <Lachy> no-one nominated me?
- # [12:09] <Lachy> :-(
- # [12:10] <gsnedders> Lachy: no. you're here to go find proof for Robert Burns :)
- # [12:10] <Hixie> fwiw i'd be happy with you on the task force, lachy
- # [12:11] <Lachy> I don't particularly want to be cause I don't want particularly deal with the XForms WG
- # [12:11] <Lachy> my past experience with them hasn't been productive
- # [12:11] <gsnedders> how many implementers are there on the XForms WG?
- # [12:13] <Lachy> no-idea, probably a few like people from IBM, Mark Birbeck (I think)
- # [12:14] <gsnedders> I think we really need someone from Opera who has actually implemented WF2
- # [12:20] <Lachy> hey, I'm trying to be completely scientific with my response about the alt attribute. Can someone review this and just check I followed the scientific method properly: http://lachy.id.au/temp/alt.txt
- # [12:21] <Lachy> it goes from observations, to hypothesis to testing methodology and expected results
- # [12:23] <hsivonen> if I weren't ill, I'd be replying to the baby steps thread, too, but now I'm in a stress avoidance mode trying to get back in health
- # [12:25] <Hixie> you use [1] twice
- # [12:25] <gsnedders> hsivonen: ill?
- # [12:25] <Lachy> Hixie: the first is supposed to be a reference to the second
- # [12:25] <gsnedders> hsivonen: what with?
- # [12:26] <Lachy> oh, I see
- # [12:26] <gsnedders> and I've now just been reminded to rind the doctor :\
- # [12:26] <Hixie> Lachy: ah ok
- # [12:27] <Lachy> I wasn't aware of the one after "Gregory's own photo album" was still there, I thought I'd taken it out
- # [12:30] <hsivonen> gsnedders: a relatively bad summer flu since saturday :-(
- # [12:33] * gsnedders is going to miss Maths with an appointment at that time. Maybe computing too. He'll fail computing now.
- # [12:34] <gsnedders> (actually, FWIW, I'd didn't get the top grade for practical computing abilities last year)
- # [12:42] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [12:43] * Quits: sbuluf (nhkyfzx@200.49.140.182) (Quit: sbuluf)
- # [12:47] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [12:55] <gsnedders> almost two hours to write that email.
- # [13:06] <Hixie> http://junkyard.damowmow.com/291 updated
- # [13:27] * Quits: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.145.188.203) (Quit: gsnedders)
- # [13:43] * Joins: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.145.188.203)
- # [13:50] <krijnh> Philip`: If you send me the missing parts, I can add them to the logs
- # [13:57] * Joins: myakura (myakura@122.29.114.29)
- # [14:15] <Philip`> krijnh: I seem to remember you disconnecting quite frequently recently, but I'm not sure if that means you've lost significant bits of log (other than the few lines mentioned earlier about design principles being #3)
- # [14:15] <Philip`> I could send my whole log file, but I don't know if it is/isn't worth trying to stitch them back together for the online log
- # [14:24] <krijnh> Philip`: Yeah, I know :( Damn adsl connection
- # [14:24] <krijnh> Philip`: Don't know either, cause I don't know what I'm missing :)
- # [14:25] <krijnh> Perhaps you can filter out the important parts (if there are)
- # [14:25] * Quits: ROBOd (robod@86.34.246.154) (Quit: http://www.robodesign.ro )
- # [14:50] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [14:55] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [15:01] <Philip`> "This was awesome! - IMG20674.JPG" - "I can't imagine anyone presented with that would be able to determine that the image is a picture of a humpback whale breaching the surface off the coast of California." - it would be so much easier if we could specify "User agents MUST ensure their users have psychic powers"
- # [15:38] * Joins: Sander (svl@213.151.129.138)
- # [15:56] * Quits: Sander (svl@213.151.129.138) (Ping timeout)
- # [15:58] * Joins: Sander (svl@213.151.129.138)
- # [16:19] * Quits: Lachy (chatzilla@124.168.4.56) (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.78.1 [Firefox 2.0.0.6/2007072518])
- # [16:27] * Joins: ROBOd (robod@86.34.246.154)
- # [16:28] * Joins: billmason (billmason@69.30.57.156)
- # [16:29] * Joins: Lachy (chatzilla@124.168.4.56)
- # [16:41] * Quits: Sander (svl@213.151.129.138) (Quit: And back he spurred like a madman, shrieking a curse to the sky.)
- # [16:57] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [17:02] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [17:51] * Quits: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.145.188.203) (Quit: Don't touch /dev/null…)
- # [18:06] * Quits: myakura (myakura@122.29.114.29) (Quit: Leaving...)
- # [18:18] * Joins: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22)
- # [18:22] * Joins: Julian (chatzilla@217.91.35.233)
- # [18:27] * Parts: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22)
- # [18:28] * Joins: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22)
- # [18:33] * Quits: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22) (Ping timeout)
- # [18:33] * Joins: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22)
- # [18:39] * Joins: Roger (roger@213.64.74.230)
- # [18:41] * Joins: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.145.188.203)
- # [18:41] * Quits: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [18:42] * Joins: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22)
- # [18:45] * Joins: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.30)
- # [18:45] <DanC> Zakim, this will be html
- # [18:45] <Zakim> ok, DanC; I see HTML_WG()1:00PM scheduled to start in 15 minutes
- # [18:45] * Joins: RRSAgent (rrs-loggee@128.30.52.30)
- # [18:45] <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/08/16-html-wg-irc
- # [18:47] <Lachy> DanC: what's the command to get the phone number from zakim?
- # [18:48] <DanC> Zakim, passcode?
- # [18:48] <Zakim> the conference code is 4865 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), DanC
- # [18:49] * DanC changes topic to 'HTML WG telcon 16 Aug 1700Z http://www.w3.org/html/wg/il16 also logged: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/'
- # [18:50] <DanC> Zakim, read agenda from http://www.w3.org/html/wg/il16_formal
- # [18:50] <Zakim> working on it, DanC
- # [18:50] <Zakim> done reading agenda, DanC
- # [18:51] <DanC> :-/
- # [18:52] <Zakim> HTML_WG()1:00PM has now started
- # [18:52] <Zakim> +??P0
- # [18:52] <Lachy> Zakim: I am +??P0
- # [18:53] <DanC> Zakim, read agenda from http://www.w3.org/html/wg/il16_formal
- # [18:53] <Zakim> working on it, DanC
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agenda+ Convene HTML WG meeting of 2007-08-16T17:00:00Z
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agendum 1 added
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agenda+ next meeting, regular meeting times
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agendum 2 added
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agenda+ toward release of Design Principles
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agendum 3 added
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agenda+ Detailed Spec Reviews
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agendum 4 added
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agenda+ table headers
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agendum 5 added
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agenda+ Name for XHTML serialization
- # [18:53] * Joins: CarolKing (CarolK@70.242.223.12)
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agendum 6 added
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agenda+ Forms Taskforce
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agendum 7 added
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agenda+ face-to-face meeting 8-9 November
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agendum 8 added
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agenda+ Announcement mailing list, RSS feeds
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agendum 9 added
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agenda+ Wiki Migration
- # [18:53] <Zakim> agendum 10 added
- # [18:53] <Zakim> done reading agenda, DanC
- # [18:53] * Lachy DanC did I get the command wrong or something?
- # [18:54] * DanC Zakim, who's on the phone?
- # [18:54] * Zakim sees on the phone: ??P0
- # [18:54] <Lachy> Zakim, I am ??P0
- # [18:54] <Zakim> +Lachy; got it
- # [18:54] <DanC> right; direct address is comma. colon is for attribution.
- # [18:54] * DanC Zakim, call DanC-BOS
- # [18:54] * Zakim ok, DanC; the call is being made
- # [18:54] <Zakim> +DanC
- # [18:57] * Lachy DanC, yay! found the setting :-)
- # [18:58] * DanC :)
- # [18:58] * Joins: michael (michael@206.251.234.34)
- # [18:59] <michael> hello all
- # [19:00] * Lachy hi michael
- # [19:00] * Joins: oedipus (oedipus@70.21.186.99)
- # [19:00] <Zakim> + +1.312.933.aaaa
- # [19:00] <DanC> Zakim, aaaa is Rob_Burns
- # [19:01] <Zakim> + +49.208.8.aabb
- # [19:01] <Zakim> +Rob_Burns; got it
- # [19:01] <Zakim> +Gregory_Rosmiata
- # [19:01] <DanC> Zakim, aabb Marcin_Hanclik
- # [19:01] <Zakim> I don't understand 'aabb Marcin_Hanclik', DanC
- # [19:01] <DanC> Zakim, take up item 1
- # [19:01] <Zakim> agendum 1. "Convene HTML WG meeting of 2007-08-16T17:00:00Z" taken up
- # [19:02] <oedipus> zakim, Gregory_Rosmiata is Gregory_Rosmaita
- # [19:02] <Zakim> +Gregory_Rosmaita; got it
- # [19:02] <DanC> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/0535.html
- # [19:02] <oedipus> zakim, mute me
- # [19:02] <Zakim> sorry, oedipus, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you
- # [19:02] <oedipus> zakim, mute Gregory_Rosmaita
- # [19:02] <Zakim> Gregory_Rosmaita should now be muted
- # [19:03] <hsivonen> hmm. Skype isn't working :-(
- # [19:03] <DanC> Zakim, aabb is Marcin_Hanclik
- # [19:03] <Zakim> +Marcin_Hanclik; got it
- # [19:03] * Joins: sierk (sbornema@89.182.131.138)
- # [19:03] <Zakim> +Dave_Singer
- # [19:04] * Joins: mausonio (mausonio2@206.251.234.34)
- # [19:04] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:04] * Lachy I added my name and number to this name mapping form before, and it didn't work for me http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/info/name.php3
- # [19:05] * Joins: dsinger (daithesong@17.202.35.52)
- # [19:05] * Joins: robburns (robburns@98.193.22.194)
- # [19:06] <DanC> scribe: Lachy
- # [19:06] <DanC> regrets: Anne
- # [19:07] <mausonio> hi all
- # [19:07] * oedipus aloha, mausonio
- # [19:07] <DanC> Zakim, close item 1
- # [19:07] <Zakim> agendum 1, Convene HTML WG meeting of 2007-08-16T17:00:00Z, closed
- # [19:07] <Zakim> I see 9 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- # [19:08] <Zakim> 2. next meeting, regular meeting times
- # [19:08] * Quits: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.145.188.203) (Quit: gsnedders)
- # [19:08] <DanC> Zakim, take up item 3
- # [19:08] <Zakim> agendum 3. "toward release of Design Principles" taken up
- # [19:08] <DanC> [DONE] ACTION: Maciej to send out wrap-up about design principles
- # [19:09] <DanC> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/0617.html # HTML Design Principles Review Maciej Stachowiak (Thursday, 16 August)
- # [19:09] <Lachy> DanC, Maciej wants to start a review of the design principles, I want to ship the draft
- # [19:09] <Lachy> DanC: Maciej wants to start a review of the design principles, I want to ship the draft
- # [19:10] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [19:10] <DanC> -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/0580.html # Re: Support for Design Principles (was: Design Principles survey delayed) Geoffrey Sneddon (Thursday, 16 August)
- # [19:11] <oedipus> zakim, unmute me
- # [19:11] <Zakim> sorry, oedipus, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you
- # [19:11] <oedipus> zakim, unmute Gregory_Rosmaita
- # [19:11] <Zakim> Gregory_Rosmaita should no longer be muted
- # [19:12] * Joins: maha (maha@82.207.140.17)
- # [19:12] <Lachy> Zakim, oedipus is Gregory_Rosmaita
- # [19:12] <Zakim> sorry, Lachy, I do not recognize a party named 'oedipus'
- # [19:12] <DanC> ack greg
- # [19:12] * Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
- # [19:12] <oedipus> one concern is that rearranging the Proposed Design Principles will break a lot of link on the wiki, so we should procede with caution
- # [19:12] <DanC> Zakim, unmute Gregory_Rosmaita
- # [19:12] <Zakim> Gregory_Rosmaita was not muted, DanC
- # [19:13] <Lachy> GR: If we accept mjs suggestion, the problem is that the references to the old proposals will be broken
- # [19:14] * Joins: jgraham_ (jgraham@81.86.209.27)
- # [19:14] <Lachy> GR: MoinMoin doesn't have ability to move wiki pages
- # [19:14] <Zakim> +[Microsoft]
- # [19:15] * Lachy is having trouble scribing
- # [19:15] * Joins: Chris (cwilso@131.107.0.101)
- # [19:16] <DanC> Zakim, [Microsoft] is ChrisW
- # [19:16] <Zakim> +ChrisW; got it
- # [19:16] <DanC> Zakim, take up item 2
- # [19:16] <Zakim> agendum 2. "next meeting, regular meeting times" taken up
- # [19:17] <Lachy> DanC: My thought is to have 2 separate times. One chaired by me, other by Cris
- # [19:17] <Lachy> s/Cris/Chris/
- # [19:18] <Lachy> Chris: I think bi-weekly meetings would be good
- # [19:18] <Lachy> DanC: that's probably good enough
- # [19:20] <dsinger> 2300Z is +6 from now...
- # [19:20] <DanC> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?month=8&day=16&year=2007&p1=0&p2=137&p3=240&p4=-1
- # [19:20] <Lachy> [discussion of new time for meeting]
- # [19:22] <DanC> "Thursday, August 30, 2007 at 14:00:00 Thu 7:00 AM * Midnight Thu-Fri"
- # [19:23] <DanC> my favorite: "Thursday, August 30, 2007 at 23:00:00Z Thu 4:00 PM * Fri 9:00 AM"
- # [19:24] <DanC> PROPOSED: to meet Thu 30 Aug 4pm Pacific/2300Z, and to meet weekly, alternating between 1pm Boston time and 4pm Pacific.
- # [19:25] <oedipus> 2300z Thursday is 08:00:00 Friday in Asia/Tokyo
- # [19:25] <oedipus> 2300z Thursday is 09:00:00 Friday in Australia/Melbourne
- # [19:25] <Zakim> +??P11
- # [19:25] <hsivonen> this is hsivonen
- # [19:25] <DanC> Zakim, ??P11 hsivonen
- # [19:25] <Zakim> I don't understand '??P11 hsivonen', DanC
- # [19:25] <Chris> Zakim, +??P11 hsivonen
- # [19:25] <Zakim> I don't understand '+??P11 hsivonen', Chris
- # [19:26] <DanC> Zakim, ??P11 is hsivonen
- # [19:26] <Zakim> +hsivonen; got it
- # [19:26] <Lachy> what's the difference between Pacific and Boston time zones?
- # [19:26] <Chris> 3 hours.
- # [19:27] <Chris> PST = UTC/GMT -7/8
- # [19:27] <DanC> PROPOSED: to meet Thu 30 Aug 4pm Pacific/2300Z, and to meet weekly, alternating between 1pm Boston time and 4pm Los Angeles
- # [19:27] <oedipus> 2300z Thursday is 04:30:00 Friday in Asia/Calcutta
- # [19:27] <DanC> so RESOLVED.
- # [19:27] <DanC> Zakim, close item 2
- # [19:27] <Zakim> agendum 2, next meeting, regular meeting times, closed
- # [19:27] <Zakim> I see 8 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is
- # [19:27] <Zakim> 3. toward release of Design Principles
- # [19:28] <DanC> Zakim, next item
- # [19:28] <Zakim> agendum 3. "toward release of Design Principles" taken up
- # [19:29] * Joins: gsnedders (gsnedders@86.145.188.203)
- # [19:29] * Joins: kingryan (rking3@208.66.64.47)
- # [19:29] <Lachy> DanC: I was going to do a survey about the design principles
- # [19:29] <Lachy> DanC: Mjs finally sent a wrap up, which says "let's start over" - that's depressing
- # [19:30] <Lachy> DanC: I was hoping we were 2/3 of the way through review process
- # [19:30] <Lachy> DanC: Chris, have you read the summary from gsnedders?
- # [19:30] <DanC> summary from sneddon http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/0580.html
- # [19:30] <Lachy> Chris: I have not
- # [19:30] <Lachy> DanC: I was hoping to publish the document in a week
- # [19:31] <Lachy> Chris: mjs did not have a time frame for when the clean up would be done
- # [19:32] <Lachy> Chris: I think we need a short time frame
- # [19:32] <Lachy> Chris: we should have it out for reveiw within a week, then clean up and then agree within 2 weeks
- # [19:34] <Lachy> Chris: we should respond to mjs and say we like the plan, we want to make sure we're at step 5 by next week.
- # [19:34] <Lachy> DanC: let's review gsnedders message
- # [19:35] <DanC> (I'm also opening http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ProposedDesignPrinciples in another window, last edited 2007-08-16 12:26:51)
- # [19:36] <DanC> Zakim, who's on the phone?
- # [19:36] <Zakim> On the phone I see Lachy, DanC, Rob_Burns, Marcin_Hanclik, Gregory_Rosmaita, Dave_Singer, ChrisW, hsivonen
- # [19:36] <Lachy> RB: I thought the support existing content principle was fairly solid
- # [19:37] <Lachy> DanC: I wonder what gsnedders means by how it's being implemented in "I've not to my knowledge heard anything against this, though there have been people questioning how it has been implemented."
- # [19:38] * Lachy who said that?
- # [19:38] * gsnedders starts wondering what he meant
- # [19:38] <oedipus> the last comment on implmentation and HTML5 test suites for degrading gracefully was GJR
- # [19:39] * Joins: mjs (mjs@17.203.15.142)
- # [19:39] <oedipus> need practical not theoretical data
- # [19:39] <Lachy> RB: I'm not sure he's changes to the Wheel principle made too much difference, I don't have any problems with it myself
- # [19:39] <Lachy> s/he's/his/
- # [19:39] <gsnedders> It may well be just how some things in the spec degrade.
- # [19:40] <mjs> hi everyone
- # [19:40] <Lachy> DanC: is the survey a cost effective way to proceed?
- # [19:40] <gsnedders> I cannot find anything more specific than that, so I'm assuming that's all I meant.
- # [19:40] * oedipus aloha maciej
- # [19:40] <Lachy> Chris: how long to put it together?
- # [19:41] <Lachy> Chris: [need to decide which principles are stable and finsish the survey with DanC]
- # [19:41] <DanC> ACTION DanC: discuss survey with Chris W and issue it, based on the most mature/agreed ones
- # [19:41] * RRSAgent records action 1
- # [19:42] <DanC> Zakim, next item
- # [19:42] <Zakim> agendum 4. "Detailed Spec Reviews" taken up
- # [19:42] <gsnedders> I expect even from survey the majority would have consensus
- # [19:42] <oedipus> +1 from GJR to DanC & ChrisW's action item
- # [19:43] <Lachy> DanC: What hasn't been done in the spec reviews? [checks wiki...]
- # [19:45] <Lachy> Marcin: I have reviewed the media elements
- # [19:45] <DanC> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/0280.html
- # [19:46] <DanC> review from marcin http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jul/1191.html
- # [19:47] <Lachy> is this it http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/0407.html ?
- # [19:47] <mjs> fwiw I don't think a survey will be very helpful to improving the document, but I'll look over the results if there is one
- # [19:47] <DanC> no reviews for Communications, no volunteers. hmm
- # [19:48] <DanC> ChrisW: I'll make sure Communications gets covered
- # [19:49] <dsinger> apple has some comments of detail on the video/audio tags coming in soon...
- # [19:49] <oedipus> KarlD on SMIL3: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/0407.html
- # [19:50] <oedipus> Dave Singer on SMIL3: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/0411.html
- # [19:50] <dsinger> we considered the SMIL media tags when doing the proposal, obviously, but the needs are different in SMIL and HTML
- # [19:50] <Lachy> DanC: I want to figure out when to publish
- # [19:51] <Lachy> DanC: if we said something like 10 times as many yes, as no votes, that would be compelling
- # [19:52] <Lachy> Chris: it would depend on the the type of formal objections
- # [19:52] <Lachy> Chris: I expect there will be real objections
- # [19:52] <Lachy> I expect them too!
- # [19:52] <Lachy> DanC: we have to publish, we don't necessarily need 100% concensus
- # [19:53] <gsnedders> As I said in my email, I concluded that I doubt we'll ever have consensus, but rather almost always dissent
- # [19:53] <DanC> Zakim, next item
- # [19:53] <Zakim> agendum 5. "table headers" taken up
- # [19:54] <DanC> "We don't build fire stairs just enough to evacuate 80% of the occupants."
- # [19:54] <DanC> -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jun/0145.html
- # [19:57] <Lachy> DanC: Hixie said he intends to get to this in due course, but I would like to have a schedule
- # [19:57] <hsivonen> q+
- # [19:57] * Zakim sees hsivonen on the speaker queue
- # [19:57] * Quits: schepers (schepers@128.30.52.30) (Ping timeout)
- # [19:59] * Quits: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123) (Quit: http://eric.daspet.name/ - du nouveau sur http://www.paris-web.fr/ ce mois ci, inscrivez vous au RSS)
- # [19:59] <DanC> ack hsivonen
- # [19:59] * Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
- # [20:00] <Lachy> hsivonen: Hixie has implemented the implicit association algorithm, to anylise it's effectiveness
- # [20:00] <oedipus> WAI PF Summary of goals for HTML5: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jul/0903.html
- # [20:00] <Lachy> hsivonen: the headers issue is a late comer in the first-come-first-serve queue, but he added a note to the draft about it being an open issue
- # [20:01] <oedipus> quote To summarize, our goals for HTML 5 are as follow: (1) Support for issues highlighted in Table: 1 of the ARIA Roadmap; (2) Backward compatability to ARIA, including the role attribute. (3) Allow for full interoperability with assistive technologies; (4) A preference for access to accessibility information via the DOM; (5) reduced efforts by authors to support assistive technologies (6) Support for the access element or a version of it. (7) Maintain equ
- # [20:01] <oedipus> discussed in http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ARIAIntegration
- # [20:01] <DanC> Zakim, next item
- # [20:01] <Zakim> agendum 6. "Name for XHTML serialization" taken up
- # [20:02] <Lachy> DanC: XHTML2 WG want us to change our name from XHTML, I haven't seen any justifaction
- # [20:02] <Lachy> no
- # [20:02] <Lachy> no justification
- # [20:02] * Quits: billmason (billmason@69.30.57.156) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [20:02] <hsivonen> q+
- # [20:02] * Zakim sees hsivonen on the speaker queue
- # [20:03] <Lachy> We should both just use the name XHTML, changing the name is counter productive
- # [20:03] <DanC> ack hsivonen
- # [20:03] * Zakim sees no one on the speaker queue
- # [20:03] <DanC> ACTION: ChrisW discuss XHTML name coordination with XHTML 2 WG in the Hypertext CG
- # [20:03] * RRSAgent records action 2
- # [20:04] * Joins: billmason (billmason@69.30.57.156)
- # [20:04] <Lachy> hsivonen: The media type and namespace still need to contain "xhtml", so the name should also be XHTML
- # [20:04] <DanC> DanC: yes, the namespace name is a bigger issue.
- # [20:04] <oedipus> +1 on namespaces more important issue to address
- # [20:04] <DanC> Zakim, next agendum
- # [20:04] <Zakim> agendum 7. "Forms Taskforce" taken up
- # [20:05] <DanC> (14 volunteers currently at http://www.w3.org/2005/08/online_xslt/xslt?xslfile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fhtml%2Fwg%2Fwhowhat.xsl&xmlfile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2002%2F09%2Fwbs%2F40318%2Ftasks83%2Fresults&content-type=&submit=transform )_
- # [20:06] <Lachy> LH: I think it should include people who are very familiar with WF2
- # [20:07] <Lachy> LH: I like Hixie, Anne, Mjs, Henri, Matthew Raymond
- # [20:07] <Lachy> -1 John Boyer
- # [20:07] * DanC checks http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=41565
- # [20:07] <oedipus> GJR: john boyer may be one of the 3 from the Forms side
- # [20:09] <oedipus> GJR: he may not be on the list, but what about asking TV Raman?
- # [20:10] <oedipus> GJR: Raman has experience from both sides
- # [20:10] <Lachy> DanC: what about Gregory,
- # [20:10] <Lachy> ... Anne and Mjs
- # [20:10] <Lachy> ?: I think TV Raman would be an ideal person
- # [20:11] <Lachy> ACTION: Gregory to contact T.V. Raman about the Forms Task force
- # [20:11] * RRSAgent records action 3
- # [20:12] <Lachy> s/?/GR/
- # [20:12] <hsivonen> Sander Tekelenburg is the active one
- # [20:13] <Lachy> DanC: I suppose we could rotate task force members
- # [20:14] <DanC> DanC: I'll fill in 2 (Anne, Maciej) and wait on the 3rd
- # [20:14] * Quits: drry (drry@211.9.170.176) (Quit: drry)
- # [20:14] <DanC> Zakim, next item
- # [20:14] <Zakim> agendum 8. "face-to-face meeting 8-9 November" taken up
- # [20:15] * DanC wonders if chrisw can see http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2007/results
- # [20:17] * Joins: drry (drry@211.9.170.176)
- # [20:17] <DanC> "President's D 66 HTML 50 " -- http://www.w3.org/2007/11/TPAC/overview.html
- # [20:17] <Lachy> DanC: Hixie suggested an unconference style agenda
- # [20:17] <Lachy> DanC: that's easier for me
- # [20:18] * michael is now known as asdf
- # [20:18] <Lachy> ?: I would be comfortable with that for a while, but not the whole time
- # [20:18] * asdf is now known as michael
- # [20:19] * oedipus lachy that was ChrisW
- # [20:19] <Chris> "?" is ChrisWilson
- # [20:19] <Lachy> s/?/Chris/
- # [20:19] <DanC> Zakim, next item
- # [20:19] <Zakim> agendum 9. "Announcement mailing list, RSS feeds" taken up
- # [20:20] <DanC> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/
- # [20:20] <Lachy> DanC: I still need to speak with chaals about how to operate the -announcements mailing list
- # [20:21] <DanC> [CONTINUES] ACTION: DanC to set up an announcement mailing list, noodling with chaals
- # [20:21] <Lachy> DanC: MikeSmith was going to write a summary of the CVS commit changes. Has that happened?
- # [20:21] <DanC> progress; still want to noodle with chaals
- # [20:21] <Lachy> Chris: I haven't seen it.
- # [20:21] <DanC> [CONTINUES] ACTION: MikeSmith to write up a summary of changes for last [period of time], description of where changes go
- # [20:22] * Joins: schepers (schepers@128.30.52.30)
- # [20:22] <Lachy> DanC: Volunteers are welcome for writing up a summary of changes
- # [20:23] <DanC> Zakim, next item
- # [20:23] <Zakim> agendum 10. "Wiki Migration" taken up
- # [20:23] <DanC> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/0488.html
- # [20:23] <Lachy> DanC: I expect to migrate to MediaWiki, and I'm inclined to have a separate HTMLWG wiki
- # [20:23] <Lachy> Chris: that seems like a good idea
- # [20:24] <Lachy> why don't we just start using the WHATWG wiki?
- # [20:24] <DanC> Zakim, agenda?
- # [20:24] <Zakim> I see 1 item remaining on the agenda:
- # [20:24] <Zakim> 10. Wiki Migration
- # [20:24] <DanC> Zakim, close item 10
- # [20:24] <Zakim> agendum 10, Wiki Migration, closed
- # [20:24] <Zakim> I see nothing remaining on the agenda
- # [20:24] <DanC> ADJOURN.
- # [20:24] <Zakim> -Gregory_Rosmaita
- # [20:24] <Zakim> -Rob_Burns
- # [20:24] <dsinger> cheers\
- # [20:24] <hsivonen> advance regrets for Aug 30th
- # [20:24] <Zakim> -Lachy
- # [20:24] <Zakim> -Dave_Singer
- # [20:25] <Zakim> -hsivonen
- # [20:25] <Zakim> -Marcin_Hanclik
- # [20:25] * Quits: dsinger (daithesong@17.202.35.52) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [20:25] <DanC> bringing up http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/dprv/
- # [20:25] * Quits: maha (maha@82.207.140.17) (Quit: $mahaquit)
- # [20:25] * Quits: CarolKing (CarolK@70.242.223.12) (Quit: $quitmessage)
- # [20:29] <DanC> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ProposedDesignPrinciples?action=recall&rev=89
- # [20:33] <Lachy> DanC: I definitely think pave the cowpaths should be included in the survey. After I clarified its meaning, it didn't get much objection. Only one person objected, who moved it to the wiki, but that was clearly due to a misunderstanding (see my response in the wiki)
- # [20:34] <Lachy> *moved it to the disputed section
- # [20:42] * Quits: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22) (Client exited)
- # [20:42] * Joins: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22)
- # [20:42] * Quits: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22) (Client exited)
- # [20:42] * Joins: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22)
- # [20:47] * Quits: Julian (chatzilla@217.91.35.233) (Ping timeout)
- # [20:49] <Zakim> -ChrisW
- # [20:49] <Zakim> -DanC
- # [20:49] <Zakim> HTML_WG()1:00PM has ended
- # [20:49] <Zakim> Attendees were Lachy, DanC, +1.312.933.aaaa, +49.208.8.aabb, Rob_Burns, Gregory_Rosmaita, Marcin_Hanclik, Dave_Singer, ChrisW, hsivonen
- # [20:50] * Quits: drry (drry@211.9.170.176) (Quit: drry)
- # [20:53] * Joins: drry (drry@211.9.170.176)
- # [20:56] * Quits: robburns (robburns@98.193.22.194) (Quit: robburns)
- # [21:08] * Quits: Roger (roger@213.64.74.230) (Quit: Roger)
- # [21:08] * Parts: mausonio (mausonio2@206.251.234.34)
- # [21:12] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [21:17] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [21:19] * Quits: oedipus (oedipus@70.21.186.99) (Quit: oedipus)
- # [21:26] * Quits: michael (michael@206.251.234.34) (Quit: michael)
- # [21:30] * Joins: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123)
- # [21:38] * Joins: kazuhito (kazuhito@222.151.185.252)
- # [21:39] * Parts: hasather (hasather@80.203.71.22)
- # [21:40] * Parts: sierk (sbornema@89.182.131.138)
- # [21:45] * Joins: briansuda (briansuda@85.220.84.60)
- # [21:48] * Quits: briansuda (briansuda@85.220.84.60) (Quit: briansuda)
- # [22:17] * Philip` wonders why Opera consistently fails to realise the ESW Wiki is UTF-8, and shows the page-trail ">>" characters with A-hats in front of them
- # [22:19] <Philip`> Oh, it's because http://www.w3.org/2007/04/wiki/modern/css/screen.css isn't served with a charset, and Opera ignores the charset from <link charset="utf-8" href="..."/>
- # [22:28] * DanC reports the screen.css charset problem to an internal support mailing list
- # [22:46] * Quits: hober (ted@68.107.112.172) (Quit: ERC Version 5.2 (IRC client for Emacs))
- # [22:50] * Zakim excuses himself; his presence no longer seems to be needed
- # [22:50] * Parts: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.30)
- # [22:53] * Quits: ROBOd (robod@86.34.246.154) (Quit: http://www.robodesign.ro )
- # [23:00] * Joins: mjs_ (mjs@17.255.106.86)
- # [23:02] * Quits: mjs (mjs@17.203.15.142) (Ping timeout)
- # [23:04] * Quits: mjs_ (mjs@17.255.106.86) (Ping timeout)
- # [23:14] * Joins: mjs (mjs@17.255.104.130)
- # [23:15] * DanC waves to mjs
- # [23:15] <mjs> hello DanC
- # [23:16] <DanC> somebody pointed out that there are lots of links to fragments of the ProposedDesignPrinciples document from other parts of the wiki. that gives me pause
- # [23:18] * Quits: kazuhito (kazuhito@222.151.185.252) (Quit: Quitting!)
- # [23:19] <DanC> I wonder which people are more comfortable with the "it's a wiki; change it yourself" style vs the mail-changes-to-the-editor style.
- # [23:19] * Quits: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221) (Ping timeout)
- # [23:19] <DanC> the mail-changes-to-the-editor style is more straightforward to manage, in some ways
- # [23:20] <DanC> just to be arbitrary and capricious, I'll pick on you, kingryan . What do you think about design principles collaboration logistics at this point?
- # [23:21] * Joins: Roger (roger@213.64.74.230)
- # [23:23] <DanC> why are we debating whether alt is required under the subject "Baby Steps or Backwards Steps"? surely "mandating img/@alt" or some such would be better? or "cost-effectiveness of mandating alt attributes on img"
- # [23:23] <gsnedders> I prefer the latter option (having an editor)
- # [23:24] * Joins: gavin_ (gavin@74.103.208.221)
- # [23:25] <DanC> ok, good to know... any other preferences?
- # [23:25] * Joins: johnst (johnst@83.89.44.198)
- # [23:25] <kingryan> DanC: for consensus building types of documents like that, it easier to have fewer editors
- # [23:26] <kingryan> the "ETFW" approach (http://theryanking.com/blog/archives/2006/08/18/etfw/) tends to work better when there's an objective answer to what should be on the page
- # [23:26] <DanC> ok good. I like it when the universe offers consistent advice.
- # [23:26] <kingryan> like wikipedia
- # [23:27] <DanC> right; wiki works best when there's a consensus that just needs to be written down
- # [23:28] <DanC> ok; Anne is on holiday, I gather. mjs, do you know when he gets back?
- # [23:28] * DanC wonders why he hasn't bumped into chaals lately
- # [23:29] <Philip`> It seems that Wikipedia fails worst when there isn't an objective answer, and the same would apply to any wiki that doesn't have significantly different editorial rules or culture
- # [23:29] <mjs> DanC: in meeting at the moment, will read scrollback later
- # [23:29] <DanC> ah. ok.
- # [23:30] <mjs> DanC: (< 30 min)
- # [23:30] <kingryan> DanC: fwiw, we've taken both approaches with the mf.org wiki
- # [23:30] <kingryan> some areas are mostly "editor only"
- # [23:30] <kingryan> while others are "anyone can edit"
- # [23:32] * DanC tunes into http://webkit.org/blog/
- # [23:32] <DanC> darn; new stuff there that I haven't seen. why isn't it on planet html5?
- # [23:34] <hsivonen> considering disputes, I'd prefer to have mjs as a gatekeeper instead of anything goes wiki edits
- # [23:34] <gavin> I agree
- # [23:36] <DanC> hmm... "the block flow child invariant" ... I didn't realize that showed up in rendering code; that makes the HTML 5 constraint seem a little less arbitrary
- # [23:36] * Quits: Roger (roger@213.64.74.230) (Quit: Roger)
- # [23:39] * Quits: mjs (mjs@17.255.104.130) (Ping timeout)
- # [23:40] <DanC> hmm.. "We use regression testing to maintain our compatibility gains." , plus Open Source in http://webkit.org/projects/goals.html . I wonder if we can make use of those tests for HTML WG work.
- # [23:40] * Joins: karl (karlcow@128.30.52.30)
- # [23:41] * DanC checks the time in japan... 6:41am ... wonders how much of karl's brain is connected to his IRC client
- # [23:44] * Joins: hyatt (hyatt@17.255.98.64)
- # [23:44] * karl 's brain is in the shower. (hmmm too much information) in the process of going to Keio
- # [23:49] * Joins: mjs (mjs@17.255.106.86)
- # [23:49] <Philip`> http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200708/the_html_5_circus_why_i_left_and_rejoined_the_w3c_html_working_group/ - "I think my energy will be best spent helping to produce documents that are useful to and readable by people who create websites" sounds good
- # [23:50] <mjs> DanC: back
- # [23:51] <mjs> DanC: the wiki style was good for brainstorming and initial development, but I think have editors helps in two ways:
- # [23:51] * Quits: edas (edaspet@88.191.34.123) (Ping timeout)
- # [23:51] * DanC is pretty much sold already
- # [23:51] <mjs> 1) it doesn't seem to fit well with the w3c process to turn a wiki page directly into a Working Group technical report
- # [23:52] <mjs> 2) wikis are good for recording information, but not so good for resolving disputes
- # [23:52] <mjs> DanC: but I am going to do my best to distill the contents of the wiki into usable feedback in any case
- # [23:54] <DanC> but it seems like the time is now to put something at the top of the wiki page to say "this document is moving out of the wiki; please mail change requests to public-html@w3.org" or "... please see _a message about change requests_"
- # [23:56] * DanC updates http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/dprv/ to point to http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/html5/html-design-principles/Overview.html?rev=HEAD
- # [23:57] <DanC> the status of that document should have a pointer back to the wiki copy
- # [23:57] <mjs> DanC: ok, I'll add cross-links
- # Session Close: Fri Aug 17 00:00:00 2007
The end :)