Options:
- # Session Start: Fri Apr 13 00:00:00 2007
- # Session Ident: #whatwg
- # [00:01] <zcorpan_> should i respond to henrik's last email?
- # [00:02] <zcorpan_> too late
- # [00:02] <zcorpan_> although i could be more specific
- # [00:02] <hsivonen> zcorpan_: kingryan didn't mention the charter
- # [00:02] * Joins: karlUshi (n=karl@124-144-94-185.rev.home.ne.jp)
- # [00:02] <zcorpan_> indeed
- # [00:03] * kingryan is lost
- # [00:03] <kingryan> are you talking about my email re: implementors vs. authors?
- # [00:04] <zcorpan_> no
- # [00:04] <zcorpan_> version information
- # [00:04] <kingryan> ah, yes
- # [00:04] <kingryan> I should have mentioned that too
- # [00:09] * Joins: aroben_ (i=adamrobe@nat/apple/x-ccb7aa27be58527e)
- # [00:11] * moeffju[afk] is now known as moeffju
- # [00:13] * Quits: MikeSmith (i=mike@tea09.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp) ("Get thee behind me, satan.")
- # [00:17] * othermaciej is now known as om_meet
- # [00:26] * Quits: aroben (i=adamrobe@nat/apple/x-a2ecccc2568e3534) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [00:29] * Joins: KevinMarks (i=KevinMar@nat/google/x-f411ee104a73efe8)
- # [00:43] * Joins: MikeSmith (i=mike@tea09.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp)
- # [01:11] * Joins: tantek (n=tantek@pool-71-105-209-8.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net)
- # [01:18] * om_meet is now known as othermaciej
- # [01:33] * Quits: Toolskyn (n=toolskyn@adsl-dc-266ef.adsl.wanadoo.nl) (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer))
- # [01:39] * Parts: hasather (n=hasather@81-235-209-174-no62.tbcn.telia.com)
- # [01:44] * Quits: Philip` (n=excors@zaynar.demon.co.uk)
- # [01:52] * Quits: Voluminous (n=Volumino@unaffiliated/voluminous) ("Leaving")
- # [01:53] * Parts: jdandrea_ (n=jdandrea@ool-44c0a58f.dyn.optonline.net)
- # [01:54] * Joins: jdandrea_ (n=jdandrea@ool-44c0a58f.dyn.optonline.net)
- # [01:57] * jdandrea_ is now known as jdandrea
- # [02:04] * jdandrea is now known as jdandrea_
- # [02:06] * jdandrea_ is now known as jdandrea
- # [02:08] * Quits: webben (n=benjamin@82.152.236.225) ("Leaving")
- # [02:35] * Quits: afewbriefmoments (i=Brian@brown.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [02:36] * Joins: afewbriefmoments (i=Brian@brown.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu)
- # [02:45] * Joins: marcosc (n=chatzill@131.181.148.226)
- # [02:48] * Quits: kingryan (n=kingryan@dsl092-187-033.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net)
- # [02:51] * Quits: marcosc (n=chatzill@131.181.148.226) ("...and I'm gone.")
- # [02:52] * Joins: marcosc (n=chatzill@131.181.148.226)
- # [02:57] * Quits: SimonW (n=simon@dyn-62-56-110-65.dslaccess.co.uk)
- # [03:02] * Quits: tantek (n=tantek@pool-71-105-209-8.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net)
- # [03:03] * Parts: zcorpan_ (n=zcorpan@84-216-43-114.sprayadsl.telenor.se)
- # [03:09] * Quits: othermaciej (i=mjs@nat/apple/x-f752f677a52cd887)
- # [03:28] * Quits: KevinMarks (i=KevinMar@nat/google/x-f411ee104a73efe8) ("The computer fell asleep")
- # [03:40] * Joins: ericcarlson (n=ericcarl@adsl-67-115-144-162.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
- # [03:50] * Quits: weinig (n=weinig@odin.landmark.edu) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [03:56] * Quits: ericcarlson (n=ericcarl@adsl-67-115-144-162.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net) (Remote closed the connection)
- # [03:56] * Joins: ericcarlson (n=ericcarl@adsl-67-115-144-162.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
- # [04:02] * Quits: jdandrea (n=jdandrea@ool-44c0a58f.dyn.optonline.net)
- # [04:08] * moeffju is now known as moeffju[ZzZz]
- # [04:24] <Hixie> so...
- # [04:24] <Hixie> there's a problem with the spec splitter script
- # [04:24] <Hixie> it causes me to hit my CPU limit.
- # [04:24] <Hixie> I've tried 'nice'ing it but that doesn't help
- # [04:25] * Joins: tantek (n=tantek@pool-71-105-209-8.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net)
- # [04:25] * Joins: htmlr (n=cjb@203-206-237-84.dyn.iinet.net.au)
- # [04:39] * Quits: bzed (n=bzed@dslb-084-059-099-095.pools.arcor-ip.net) ("Leaving")
- # [04:46] * Quits: MikeSmith (i=mike@tea09.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp) ("Get thee behind me, satan.")
- # [04:47] <mpt_> Hixie, that's easy to solve, just shorten the spec
- # [04:48] * mpt_ ducks
- # [04:56] * Lachy_ is now known as Lachy
- # [05:02] <Lachy> are there any comments in that slashdot article that actually respond to the issue? So far, all comments I've read are mostly off topic talk about stylesheet issues
- # [05:05] <mpt_> Not that I could see (but then, I browse at ≥3, so maybe the moderators weren't interested in on-topic discussion)
- # [05:07] <Lachy> I leave all comments visible. I find it annoying reading comments that respond to others that aren't shown
- # [05:07] <Lachy> and I don't particularly trust people I don't know to be able to choose what I should and shouldn't read
- # [05:07] <mpt_> It's great that you have that much time to read :-)
- # [05:08] <Lachy> ah, the benefits of being unemployed :-)
- # [05:09] <mpt_> You are, largely, trusting people you don't know to choose what you should and shouldn't read every time you do a Web search and don't go beyond the first page of results
- # [05:10] <Lachy> I often go beyond the first results page if I don't find what I want
- # [05:19] * Quits: htmlr (n=cjb@203-206-237-84.dyn.iinet.net.au)
- # [05:45] * Joins: weinig (n=weinig@odin.landmark.edu)
- # [05:57] * Quits: ericcarlson (n=ericcarl@adsl-67-115-144-162.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
- # [06:08] * Quits: tantek (n=tantek@pool-71-105-209-8.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net)
- # [06:19] * aroben_ is now known as aroben
- # [06:24] * Quits: mw22 (n=chatzill@guest-228.mountainview.mozilla.com) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [06:30] <Hixie> mpt_: not clear what I should drop that would make it shorter enough. The script that's failing is the one that MAKES it shorter :-P
- # [06:35] * Joins: KevinMarks (n=Snak@h-68-164-93-9.snvacaid.dynamic.covad.net)
- # [06:55] * Joins: aroben_ (i=adamrobe@nat/apple/x-8dec64ee20f0e3bb)
- # [06:56] * Quits: aroben (i=adamrobe@nat/apple/x-ccb7aa27be58527e) (Read error: 104 (Connection reset by peer))
- # [06:56] * Joins: aroben (i=adamrobe@nat/apple/x-a3d08fce15fbf19b)
- # [07:07] * Joins: html6 (n=html60@82.209.238.118)
- # [07:13] * Quits: aroben_ (i=adamrobe@nat/apple/x-8dec64ee20f0e3bb) (Connection timed out)
- # [07:33] * Quits: csarven (n=nevrasc@modemcable081.152-201-24.mc.videotron.ca)
- # [08:16] * Joins: othermaciej (n=mjs@dsl081-048-145.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net)
- # [08:24] * Joins: annevk (n=annevk@5352CE6F.cable.casema.nl)
- # [08:24] * Joins: Charl (n=charlvn@net-153-111.mweb.co.za)
- # [08:25] <annevk> Everyone should agree on this by now. Versioning debates are awesome!
- # [08:27] <othermaciej> I'm going to have to make my own entry in the versioning debate, I fear
- # [08:29] <annevk> The browsing sniffing from authors is a major pain though.
- # [08:30] <othermaciej> I do think what cwilso is asking for is not only a bad idea but also kind of insulting to the working group
- # [08:30] <othermaciej> "we won't ever conform to the spec because at some point we will freeze bugs, please change the spec to make it easier for us to not conform"
- # [08:30] <annevk> If a site uses features browser A and B equally support they can still render it differently because the author is uninformed
- # [08:31] <Lachy> Chris' fallicious arguments are starting to get annoying
- # [08:32] <annevk> (Because the site uses feature detection with a feature outside of the compatible rangebetween A and B.)
- # [08:32] <annevk> othermaciej, yeah, that's not very clear to me either. If they completely implement HTML5, there's no need for versioning in HTML6...
- # [08:33] <othermaciej> Chris has pretty much said they will never support it: "- support <!DOCTYPE html> as always-the-latest-version,
- # [08:33] <othermaciej> Not once it's widely used, as we will break back-compat."
- # [08:35] * Joins: mpt__ (n=mpt@canonical/launchpad/mpt)
- # [08:36] <annevk> Yeah, I didn't get that statement
- # [08:36] <Lachy> I wish Chris would join us in here or #html-wg
- # [08:39] <annevk> did David P. try to beat cwilso in the longest e-mail match?
- # [08:39] * annevk quit reading it
- # [08:41] <othermaciej> I find it funny that he says no changes are acceptable for current content, but any IE changes to HTML5 support will be acceptable so long as less than 0.5% of the web uses that doctype
- # [08:41] <othermaciej> so which is it, absolutely 0, or up to 0.5%?
- # [08:41] * Quits: mpt_ (n=mpt@canonical/launchpad/mpt) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [08:41] <othermaciej> because I think "breaks less than 0.5% of sites" would be a fine threshold for anything in HTML5
- # [08:41] <othermaciej> perhaps even too lenient
- # [08:42] <annevk> if done incrementally we could fix the web :)
- # [09:11] <annevk> That people still believed HTML5 was based on SGML
- # [09:11] <annevk> How about reading what type of effort you join...
- # [09:13] <hsivonen> annevk: I guess having Web Apps 1.0 and Patent Law for Dummies as required reading is too ambitious if people don't read the Charter, which is required reading that everyone had to affirmatively claim to have read
- # [09:13] <othermaciej> We need a FAQ
- # [09:13] <othermaciej> people won't read that either but at least you can point them to it
- # [09:16] <othermaciej> I may have to write an essay of my own to properly reply to Chris
- # [09:18] <Lachy> othermaciej, what questions would you like me to add to the WHATWG FAQ to deal with these issues?
- # [09:18] <KevinMarks> he basically syas people serve specific things to fucked up ie versions
- # [09:18] <annevk> Q: Am I an idiot?
- # [09:18] <annevk> A: Most likely.
- # [09:19] <othermaciej> Lachy: I guess one about the format not being based on SGML, and maybe one about the reasoning behind the doctype
- # [09:20] <KevinMarks> so, how about an ie version tag with a range
- # [09:20] <KevinMarks> and he can commit to which version he'll fix it in
- # [09:20] <Lachy> othermaciej, we already have those questions
- # [09:21] <Lachy> but they could be improved
- # [09:22] <othermaciej> Lachy: then I just need to read the FAQ so I know when to point people to it :-)
- # [09:22] <Lachy> http://blog.whatwg.org/faq/#doctype
- # [09:35] * Joins: htmlr (n=cjb@203-206-237-84.dyn.iinet.net.au)
- # [09:42] * Joins: met_ (n=Martin@b14-4.vscht.cz)
- # [09:47] * Quits: othermaciej (n=mjs@dsl081-048-145.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net) (Remote closed the connection)
- # [09:48] * Joins: othermaciej (n=mjs@dsl081-048-145.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net)
- # [09:55] * Quits: virtuelv (n=virtuelv@pat-tdc.opera.com) ("Leaving")
- # [10:03] * Joins: ROBOd (n=robod@86.34.246.154)
- # [10:06] * Quits: aroben (i=adamrobe@nat/apple/x-a3d08fce15fbf19b) (Read error: 54 (Connection reset by peer))
- # [10:08] * Joins: virtuelv (n=virtuelv@pat-tdc.opera.com)
- # [10:11] * Joins: aroben (i=adamrobe@nat/apple/x-bafe8d01b0355a09)
- # [10:12] * Parts: aroben (i=adamrobe@nat/apple/x-bafe8d01b0355a09)
- # [10:26] * Joins: hasather (n=hasather@81-235-209-174-no62.tbcn.telia.com)
- # [10:38] * Joins: krijnh2 (n=krijnhoe@ktk.xs4all.nl)
- # [10:38] * Parts: krijnh2 (n=krijnhoe@ktk.xs4all.nl)
- # [10:47] <krijnhoetmer> Lachy: http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/latest/
- # [10:48] <hasather> krijnhoetmer: great, thanks for that
- # [10:48] <krijnhoetmer> hasather: np
- # [10:52] <krijnhoetmer> More ideas?
- # [10:53] <met_> http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/ sould redirect to latest ?
- # [10:53] <met_> and not to the index
- # [10:53] <krijnhoetmer> Doh
- # [10:53] <krijnhoetmer> :)
- # [10:55] <krijnhoetmer> met_: Done
- # [10:55] <met_> thx
- # [10:55] <met_> and same for http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/ ?
- # [10:56] <met_> 8-)
- # [10:56] <krijnhoetmer> I did
- # [10:56] <met_> not workfor me
- # [10:56] <met_> http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/ still redirect to index
- # [10:56] <krijnhoetmer> Lies!
- # [10:56] <krijnhoetmer> :(
- # [10:57] <met_> sorry, but till 8-(
- # [10:57] <met_> now, the change
- # [10:57] <met_> ok mabe it was some cache
- # [10:58] <met_> ff cache, in IE it redirect thx and sorry for confusion 8-)
- # [10:58] * Joins: bzed (n=bzed@dslb-084-059-112-037.pools.arcor-ip.net)
- # [10:58] <krijnhoetmer> Yeah, Fx sucks
- # [10:58] <krijnhoetmer> *runs*
- # [10:58] * krijnhoetmer is going to erase that line from the logs :P
- # [10:59] * met_ used to do ff propaganda in czech republic
- # [10:59] <krijnhoetmer> I hope you used 'Fx' for that propaganda then? ;)
- # [10:59] * met_ sometime agree, but only sometime
- # [10:59] <krijnhoetmer> http://www.mozilla.org/support/firefox/faq.html#spell-abbreviate
- # [11:01] * met_ will prefers ff for the end of his life
- # [11:06] * Quits: Charl (n=charlvn@net-153-111.mweb.co.za) ("Leaving")
- # [11:16] * othermaciej is now known as om_sleep
- # [11:26] * Joins: ROBOd2 (n=robod@86.34.246.154)
- # [11:28] * Joins: mpt_ (n=mpt@canonical/launchpad/mpt)
- # [11:28] * Quits: ROBOd (n=robod@86.34.246.154) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [11:30] * Joins: Toolskyn (n=toolskyn@adsl-dc-266ef.adsl.wanadoo.nl)
- # [11:33] * Quits: mpt__ (n=mpt@canonical/launchpad/mpt) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [11:43] * Joins: zcorpan_ (n=zcorpan@84-216-42-156.sprayadsl.telenor.se)
- # [11:46] * moeffju[ZzZz] is now known as moeffju
- # [12:11] * Quits: Yudai (n=Yudai@p931d95.tokyte00.ap.so-net.ne.jp) ("SIGTERM received; exit")
- # [12:11] * Joins: Yudai (n=Yudai@p931d95.tokyte00.ap.so-net.ne.jp)
- # [12:21] <Lachy> krijnhoetmer, that FAQ entry is poor. FF is the most commonly used abbreviation, although FX does get used in SFX for SpreadFirefox
- # [12:22] <Lachy> although it's correcrt about not calling it FireFox - that just annoys me everytime I see it
- # [12:23] <html6> don't read, test sentance
- # [12:24] <Lachy> oops, sorry, I read the sentence and now it's too late :-(
- # [12:25] <zcorpan_> Lachy: "fx" or "Fx" is the preferred abbreviation according to Mozilla's FAQ
- # [12:26] <Lachy> yeah, like I said, that's wrong
- # [12:26] <Lachy> it's always been FF for as long as I've known it
- # [12:29] <Toolskyn> Lachy, as far as I know Mozilla made that FAQ entry as soon as the name Firefox was introduced, so how can it be wrong? ;)
- # [12:30] <zcorpan_> yeah, people naturally abbreviate it to FF, i don't know why the moz guys don't take a step back and say that it is ok
- # [12:41] * Joins: wobble- (n=hkmoen@pat-tdc.opera.com)
- # [12:42] * wobble- is now known as haavard-
- # [12:49] * Parts: karlUshi (n=karl@124-144-94-185.rev.home.ne.jp) ("Leaving")
- # [12:56] * Joins: jdandrea (n=jdandrea@ool-44c0a58f.dyn.optonline.net)
- # [12:56] * Quits: jdandrea (n=jdandrea@ool-44c0a58f.dyn.optonline.net) (Client Quit)
- # [12:57] * Joins: jdandrea (n=jdandrea@ool-44c0a58f.dyn.optonline.net)
- # [14:02] <krijnhoetmer> Lachy: Ah, okay :)
- # [14:03] * krijnhoetmer is now known as krijnh
- # [14:05] * Quits: htmlr (n=cjb@203-206-237-84.dyn.iinet.net.au)
- # [14:26] * Joins: csarven (n=nevrasc@modemcable081.152-201-24.mc.videotron.ca)
- # [14:39] * Joins: Ian_ (n=chatzill@ACD44B6A.ipt.aol.com)
- # [14:40] <Ian_> may i ask why you so choose HTML4 rather than XHTML1.1 to base your new idea on?
- # [14:42] <Lachy> XHTML 1.1 is a useless spec
- # [14:43] <virtuelv> worse than useless, in fact
- # [14:43] <Lachy> HTML4 is also useless, but still much closer to reality
- # [14:44] <Ian_> see, i think XHTML is quite good. For one thing it encourages that the webpage should centralise around content, and the CSS style sheet around styling.Rather useful for low-capacity low-bandwidth devices such as mobiles to just get the data.
- # [14:45] <Lachy> that's the zeldman myth, it's not true
- # [14:45] <Lachy> XHTML1 was just a reformulation of HTML4 as XML
- # [14:45] <Lachy> the semantics are idenitical
- # [14:45] <Ian_> well - i certainly think style stuff should not be in HTML tags but in style sheets
- # [14:46] <virtuelv> Ian_: there's _nothing_ preventing you from doing that to HTML4
- # [14:46] <Lachy> it does not encourage the separation of content and presentation any more or less than HTML does.
- # [14:46] <Ian_> and what is so bad with XML?
- # [14:46] <virtuelv> or WA1.0
- # [14:46] <Lachy> it's just a different syntax for the same vocabulary
- # [14:47] <Ian_> well - will this HTML5 idea remove things such as td height and width and leave that to style sheets
- # [14:47] <virtuelv> Ian_: what's so bad about sending user content as XML? read http://annevankesteren.nl/2005/11/draconian
- # [14:47] <Lachy> Ian_, HTML5 defines 2 serialisations: One HTML and one XML
- # [14:47] <Lachy> so there is both HTML5 and XHTML5
- # [14:47] <Lachy> both are the same langauage, just different syntaxes
- # [14:48] <Ian_> okay
- # [14:49] <Ian_> it is just the styling element which concerns me
- # [14:49] <annevk> hey, a non-Hixie Ian
- # [14:49] <jdandrea> :)
- # [14:50] <Ian_> *)
- # [14:50] <Ian_> * 8)
- # [14:50] <annevk> FWIW: HTML5 is also based on XHTML 1.1
- # [14:50] <Ian_> okay
- # [14:50] <Ian_> i should really look into some of the height, width and align etc tags to see if they remain - that would just be annoying :p
- # [14:50] <annevk> Ian_, http://simon.html5.org/html5-elements should give you an idea of what elements and attributes HTML5 will have
- # [14:51] <Ian_> thanks
- # [14:51] <Ian_> may i ask, i dont see it there, but will he style="" tag remain?
- # [14:52] <Lachy> hopefully not
- # [14:52] <zcorpan_> Ian_: that's not resolved yet. currently only <font style> is allowed by wysiwyg
- # [14:52] <Lachy> though, it will be defined, I hope it will remain non-conforming
- # [14:52] <annevk> Ian_, it's likely that the attribute will be added back, yes
- # [14:53] <Lachy> though, I think it's better than the alternative of <font style>
- # [14:53] <hasather> Lachy: agreed
- # [14:53] <annevk> Ian_, http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Changes_from_HTML4 lists some changes from HTML4
- # [14:53] <annevk> Ian_, most of them, I think
- # [14:53] <Ian_> <font> is evil
- # [14:53] <annevk> <font> is the only thing that makes sense for WYSIWYG editors
- # [14:54] <Ian_> guess you should tell WYSIWYG editors to update themselves if they want to use HTML5
- # [14:54] <Ian_> oh - scraping <br/> for the plain <br>
- # [14:55] <annevk> Ian_, <br/> is allowed
- # [14:55] <Lachy> does anyone know if javascript: URIs have ever been formally defined in any spec?
- # [14:55] <Ian_> hmm - i dont like the idea of a double standard
- # [14:55] * annevk doesn't think syntax is worthy of much discussion though
- # [14:56] <Ian_> i think i may be much more constructive if i actuctly contributed to discussions :P
- # [14:56] <zcorpan_> Lachy: i think there's an rfc or i-d for it
- # [14:56] <Lachy> HTML5 has a reference to [JSURI], but there's no references in the spec yet
- # [14:56] <annevk> Ian_, specifically, the trailing slash is allowed as a symbol of faith
- # [14:56] <annevk> Ian_, or something in that direction, for people who believe in that sort of thing :)
- # [14:56] <Ian_> yey - all hail />
- # [14:56] <Lachy> it's not listed here http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html
- # [14:57] <zcorpan_> Lachy: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hoehrmann-javascript-scheme-00.txt
- # [14:58] <Lachy> awesome!
- # [14:58] <jdandrea> And on my birthday no less. :)
- # [14:59] <jdandrea> This post appears to have predated the Hoehrmann draft too: Lachy: See also - http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/discuss/current/msg00330.html
- # [14:59] <Ian_> http://www.w3.org/Help/Account/Request/Public - hmm , i never give my phone number online- no need to give it
- # [15:00] <annevk> i don't think it will be shown to non members
- # [15:00] <annevk> then again...
- # [15:00] <Lachy> jdandrea, I already found that email thread when I searched :-)
- # [15:00] <jdandrea> Lachy: Ahh, got it.
- # [15:01] <Ian_> ok - i will poke around on the site a bit
- # [15:01] <Ian_> cya
- # [15:01] * Quits: gsnedders (n=gsnedder@host86-139-123-225.range86-139.btcentralplus.com)
- # [15:02] * Quits: Ian_ (n=chatzill@ACD44B6A.ipt.aol.com) ("ChatZilla 0.9.78.1 [Firefox 2.0.0.3/2007030919]")
- # [15:17] <Lachy> html6, I have no idea what you were trying to say in this email http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Apr/0694.html
- # [15:17] * Joins: gsnedders (n=gsnedder@host86-139-123-225.range86-139.btcentralplus.com)
- # [15:18] <Lachy> is anyone else able to comprehend it?
- # [15:19] <jdandrea> Lachy: I think it refers to wildcarding.
- # [15:19] <Lachy> wild carding in the browsers address bar? What for?
- # [15:19] <jdandrea> :)
- # [15:20] <jdandrea> To get a list of matching, previously visited links. (As Laurens replies, not something for an HTML spec.)
- # [15:21] <annevk> I think it's a feature request
- # [15:21] <annevk> for the UI of web browsers
- # [15:21] <Lachy> I realise that from reading the replies to it, but I don't understand what the feature request actually is
- # [15:21] * jdandrea nods
- # [15:21] <Lachy> oh, like a histroy search feature
- # [15:22] * jdandrea nods again
- # [15:35] <Lachy> oh my gosh, does anyone know what a "tag PACK" is? - another one of Dmitry Turin's emails.
- # [15:40] <jdandrea> Lachy: I'm reading the msg it supposedly replies to ... and - this is just a wild guess - I'm wondering if it refers to a related set of elements (table, thead, tfoot, et. al.) ???
- # [15:41] <Lachy> I'll reply and ask him.
- # [15:42] <jdandrea> Lachy: A ha! Don't know if you've seen this yet, but: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Apr/0520.html
- # [15:42] <jdandrea> See <pack host="id1"> ...
- # [15:42] <jdandrea> It's literally a pack element.
- # [15:44] <Lachy> Do you think it would be rude if I suggested that he seek assistence from someone who is more fluent in english than he is?
- # [15:45] <Lachy> I still have no idea what a pack element is supposed to be
- # [15:46] <jdandrea> Neither do I. host .. ? Hmm.
- # [15:47] <annevk> i believe it's declaritive drawing with HTML
- # [15:47] <annevk> similar to the <line> proposal
- # [15:47] <Lachy> oh well, I'm going to add him to my growing list of people to ignore
- # [15:48] <Lachy> currently up to 3 people, I think
- # [15:48] <annevk> the problem with that is that some ideas might be good
- # [15:50] <Lachy> I'll skim the messages. If I can comprehend anything that's worthwhile, then I'll see it, but I'm not going to spend time trying to interpret any more
- # [15:50] * Joins: rourke (i=seb@84.5.100.41)
- # [15:51] * annevk has 95 draft messages from started replies that never have been sent
- # [15:51] <Lachy> though, I've seen the ideas on his website. I doubt there will be any that are worthwhile
- # [15:51] <Lachy> wow!
- # [15:51] <Lachy> how long have those drafts been building up?
- # [15:51] <annevk> accumulated over some time
- # [15:51] <annevk> i won't be sending them btw
- # [15:52] <annevk> more things I can simply answer an then realize that someone else will probably do that
- # [15:52] <annevk> so I won't bother
- # [15:53] <Lachy> I have 6 in my drafts. 1 for whatwg, 1 for www-tag, 1 for Mike Schinkel (probably won't send) and one I'm writing now for public-html, and one personal
- # [15:53] <Lachy> s/6/5/
- # [16:02] * Quits: rourke (i=seb@84.5.100.41) ("Quitte")
- # [16:10] <annevk> see, jgraham just answered the e-mail I had a draft for
- # [16:10] <annevk> and better than my one liner
- # [16:11] * annevk had something like "Take it up with your browser vendor. No need for interoperability on UI features."
- # [16:12] * Joins: hendry (n=hendry@91.84.53.136)
- # [16:12] <Lachy> I was drafting a reply to that one too :-)
- # [16:13] <annevk> anyway, time to move places
- # [16:13] <annevk> s/places/somewhere else/
- # [16:13] <Lachy> http://webstandardsgroup.org/features/lachlan-hunt.cfm is published!
- # [16:14] <jdandrea> Congrats! Reading.
- # [16:31] <krijnh> "I’ve heard rumours that you were once fired from a job for refusing to top post." - priceless :p
- # [16:31] * Quits: annevk (n=annevk@5352CE6F.cable.casema.nl) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [16:32] * Joins: met__ (n=Martin@b14-4.vscht.cz)
- # [16:34] * Joins: met___ (n=Martin@b14-4.vscht.cz)
- # [16:39] <Lachy> yeah, it seems companies just can't stop thinking up pathetic reasons to fire me
- # [16:40] <krijnh> I got fired once, because I didn't want to wear a tie
- # [16:40] <krijnh> (and because I made fun of my boss, that as well)
- # [16:41] * Quits: met_ (n=Martin@b14-4.vscht.cz) (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out))
- # [16:41] <Lachy> I got fired for: 1. Refusing to to replace all & with & in an XHTML document (even though it was text/html) and then publicly call my boss a moron
- # [16:41] <Lachy> 2. Refusig to top post
- # [16:42] <Lachy> 3. Not having any skills with Flash
- # [16:42] <jdandrea> Lachy: They wanted you to REPLACE & with &?
- # [16:42] <Lachy> yes!
- # [16:42] * jdandrea shakes head
- # [16:42] <krijnh> Why would they want that?
- # [16:43] <Lachy> I had to remove the blog entry about it cause they threatened legal action and I couldn't be bothered fight it on free speech grounds
- # [16:44] <Lachy> but the reason was that on my boss' computer, an image was failing to load and he assumed that the cause was the use of & in the query string
- # [16:44] <Lachy> despite the fact that it worked on every other comptuer I tested
- # [16:46] * Parts: html6 (n=html60@82.209.238.118)
- # [16:47] <krijnh> Silly boss
- # [16:52] * Quits: met__ (n=Martin@b14-4.vscht.cz) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [16:55] * Quits: met___ (n=Martin@b14-4.vscht.cz) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [18:00] * Joins: met_ (n=Hassman@r5bx220.net.upc.cz)
- # [18:04] * Joins: hober (n=ted@unaffiliated/hober)
- # [18:09] * Quits: Yudai (n=Yudai@p931d95.tokyte00.ap.so-net.ne.jp) ("SIGTERM received; exit")
- # [18:09] * Joins: Yudai (n=Yudai@p931d95.tokyte00.ap.so-net.ne.jp)
- # [18:28] * Quits: AlexLatchford (n=alex@82-44-193-109.cable.ubr07.haye.blueyonder.co.uk) ("Ex-Chat")
- # [18:47] * Quits: psa2 (n=yomode@posom.com) (Remote closed the connection)
- # [18:57] * Joins: mw22 (n=chatzill@guest-228.mountainview.mozilla.com)
- # [19:19] * Joins: psa (n=yomode@posom.com)
- # [19:23] * Joins: Yen` (n=Yen@d54C0549D.access.telenet.be)
- # [19:29] * Joins: kingryan (n=kingryan@dsl092-187-033.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net)
- # [19:45] * Quits: Yen` (n=Yen@d54C0549D.access.telenet.be) (Read error: 60 (Operation timed out))
- # [19:53] * Quits: mpt_ (n=mpt@canonical/launchpad/mpt) ("This computer has gone to sleep")
- # [20:05] * Joins: mw22_ (n=chatzill@guest-228.mountainview.mozilla.com)
- # [20:14] * Quits: mw22 (n=chatzill@guest-228.mountainview.mozilla.com) (Read error: 110 (Connection timed out))
- # [20:17] * Joins: ericcarlson (n=ericcarl@adsl-67-115-144-162.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
- # [20:35] <hendry> anyone seen the OLPC? http://flickr.com/photos/hendry/457911926/
- # [21:02] * om_sleep is now known as othermaciej
- # [21:28] * Quits: ericcarlson (n=ericcarl@adsl-67-115-144-162.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
- # [21:30] * Joins: hasather_ (n=hasather@81-235-209-174-no62.tbcn.telia.com)
- # [21:38] * Quits: ROBOd2 (n=robod@86.34.246.154) ("http://www.robodesign.ro")
- # [21:51] * Quits: othermaciej (n=mjs@dsl081-048-145.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net)
- # [21:57] * Joins: ericcarlson (n=ericcarl@adsl-67-115-144-162.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
- # [22:09] * Quits: ericcarlson (n=ericcarl@adsl-67-115-144-162.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
- # [22:16] * Joins: ericcarlson (n=ericcarl@adsl-67-115-144-162.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
- # [22:28] * Quits: ericcarlson (n=ericcarl@adsl-67-115-144-162.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
- # [22:54] * Joins: ericcarlson (n=ericcarl@adsl-67-115-144-162.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
- # [22:59] * Quits: met_ (n=Hassman@r5bx220.net.upc.cz) ("Leaving")
- # [23:40] * Quits: ericcarlson (n=ericcarl@adsl-67-115-144-162.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
- # [23:44] * Quits: hober (n=ted@unaffiliated/hober) ("ERC Version 5.2 (IRC client for Emacs)")
- # [23:46] * Joins: hober (n=ted@unaffiliated/hober)
- # [23:53] * Joins: Philip` (n=philip@host86-143-13-80.range86-143.btcentralplus.com)
- # Session Close: Sat Apr 14 00:00:00 2007
The end :)