/irc-logs / w3c / #webapps / 2011-06-02 / end
Options:
- # Session Start: Thu Jun 02 00:00:00 2011
- # Session Ident: #webapps
- # [00:26] * Joins: Marcos1 (Adium@84.215.169.13)
- # [00:26] * Quits: Marcos (Adium@84.215.169.13) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [00:28] * Quits: smaug (chatzilla@85.78.97.240) (Ping timeout)
- # [00:38] * Joins: Marcos (Adium@84.215.169.13)
- # [00:38] * Quits: Marcos1 (Adium@84.215.169.13) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [00:48] * Joins: Marcos1 (Adium@84.215.169.13)
- # [00:48] * Quits: Marcos (Adium@84.215.169.13) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [01:00] * Joins: homata (homata@58.158.182.50)
- # [01:03] * Joins: rogerk (Adium@96.237.170.36)
- # [01:07] * Joins: dveditz_ (dveditz@63.245.220.240)
- # [01:08] * Quits: dveditz (dveditz@63.245.220.240) (Ping timeout)
- # [01:08] * dveditz_ is now known as dveditz
- # [01:17] * Quits: rogerk (Adium@96.237.170.36) (Quit: Leaving.)
- # [02:15] * Quits: hober (ted@174.143.153.77) (Quit: ERC Version 5.3 (IRC client for Emacs))
- # [02:16] * Joins: hober (ted@125.207.177.35)
- # [02:26] * Quits: sicking (chatzilla@63.245.220.240) (Ping timeout)
- # [02:27] * Joins: sicking (chatzilla@63.245.220.240)
- # [02:30] * Quits: sicking (chatzilla@63.245.220.240) (Ping timeout)
- # [03:22] * heycam is now known as heycam|away
- # [03:51] * Quits: dveditz (dveditz@63.245.220.240) (Quit: dveditz)
- # [04:07] * heycam|away is now known as heycam
- # [04:12] * Joins: MikeSmith_ (MikeSmith@111.188.24.222)
- # [04:14] * Quits: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@1.112.163.236) (Ping timeout)
- # [04:14] * MikeSmith_ is now known as MikeSmith
- # [05:59] * heycam is now known as heycam|away
- # [06:19] * heycam|away is now known as heycam
- # [07:57] * Joins: Marcos (Adium@84.215.169.13)
- # [07:57] * Quits: Marcos1 (Adium@84.215.169.13) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [08:02] * Joins: Marcos1 (Adium@84.215.169.13)
- # [08:02] * Quits: Marcos (Adium@84.215.169.13) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [08:06] * heycam is now known as heycam|away
- # [08:14] * Joins: Marcos (Adium@84.215.169.13)
- # [08:14] * Quits: Marcos1 (Adium@84.215.169.13) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [08:41] * Joins: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@91.181.154.155)
- # [10:14] * Quits: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@111.188.24.222) (Ping timeout)
- # [10:21] * Joins: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@114.48.168.181)
- # [10:42] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.59.50)
- # [11:01] * Quits: hober (ted@125.207.177.35) (Quit: ERC Version 5.3 (IRC client for Emacs))
- # [11:53] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.59.50) (Quit: This computer has gone to sleep)
- # [12:05] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.59.50)
- # [12:10] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.59.50) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [12:10] * Joins: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.59.50)
- # [12:51] * Joins: rogerk (Adium@96.237.170.36)
- # [13:00] * Quits: homata (homata@58.158.182.50) (Quit: Leaving...)
- # [13:45] * Joins: ArtB (ArtB@192.100.124.218)
- # [13:51] * Joins: Martijnc (Martijnc@84.192.44.100)
- # [13:56] * Quits: Lachy (Lachlan@84.215.59.50) (Quit: Leaving)
- # [14:37] * Joins: plh (plh@128.30.52.28)
- # [14:53] * Joins: Ms2ger` (Ms2ger@91.181.49.137)
- # [14:54] * Quits: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@91.181.154.155) (Ping timeout)
- # [14:58] * Ms2ger` is now known as Ms2ger
- # [15:16] <ArtB> Marcos - PLH is interested in the status of the widget specs
- # [15:16] <Marcos> Awesome :)
- # [15:17] <ArtB> He know about the August PR plan for Packaging, Dig Sig, Interface and View-Modes
- # [15:17] <ArtB> and about the Web Storage reference for Widget Interface
- # [15:17] <ArtB> that leaves 3 other widget specs:
- # [15:17] <plh> (and HTML5 and WebIDL references)
- # [15:17] <ArtB> 1. WARP - blocked by a PAG
- # [15:17] <ArtB> 2. Widget URI scheme - Robin was the lead but has stopped work on that spec
- # [15:18] <ArtB> 3. Widget Updates - still a WD
- # [15:18] <ArtB> BTW, WARP is in CR, YOU ARE Scheme is LCWD
- # [15:18] <ArtB> So, Marcos - you have been quite active recently on WARP
- # [15:18] <ArtB> what's your plan there?
- # [15:18] * Marcos feels like he is at a job interview :)
- # [15:19] <Marcos> I am finishing off WARP test suite
- # [15:19] <ArtB> sorry, didn't want t put you on the spot
- # [15:19] <Marcos> np :)
- # [15:19] <ArtB> we are just trying to "set expectations"
- # [15:19] <Marcos> first and trying to get resolution on a few open issues, so we can push WARP to CR
- # [15:19] <plh> it's already in CR...
- # [15:19] <ArtB> and I'll update PubStatus according (http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus#Widget_Specifications)
- # [15:20] <Marcos> plh: it will probably need to go back to LC, and then to CR again or straight to PR… unless we leave the bugs and fix it in a V2
- # [15:21] <plh> what's your timeline to get it ready for PR then?
- # [15:21] <Marcos> we have gathered quite a bit of implementation experience that needs to be folded into the spec… which is what CR is for, right?
- # [15:21] <plh> correct
- # [15:21] <Marcos> Depends on implementations and on the WG reaching an agreement on what we do about the two issues I have raised about the spec
- # [15:22] <ArtB> Marcos, make a clear proposal on how to address the issues
- # [15:22] <ArtB> and I can then followup with something like "if you have any objections to MC's proposal, speak up by MM DD; otherwise the proposal will carry"
- # [15:22] <Marcos> Actually, there are 3 issues.
- # [15:22] * Quits: karl (karlcow@128.30.54.58) (Quit: Freedom - to walk free and own no superior.)
- # [15:23] * Joins: karl (karlcow@128.30.54.58)
- # [15:23] <Marcos> but anyway. I can take those 3 on the list
- # [15:23] <Marcos> with proposals
- # [15:23] <ArtB> cool
- # [15:24] <plh> for URI Scheme and Updates, should we push them as Notes?
- # [15:24] <Marcos> Why would we do that?
- # [15:24] <Marcos> They are good specs
- # [15:25] <plh> because I'm not going to keep those specs in the webapps charter forever
- # [15:25] <plh> they'll be as good as as Notes as they are now
- # [15:25] <Marcos> But they are almost done, and a lot of people are depending on them
- # [15:25] <Marcos> I think the WAC membership would object to such a move
- # [15:25] <plh> so any chance to get RECs for them in the upcoiming months as well?
- # [15:26] <Marcos> sure, that is my goal
- # [15:26] <Marcos> I want to have everything done by Oct, 19th
- # [15:26] <plh> fine then. my goal is to get those out of the way somehow. either as RECs or as Notes.
- # [15:27] <Marcos> Can I ask why there is such a hurry to get them "out of the way"?
- # [15:27] <plh> I won't recharter the webapps group with the widgets specs in
- # [15:27] <ArtB> Marcos, do you know - approximately - when Updates will be ready for LC?
- # [15:27] <plh> we had too much troubles in the past 2 years
- # [15:27] <Marcos> Can you elaborate?
- # [15:28] <Marcos> As editor, and as someone who has been part of the w3c, I don't see anything out of the ordinary with the widget specs and their progress?
- # [15:29] <ArtB> Marcos, I don't think PLH means the widget specs themselves have been problematic
- # [15:29] <plh> we do objections on the current bundling of specs in webapps everytime we recharter the group
- # [15:29] <plh> s//get/
- # [15:30] <ArtB> but rather Webapps' charter discussions related to widgets have resulted in some Members voicing complaints
- # [15:30] <plh> correct
- # [15:30] <plh> we get object on the current scope of webapps everytime we try to recharter the group
- # [15:30] <plh> this prevents us from easily adding new APIs into the group
- # [15:31] <Marcos> plh, are you saying this does not happen for other specifications in other working groups? A few companies being protectionist about their patents should not have widgets kicked out. They knew widgets were here when they joined the WG
- # [15:31] <plh> it doesn't happen in html, css, or svg
- # [15:31] <plh> nor in web perf, geolocation, etc.
- # [15:32] <plh> I understand that Opera likes the status quo, but this has to change
- # [15:32] <Marcos> are you sure?… I know geolocation in not in WebApps for *some* reason
- # [15:33] <plh> sure, like Web Events
- # [15:33] <plh> but geolocation doesn't get in the way of rechartering webapps
- # [15:33] <Marcos> What about Aplix, Samsung, WAC, etc. which all depend on widgets?
- # [15:33] <Marcos> Ok, so we could finish the current specs and move new specs to a new WG?
- # [15:33] <plh> how is it that you're the only editor on those documents if all those companies care so much?
- # [15:34] <plh> Marcos, correct
- # [15:34] <plh> this has been the plan for the past 2 years
- # [15:34] <Marcos> You read my specs? i'm a pretty good editor
- # [15:34] <plh> but you have limited time :)
- # [15:34] <Marcos> And don't forget Robin also edited widget specs.
- # [15:35] <plh> but he stopped
- # [15:35] <Marcos> Not at the moment. I have 6 months to work on this full time. He didn't stop by choice. He is a contractor and gets assigned to work stuff… not by choice
- # [15:35] <gsnedders> plh: How is it that Hixie is the only editor on HTML5 despite quite obviously a lot of companies caring a lot?
- # [15:35] <gsnedders> (It's not just market interest that dictates number of editors.)
- # [15:36] <plh> I'm not complaining about having one editor, I'm complaining about companies who have significant interest in specs but are not willing to dedicate the resources
- # [15:37] <Marcos> It's hard to edit specs, let alone find people who have the skills required to do it.
- # [15:37] <Marcos> You can't just assign resources … it takes a lot of experience
- # [15:38] <plh> I agree, but if we can't find resources, they shouldn't be surprised if the work doesn't happen
- # [15:38] <Marcos> Anyway, we are getting into a philosophical debate
- # [15:38] <plh> indeed :)
- # [15:39] <Marcos> So, you are happy for me to finish by Oct, right?
- # [15:39] <plh> more than happy
- # [15:39] <ArtB> Delighted Marcos!
- # [15:39] <Marcos> But in return, you have to sort the WARP PAG
- # [15:39] <plh> that's deal :)
- # [15:39] <ArtB> that's your action PLH ;)
- # [15:39] <plh> s/deal/a deal/
- # [15:40] <Marcos> Awesome
- # [15:41] <Marcos> plh: what else do you need from me? do you have all the information you need?
- # [15:42] <plh> nope, I believe I'm all set
- # [15:42] <plh> thank you!
- # [15:42] <Marcos> plh: what do we do to move new specs to a new WG?
- # [15:42] <ArtB> Marcos - coming back to Widget Updates - what's the general plan there?
- # [15:43] <plh> re new WG, Matt Womer is looking into that
- # [15:43] <Marcos> Re: updates, just edit it, fix up the test suite, and publish it
- # [15:43] <Marcos> about 1 month of work
- # [15:44] <ArtB> so an LC for Updates in July?
- # [15:44] <Marcos> it's certainly possible
- # [15:45] <ArtB> ok; thanks
- # [15:45] <ArtB> Marcos - WebApps still has the so-called Widget Embedding deliverable in its charter
- # [15:46] <Marcos> right, need to think about that one
- # [15:47] * Joins: davidb (davidb@66.207.206.180)
- # [15:47] * Joins: hendry (hendry@212.13.195.83)
- # [15:49] <Marcos> ArtB: ping me if you need anything else
- # [16:03] <plh> ArtB, btw, Doug is somewhere between his wedding and his honeymoon this week
- # [16:03] <plh> so don't be surprised if he is not responsive
- # [16:03] * Quits: karl (karlcow@128.30.54.58) (Quit: Freedom - to walk free and own no superior.)
- # [16:13] * Joins: MikeSmith_ (MikeSmith@114.49.128.6)
- # [16:15] * Quits: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@114.48.168.181) (Ping timeout)
- # [16:15] * MikeSmith_ is now known as MikeSmith
- # [16:18] <ArtB> how dare him prioritize his personal life over WebApps; what a slacker ;)
- # [16:52] * Quits: rogerk (Adium@96.237.170.36) (Ping timeout)
- # [16:53] <Ms2ger> ArtB, shouldn't have let him marry
- # [16:55] <plh> I tried but he never listen to me anyway
- # [17:36] * Joins: Marcos1 (Adium@84.215.169.13)
- # [17:36] * Quits: Marcos (Adium@84.215.169.13) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [17:46] * Joins: smaug (chatzilla@82.181.139.127)
- # [18:08] * Joins: Marcos (Adium@84.215.169.13)
- # [18:08] * Quits: Marcos1 (Adium@84.215.169.13) (Connection reset by peer)
- # [18:30] * Joins: rogerk (Adium@96.237.170.36)
- # [18:37] * Joins: dveditz (dveditz@63.249.106.47)
- # [19:04] * Joins: sicking (chatzilla@63.245.220.240)
- # [19:42] * Quits: sicking (chatzilla@63.245.220.240) (Client exited)
- # [19:42] * Joins: sicking (chatzilla@63.245.220.240)
- # [19:47] * Joins: konaya (konaya@83.251.16.72)
- # [20:15] * Quits: dveditz (dveditz@63.249.106.47) (Client exited)
- # [20:15] * Joins: dveditz (dveditz@63.249.106.47)
- # [20:17] * Quits: smaug (chatzilla@82.181.139.127) (Ping timeout)
- # [20:23] * Joins: dveditz_ (dveditz@63.249.106.47)
- # [20:26] * Quits: dveditz (dveditz@63.249.106.47) (Ping timeout)
- # [20:26] * dveditz_ is now known as dveditz
- # [20:55] * Parts: Marcos (Adium@84.215.169.13)
- # [21:29] * Joins: smaug (chatzilla@82.181.139.127)
- # [21:36] * Quits: Ms2ger (Ms2ger@91.181.49.137) (Quit: nn)
- # [21:53] * heycam|away is now known as heycam
- # [22:13] * Joins: MikeSmith_ (MikeSmith@111.188.52.81)
- # [22:15] * Quits: MikeSmith (MikeSmith@114.49.128.6) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:15] * MikeSmith_ is now known as MikeSmith
- # [22:18] * Quits: ArtB (ArtB@192.100.124.218) (Quit: Leaving.)
- # [22:21] * Quits: davidb (davidb@66.207.206.180) (Quit: davidb)
- # [22:28] * Quits: smaug (chatzilla@82.181.139.127) (Ping timeout)
- # [22:50] * Quits: Martijnc (Martijnc@84.192.44.100) (Quit: Martijnc)
- # [23:11] * Joins: smaug (chatzilla@85.78.57.147)
- # [23:16] * Quits: plh (plh@128.30.52.28) (Client exited)
- # [23:44] * Quits: guignome (guignome@129.6.58.226) (Quit: guignome)
- # [23:49] * Quits: smaug (chatzilla@85.78.57.147) (Ping timeout)
- # Session Close: Fri Jun 03 00:00:00 2011
The end :)