Options:
- # Session Start: Tue Jan 22 00:00:00 2008
- # Session Ident: #html-wg
- # [00:06] <anne> yes
- # [00:06] <anne> and html5-diff
- # [00:14] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@71.204.145.103) (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
- # [00:17] * Quits: tH (Rob@87.102.8.113) (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.80-rdmsoft [XULRunner 1.8.0.9/2006120508])
- # [00:38] * Quits: aroben (aroben@68.63.169.188) (Quit: aroben)
- # [00:48] * Quits: Zeros (Zeros-Elip@67.154.87.254) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [00:51] * Quits: Sander (svl@86.87.68.167) (Quit: And back he spurred like a madman, shrieking a curse to the sky.)
- # [01:25] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.54.100)
- # [01:30] * Quits: smedero (smedero@192.223.6.251) (Quit: smedero)
- # [01:54] * Joins: olivier (ot@128.30.52.30)
- # [02:29] * Joins: heycam (cam@124.168.58.127)
- # [02:30] * Quits: adele (adele@17.203.15.207) (Quit: adele)
- # [03:06] * Quits: aaronlev (chatzilla@65.78.0.149) (Quit: ChatZilla 0.9.80 [Firefox 3.0b3pre/2008012104])
- # [03:07] * Joins: aaronlev (chatzilla@65.78.0.149)
- # [03:13] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.54.100) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [03:13] * Joins: Lachy_ (Lachlan@84.215.54.100)
- # [03:15] <MikeSmith> gsnedders - yup
- # [03:17] <Hixie> ok pubrules time
- # [03:20] <MikeSmith> Hixie - yep
- # [03:20] <MikeSmith> please
- # [03:21] <Hixie> oops, i have outstanding changes
- # [03:21] <Hixie> better commit those first
- # [03:24] * mjs_ wonders if there is a fancy press release prepared
- # [03:24] * mjs_ is now known as mjs
- # [03:25] <Hixie> i hope not, but i assume yes
- # [03:39] <Hixie> MikeSmith: so the references section is incomplete, and this is making the link checker claim that there's a bazillion broken fragment links
- # [03:39] <Hixie> MikeSmith: is the pubteam going to be annoying about this?
- # [03:42] <Hixie> MikeSmith: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/
- # [03:42] <MikeSmith> Hixie - No, I don't think so, not if I make it clear that we aware of it
- # [03:42] <MikeSmith> But I guess it's also a case of readers of the doc being annoyed about it
- # [03:42] <MikeSmith> Seems like something to note in the SOTD
- # [03:43] <Hixie> the references section says "This section will be written in a future draft."
- # [03:43] <Hixie> (the SOTD section is long enough by this point that i doubt anyone would read anything else we added to it)
- # [03:43] <MikeSmith> heh
- # [03:43] <MikeSmith> Yeah, I guess so
- # [03:44] <Hixie> ok the draft is committed and as far as i know follows all applicable rules except for the aforementioned broken internal links
- # [03:44] <Hixie> it's dated for the 22nd
- # [03:44] <MikeSmith> OK, taking a look now
- # [03:57] * Quits: Lachy_ (Lachlan@84.215.54.100) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [03:57] * Joins: Lachy__ (Lachlan@84.215.54.100)
- # [03:58] <MikeSmith> Hixie - I think a reasonable solution is to update the links in the copy that goes into /TR to all point for now to the same fragment ID, and for that ID to be #references
- # [03:59] <MikeSmith> I will make that change when I add the static copy in /TR
- # [04:06] <Hixie> ok
- # [04:06] <Hixie> that should be relatively easy
- # [04:06] <Hixie> s/"#refs[^"]+"/"#references"/g
- # [04:06] <Hixie> anything else need chanigng?
- # [04:08] * Quits: jmb (jmb@152.78.68.189) (Ping timeout)
- # [04:10] * Joins: jmb (jmb@152.78.68.189)
- # [04:10] <MikeSmith> Hixie - nothing else I see right now
- # [04:10] <Hixie> k
- # [04:10] <Hixie> let me know if you do need changes
- # [04:10] <Hixie> or if you want me to make the refs change
- # [04:11] <MikeSmith> Hixie - if you want to go ahead and make that refs change now, that would be great
- # [04:16] <Hixie> k
- # [04:31] * Quits: aaronlev (chatzilla@65.78.0.149) (Ping timeout)
- # [04:42] * Joins: adele (adele@67.170.232.64)
- # [04:53] <Hixie> MikeSmith: k, checked in
- # [04:53] <MikeSmith> thanks, taking a look now
- # [04:54] * Quits: adele (adele@67.170.232.64) (Client exited)
- # [04:55] * Joins: adele (adele@67.170.232.64)
- # [05:04] <MikeSmith> Hixie - I see the checker is flagging the string "http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notic" in the example in http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#header
- # [05:04] <MikeSmith> line 8573
- # [05:05] <MikeSmith> not technically an error, but adding the "e" will make it shut up
- # [05:06] <Hixie> the link checker?
- # [05:06] <Hixie> which checker?
- # [05:08] <MikeSmith> pubrules checker
- # [05:09] <Hixie> where?
- # [05:09] <Hixie> i don't see anything
- # [05:10] <MikeSmith> in pubrules output, section "7. Document Body"
- # [05:10] <MikeSmith> item 4
- # [05:10] <Hixie> namespaces?
- # [05:11] <MikeSmith> yeah
- # [05:11] <Hixie> says "OK The Namespaces Checker was used for this test." for me
- # [05:12] <MikeSmith> It's not even flagging http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-20080122/ and http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/ in your output?
- # [05:12] <MikeSmith> it should be, since they're not there yet
- # [05:12] <Hixie> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/pubrules-conformance-report.html
- # [05:13] <MikeSmith> wacky
- # [05:14] <MikeSmith> dunno why it's not reporting http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/ and http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-20080122/ to you
- # [05:14] <MikeSmith> it should be flagging those at least, as far as I can see
- # [05:22] <MikeSmith> Hixie - anyway, I don't see any real problems
- # [05:22] <MikeSmith> I think we're good to go
- # [05:22] <MikeSmith> I see the "Required boilerplate text not found" stuff as usual
- # [05:24] <MikeSmith> but I've never been able to prevent the pubrules checker from flagging that part even if it's exactly word-for-word matching the recommended text
- # [05:44] <Hixie> heh
- # [05:44] <Hixie> maybe the namespace checker is dependent of the domain of the page
- # [05:45] <Hixie> since i ran the checker locally
- # [05:45] <Hixie> why would it report http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/ and http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-20080122/?
- # [05:51] * Quits: xover (xover@193.157.66.5) (Client exited)
- # [05:52] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@71.204.145.103)
- # [05:54] <MikeSmith> Hixie - I guess because it check the status code on those, and they come back 404
- # [05:54] <MikeSmith> because nothing there
- # [05:54] <MikeSmith> yet
- # [05:55] <MikeSmith> I think what it does is grep through the whole doc to for anything that matches an http URI
- # [05:55] <MikeSmith> and then checks the status code to see if there's actually anything at the location
- # [05:56] <Hixie> i thought that was what hte link checker did
- # [05:56] <Hixie> the link checker certainly does flag a bunch of things
- # [05:56] <Hixie> including those two URIs
- # [05:56] <Hixie> though not the IPR one you mentioned earlier
- # [05:57] <MikeSmith> Hixie - right, because that one's not a hyperlink
- # [05:57] <Hixie> iirc i changed that IPR uri to have its "e" taken off so that the other part of hte pubrules checker wouldn't flag that example as having the wrong IPR notice
- # [05:57] <MikeSmith> I guess the pubrules checker is intended to just be checking namespace URIs
- # [05:58] <MikeSmith> Hixie - thanks for changing that
- # [05:58] <MikeSmith> Oh, sorry, re-reading what you just said
- # [05:58] <MikeSmith> heh
- # [05:58] <Hixie> oh hey, if i run the nschecker directly, it does complain about those
- # [05:58] <Hixie> weird
- # [05:59] <MikeSmith> I see what you're saying about the IPR URI
- # [05:59] <MikeSmith> so let's just leave that one as-is
- # [06:00] <Hixie> i k
- # [06:00] <Hixie> er
- # [06:00] <Hixie> "ok"
- # [06:02] <MikeSmith> Hixie - you said link checker is flagging a bunch of things... The only broken links the link checker is flagging for me are that not-yet-there /TR ones
- # [06:03] <MikeSmith> and then some 302's
- # [06:03] <MikeSmith> but nothing else
- # [06:03] <Hixie> that was a bunch :-)
- # [06:03] <MikeSmith> and robot exclusion for https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=180157&action=view
- # [06:04] <MikeSmith> OK, so we're fine as far as links too
- # [06:05] <MikeSmith> So I think we really are good to go and I can copy it over to http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-20080122/ and follow up on the publication request
- # [06:05] * Quits: adele (adele@67.170.232.64) (Quit: adele)
- # [06:26] <Hixie> MikeSmith: k
- # [06:26] <MikeSmith> Hixie - how much longer will you still be online today?
- # [06:30] <Hixie> dunno
- # [06:33] <MikeSmith> OK, anyway, was just wondering if how long you'd be available if I happen to find any problems with the draft later. But I don't anticipate finding any, so no worries
- # [06:33] <MikeSmith> we publish at 11am US/East
- # [06:59] <Hixie> 9am PDT?
- # [07:00] <Hixie> i won't be awake around then :-)
- # [07:02] <MikeSmith> Hixie - yeah, I figured you wouldn't be :)
- # [07:27] * Joins: xover (xover@193.157.66.5)
- # [07:42] * Quits: gavin (gavin@63.245.208.169) (Ping timeout)
- # [07:42] * Joins: gavin (gavin@63.245.208.169)
- # [08:06] <MikeSmith> http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/01/ie8-versioning-mechanism
- # [08:07] <MikeSmith> <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=8;FF=3;OtherUA=4" />
- # [08:11] * Joins: tH_ (Rob@87.102.8.113)
- # [08:11] * tH_ is now known as tH
- # [08:17] <mjs> I think the odds of non-IE browsers doing anything based on that extension are pretty low
- # [08:20] <mjs> it's unfortunate that there's no "always the most standards compliant mode available" switch
- # [08:20] <mjs> in effect there is no standards mode, only more quirks modes
- # [08:22] <mjs> oh no, wait, there is a latest version switch
- # [08:22] <mjs> "IE=edge"
- # [08:23] <MikeSmith> yeah
- # [08:23] <mjs> so that's the real standards mode
- # [08:23] <MikeSmith> though "strongly discouraged"
- # [08:24] <mjs> though presumably in IE8 it will match IE8 quirks mode
- # [08:24] <MikeSmith> the phrase "...will cause a site to target the latest IE browser versions as they release" is kind of encouraging
- # [08:25] <MikeSmith> and that "strongly discouraged" bit too
- # [08:25] <MikeSmith> because it seems to imply they possibly have plans to do more frequent releases
- # [08:26] <MikeSmith> the Mozilla-Webkit-Opera model of weekly or nightly builds
- # [08:26] <MikeSmith> or at least something closer to that than their current beta/release model
- # [08:27] <MikeSmith> or maybe I'm just reading too much into it
- # [08:28] * Quits: olivier (ot@128.30.52.30) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [08:33] <mjs> I think you are reading too much into it
- # [08:34] <MikeSmith> I guess so
- # [08:42] <MikeSmith> mjs - btw and just fyi, in looking at the History section of the KHTML page at Wikipedia a while back, I noticed it didn't really provide a whole lot of useful information, so I some stuff to it
- # [08:43] <MikeSmith> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KHTML#History
- # [08:43] <MikeSmith> most of it just copped from the video presentation that Lars Knoll and George Staikos did at Yahoo
- # [08:44] <MikeSmith> I'm not really very qualified to be trying to document that history
- # [08:44] <MikeSmith> but nobody else had taken time to update it there, so I figured I might as well give it a try
- # [08:45] <mjs> the comment about WebKit there is a wee bit unfriendly sounding
- # [08:46] <mjs> "Apple now publishes the source code for their fork of the KHTML engine, called WebKit, as required by the LGPL."
- # [08:46] <mjs> that makes it sound like Apple is doing the bare minimum required by the liecense
- # [08:46] <mjs> (to my ear anyway)
- # [08:46] <mjs> still, good to fill it in
- # [08:46] <MikeSmith> yeah, I felt the same way reading that part
- # [08:47] <mjs> I guess the end of that section sounds more positive
- # [08:47] <MikeSmith> I didn't touch that section except to tweak the wording a bit to make it less clunky
- # [08:47] <MikeSmith> yeah, well, I think that section could definitely use some work still
- # [08:47] <MikeSmith> and a bit more balance
- # [08:49] <MikeSmith> the only things I changed there were this:
- # [08:49] <MikeSmith> http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=KHTML&diff=185840509&oldid=185839910
- # [08:50] <MikeSmith> only really substantive thing was that I added mention of KJS there
- # [09:02] <hsivonen> gotta remember to adjust the wikitruthiness about the status of HTML 5 after we publish
- # [09:07] <MikeSmith> jah
- # [09:08] <MikeSmith> hsivonen - in his article, Aaron Gustafson cites the following:
- # [09:08] <MikeSmith> http://web.archive.org/web/20030212115103/http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/list-name.mbox/123/1998/7/0/1037920/
- # [09:09] <MikeSmith> "Back in 1998, Todd Fahrner came up with a toggle that would allow a browser to offer two rendering modes: one for developers wishing to follow standards... This concept was first implemented in IE5/Mac two years later"
- # [09:09] <hsivonen> MikeSmith: yeah. might be good to put on the wiki
- # [09:10] <MikeSmith> yeah, I'll get it in
- # [09:10] <MikeSmith> would like to eventually also get the date when IE for Mac added doctype switching
- # [09:10] <MikeSmith> I guess I can poke around and see if I find anything
- # [09:11] <mjs> "Use NGLayout when rendering documents authored in either HTML 4.0 Strict or XML
- # [09:11] <mjs> (this will include HTML 5.0)"
- # [09:11] <mjs> html5 in strict mode, even in 1998!
- # [09:11] <mjs> :-p
- # [09:11] <MikeSmith> heh
- # [09:12] <hsivonen> MikeSmith: wikipedia says March 27 2000 was the release date of Mac IE 5.0
- # [09:12] <MikeSmith> hsivonen - OK, that makes sense
- # [09:13] <MikeSmith> was wondering if it were added in 5.something
- # [09:13] <hsivonen> I'm pretty sure it was in 5.0
- # [09:13] <MikeSmith> but Aaron mentions "two years later"
- # [09:13] <MikeSmith> OK
- # [09:14] <hsivonen> MikeSmith: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1312 for moz
- # [09:14] <MikeSmith> yeah, that I one I came across already, linked to from one of your pages I think
- # [09:14] <MikeSmith> will add that too
- # [09:15] <hsivonen> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42525
- # [09:15] <hsivonen> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153032
- # [09:16] <hsivonen> those are notable things shaping the eventual form of sniffing
- # [09:18] <MikeSmith> hsivonen - OK, I'll get some stuff added right now, then maybe you can review if/when you have time
- # [09:40] * MikeSmith finds http://www.alistapart.com/stories/ie5mac/
- # [09:40] <MikeSmith> Zeldman from March 2000
- # [09:52] * Quits: jgraham (james@81.86.219.94) (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
- # [10:06] * Joins: jgraham (james@81.86.219.94)
- # [10:19] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@71.204.145.103) (Quit: 8403864 bytes have been tenured, next gc will be global.)
- # [10:23] * Quits: Lachy__ (Lachlan@84.215.54.100) (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
- # [10:34] <anne> morning
- # [10:34] <anne> guess I'm up for the pubrules game now? :)
- # [10:38] <anne> MikeSmith, done
- # [10:48] <MikeSmith> anne - thanks, taking a look now
- # [10:50] * Joins: ROBOd (robod@89.122.216.38)
- # [10:51] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22)
- # [10:52] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22) (Client exited)
- # [10:52] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22)
- # [10:54] * Quits: sbuluf (ll@200.49.132.81) (Ping timeout)
- # [10:56] <MikeSmith> anne - pubrules doesn't seem to be recognizing it as a FPWD
- # [10:56] <MikeSmith> so I'm getting some errors
- # [10:56] <MikeSmith> e.g., it's tell me there is not Previous Version link
- # [10:57] <anne> you'd think that a FPWD doesn't have that :-)
- # [10:57] <anne> I can add <dt>Previous Version:<dd>none though
- # [10:57] <anne> would that help?
- # [10:58] * Quits: kingryan (kingryan@66.92.2.56) (Quit: kingryan)
- # [10:58] <MikeSmith> anne - no, we don't want to do that
- # [10:59] <MikeSmith> give me a few minutes to look at it and try to figure out why it's not catching it
- # [11:00] <anne> other drafts do have something like that, e.g. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/NOTE-access-control-20050613/
- # [11:00] <anne> actually, some others don't, e.g. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-XMLHttpRequest-20060405/
- # [11:08] * Joins: timbl (timbl@208.54.94.79)
- # [11:09] <hsivonen> MikeSmith: Validator.nu now supports &out=gnu
- # [11:10] <hsivonen> MikeSmith: also, there's &level=error, which suppresses info and warning, so you can simply count output lines and decide that zero lines is ok
- # [11:10] <hsivonen> MikeSmith: documentation to follow
- # [11:10] <MikeSmith> hsivonen - sweet. thanks
- # [11:10] <MikeSmith> btw, I added stuff to http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/history
- # [11:10] <MikeSmith> search for "switching"
- # [11:11] <MikeSmith> also this:
- # [11:11] <MikeSmith> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/DoctypeSwitching
- # [11:11] <MikeSmith> anne - I'm still not seeing what pubrules thinks is wrong
- # [11:11] <hsivonen> MikeSmith: looks good. thanks.
- # [11:11] <MikeSmith> anne - are you seeing the same errors from teh pubrules checker?
- # [11:11] <anne> HTML 5.0 :)
- # [11:12] <MikeSmith> hsivonen - feel free to make any changes or additions there if you want
- # [11:12] <anne> I never run the pubrules checker because I trust in Bert's script to do the right thing
- # [11:12] <MikeSmith> ah
- # [11:12] * anne tries to find it now
- # [11:12] <MikeSmith> anne - well do me a big favor and try it so you can see what I'm talking about
- # [11:13] <MikeSmith> http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules
- # [11:14] <MikeSmith> running http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/ through that, I don't get those same error messages
- # [11:14] <anne> I see it
- # [11:14] <anne> I think
- # [11:15] <anne> nope :(
- # [11:15] <anne> I thought "latest draft:" -> "latest version" would do it
- # [11:17] <MikeSmith> anne - HTML5 draft has "Latest Published Version:" and "Latest Editor's Draft:"
- # [11:17] <MikeSmith> so I don't think it cares much about that text
- # [11:19] <anne> should I include a pointer to the latest editor's draft here too?
- # [11:19] <anne> btw, I fixed it now
- # [11:19] <anne> it wanted an indication that this is the first public working draft
- # [11:19] <anne> i fixed that in the sotd
- # [11:20] <MikeSmith> OK
- # [11:20] <MikeSmith> I don't think we need a pointer to the editor's draft
- # [11:21] <MikeSmith> for this doc
- # [11:21] <MikeSmith> because it's not changing often
- # [11:21] <anne> ok
- # [11:21] <MikeSmith> main reason for having it the HTML5 draft is just because it is changing weekly
- # [11:22] <anne> oh, btw, the style sheet errors are actually an error in the CSS validator
- # [11:24] <MikeSmith> anne - yeah, I remember we had that problem before
- # [11:24] <MikeSmith> and btw, the cause of the problem was my fault
- # [11:24] <anne> :)
- # [11:24] <MikeSmith> I think you actually had "First Public Working Draft" previously
- # [11:24] <MikeSmith> before that change I sent you
- # [11:25] <MikeSmith> sorry
- # [11:25] <anne> aah
- # [11:25] <anne> oh well
- # [11:28] <MikeSmith> anyway, it looks fine now
- # [11:28] <MikeSmith> I get that final publication request sent in a few minutes
- # [11:29] <MikeSmith> then we just wait for folks to get up on the east coast
- # [11:30] <hsivonen> will the FPWD have PDFs run through Hixie's pipeline but with the W3C CSS?
- # [11:31] <MikeSmith> hsivonen - nope
- # [11:31] <MikeSmith> the W3C copies don't have links to PDF versions
- # [11:31] <hsivonen> ok
- # [11:55] * Quits: timbl (timbl@208.54.94.79) (Ping timeout)
- # [12:19] <anne> this press release will cost the W3C so much bandwidth
- # [12:19] <anne> HTML5 is roughly 2MiB now...
- # [12:37] <Philip> Is the spec included in the press release email?
- # [12:37] <anne> i'm just thinking about all the hits it will get from all over the world
- # [12:38] <Philip> Ah
- # [12:38] <Philip> Hopefully they have compression...
- # [12:39] <Philip> Hmm, looks like they don't
- # [13:10] * Joins: aaronlev (chatzilla@65.78.0.149)
- # [14:24] * Quits: ROBOd (robod@89.122.216.38) (Quit: http://www.robodesign.ro )
- # [14:46] * Parts: anne (annevk@77.163.243.203)
- # [14:48] * Joins: anne (annevk@77.163.243.203)
- # [14:57] <anne> MikeSmith, yt?
- # [15:15] <MikeSmith> anne - here now
- # [15:16] <anne> MikeSmith, will you deal with the issue?
- # [15:16] <MikeSmith> which issue would that be?
- # [15:22] * Joins: aroben (aroben@68.63.169.188)
- # [16:25] * Joins: billmason (billmason@69.30.57.129)
- # [17:01] * Joins: jdandrea (jdandrea@24.228.42.231)
- # [17:01] <DanC> whee!
- # [17:01] <DanC> Your documents has been published under http://www.w3.org/TR/
- # [17:01] <DanC> HTML 5
- # [17:01] <DanC> A vocabulary and associated APIs for HTML and XHTML
- # [17:01] <DanC> W3C Working Draft 22 January 2008
- # [17:01] <DanC> This Version:
- # [17:01] <DanC> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-20080122/
- # [17:01] <DanC> Latest Published Version:
- # [17:01] <DanC> http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/
- # [17:02] * Joins: timbl (timbl@85.95.98.99)
- # [17:05] <anne> nice nice
- # [17:09] <hsivonen> DanC, MikeSmith: thank you
- # [17:10] <anne> yeah, thanks!
- # [17:13] <DanC> likewise... thanks for all your work!
- # [17:13] * DanC expects the "differences from html 4" document to go live any time
- # [17:14] <Lachy> it's live now http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-diff-20080122/
- # [17:15] <anne> in my e-mail it said both were published and it seems both are
- # [17:19] <MikeSmith> To quote George Bush: "Mission accomplished." ... now all we need to do is distribute the Presidential Medals of Freedom (after purging all the Baathists from office and taking away the guns from the police), and we'll be on easy street...
- # [17:20] * Joins: ROBOd (robod@89.122.216.38)
- # [17:22] <Philip> http://www.w3.org/News/2008#item8 is missing a double-quote to end the “"I am glad ...” section
- # [17:22] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22) (Ping timeout)
- # [17:23] * Philip wonders why http://www.w3.org/2008/02/html5-pressrelease is 2008/02
- # [17:24] * Parts: timbl (timbl@85.95.98.99)
- # [17:25] <anne> Philip, you can e-mail w3t-comm@w3.org with corrections
- # [17:26] <MikeSmith> I just pinged comm about that one
- # [17:26] <MikeSmith> but would be good to e-mail it also
- # [17:30] <MikeSmith> missing quote is fixec
- # [17:32] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.54.100)
- # [18:05] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.54.100) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [18:05] * Joins: Lachy_ (Lachlan@84.215.54.100)
- # [18:23] * Joins: adele (adele@67.170.232.64)
- # [19:00] * Joins: timbl (timbl@208.54.14.123)
- # [19:18] * Quits: adele (adele@67.170.232.64) (Quit: adele)
- # [19:43] * Joins: Sander (svl@86.87.68.167)
- # [20:00] * Joins: zcorpan (zcorpan@83.227.33.203)
- # [20:03] * Joins: dbaron (dbaron@63.245.220.226)
- # [20:43] * Quits: zcorpan (zcorpan@83.227.33.203) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [21:03] * Quits: timbl (timbl@208.54.14.123) (Ping timeout)
- # [21:06] * Quits: jdandrea (jdandrea@24.228.42.231) (Quit: ciao)
- # [21:12] * Quits: Lachy_ (Lachlan@84.215.54.100) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [21:18] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.54.100)
- # [21:27] * MikeSmith is now known as Mike^mail
- # [21:28] * Joins: edas (edaspet@82.233.238.50)
- # [21:41] * Joins: zcorpan (zcorpan@83.227.33.203)
- # [21:41] * Joins: dbaron_ (dbaron@63.245.220.241)
- # [21:44] * Quits: dbaron (dbaron@63.245.220.226) (Ping timeout)
- # [21:45] * Quits: zcorpan (zcorpan@83.227.33.203) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:01] * Quits: edas (edaspet@82.233.238.50) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:04] * Joins: edas (edaspet@82.233.238.50)
- # [22:07] * Quits: edas (edaspet@82.233.238.50) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:09] * Quits: aaronlev (chatzilla@65.78.0.149) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:10] * Quits: ROBOd (robod@89.122.216.38) (Quit: http://www.robodesign.ro )
- # [22:12] * Joins: Julian (chatzilla@217.91.35.233)
- # [22:14] * Joins: edas (edaspet@82.233.238.50)
- # [22:17] * Joins: adele (adele@17.203.15.207)
- # [22:42] * Joins: aaronlev (chatzilla@65.78.0.149)
- # [22:45] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.54.100) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [22:45] * Joins: hober (ted@68.101.220.172)
- # [22:47] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.54.100)
- # [22:55] * Joins: zcorpan (zcorpan@83.227.33.203)
- # [22:58] * Joins: edaspet (edaspet@82.233.238.50)
- # [22:59] * Quits: Julian (chatzilla@217.91.35.233) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:59] * Quits: edas (edaspet@82.233.238.50) (Ping timeout)
- # [23:02] * Joins: Zeros (Zeros-Elip@67.154.87.254)
- # [23:05] * Quits: xover (xover@193.157.66.5) (Client exited)
- # [23:14] * Joins: sbuluf (hrijsf@200.49.132.77)
- # [23:23] * Quits: edaspet (edaspet@82.233.238.50) (Ping timeout)
- # [23:46] * Quits: zcorpan (zcorpan@83.227.33.203) (Ping timeout)
- # Session Close: Wed Jan 23 00:00:00 2008
The end :)