/irc-logs / w3c / #webapps / 2009-02-25 / end

Options:

  1. # Session Start: Wed Feb 25 00:00:00 2009
  2. # Session Ident: #webapps
  3. # [00:42] * Quits: aroben (aroben@71.58.77.15) (Quit: Leaving)
  4. # [00:52] * Quits: heycam (cam@118.138.224.41) (Ping timeout)
  5. # [00:53] * Joins: heycam (cam@118.138.224.41)
  6. # [01:40] * Joins: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org)
  7. # [01:43] * Quits: arve (arve@82.236.193.123) (Ping timeout)
  8. # [02:19] * Quits: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org) (Quit: Tomorrow to fresh woods, and pastures new.)
  9. # [03:14] * Joins: anne (annevk@58.1.246.135)
  10. # [03:33] * Joins: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org)
  11. # [05:19] * Quits: anne (annevk@58.1.246.135) (Client exited)
  12. # [05:19] * Joins: anne (annevk@58.1.246.135)
  13. # [06:02] * Quits: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org) (Quit: Tomorrow to fresh woods, and pastures new.)
  14. # [06:03] * Joins: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org)
  15. # [06:04] <anne> bit sad that there haven't been any comments on CORS so far
  16. # [06:07] <anne> guess the only way to grab attention is to publish Last Call but that creates so much overhead i don't really want to
  17. # [06:07] <anne> (unless really nobody cares, in which case we can go to CR, but that seems unrealistic)
  18. # [06:27] <MikeSmith> anne: remind me what's the deadline for comments?
  19. # [06:27] <anne> we haven't published as Last Call yet
  20. # [06:28] <anne> it's just that we do have implementations and several updates to the spec without any kind of review :)
  21. # [06:28] <anne> though maybe that's not too different from HTML5
  22. # [06:35] * Quits: heycam (cam@118.138.224.41) (Quit: bye)
  23. # [06:55] <MikeSmith> anne: so maybe it's time to publish another WD?
  24. # [06:56] <anne> yeah
  25. # [06:57] <anne> almost done with edits
  26. # [07:01] <anne> I think I only use MUST and MAY so far, fun
  27. # [07:12] <anne> ah, in doing things the wrong way around I found a good name for the spec that will define things like case-sensitive: "Web Terminology Framework"
  28. # [07:12] <anne> the name is inaccurate and only good because of the abbreviation
  29. # [07:13] <MikeSmith> heh
  30. # [07:13] <anne> do you think it's worth having a spec for that?
  31. # [07:13] <MikeSmith> yeah, absolutely
  32. # [07:14] <anne> ideally HTML5 datatypes are also separated out at some point
  33. # [07:14] * Joins: heycam (cam@124.168.12.212)
  34. # [07:14] <MikeSmith> hmm, yeah, I guess that'd make some sense
  35. # [07:14] <anne> imo
  36. # [07:14] <Hixie> man, y'all are killing me with this "html5 hasn't had any review" meme
  37. # [07:14] <Hixie> THOUSANDS OF E-MAILS
  38. # [07:14] <Hixie> THOUSANDS
  39. # [07:15] <Hixie> :-P
  40. # [07:15] <Hixie> (from me, replying to feedback, i mean)
  41. # [07:16] <MikeSmith> who been saying that?
  42. # [07:16] <anne> yeah, HTML5 prolly had more review
  43. # [07:16] <MikeSmith> oh, I see
  44. # [07:16] <MikeSmith> above
  45. # [07:16] <anne> so maybe the question should be why CORS isn't followed as closely as say, HTML5 <video>
  46. # [07:17] <MikeSmith> cause <video> makes pretty pictures
  47. # [07:17] <Hixie> MikeSmith: sam also implied it in a recent www-archive mail
  48. # [07:17] <MikeSmith> hmm
  49. # [07:18] <anne> sam was mostly about non-implementor feedback I believe
  50. # [07:19] <anne> i'd be happy with just that :)
  51. # [07:20] <MikeSmith> anne: I think what we need in order to get more attention on CORS is, we need a logo
  52. # [07:20] <MikeSmith> I suggest this one:
  53. # [07:20] <MikeSmith> http://www.empirezwinger.com/images/Leprechaun.jpg
  54. # [07:20] <anne> (the reason for datatypes externally is that other specs could reuse them more easily and not invent yet another variant as we've been doing so often)
  55. # [07:20] <anne> haha
  56. # [07:20] * anne replaces the W3C brand with that image
  57. # [07:21] <MikeSmith> hehehe
  58. # [07:21] <MikeSmith> I would vote for it
  59. # [07:21] <MikeSmith> yeah, about datatypes. would make it easier maybe for people to write datatype libraries
  60. # [07:31] <anne> yeah, and not have every spec define space-separated in its own unique way
  61. # [07:31] <anne> or how to parse an integer, etc.
  62. # [07:32] <MikeSmith> yeah, seriously
  63. # [07:33] <MikeSmith> you volunteering it actually write it?
  64. # [07:34] <anne> dunno yet, I think I'll write one for case-sensitive and all just copying Hixie's stuff
  65. # [07:34] <anne> I use most of the terms in various specs already
  66. # [07:35] * MikeSmith hopes we would not have to do a charter update/review if we added it to WebApps deliverables
  67. # [07:36] <MikeSmith> shepazu: ↑
  68. # [07:36] <anne> hmm it seems like just splitting out some text from one spec into a separate spec...
  69. # [07:36] <Hixie> if we do, there's a bunch of html5 stuff coming down the pipe
  70. # [07:37] <anne> i think there's an update in the works for web workers and such
  71. # [07:37] <Hixie> storage (localstorage and database), websocket api, eventsource
  72. # [07:37] <Hixie> timers
  73. # [07:44] <shepazu> it would have to be added to the charter, I'd reckon
  74. # [07:49] <anne> well i'll leave it then
  75. # [07:52] <anne> too high of a barrier to bother
  76. # [07:54] <shepazu> pft
  77. # [07:55] <anne> if you want to do it for me, go ahead ;)
  78. # [07:56] <shepazu> I could propose it for the upcoming charter review, where we're adding other stuff
  79. # [07:56] <anne> i don't really want to go through that trouble just to be able to publish a doc that defines ASCII case-insensitive and such on its own
  80. # [07:56] <anne> rather than as part of >3 independent drafts
  81. # [07:56] <shepazu> write me up a summary, and I'll see if I can include it
  82. # [07:56] <shepazu> I'll ask PLH what he thinks
  83. # [07:57] <shepazu> it sounds like a good idea to me
  84. # [07:57] <shepazu> send me an email
  85. # [07:57] <shepazu> and I'll look into it this week
  86. # [07:58] <anne> "Common Terminology for Web Specifications" defines terms and algorithms to be shared across independent Web specifications so that they become more coherent.
  87. # [07:58] <shepazu> sounds good... put it in an email so I remember to add it
  88. # [07:58] <timeless> become =>
  89. # [07:58] <MikeSmith> anne: I like the original name better
  90. # [07:58] <shepazu> me too
  91. # [07:58] <timeless> become => <something else>
  92. # [07:59] <shepazu> Web Terminology Framework, totally
  93. # [07:59] <anne> yeah ok
  94. # [07:59] <anne> just have to explain it's not actually a Framework in the intro :p
  95. # [07:59] <MikeSmith> anne: btw - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Feb/0019.html
  96. # [08:00] <anne> timeless, "can get"?
  97. # [08:00] <anne> MikeSmith, fun
  98. # [08:00] <MikeSmith> heh
  99. # [08:00] <anne> MikeSmith, i want to blog about that mess, maybe I should do that
  100. # [08:00] <shepazu> Web Terminology Framework/Fundamentals/Foundation/?
  101. # [08:00] <MikeSmith> anne: yeah, man
  102. # [08:00] <MikeSmith> definitely worth a blog posting
  103. # [08:01] <anne> shepazu, Fundamentals works, cheers
  104. # [08:01] * anne e-mails
  105. # [08:01] <anne> actually, where should I e-mail it towards?
  106. # [08:01] <shepazu> webapps member list
  107. # [08:02] <timeless> anne: hrm, not really
  108. # [08:02] <anne> it's just an abstract...
  109. # [08:02] <anne> what's wrong with become?
  110. # [08:02] <timeless> can be used consistently?
  111. # [08:03] <timeless> terms are terms, it's not that the terms themselves are coherent
  112. # [08:03] <timeless> it's that you want them to be used in that manner
  113. # [08:03] <MikeSmith> it's the specifications that become more coherent, was the intent of the sentence, i think
  114. # [08:04] <timeless> then i treed the sentence wrong
  115. # [08:04] <shepazu> I think this is something that goes well with WebIDL
  116. # [08:04] <anne> is the grammar ambigious?
  117. # [08:04] <MikeSmith> anne: yeah, it seems it is
  118. # [08:04] <shepazu> in fact, I proposed something similar a while back
  119. # [08:04] <shepazu> anne, don't worry about the grammar, I'll change it anyway
  120. # [08:04] <MikeSmith> anne: anyway, like you said, it's just an abstract
  121. # [08:05] <MikeSmith> I'm sure it'll change anyway
  122. # [08:05] <timeless> just so long as we understand which way you were trying
  123. # [08:05] <timeless> since obviously i failed there :)
  124. # [08:05] <shepazu> I understood it, and I'll use poetic license
  125. # [08:06] <shepazu> er, poetic CC
  126. # [08:06] <timeless> ?
  127. # [08:06] * timeless tries to understand that last correction
  128. # [08:07] <MikeSmith> more important thing is that we have a logo for the spec, and for each spec we do from now on
  129. # [08:07] <timeless> seriously"?
  130. # [08:07] <MikeSmith> maybe the bareass leprechaun would be better for this spec than for CORS
  131. # [08:07] <MikeSmith> or maybe this:
  132. # [08:07] <MikeSmith> http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_h9eVfqVXHUY/Rp6lOnYdFfI/AAAAAAAAArg/RHa88GW3BIc/s320/walking_tall.jpg
  133. # [08:08] <timeless> heh
  134. # [08:09] <timeless> http://nt2.ggpht.com/news?imgefp=TjmQvXRAkXwJ&imgurl=media.nzherald.co.nz/webcontent/image/jpg/browserwars.jpg
  135. # [08:09] <MikeSmith> in general, we really need to do a better job of intimidating potential commentors
  136. # [08:09] <timeless> poor ie, it looks so small next to its rivals
  137. # [08:10] <shepazu> webkit/safari is missing there
  138. # [08:11] <MikeSmith> ah geez, another missile from He Who Shall Not Be Named on public-html
  139. # [08:13] * MikeSmith scans it to see it to see how many statements impugning other people he's managed to squeeze into this one
  140. # [08:13] <timeless> shepazu: they're a well behaved american company who don't want to get involved in this nonsense\?
  141. # [08:13] <shepazu> Sam Ruby? Dmitri Turin? Hastur the Unspeakable?
  142. # [08:13] <timeless> besides, if apple gets involved, it's inviting the EU to sue it next
  143. # [08:14] <MikeSmith> hmm, first sentence is pretty good. sort of the equivalent of "Jane, you ignorant slut."
  144. # [08:14] <shepazu> oh, is that the context there, timeless?
  145. # [08:14] <timeless> shepazu: i hope so
  146. # [08:14] <timeless> dunno, google doesn't have a perfect record when grabbing images for headlines
  147. # [08:15] <timeless> this is from the front page for news.google.com
  148. # [08:15] <timeless> http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10558656
  149. # [08:15] <timeless> is the link
  150. # [08:15] <timeless> and http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/25/technology/companies/25google.html?ref=business
  151. # [08:15] <timeless> is the primary headline
  152. # [08:15] <timeless> note that MoCo/MoFo actually indicated it wasn't interested
  153. # [08:16] <timeless> at least, the last time i checked
  154. # [08:16] <timeless> yeah, the contet is otherwise correct
  155. # [08:16] * timeless does need ot recheck the mozilla status
  156. # [08:16] <timeless> http://static.arstechnica.com/gorilla_ie.jpg
  157. # [08:16] <timeless> is better art :)
  158. # [08:17] <timeless> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/02/google-joins-the-eus-internet-explorer-smackdown.ars
  159. # [08:18] <timeless> is a much better article
  160. # [08:20] <shepazu> "You make a logical leap here that has no basis." is the new "Jane, you ignorant slut."
  161. # [08:20] <shepazu> I'm going to start prefacing all my emails with that
  162. # [08:21] <shepazu> "Hi, Mom- You make a logical leap here that has no basis. Hope everything is well. Love- -Doug"
  163. # [08:22] <anne> he always makes this broad claims how the other person is ignorant, illogical, etc. and then goes on in non-followable fashion
  164. # [08:22] <shepazu> anne, you make a logical leap here that has no basis.
  165. # [08:22] <shepazu> Get back in the kitchen.
  166. # [08:23] * shepazu notes that this will look funnier in the logs, to people who don't know anne is a boychild
  167. # [08:25] <anne> s/this broad/these broad/
  168. # [08:27] <timeless> should i be glad i don't read this list?
  169. # [08:31] <Hixie> anne: fwiw, with html5, i'd probably not use the suggested document until late in the process, because i find myself tweaking those definitions often
  170. # [08:34] <MikeSmith> could have multiple editors on it, both tweak the same source
  171. # [08:39] <anne> Hixie, the idea is that you won't have to worry about the definitions :)
  172. # [08:40] <Hixie> how would that work?
  173. # [08:40] <Hixie> if i come across some weird behavior that needs some particular definition, it won't just appear in the definitions spec
  174. # [08:41] <anne> true, I was thinking of doing very basic stuff first
  175. # [08:41] <anne> e.g. tree order and ASCII case-insensitive
  176. # [08:54] <Hixie> even things like tree order change sometimes, e.g. "home subtree" and so forth has changed and been tweaked a number of times recently
  177. # [08:55] <anne> k
  178. # [09:07] * Joins: ArtB (5a025589@128.30.52.43)
  179. # [09:14] * Quits: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org) (Quit: Tomorrow to fresh woods, and pastures new.)
  180. # [09:15] * Joins: arve (arve@90.2.85.137)
  181. # [09:36] * Joins: Marcos (Marcos@90.2.85.137)
  182. # [09:42] * Joins: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org)
  183. # [10:03] * Quits: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@mcclure.w3.org) (Quit: Tomorrow to fresh woods, and pastures new.)
  184. # [11:04] * Joins: tlr (tlr@128.30.52.30)
  185. # [11:23] * Parts: anne (annevk@58.1.246.135)
  186. # [11:26] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@85.196.122.246) (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
  187. # [11:47] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22)
  188. # [12:56] * Quits: Marcos (Marcos@90.2.85.137) (Quit: Marcos)
  189. # [13:55] * Joins: Marcos (Marcos@90.2.85.137)
  190. # [13:58] * Quits: ArtB (5a025589@128.30.52.43) (Quit: CGI:IRC (EOF))
  191. # [13:59] * Joins: ArtB (5a025589@128.30.52.43)
  192. # [15:35] * Joins: aroben (aroben@71.58.77.15)
  193. # [16:02] * tlr is now known as tlr-bbiab
  194. # [16:03] * Quits: ArtB (5a025589@128.30.52.43) (Quit: CGI:IRC (Ping timeout))
  195. # [16:21] * Joins: ArtB (5a025589@128.30.52.43)
  196. # [16:24] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22) (Quit: Leaving)
  197. # [16:24] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.247)
  198. # [16:47] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.247) (Ping timeout)
  199. # [16:48] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22)
  200. # [16:48] * tlr-bbiab is now known as tlr
  201. # [17:45] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@213.236.208.22) (Quit: Leaving)
  202. # [17:58] * Quits: smaug (chatzilla@82.181.141.13) (Client exited)
  203. # [18:01] * Joins: smaug (chatzilla@82.181.141.13)
  204. # [18:14] * Quits: ArtB (5a025589@128.30.52.43) (Quit: CGI:IRC (EOF))
  205. # [18:19] * Quits: Marcos (Marcos@90.2.85.137) (Quit: Marcos)
  206. # [18:21] * Quits: arve (arve@90.2.85.137) (Ping timeout)
  207. # [18:29] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@85.196.122.246)
  208. # [18:37] * Joins: arve (arve@82.236.193.123)
  209. # [18:37] * Joins: Marcos (Marcos@82.236.193.123)
  210. # [19:34] * Quits: Marcos (Marcos@82.236.193.123) (Quit: Marcos)
  211. # [19:38] * Quits: arve (arve@82.236.193.123) (Ping timeout)
  212. # [19:52] * Joins: sicking (chatzilla@63.245.220.246)
  213. # [20:12] * Joins: chaals (chaals@213.236.208.22)
  214. # [20:34] <smaug> is there a call today
  215. # [20:38] <shepazu> hi, smaug, that's the plan
  216. # [20:38] <shepazu> waiting for chaals
  217. # [20:38] <smaug> ah,
  218. # [20:38] * Joins: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.30)
  219. # [20:38] * smaug checks if he has skype credits
  220. # [20:38] <shepazu> zakim, start telcon
  221. # [20:38] <Zakim> I don't understand 'start telcon', shepazu
  222. # [20:38] <shepazu> trackbot, start telcon
  223. # [20:38] * trackbot is starting a teleconference
  224. # [20:38] * Joins: RRSAgent (rrs-loggee@128.30.52.30)
  225. # [20:38] <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-webapps-irc
  226. # [20:38] <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
  227. # [20:38] <RRSAgent> I have made the request, trackbot
  228. # [20:38] <trackbot> Zakim, this will be WAPP
  229. # [20:38] <Zakim> I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
  230. # [20:39] <trackbot> Meeting: Web Applications Working Group Teleconference
  231. # [20:39] <trackbot> Date: 25 February 2009
  232. # [20:39] <shepazu> Zakim, this will be DOM3
  233. # [20:39] <Zakim> ok, shepazu, I see IA_WebAPI(DOM3)2:30PM already started
  234. # [20:39] * shepazu zakim, call shepazu
  235. # [20:39] * Zakim ok, shepazu; the call is being made
  236. # [20:39] <Zakim> +Shepazu
  237. # [20:40] <smaug> hmm, couldn't call in
  238. # [20:41] <Zakim> +??P18
  239. # [20:41] <smaug> Zakim, ??P18 is me
  240. # [20:41] <Zakim> +smaug; got it
  241. # [20:41] <chaals> zakim, who is here?
  242. # [20:41] <Zakim> On the phone I see ??P10, Shepazu, smaug
  243. # [20:41] <Zakim> On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, chaals, sicking, Lachy, smaug, aroben, tlr, heycam, shepazu, gsnedders, hober, hendry, gavin, timeless, krijnh, inimino, Dashiva, timelyx, trackbot,
  244. # [20:41] <Zakim> ... phenny, Hixie
  245. # [20:41] <chaals> zakim, ??p10 is me
  246. # [20:41] <Zakim> +chaals; got it
  247. # [20:43] <chaals> Agenda+ load event and what it fires on
  248. # [20:43] * Zakim notes agendum 1 added
  249. # [20:43] <smaug> better to mute myself
  250. # [20:45] <shepazu> ISSUE-44?
  251. # [20:45] * trackbot getting information on ISSUE-44
  252. # [20:45] <trackbot> ISSUE-44 -- Should DOM3 Events cover the interaction of events and the Window object? -- RAISED
  253. # [20:45] <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/44
  254. # [20:46] <chaals> scribe: Chaals
  255. # [20:47] <chaals> Smaug: The thing that Gecko does is very odd, but it because that is what Web pages does
  256. # [20:47] <chaals> DS: That would be HTML - SVG is different
  257. # [20:47] <chaals> Sm: Does SVG have SVGLoad?
  258. # [20:48] <chaals> DS: Proposal, say that a language may/must/? define where a load event is fired
  259. # [20:48] <chaals> Sm: HTML5 does sort of do that already.
  260. # [20:48] <chaals> q+ to ask what happens for a language that *doesn't* specify that?
  261. # [20:48] * Zakim sees chaals on the speaker queue
  262. # [20:49] <chaals> DS: We could point out the two different cases.
  263. # [20:49] <chaals> s/Proposal/Yes, and load that is somewhat overloaded. Proposal/
  264. # [20:49] * chaals finding it hard to hear
  265. # [20:50] <chaals> Sm: Something strange happens - the event is dispatched to the window, not to the target. That is how Gecko works, because when I tried to make it do something more reasonable it broke lots of sites.
  266. # [20:50] <chaals> DS: SO, does the proposal work for you?
  267. # [20:51] <chaals> SM: Yes, makes sense for it to depend on the language
  268. # [20:51] <chaals> DS: So what should we do if I have SVG inside HTML. How should it bubble?
  269. # [20:52] <chaals> Sm: If you get loading for the image it is dispatched to the image in HTML, and goes to document. Doesn't go to the window like all other events.
  270. # [20:52] <chaals> ... load event listeners on window only find the events that are for loading the page
  271. # [20:53] <chaals> ... I think webkit has the same hack
  272. # [20:53] <chaals> ... Opera used to do something different, years ago, not sure now.
  273. # [20:53] <chaals> DS: So if I work out some proposed wording and submit that to the list
  274. # [20:54] <chaals> ACTION: Doug to propose some wording to resolve ISSUE-44 by saying that it depends on the language where the event goes
  275. # [20:54] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
  276. # [20:54] <trackbot> Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - Doug
  277. # [20:54] <trackbot> Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. dstamper, schepers)
  278. # [20:54] * RRSAgent records action 1
  279. # [20:54] <chaals> ACTION: schepers to propose some wording to resolve ISSUE-44 by saying that it depends on the language where the event goes
  280. # [20:54] * trackbot noticed an ACTION. Trying to create it.
  281. # [20:54] * RRSAgent records action 2
  282. # [20:54] <trackbot> Created ACTION-312 - Propose some wording to resolve ISSUE-44 by saying that it depends on the language where the event goes [on Doug Schepers - due 2009-03-04].
  283. # [20:56] <chaals> Adjourned.
  284. # [20:56] <chaals> Proposed topic for next week: Mutation events
  285. # [21:00] <chaals> Sm: Would it make sense to have a small spec for gesture events?
  286. # [21:00] <chaals> DS: Yes. Pen, multi-touch, ...
  287. # [21:01] <Zakim> -smaug
  288. # [21:01] <Zakim> -chaals
  289. # [21:01] <chaals> rrsagent, make minutes member
  290. # [21:01] <RRSAgent> I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes member', chaals. Try /msg RRSAgent help
  291. # [21:01] <Zakim> -Shepazu
  292. # [21:01] <Zakim> IA_WebAPI(DOM3)2:30PM has ended
  293. # [21:01] <Zakim> Attendees were Shepazu, smaug, chaals
  294. # [21:02] <chaals> rrsagent, make log member
  295. # [21:02] <RRSAgent> I have made the request, chaals
  296. # [21:02] <chaals> rrsagent, draft minutes
  297. # [21:02] <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-webapps-minutes.html chaals
  298. # [21:14] <chaals> rrsagent, bye
  299. # [21:14] <RRSAgent> I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-webapps-actions.rdf :
  300. # [21:14] <RRSAgent> ACTION: Doug to propose some wording to resolve ISSUE-44 by saying that it depends on the language where the event goes [1]
  301. # [21:15] <RRSAgent> recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-webapps-irc#T19-51-11
  302. # [21:15] <RRSAgent> ACTION: schepers to propose some wording to resolve ISSUE-44 by saying that it depends on the language where the event goes [2]
  303. # [21:15] <RRSAgent> recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/02/25-webapps-irc#T19-51-19
  304. # [21:15] * Parts: RRSAgent (rrs-loggee@128.30.52.30)
  305. # [21:15] <chaals> zakim, bye
  306. # [21:15] * Parts: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.30)
  307. # [21:18] <gsnedders> And again bots vanish. Have they been murdered!? :o
  308. # [21:23] * Joins: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.30)
  309. # [21:23] <tlr> gah
  310. # [21:23] <tlr> zakim, bye
  311. # [21:24] * Parts: Zakim (rrs-bridgg@128.30.52.30)
  312. # [21:24] * tlr saw gsnedders' remark, thought something was wrong
  313. # [21:24] * tlr had missed chaals's dismissal
  314. # [21:24] * gsnedders notes the safe thing to do around him is to ignore him
  315. # [21:25] * tlr will happily comply
  316. # [22:25] * Quits: heycam (cam@124.168.12.212) (Quit: bye)
  317. # [23:16] * Quits: tlr (tlr@128.30.52.30) (Quit: tlr)
  318. # [23:28] * Joins: heycam (cam@118.138.224.18)
  319. # Session Close: Thu Feb 26 00:00:00 2009

The end :)